whats the ice jolly jocker. paste code pls
|
|
|
so wow puzzle 20 works, but you have anything else for the 64th puzzle. thanks
|
|
|
Hi I can eventually convert this code using my own secp256k1 library for CUDA (based on Jean Luc Pons Kangaroo ).
It can achieve up to 70M scalar mult /sec on a rtx 3070.
A python implementation with pycuda can be do easily
But sorry for this trivial question : What the purpose of this script?
Regards
Fanch
using 120 puzzles public key to generate a lot of keys and use that script random the more keys the better the chance to hit one I just don't know if it can be generated with 1 public key more keys if so, it can be useful I've redesigned it a bit now, I should , 2x faster for python you share a copy of that one, ty
|
|
|
something this damn shit doesn't want to give up maybe we can try to get in through ripemd160... These stories abour lot's of BTC being lost are just legends "from Russia with love" Hi there Andzhig, you have a complete package of these things you are programming to start searching somehow. thanks man,
|
|
|
was thinking how much is it gonna be in data TB , if range 64 would be safed uncompressed, raw txt file, and only this range is it doable?
|
|
|
Hi y'all! A friend has forgotten his password, already several years back before mnemonic backups, and the bitcoins are now worth quite something. He has some idea of what it might be, but it's millions of possible combinations, impossible for him to try sequentially, but trivial for a computer to process if the right regex pattern could be supplied given some knowledge of parts of the password.
Is there such a brute force program that could be used to try a regex against a wallet.dat file?
btcusury you still on the look for a program, i found this one very usefull, https://github.com/glv2/bruteforce-walletgo try out, can do quite a lot with that one, some threadripper at it, and you got the coins. gl.
|
|
|
Dear alberto, how is this not ok? or is it ok? how much time should this last processing take, already a long few hrs. passed,. thanks ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f pubs.txt -b 120 -k 1024 -q -t 6 +] Version 0.1.20210412 secp256k1 - Setting mode BSGS
- Min range: 800000000000000000000000000000
- Max range: 1000000000000000000000000000000
- Setting k factor to 1024
- Set quiet thread output
- Setting 6 threads
- Opening file pubs0-65.txt
- Added 1129 points from file
- Bit Range 120
- Setting N up to 17592186044416.
- Init 1st bloom filter for 4294967296 elements : 14722.00 MB
- Init 2nd bloom filter for 214748365 elements : 736.13 MB
- Allocating 0.5 MB for 4096 aMP Points
- Precalculating 4096 aMP points
- Allocating 3276.80 MB for 214748365 bP Points
- processing 4294963200/4294967296 bP points : 99%
|
|
|
Trojan:Win32/Sabsik.FT.A!ml , this one is found by windows,
etayson love your software man, the previous server software great. now this one greatest, thanks a lot, hope false positive obviously.
|
|
|
ik zou stoppen met bitcionmeester te gebruiken..
|
|
|
hi give link please to program you are using.. will try.. what the range 115. hell yeah
|
|
|
hi there, wandering any demo releases of your program upto 84? please thanks . getting bored doing nothing, have some time. 2days off.
|
|
|
A prototype in work. Solves an 84 bit range search in under 1 minute, but cannot solve 85 bits for some reason! More work tomorrow. It is something in the GPU...more troubleshooting! It does not work above 84 bit range. It is not for sale nor available to test. If I ever get it to work right, will use in the pool for the larger challenges with x points exposed.
CPU walks the baby steps with DP method (with limit setting). GPU burns through the range with giant steps, looking for collisions.
Try my pubkeys.... You two do not read lol...it can't find an 85 bit pubkey. I've ran it for a day looking for several 85 bit pubkeys, no luck. I will not waste time on 117-120 pubkey that may or may not be there. lol , i read what you say and understand as well , just i asked if you like to share send me codes so will try to fix bug and do optimization , same here bro, will test and share, and prolly you will put it up on git to, like vanbitcrackn,
|
|
|
brainless talked about reducing the number of keys but he never shared how can we (working script) , perhaps i will figure out something better soon IA As I wrote earlier, that method is useless, because it increases the range of the generated keys. hi notatether, what does this do with the pkshift.py shiftdown(pubkey, 160000) do you need to save it to file like pub.txt , then what range that one will be when search all those pubs? please help, or this one with the seedshift.py factor = 65 what keyrange this will be wanna go low as possible. and how to multiply the found public key back or so? wich i just not yet figured out. ? thanks ok another more important question, tether could you make another script that, goes back with the found privk. to the divised original one. is this possible?
