Friend,
Al Qaeda was an US project. Even Ladeen was Bush's business partner.
ISIS is also same... Can you imagine, they claim fighting in name of Islam but kill muslims.
Friend, Conspiracy go back very far. Mohammed himself was a time-travelling CIA/Mossad agent, sent back to pervert the peaceful message of Islam by beheading people and fucking 9 year olds. The true Muslim follow peaseful msg of Islam, and not follow teachings of pervert terrorist Mohammed. Thanks you for ur wisdum |
|
|
|
I expect exactly nothing from people like you hence i wrote people like you can only sit and watch (and writing bs on the internet of course).
Congratulations on the cultural enrichment you guys got today. Good day for me. I get to sit back and watch. And eat popcorn. |
|
|
|
It is surprising how brainwashed these Germans are. During the recent state elections, the only anti-immigrant party (AfD) received a huge surge in support (scoring 24.5% in Sachsen-Anhalt, 15.0% in Baden-Württemberg, and 12.6% in Rheinland-Pfalz), but still the pro-immigrant ones (SPD, CDU, Greens.etc) received enough support to form state governments in all the three states. Low IQ people deserve extermination. No sympathies.
Avg. German iq: 101 India iq: 82 US iq: 95 And germany is the 3rd to 4th largest economy in the world depending on year. These are largely measures that depend on the past. It's legacy stats. In the present the overwhelming majority of Germans *still* vote for politicians who support importing millions of Islamonazis (and silence the minority who object). That's clear enough evidence for the state of German "intelligence." I certainly don't generally agree that "Low IQ people deserve extermination." But Germans? They have more than enough history and culture that they should know what they're doing. Yet they're engaging in denial, and silencing opponents. So, yes: Germans deserve extermination. Certainly no sympathies from me. I'm going to enjoy watching that extermination and using it as a case study to try to prevent more intelligent countries/cultures from following the same path. The most fun part will be watching Germans deny what's happening to their next to the last breath. I'm sure they'll save their last breath to do what they always do: Blame the Jews. Good stuff that you internet warriors cant dont anything else then sit and watch  What else would you expect us to do? Fight to save Deutschistan? |
|
|
|
This is very warning report.
If true, it seems that Muslims in the Europe don't accept multiculturalism and don't trust their own government.
It seems they don't have problems with terrorist attacks in Europe, in their own name.
It seems they also have negative feelings toward West, even after West helped them so much, financially and in many other ways, and gave them total freedom to do whatever they like.
Everything you're saying is not only true, but obvious. Nevertheless, good for you for saying it. Most people won't. I hope this story is not true otherwise it seems that big part of Muslim community in Europe is already against West.
Now, here's the good news. The West has a foolproof strategy for dealing with the problem. You hint at it bysaying "I hope this story is not true..." It's very simple: deny the problem. Sometimes it's tough because people get raped or killed or otherwise Allahu Ackbarred and it doesn't get successfully covered up. In that case it's very important to repeat the following: Shut up, racist. As anyone who has experience with cancer sufferers can tell you: if you deny the problem long enough, it goes away. |
|
|
|
Islam teaches peace. if he does not do peace is not a Muslim. all religions teach about peace. only people who do not have a religion that violates it all.
Apparently Mohammed wasn't a Muslim. And "all religions teach about peace"? Did you mean to type "no" instead of "all"? |
|
|
|
It is surprising how brainwashed these Germans are. During the recent state elections, the only anti-immigrant party (AfD) received a huge surge in support (scoring 24.5% in Sachsen-Anhalt, 15.0% in Baden-Württemberg, and 12.6% in Rheinland-Pfalz), but still the pro-immigrant ones (SPD, CDU, Greens.etc) received enough support to form state governments in all the three states. Low IQ people deserve extermination. No sympathies.
