 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
|
|
Just wanted to say I sent some money to intersango--into their new Metro Bank account--on thursday, and it showed up at intersango just fine an saturday. That's a little longer than it took with transfers using the old Lloyds account, but maybe this little delay was just an instance of teething troubles...? Anyhow one trade later, and I'm a btc or two to the good now, so thanks intersango peeps!
|
|
|
|
I mined here ok a few days ago, but i can't seem to get much past the login page on the web-pages now: Fatal error: Uncaught litecoinClientException: - : Connect error: Connection refused (111) thrown in on line 0
That's all i have been getting for the last twelve hours or so :-/ |
|
|
|
What if I'm already spending them? +1 |
|
|
|
|
I'm running python 2.7.1+ and jackjack-jj-pywallet-db5f0e9, on ubuntu 11.04 64 bit. I do...
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:twisted-dev/ppa
$ sudo aptitude install build-essential python-dev python-twisted python-bsddb3
... and so far, so good. But then...
$ sudo easy_install ecdsa
Processing ecdsa
error: Not a recognized archive type: ecdsa
I had a hunt around in synaptic, and the links in jackjack's first post in this thread, but no joy. Arghh, I have had this working before in debian squeeze! Anybody got any ideas how to fix this up for ubuntu 11.04?
edit: Just for the record,
# aptitude install build-essential python-dev python-twisted python-bsddb3 python-setuptools
# easy_install ecdsa
... does the job in debian squeeze (32 bit). I just tried it.
|
|
|
|
|
seems there is a problem here too. I've been stuck on a confirmed reward of 0.96934018 BTC since this morning--it's now 6PM here. I'm watching confirmations roll past 120, one after the other. My GPU is whirring away, and my stats page at bitcoin.cz is showing my shares, but there's no change to the reward. I gotta go now, unfortunately :-O
Update: All good now. Thanks Slush :-)
|
|
|
|
|
I just logged into intersango OK...
|
|
|
|
|
I just wanted to drop in to say that following a short, apparently HSBC induced black-out, intersango got me all my money back a few days ago, as I always expected they would. And I am now some number of bitcoin to the good :-)
Thanks guys :-)
|
|
|
|
... painful experience with VMWare... Internet connection down... working on mobile... omg...
it will make a good story for the grandkids in a few decades. |
|
|
|
maybe switch to plain linux and use kvm?
+1 debian + kvm have always been good to me. Sorry to hear about these woes slush. Hope you can get fixed up, whether running on the metal or not. |
|
|
|
|
dooglus, i just logged in and found the quoted text (and a bit else besides) where i would usually expect to find instructions for depositing GBP.
genjix. keep your chin up man, you guys are doing good work :-)
|
|
|
|
|
: "Transfers made to our HSBC account on or after the 19th which have not been linked to your account will be delayed. HSBC has unexpectedly closed our account. They did so without any warning. We are working on alternative banking options, but of course are having trouble quickly opening a new account. Transfer made into the account after our records stop but before the account was actually closed will be delayed until we can obtain the records. "
Wow, that sounds bad. What's the latest? Obviously, I transferred a hundred pounds over on that day, and it isn't showing up at the intersango accounts page. :-O
This must all be very frustrating for you guys.
|
|
|
|
$ cd ~/forrestv-p2pool-27ab63b;python run_p2pool.py user xxx
11:08:55.705643 p2pool (version 27ab63b)
11:08:55.705710
11:08:55.705732 Testing bitcoind RPC connection to 'http://127.0.0.1:8332/' with username 'user'...
11:08:56.193601 ...success!
11:08:56.193772 Current block hash: 649e981220551b0f99208ee9ad9355b70b9b870ab703fa0a02
11:08:56.193852
11:08:56.193933 Testing bitcoind P2P connection to '127.0.0.1:8333'...
11:08:56.417277 IP transaction denied ... falling back to sending to address.
11:08:56.483169 ...success!
11:08:56.483339 Payout script: 76a91452d75b482c2ec1c1490f02a1483b795c301ee85988ac
11:08:56.483416
11:08:56.483491 Loading cached block headers...
...
11:08:58.376403 140000
11:09:04.915384 ...done loading 149530 cached block headers.
11:09:04.915453
11:09:04.915673 Loading shares...
11:09:05.140885 1000
...
11:09:26.560440 87000
11:09:26.565103 ...inserting 69516 verified shares...
11:09:27.423753 ...done loading 87018 shares!
11:09:27.423832
11:09:27.424093 Initializing work...
