 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
...So they already have Ken's full details and have been in touch with him. That's why he acts on legal advice now. That's why he spent a good deal of time sorting out the legalities of going onto CT.
... Nah. Ken's playing this by ear. Experimenting, as is clearly seen from this candid footage:  |
|
|
|
Before raging, point to a specific statement in my post that you disagree with. I'll wait  And before posting further with such a nick, please post a selfie with Amy in left hand and a BJ in right hand, while holding a "I'm Eduardo" hand-written paper with the appendage of your choice. Sorry for the confusion. I'm not Eduardo, but an incredibly pesky couple of trolls in another thread persistently insisted that I was. It was simpler (and kinder) for me to make a new account and start posting as Eduardo de Castro than to explain stuff to them. So yeah, I ain't him  |
|
|
|
Before raging, point to a specific statement in my post that you disagree with. I'll wait  Surely you jest Sir, "raging" lol? You compare two scams to NEO & BEE, implying NEO & BEE are a scam. Evidence...? I'll wait So you agree that Ukyo fiasco is a scam? Odd, because Danny claims it is not... Ukyo(Bitfunder) ≠ Danny(NEO & BEE) Ukyo situation is a fiasco, we both agree on this. Is it a scam, I don't know enough to say, and to be redundant Ukyo(Bitfunder) ≠ Danny(NEO & BEE). Or do you convict with guilty by the looses of association? You were certain that Ukyo was a scam just a few minutes ago, while berating me for "... compar[ing] two scams to NEO & BEE." Now that it's no longer convenient, you recant. Danny, your banker of choice, claims that he knows what's up and the Ukyo mess is not a scam. If Ukyo "sry bro, unavailable" is not a scam, then I have compared NeoBee to another upstanding business just like NeoBee. What's the harm in that? Wanna give it another shot without contradicting yourself? |
|
|
|
Before raging, point to a specific statement in my post that you disagree with. I'll wait Surely you jest Sir, "raging" lol? You compare two scams to NEO & BEE, implying NEO & BEE are a scam. Evidence...? I'll wait So you agree that Ukyo fiasco is a scam? Odd, because Danny claims it is not... |
|
|
|
Number of Bitcoin banks that collapsed, leaving depositors bawwing: Each and every one. All of them. How many Bitcoin banks have there been? Or are you reffering to Coinlenders / Inputs.io? Yep. Along with the granddaddy, Pirateat40's Bitcoin Savings and Trust. Please stop with the FUD, as it makes you look either willfully ignorant or trying to manipulate the market. Unlike Pirate and TradeFortress we know who NEO & BEE are from the beginning. As well we have a prospectus clearly outlining how the business will work unlike the former two. And regardless the law has caught up to Trendon Shavers and is in process of investigating TradeFortress. This BTC frontier is not as lawless and consequence free as it is made out to be. If you think NEO & BEE are a bad investment support that with facts but don't imply they are a scam when there is absolutely no proof of such.. Before raging, point to a specific statement in my post that you disagree with. I'll wait |
|
|
|
Number of Bitcoin banks that collapsed, leaving depositors bawwing: Each and every one. All of them. How many Bitcoin banks have there been? Or are you reffering to Coinlenders / Inputs.io? Yep. Along with the granddaddy, Pirateat40's Bitcoin Savings and Trust. |
|
|
|
Official response regarding the CBC announcement surrounding Bitcoin:
Date: 10th February 2014
"As the CEO of a leading company that is building the infrastructure surrounding the Bitcoin technology (Neo), I believe the announcement made by The Central Bank of Cyprus surrounding the dangers of using Bitcoin was reasonable. Innovation is always upsetting, not innovating and being left behind as the world evolves has historically proven to be far more dangerous though; if not for vested interests, then for the future generations.