Avg. German iq: 101 India iq: 82 US iq: 95 And germany is the 3rd to 4th largest economy in the world depending on year. These are largely measures that depend on the past. It's legacy stats. In the present the overwhelming majority of Germans *still* vote for politicians who support importing millions of Islamonazis (and silence the minority who object). That's clear enough evidence for the state of German "intelligence." I certainly don't generally agree that "Low IQ people deserve extermination." But Germans? They have more than enough history and culture that they should know what they're doing. Yet they're engaging in denial, and silencing opponents. So, yes: Germans deserve extermination. Certainly no sympathies from me. I'm going to enjoy watching that extermination and using it as a case study to try to prevent more intelligent countries/cultures from following the same path. The most fun part will be watching Germans deny what's happening to their next to the last breath. I'm sure they'll save their last breath to do what they always do: Blame the Jews. |
|
|
|
Pope should not attack Trump. Trump has big chance to be the next President of America. Pope would be needing Trump help once ISIS surrounded Vatican.
Lol..... Once ISIS conquers Rome and Vatican, the Pope will cut a deal with the ISIS and convert to Islam. This guy only bothers about money and influence. He never cares about the 1 billion+ adherents, who believe in Roman Catholicism. ISIS will never conquer the Vatican. Russia will make them disappear before they ever do anything. However, I wouldn't be surprised by a bomb attack there, real or faked  ... Yes, the idea of Muslims capturing Rome/Vatican City is farfetched. It's as likely as Muslims capturing Constantinople (Second Rome). Wait. Muslims capturing Rome would mean France tolerating a Muslim invaded neighboor while having nuclear power. Seems really impossible to me  If you can imagine France using nuclear weapons in order to stop Muslims from taking over any part of Europe (or any part of the world, including France itself), then you have quite an imagination. stop muslims?no! . This is also why all this back and forth over the current numbers is irrelevant. People pushing the idea that it's not that many Muslims (yet) don't think there would be anything wrong if there were 20% Muslims, or 50% Muslims, or even 100% Muslims. They're pretending like there's nothing fundamentally wrong with Islam. Is there any reason to stop Muslims from taking over part of Europe and imposing their religious laws? I think there is. You and others think there isn't. The good news for you guys is that you're winning. The bad news for me is that for the time being I have to live in your fucking idiotic world. |
|
|
|
I think people believe media ( especially big media organs like Bbc, Cnn) without searching Islam.
Whereas Islam is a peace religion. Calls humanty to heaven by making favor for humanity and avoiding bad things. Islam heralds a second life after death. Quran says "if one kills onebody, he is like as killed all world". While such, how a muslim can be terrorist?
I think some people are prejudiced about Islam. If there's a muslim terrorist, it is not Islam's mistake. That means he misunderstood Islam and he destroyed his both life.
I think you should re-read your Quran. Your Mohammed was a warlord, pedophile, murderer, slave owner and a rapist.Nothing wrong with it, if you lived in 6th century, I guess. Last time I check we live in the 21st century. If you believe in Islam, you believe in everything Mohammed said and did. And if you do, you are a despicable human being. I hope you recover from your delusion. Yes. It's amazing -- after everything that's happened -- how many people either choose to be ignorant about Islam's founder, Islam's history and Islam's belief system. And the people who know better purposefully spread lies about Islam being "peace religion." Fucking people. Goddammit. Have you ever read prophet's life from correct source? Yes, I have. And you know I'm telling the truth. |
|
|
|
Yes, the idea of Muslims capturing Rome/Vatican City is farfetched. It's as likely as Muslims capturing Constantinople (Second Rome).