|
|
|
i actually could not find the program that show quadrillion readout, all his current git version show trillion
so probably an older version, showing 20000000000000000 is 20.00000 quadrillion in 12 sec. on cpu, Search Range: 0x800000000000000000000000000000 to 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff PVK not found. 20000.00000 Trillion scanned in 12.01 sec. New range
and why i mean this range 1: 1124bff742a76f92fa3a76f8f6552f (decimal only 89014422443240977657631574972585263 !!! ) bits ? 100000000000000000000000000 1FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
on 03c95ba9e6a637e739d13a6d036507ecc37a70c26e68ac7e5f157268311c6c3938 key 117 bit?
|
|
|
wich publickey's private key you need, what range.? @DESKTOP-EAVG3O8:/mnt/d/bsgs-development$ python3.9 bsgs_hybrid_dll_secp256k1.py -n 20000000000000000 -pfile puzzle_pubs.txt -b bPfile.bin -bl bloomfile.bin -keyspace 800000000000000000000000000000:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF -rand - Starting Program : BSGS mode with hybrid algo using bloom dll and secp256k1 dll Version [ 13072021 ]
- Loading 75 Public Keys to search
- Search Mode: Random Start after every n sequential key search
- Reading bloom filter from file complete in : 350.20511 sec
- Reading Baby table from file complete in : 0.13070 sec
- seq value: 20000000000000000 m value : 20000000000
- Search Range: 0x800000000000000000000000000000 to 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
- k1: 0x38b63a35d47e0ca8b7dd83abeb1c3177
- PVK not found. 20000.00000 Trillion scanned in 12.01 sec. New range
- k1: 0xca5da4b0e249fc9673b61fa0576ca7a1
and right now the terakeys is doing 2200 tera /s Kang 23552 / Elapsed 20 sec. /ram 24.6MB / 45.7MB
|
|
|
in 10sec. with 20 cores i get range 120 2^26.00/2^29.10 2200000000000000000 x 22fffffffffffffffff in 60sec. with 3 cores i get range 120 2^26.00/2^29.10 2200000000000000 x 22ffffffffffffff - Scanning Range 0xa10000000000003700000000000000 : 0xa100000000000037ffffffffffffff
- [158.47 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^26.65/2^29.06][Elapsed 12s][Dead 0][RAM 14.4MB/44.7MB]
and hey right now it is not xpoints searching just plain old pubkey compressed or uc. so will make it even go faster by factor ? (the gpu version should be released mr wandering) t.i.a. m.i.a. r.i.p. if not.
|
|
|
This is a 120 bit puzzle publick key !!! If someone find a privkey for this pubkey in a range: 1:1124bff742a76f92fa3a76f8f6552f (decimal only 89014422443240977657631574972585263 !!! ) Range is mach less then origginal 120 Puzle range !!!pubkey: 03c95ba9e6a637e739d13a6d036507ecc37a70c26e68ac7e5f157268311c6c3938 02c95ba9e6a637e739d13a6d036507ecc37a70c26e68ac7e5f157268311c6c3938 search in pubkey what start with 02 some faster than 03. you can try any of this pubkeys. Proof of my succes tests with another ranges and same pubkeys one what start with 03, and anower start with 02: - Working on Pubkey: 049fa3ea651e72c5f0a660c7ae509ad180860477283f539c918a2e43514c29da92237c8751b32e5 90883aa8bd617c60aa6b388aa78381cc7adb10046a33b038598
- Using [Number of CPU Threads: 3] [DP size: 10] [MaxStep: 1]
- ............................................
- Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x100000000000000
- [55.22 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^27.92/2^29.06][Elapsed 48s][Dead 0][RAM 25.8MB/44.7MB]
============== KEYFOUND ============== Kangaroo FOUND PrivateKey : 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbf59aefd71d64b15
- Working on Pubkey: 049fa3ea651e72c5f0a660c7ae509ad180860477283f539c918a2e43514c29da92dc8378ae4cd1a 6f77c557429e839f5594c775587c7e338524effb95bc4fc7697
- Using [Number of CPU Threads: 3] [DP size: 10] [MaxStep: 1]
- ............................................
- Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x100000000000000
- [42.05 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^28.68/2^29.06][Elapsed 01:26][Dead 0][RAM 37.7MB/44.7MB]
============== KEYFOUND ============== Kangaroo FOUND PrivateKey : 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000078af8f5e5ff62c ======================================
We are spit 1.2 btc 50/50 after with someone who publication in this thread privkey first, all others member sorry... !!!
Lets DO IT !!! ?
actual ! WanderPhilosofer stop search on his prototipe softwsre and nothing found !!! Any one try hack Privkey exact in key range !!! getting 2.5 petakeys with this one on 1 system, only cpu, guess them wrote the gpu version of this same piece. Wandering you share it in your git. His prototipe maybe wrang calculate keyrate, so,his prototype real prototype, because 1,5 Mkeys on 200 000 pubkeys is a not something special... don't know wich version this is, or who's program, but it states them got the gpu programming skills, 1:1124bff742a76f92fa3a76f8f6552f for current software it is waaaay to large. Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x1124bff742a76f92fa3a76f8f6552f [2714579271.01 TeraKeys/s] [Elapsed 4:26][RAM n/a] btw how is this ok -- Proof of my succes tests with another ranges and same pubkeys one what start with 03, and anower start with 02: Working on Pubkey: 049fa3ea651e72c5f0a660c7ae509ad180860477283f539c918a2e43514c29da92237c8751b32e5 90883aa8bd617c60aa6b388aa78381cc7adb10046a33b038598 Using [Number of CPU Threads: 3] [DP size: 10] [MaxStep: 1] ............................................ this line range Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x100000000000000 quite the opposite? [55.22 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^27.92/2^29.06][Elapsed 48s][Dead 0][RAM 25.8MB/44.7MB] ============== KEYFOUND ============== this line range Kangaroo FOUND PrivateKey : 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbf59aefd71d64b15 quite the opposite? --
|
|
|
This is a 120 bit puzzle publick key !!! If someone find a privkey for this pubkey in a range: 1:1124bff742a76f92fa3a76f8f6552f (decimal only 89014422443240977657631574972585263 !!! ) Range is mach less then origginal 120 Puzle range !!!pubkey: 03c95ba9e6a637e739d13a6d036507ecc37a70c26e68ac7e5f157268311c6c3938 02c95ba9e6a637e739d13a6d036507ecc37a70c26e68ac7e5f157268311c6c3938 search in pubkey what start with 02 some faster than 03. you can try any of this pubkeys. Proof of my succes tests with another ranges and same pubkeys one what start with 03, and anower start with 02: - Working on Pubkey: 049fa3ea651e72c5f0a660c7ae509ad180860477283f539c918a2e43514c29da92237c8751b32e5 90883aa8bd617c60aa6b388aa78381cc7adb10046a33b038598
- Using [Number of CPU Threads: 3] [DP size: 10] [MaxStep: 1]
- ............................................
- Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x100000000000000
- [55.22 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^27.92/2^29.06][Elapsed 48s][Dead 0][RAM 25.8MB/44.7MB]
============== KEYFOUND ============== Kangaroo FOUND PrivateKey : 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbf59aefd71d64b15
- Working on Pubkey: 049fa3ea651e72c5f0a660c7ae509ad180860477283f539c918a2e43514c29da92dc8378ae4cd1a 6f77c557429e839f5594c775587c7e338524effb95bc4fc7697
- Using [Number of CPU Threads: 3] [DP size: 10] [MaxStep: 1]
- ............................................
- Scanning Range 0x1 : 0x100000000000000
- [42.05 TeraKeys/s][Kang 3072][Count 2^28.68/2^29.06][Elapsed 01:26][Dead 0][RAM 37.7MB/44.7MB]
============== KEYFOUND ============== Kangaroo FOUND PrivateKey : 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000078af8f5e5ff62c ======================================
We are spit 1.2 btc 50/50 after with someone who publication in this thread privkey first, all others member sorry... !!!
Lets DO IT !!! ?
actual ! WanderPhilosofer stop search on his prototipe softwsre and nothing found !!! Any one try hack Privkey exact in key range !!! getting 2.5 petakeys with this one on 1 system, only cpu, guess them wrote the gpu version of this same piece. Wandering you share it in your git.
|
|
|
|