11:09:29.340955 Traceback (most recent call last):
11:09:29.341016 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 455, in _startRunCallbacks
11:09:29.341032 self._runCallbacks()
11:09:29.341045 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 542, in _runCallbacks
11:09:29.341058 current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
11:09:29.341071 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1076, in gotResult
11:09:29.341083 _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
11:09:29.341095 File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1020, in _inlineCallbacks
11:09:29.341116 result = g.send(result)
11:09:29.341128 --- <exception caught here> ---
11:09:29.341140 File "/home/iktinos/forrestv-p2pool-27ab63b/p2pool/main.py", line 195, in main
11:09:29.341152 set_real_work2()
11:09:29.341163 File "/home/iktinos/forrestv-p2pool-27ab63b/p2pool/main.py", line 159, in set_real_work2
11:09:29.341175 best, desired = tracker.think(ht, current_work.value['previous_block'], time.time() - current_work2.value['clock_offset'])
11:09:29.341188 File "/home/iktinos/forrestv-p2pool-27ab63b/p2pool/data.py", line 349, in think
11:09:29.341200 desired.add((self.verified.shares[random.choice(list(self.verified.reverse_shares[last_hash]))].peer, last_last_hash))
11:09:29.341213 exceptions.KeyError: 21938799823926796951370893733906263687302461232855068765006963872814835735435L
$
Used to work, but no longer. Bitcoind is running fine. |
|
|
|
|
Donald_Norman,
That looks better to me. I would go along with the Terms and Conditions if Term 12 was amended as you have suggested there.
|
|
|
|
|
Donald_Norman,
Sorry for the lateness of this reply.
As far as I can remember, there was no Terms and Conditions list to tick while setting up an account at bitmarket.eu. I just set the account straight up some number of months ago, and started trading. I have made loads of trades there and not had a problem with them yet.
In fact, based on my experience, I would say both bitmarket.eu and the old britcoin.co.uk are/were offering good services, regardless of the fact that--as the poster above has pointed out--their respective methods of moving btc and stirling around were/are different.
BTW, it occurs to me that maybe the *indemnify and defend* stuff was part of the Terms and Conditions list that had to be ticked in order to enable participation on the old britcoin website. If so, all I can say is I am a bit more careful/paranoid now than I was a few months ago! Back then, I might have not bothered reading the lawyer pages. Things are different now though.
Again, Thanks for all your efforts Donald_Norman :-)
|
|
|
|
|
: "Give me a couple days."
Take your time, I'm in no rush whatsoever. BitMarket.eu is just fine for me in the meantime. Take it easy :-)
|
|
|
|
Edited because my writing sucks: I reckon it's nice for the Occupy* movement if there are firm commitments for small but regular donations. Occupy Together have forsworn donation taking, and are (for now) asking willing supporters to send donations to the Occupy Wall Street bitcoin addy: http://www.occupytogether.org/2011/09/23/aboutusOccupy Wall Street have of course expressly asked for bitcoin donations: http://nycga.cc/donateAccordingly, I will send 500 mille to Occupy Wall Street every day whilever the protest is running. My first donation is here: https://blockexplorer.com/tx/86acccec70d61b729d3e5738b55af6d8a4e9c64eebc6c108fbcaddf8a1a04caaOn its own, it ain't much. But if others would be prepared to do the same, then the total sent to Occupy Wall Street might amount to something substantial. And remember, it isn't the amount, it's the regularity that counts here. And of course, just because you send 500 mille per day, doesn't stop you making bigger donations as and when you feel like it. Anybody with me for just 500 mille per day? The addy to send to is: 1Q7DQVTubbUqr5by2YoZJRKCEzj9D3LQ9w |
|
|
|
|
Term 12 was the only thing that stopped me signing up. Allow me to have another go at that paraphrasing:
'You agree to defend Intersango['s] parent, affiliates and employees from any cost we may incur as a result of (x) as well as but not limited to (y).'
It's really that "as well as but not limited to" that seems a bit dangerous. It looks like a punter at Intersango gets landed with the responsibility to defend anything anyone connected with Intersango does that could land Intersango in the shit. Including the parent company! That seems a bit of a weird catch-all.
Again, Thanks Donald_Norman for bearing with me on this. And max respect for the coders at Intersango. I've never had any problem with them.
|
|
|
|
|
It isn't the coders I'm worrying about at all. It's the lawyers. To paraphrase:
'You agree to defend Intersango['s] affiliates from any cost we may incur [blah blah]'
I agree to "defend" some random affiliate? What's that all about? I'm not trying to be awkward here, or stir any ill will. And I definitely would recommend Intersango if user experience and interaction with Intersango coders were the be all and end all. But either I'm paranoid, or stupid, or else that term 12 ought to be reworded. IANAL, otherwise I would make a suggestion as to exactly what that wording should look like.
EDIT: forgot to say Thank You for your earlier reply Donald_Norman :-)
|
|
|
|
|