The ISIS will probably use demographic Jihad to conquer Western Europe, by creating immigrant influx from the Middle East. By 2050, at least a few of the Western European nations will be Muslim majority. Already a few of them are 10% to 20% Muslim. That said, Italy is less than 5% Muslim right now. And the rate of increase of the Muslim population is quite low, when compared to that in the other countries such as France and Germany. Still... we can't predict the future. Funny how you keep spreading false informations backed by nothing. France is the highest Muslim country in Europe with 8% Muslims. So no, it's not "a few of them are 10% to 20% Muslim." But keep writing false data, seems like nobody really cares about what's true or false on this forum. The truth is, there aren't reliable numbers. Here's a Wikipedia page that asserts there are several major European cities where the Muslim population is estimated at 15% or more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_the_European_Union_by_Muslim_populationLooking through the references on that page, they seem to date from 2008-2013, so that's before the current invasion. I realize the discussion was about "European countries" not "European cities," but the distinction is artificial -- especially to invaders who don't recognize inifidel borders anyway. The way modern Islamic invasions work is to take over parts of cities, apply Shariah law in their part of the city, and have violent riots if the native population (e.g., police) even set foot in the part they've taken. The takeover grows outward from these neighborhoods. Sometimes they venture outwards from the parts they've already taken to express their dominance over the natives, like happened New Year's Eve. The only way it could be stopped is if someone decided to do something. It's obvious no one will take such a decision There are parts of Paris, London, Amsterdam, Birmingham, Malmo, and so on, that are already under Islamic rule. Everyone knows this, including the people who actively deny it. |
|
|
|
Pope should not attack Trump. Trump has big chance to be the next President of America. Pope would be needing Trump help once ISIS surrounded Vatican.
Lol..... Once ISIS conquers Rome and Vatican, the Pope will cut a deal with the ISIS and convert to Islam. This guy only bothers about money and influence. He never cares about the 1 billion+ adherents, who believe in Roman Catholicism. ISIS will never conquer the Vatican. Russia will make them disappear before they ever do anything. However, I wouldn't be surprised by a bomb attack there, real or faked ... Yes, the idea of Muslims capturing Rome/Vatican City is farfetched. It's as likely as Muslims capturing Constantinople (Second Rome). Wait. Muslims capturing Rome would mean France tolerating a Muslim invaded neighboor while having nuclear power. Seems really impossible to me If you can imagine France using nuclear weapons in order to stop Muslims from taking over any part of Europe (or any part of the world, including France itself), then you have quite an imagination. |
|
|
|
I am not muslim but i say THAT woman is not a muslim but a religious of devil.
No woman can hurt a child.
No, that's Islam. Where have you been? Yes. I laugh when someone says, hey, like no Muslim could hurt a child, right? Because, dude, like Islam is peace and stuff. First: Mohammed fucked a 9 year old, his favorite wife, Aisha. Second: From the beginning, when Muslims conquered, they killed the men, took the women as sex slaves, and took the children to be either slaves or to convert to Islam to have new fighters for future conquests. Since I say so many (obvious) negative things about Islam, it's probably a good idea to say something positive: Islam is very effective. It's successfully spread around the world and subjugated a significant portion. And it's still spreading. |
|
|
|
German gov never lie. Heil Mutti!
I sincerely hope you spend the rest of your life in Germany. It's the fate you lying Islamophiles deserve. |
|
|
|
I think people believe media ( especially big media organs like Bbc, Cnn) without searching Islam.
Whereas Islam is a peace religion. Calls humanty to heaven by making favor for humanity and avoiding bad things. Islam heralds a second life after death. Quran says "if one kills onebody, he is like as killed all world". While such, how a muslim can be terrorist?
I think some people are prejudiced about Islam. If there's a muslim terrorist, it is not Islam's mistake. That means he misunderstood Islam and he destroyed his both life.
I think you should re-read your Quran. Your Mohammed was a warlord, pedophile, murderer, slave owner and a rapist.Nothing wrong with it, if you lived in 6th century, I guess. Last time I check we live in the 21st century. If you believe in Islam, you believe in everything Mohammed said and did. And if you do, you are a despicable human being. I hope you recover from your delusion. Yes. It's amazing -- after everything that's happened -- how many people either choose to be ignorant about Islam's founder, Islam's history and Islam's belief system. And the people who know better purposefully spread lies about Islam being "peace religion." Fucking people. Goddammit. |
|
|
|
I understand your concern about Islam. I can't say I share them mainly because I believe education makes the religious question a bit... useless. But I can understand you're afraid of that.