[snip] Number of Bitcoin banks that collapsed, leaving depositors bawwing: Each and every one. All of them. Number of fiat banks that collapsed, leaving depositors bawwing: Surprisingly, some have not. Number of Bitcoin banks needed to make Bitcoin possible: None. The whole point of Bitcoin. Number of fiat banks needed to make fiat possible: At least one. But yeah, it's hilarious to hear one Cypriot banker calling another Cypriot banker "unsafe" -- as meaningful as "being eaten by 10 sharks is more dangerous than being eaten by 9." |
|
|
|
Ken- When will verification begin? Why have you lied deceived us about the date of the start of the verification process?
The verification process has begun when Ken started working on the incredibly complex COBOL code he plans to run on his IBM 360 server. No lie. |
|
|
|
Well yeah. This is Bitcoin Securities, Ponzis are the pinnacle of excellence here. That means the issuer will give back a portion of your coin before pulling a runner.
You can extend it to the world economy. It is not sustainable and build to fail. It only work thanks to new comers entering the ponzi game and exponentially growing dept + infinite FIAT. Sure. The universe itself is built to fail -- see entropy. The difference is with Bitcoin Securities, the timeframe is so laughably small. Yes but the profit is laughably much much higher. So the result is the same : a crash and huge wealth disparities. Not sure i understand. If you invested in a basket of Bitcoin securities, you've lost money. If you invested in a basket of fiat securities, you made money. Sure, both Bitcoin and fiat are anti-egalitarian, old saws like "it takes money to make money" hold for both. Wealth disparity is the natural outcome of any enterprize where the objective is ... becoming wealthy. Seems self-evident  |
|
|
|
|
How's that Pr0nz business goin'?
Secrit pr0nz still pr0fitable?
TwentySeventy make everyone rich yet?
|
|
|
|
Well yeah. This is Bitcoin Securities, Ponzis are the pinnacle of excellence here. That means the issuer will give back a portion of your coin before pulling a runner.
You can extend it to the world economy. It is not sustainable and build to fail. It only work thanks to new comers entering the ponzi game and exponentially growing dept + infinite FIAT. Sure. The universe itself is built to fail -- see entropy. The difference is with Bitcoin Securities, the timeframe is so laughably small. |
|
|
|
OP, you're ready to float this on Havelock. Here's a scan of all the documents you'll need 4 verification:  |
|
|
|
OK, which one of you captains of industry is responsible for the dumps? Kindly hodl your vast hodlings! Wake up to this...  |
|
|
|
Reaction when the court learns you invested in "...a virtual identity totally owned by the Active Mining Corporation (Belize) that represents both itself and its profits."  |
|
|
|
...Ken needs to get on here and tell us what is going on with the shares. ... He's too busy working on his core business -- deleting posts. Chillax. |
|
|
|
There is no excuse to stop us from trading!!!!!!
... Yes, yes there is. Ken is currently developing Intellitrade(tm), which makes all your shares up to 20% more valuable as the market deteriorates. This necessitated a minor update to the Intellify(tm) codebase, which Micha Slaughter is currently recoding in Borland Pascal. TL;DR: Patience![/quote] |
|
|
|
|
@Ken -
Come up with some good news & move the wall down to .0004 maybe?
Just spitballing here...
|
|
|
|
...
Crumbs, you're a funny little fellow.
Ohai to you too! ^I see you dabble in text analytics when you're not too busy being boss trader. Who would have thought a good little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness? |
|
|
|
...
At some point, let's say December of 2014, if there is no trading, and no product being produced, there will be many angry, very angry "share holders".
Well no. With projects like Active Mining, endgame is the most important part. Think of Active Mining as a shaken up bottle of seltzer; sure, if you unscrew the top like an imbecile, you'll be instantly drenched. But if you carefully release the pressure in small increments, letting the seltzer outgas, you won't even get your hands wet. This is what's happening now. Ken is feeding you bits of bad news, letting you vent... By the time all's said and done, the worst he'll see is a couple of civil lawsuits from large "investors" (that he could settle for a tiny fraction of the raised coin). PROFIT. |
|
|
|
|
