 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
These are good times for investors. Now people will buy tokens again, hoping for their further growth.
So far, most tokens continue to fall in the price vs bitcoin or ethereum. At any time, a sharp correction of Bitcoin to 6K is possible. This is not the best effect the prices of most coins. It is difficult to understand which asset is now suitable for buy. I think that a lot of people prefer to buy Bitcoin, becouse Bitcoin has the most developed ecosystem. Yes, the preferences are obvious and everyone is inclined to the future of Bitcoin, despite the fact that other tokens can also express themselves. |
|
|
|
...................................
They short the market. This strategy is very popular among crypoto speculators because of high volatility of crypto.
I believe that at the moment this strategy is not working since the uptrend has begun. An experienced trader can always find opportunities to buy in a falling market and for short in a growing market. It is even easier for me to find a setup vs the market, since in this case the idea of an asset with this setup is clearly visible. Based on my experience, I can say that it is not difficult to buy an asset, it is difficult to sell it at the right time. And for me the hardest thing is to choose the right asset on the exchange that can potentially make a profit. From our choice will depend on the profitability or disadvantage of the asset, so it is difficult not to be mistaken. |
|
|
|
Thank you for creating mobile App. It more easey to use App because your funds always in your hands. Wish a sucsess!
Thank you. We try to do everything possible to develop our multicurrency wallet and to make it better. Stay tuned for more news! Multicurrency wallet in the mobile application is what is needed for active people, the phone is always with us. |
|
|
|
this project has something to pay dividends on tokens, so this is very good. but until now it is still unclear whether this is a scam?
I do NOT see any reason to regard this project as fraudulent. The only negative is that it took more time to implement it than previously thought. The projects did not expect that bad market conditions would slow down the development process so much that everyone expected. Not everything is so simple in recognizing fraud, recently projects have difficulties for various reasons and it is not clear what to think. |
|
|
|
If they sell at a lower market price, they incur losses. They are assholes. At the same time, other guys (holders) are forced to experience discomfort.
Therefore, now some projects are listed on the exchanges not immediately after the ICO, but when the finished product is released, so that there is a need for tokens and their price is higher. But such case is not good for bounty hunters. They have to wait when product will be launched and it must take a years. The situation is one, but everyone has their own plans, for example, investors will wait for years, they consider long-term investments, for bounty hunters this is just a job and a different attitude. Interestingly, if the project after the ICO does not immediately pay the reward to the bounty hunters or freezes the tokens, forcing them to wait for the release of the product, will it be reasonable? |
|
|
|
But the matter is that the profit in crypto higher than it is in Forex or stock market. That is why investors prefer to risk.
In the stock market and Forex you need to provide your personal data. In addition, there is a minimum amount to come the market. Often this minimum is not available to everyone. The cryptocurrency market does not have these restrictions. And, yes, the risk is great. Putting together the profit, the risk and the fact that the crypto market without obstacles for everyone who wants to try their hand is perfect only at first glance. |
|
|
|
What preventive measures are you talking about? Often, projects collect money and disappear; here we need a clear law and punishment for fraud and not prevention.
Laws are also preventive measures. Regarding scammers in the field of ICO: if the project developers provide their complete data to the community, then scammers will find it difficult to do their dirty business. This is instead of demanding KYC from investors. There will be less scams if the KYC procedure is mandatory for the ICO team and developers. |
|
|
|
I think that it is necessary to change the format of the ICO itself, to make it more open and understandable for investors. Then growth of investment in this sphere is possible.
Cryptocurrency industry develops and now a new formats of token sale appear. It hard to say now how successful they will be. We see a hitch in the ICO industry, projects and investors make mistakes and try to organize work in this area on a mutually beneficial basis. The sphere is young, statistics and interest will change, projects will appear and face the same problems - by reducing the amount of funds raised and will responsibly think through their work and change for the better. |
|
|
|
Yes, bonuses cover the risk to which investors go, only if the analysis of the project was correct and good luck is on your side.
In this case, bonuses have nothing to do with it. The definition of success is right analysis and luck. Several users in this thread talk about luck. Tell me, do you rely on luck when investing in startups? As for me luck is associated with casino, but not investing. I know one thing - everyone chooses a startup in his own way, the size of the risk and the approach is different, only the expectations that the project will be successful, we have a common  |
|
|
|
To monitor the activities of the team and its success takes time of the project. In this case, it is impossible to become an early investor. Thus, the investor must take risks. Everything that can be used for decision making: project analysis.