Well, I'm not afraid for you to try it in Germany since I'm not there. (I'm assuming you're German, since I think "mushi" is German slang for "pussy." Or the German word for "mosque." I forget.) Nope it was chosen a bit like that ^^ Not from Germany either, but I don't care about Islam or terrorism, they're just false threats. I need to correct my German. I had both of them wrong. "Mosque" is "Moschee" "Pussy" is "Muschi" For example, if you wanted to say, "Next time I visit German I think I'll revenge rape some mosque pussy," it would be something like: "Das naeschte mal ich Deutschland besuchen, glaube ich das ich werde etwas Moschee Muschi aus Rache verwaltigen." And if someone responds: you can't do that! A good counter-response is: Wir schaffen das.Probably something you can't post on Facebook-Moschee, Twitter-Moschee or Google-Moschee. |
|
|
|
Pope should not attack Trump. Trump has big chance to be the next President of America. Pope would be needing Trump help once ISIS surrounded Vatican.
Lol..... Once ISIS conquers Rome and Vatican, the Pope will cut a deal with the ISIS and convert to Islam. This guy only bothers about money and influence. He never cares about the 1 billion+ adherents, who believe in Roman Catholicism. ISIS will never conquer the Vatican. Russia will make them disappear before they ever do anything. However, I wouldn't be surprised by a bomb attack there, real or faked ... Yes, the idea of Muslims capturing Rome/Vatican City is farfetched. It's as likely as Muslims capturing Constantinople (Second Rome). Wait. |
|
|
|
I understand your concern about Islam. I can't say I share them mainly because I believe education makes the religious question a bit... useless. But I can understand you're afraid of that.
Well, I'm not afraid for you to try it in Germany since I'm not there. (I'm assuming you're German, since I think "mushi" is German slang for "pussy." Or the German word for "mosque." I forget.) |
|
|
|
That's what we keep asking for...
Please prove this:
-currently 15% Muslims
-10 million of Muslims coming quickly
-Those 10 millions Muslims are all aiming for Germany
-75% of those migrants are males between 18-34
We're not making ad hominem attacks, we're laughing at you because you keep refusing our multiple sources and proofs and you're just giving out numbers coming from nowhere.
Yes, you are making ad hominem attacks. If you like, add to that you make argument of ridicule. Both are losers in a debate. As for asking for stats, you may have me confused with someone else. Coleman, though, ALWAYS has sources for his numbers. Well, funny how he never showed any. And ad hominem attack would need to know a bit more of you guys, I was just mocking you nothing more. If you've felt insulted please accept my apologies but it's relaly tiring to see that you never gave even one source. I'd like to see the sources for those 4 stats cause there was none! He just said "it's currently more like 15%" I don't call this a reliable source xD Just to clarify, it's possible the 15% estimate came from me, not Coleman. Coleman may have said it too, and I may have missed it. Here's what I said a few days ago: Just to point out: most "invasions" do not immediately (or even eventually) mean that the invaders become the majority in the invaded land. It just means they become the occupying force -- the ones who make the rules under which society lives.
In today's Europe, Europeans are very proud to assert they have no death penalty. The truth is there is a death penalty for something as simple as drawing Mohammed. Europeans are just continuing to delude themselves about who makes and enforces the law.
But regarding the population statistics, someone should go to a few train stations in a few German cities and secretly record video of who walks by for an hour or so. Then everyone could simply count to get an estimate. I'm not there, but I expect anyone who claims the percent is either <= 5% or >= 50% will be wrong. I'll put my guess down as, oh, 15%. That might seem high, but there's clear evidence that the German government is purposefully hiding information about their policy. There's roughly 80 million people in Germany, so bringing in 10 million Muslims would increase the Muslim population by 10%. 1 million is the figure Germany admits, and we know the German government (and media) is willing to lie about it.
Anyone in Germany willing to do such an experiment? I'm not a lawyer, so it may be illegal to secretly video record people in a train station in Germany. Try to keep it secret.
I'm still hoping someone in Germany or France will take some secret video and post it. I'm curious about the real evidence myself. |
|
|
|
Islam is maybe not a race but it's how it's considered. Muslims are counted not by their faith but by their origins. The migrants are considered Muslims as long as they come from Muslim countries.
There's evidence against what you're asserting. Poland offered to take some Christian refugees. Of course, Western European leaders took this offer as evidence of double plus ungood wrongthink. If Merkel really thought that taking in Muslims is only positive, she should be happy to take more Muslims and let Poland take care of the Christian refugees. But Merkel's real interest is forcing her will on countries like Poland. It's what German leaders do. They can't help it. For myself, I'd be OK with Canada taking in a reasonable number of Atheist refugees from the Middle East. (Those wishing to leave Islam need refugee status more than anyone!) I think Canada would be improved if a lot of Ayaan Hirsi Alis were added to the mix. The problem is if you take Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslims, the Muslims murder Hirsi Ali. And that's the choice governments make when they import Muslims. Because everyone knows they will murder the Hirsi Alis. They tell you they'll do it. And then they do it. And, I assure you, I have at least as big a problem with "native" Westerners who convert to Islam as I do with non-Western Muslims. I can have a little more sympathy for people who are Muslim because of the culture they were born into. I assume some of them are thoughtful enough to realize their religion is dangerous bullshit, but having realized that they also know the most dangerous thing they could do is openly reject it. I don't understand the link between the sentence you quoted and your claim... In that case, thanks for asking for clarification. I'll try to help. You said, "The migrants are considered Muslims as long as they come from Muslim countries." The fact that Poland offered to take Christian refugees from Syria (a Muslim country) directly contradicts this sentence. You said, "Muslims are counted not by their faith but by their origins." I interpreted this as, "Muslims are judged not by their faith but by their country of origin." The fact that Poland offered to take Christian refugees from Syria but not Muslim refugees from Syria indicates that the judgment is based on their faith, not their country of origin. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
We're not making ad hominem attacks, we're laughing at you because you keep refusing our multiple sources and proofs and you're just giving out numbers coming from nowhere.
It's too early to know the numbers. Right now we only know many have come, many are coming, and governments and media have been caught lying as a matter of policy. As for the laughing, I'm laughing too. I know a French guy who lives on the border with Germany. His wife is pregnant with his first child. We recently had an argument about the situation in which he made excuses for the Muslims, like you guys are doing on this thread. I told him what I'll tell you (assuming you live in Western Europe): I'm happy for you. You're getting what you want. And when your daughters are raped, I'll be laughing. When your trains are bombed, I'll be laughing. When women in your country have to cover themselves to minimize the chances of being killed, I'll be laughing. When your cultures are destroyed, I'll be laughing. When your museums are burned, I'll be laughing. You're getting what you want. You're getting what you deserve. For me, this argument is about walling you Nazi-sympathizing idiots off from reasonable countries. And I'd like to help set the stage for rejecting refugees from Western Europe trying to flee Muslim persecution. They made their beds. Let them die in them. |
|
|
|
Islam is maybe not a race but it's how it's considered. Muslims are counted not by their faith but by their origins. The migrants are considered Muslims as long as they come from Muslim countries.
There's evidence against what you're asserting. Poland offered to take some Christian refugees. Of course, Western European leaders took this offer as evidence of double plus ungood wrongthink. If Merkel really thought that taking in Muslims is only positive, she should be happy to take more Muslims and let Poland take care of the Christian refugees. But Merkel's real interest is forcing her will on countries like Poland. It's what German leaders do. They can't help it. For myself, I'd be OK with Canada taking in a reasonable number of Atheist refugees from the Middle East. (Those wishing to leave Islam need refugee status more than anyone!) I think Canada would be improved if a lot of Ayaan Hirsi Alis were added to the mix. The problem is if you take Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Muslims, the Muslims murder Hirsi Ali. And that's the choice governments make when they import Muslims. Because everyone knows they will murder the Hirsi Alis. They tell you they'll do it. And then they do it. And, I assure you, I have at least as big a problem with "native" Westerners who convert to Islam as I do with non-Western Muslims. I can have a little more sympathy for people who are Muslim because of the culture they were born into. I assume some of them are thoughtful enough to realize their religion is dangerous bullshit, but having realized that they also know the most dangerous thing they could do is openly reject it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