Early investors have the bigest bonuses and they have a bigest risk. Very often early investors invest money in progect without MVP. And this is a realy big risk. As experience has shown, crypto startups often break the deadlines specified in the roadmap. Yes, bonuses cover the risk to which investors go, only if the analysis of the project was correct and good luck is on your side. Good luck is not something that helps projects and investors. Initially, the project is evaluated and only then the size of bonuses in relation to risk. |
|
|
|
For example, I collected tokens from all projects where I participated in the bounty. I thought then selling much more expensive. How I was wrong  Of course, many tokens have fallen in price greatly. But what can we say, if Bitcoin itself has already fallen many times, and then rose with a new force. Forget and do not rely on tokens from weak projects, they are not worthy, hold on to more reliable and potentially profitable ones. If you tell me how to identify such projects at an early stage, I will be very grateful to you! I think everyone here chooses for himself such projects by virtue of his competence or relies on larger investors. Very often simple investors do not have enough information about large investments. If project does not have a ready product investors do not have enough information about project and the team. Of course, the choice is yours, only for me personally at an early stage the potential of the project is not revealed immediately, it will take time for the team to show itself and how investors will react to it. Every self-respecting investor will not look in the direction of a project that has no information for study and a clear plan of action. |
|
|
|
Well, that is just understand. Trading or investing is much more difficult than it seems. Even having studied the necessary amount of knowledge, it is still difficult to follow reasonable rules. This is well understood by those who trade their money.
I agree with you completely. When you do not invest your money, you think that it is very easy to make the right decisions, but when you invest your money yourself there are many questions that often have no answers. Cryptocurrency because of big volatility of the rates gives a big opportunities for traders. But there are a lot of market manipulations and trader must know the market well. It is not serious to believe that it is easy to manage your own or other people's money, especially in a situation where you need to quickly make a decision - all the rules are forgotten and the correct answer disappears. |
|
|
|
Most likely it is. Because it took two days and the price drops again. Another confirmation that this market is easy to manipulate.
And what do you want the price to grow endlessly? The fact of falling after growth does not prove anything in terms of manipulation. It `s naturally. It would be very good for the price to consolidate above the previous consolidation. That is, above 4K. Otherwise, it does not matter whether there were any manipulations or not. I can’t pinpoint the market manipulation in this situation, but in most cases, big players can easily do this and we feel the consequences over time. A lot of cryptocurrency are concentrated in the hands of big investors or miners. Some big players got their cryptocurrency mined Bitcoin when from the start of Bitcoin when it was simple to mine it. That is why crypto market is so unpredictable. I feel the unpredictability of the market every day. In any case, after manipulation, the market will return to its former state. |
|
|
|
Well, but this growth should not have been. New money did not come to cryptocurrency. I think they just want to make us believe that the market trend has already changed.
Today, bitcoin has grown further. Who wants to make us believe it? A new appear that one big investor has bought a lot of Bitcoin. That is why price continue to rise. But the question is for how long it will rise. If a big investor bought a lot of Bitcoin it means that he trust Bitcoin and hope that it will continue to grow. It is not obligatory. It may be just a part of Pump and Dump taktic. It mean than the price of Bitcoin may fall up too. There are a lot of questions, even if in fact a large investor raised the price with his purchase, does not give confidence in long-term growth and it is precisely early to draw conclusions. |
|
|
|
Hope the situation that was in 2017 will repeat. Good market conditions help to develop crypto projects a lot. But it was a lot of scum too.
For the development of cryptoindustry, repetition is desirable only externally. That is a sharp rise in prices during the distribution in the market. The reasons may be other, and it is very desirable. Did not quite understand what you mean? What does external mean? Now the market conditions is very difficult for the developing of crypto projects. The team of Optherium now is working upon the follow products: — Payment platforms — Mobile eWallets — Debit Cards — Exchanges — IBANs — MultiDecentralized Data Storages And we regulary post our news. You have a lot of work to do. And it takes a lot of time for development. I see Optherium team is doing a lot and regulary post a project news. In a difficult period of time, crypto projects do not have to rely on good market conditions. Publication of project news will not give doubt to continue working. |
|
|
|
f the information is online, it can be checked. There have already been many cases when fraud ICOs were exposed in this way.
If the team is presented for the first time, the project is new, then all you can check is what they provided. It does not give much confidence. Therefore, many projects attract famous personalities to the team. I think this often distorts the true image of a project’s potential. If a new and unknown team attracts a famous person in the field of cryptocurrency, I do not think that this person will ruin his reputation by working with a fraudulent project. This team must have a big money to attrect a famous person. But very often the team just use the name of famous person and the famous person even does not know about the project. A famous person will not help the project in productive work, this is just an advertising move. We talked about the fact that a famous person can not just advertise the project, he will be able to inspire confidence from investors. If a project can afford to attract a famous person for advertising, it shows only financial opportunities. It is more correct to have people on the development team who have already shown themselves in this area or other projects. |
|
|
|
|
