 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
Hey trolls, don't take the topic aside and don't shy away from commenting on the main topic. I don't buy your offtopics, look for the fools  Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean).
Royse777 said that icopress involved into some shenanigans. If this is true, then icopress don't deserve to be a meritsourcer OMG! What a shame! |
|
|
|
|
Someone congratulate me: NEWBIE RANK 1 MERIT
|
|
|
|
Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean).
Please tell me about it Sorry this is not my goal for this topic. Please tell me it to PM |
|
|
|
Now, I understand. You're some alt playing the newbie card.
LOL. Yes I've been reading the forum for a long time, but I am registered at january 2023 What's the problem? you lied about not even knowing what "merits" are.
I remembered that I know what merits are What's the problem? And here you are, trolling icopress's merit source application for no good reason. What's your deal? Why the act?
I'm talking not only about icopress. I discuss and will be criticize anyone who will be involved in shenanigans Because I hate shenanigans |
|
|
|
A signed message would not prove anything, the "new owner" can request from the "original owner" to sign a message saying " the new owner is the same person as the "original owner"
I didn't know about such schemes. Apparently you have a lot of experience in this |
|
|
|
Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean).
Please tell me about it |
|
|
|
Don't consider yourself the center of the business. You and GazetaBitcoin really needs a break. Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean). I knew that Icopress was engaged in such shenanigans. I hate shenanigans Now from this place in more detail, we are all very interested |
|
|
|
But I find OP's observations quite interesting and credible, and considering the password change I'd say ownership change is likely to have happened.
Okay okay okay Now listen here everybody. If Ratimov comes here with a bitcoin signed message and confirms his bitcoin address, would you all agree to be accused of libel (total distrusting and tagging as slanderers from all DT members)? full list of accusers without evidence in this thread-CryptoPravda -sky999 -suchmoon Are you ready? |
|
|
|
Before the introduction of merits, the forum was better
Since you only registered less than a year ago, how would you know how it was before.  Where do such oddballs come from? Every reader of the forum is required to immediately register on it or what? |
|
|
|
|
Before the introduction of merits, the forum was better
|
|
|
|
LOL. How Ratimov can sold his account if there is no username Ratimov at the forum Try this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=mlist;sa=searchThis is a results: ~Ratimov Brand new 2020-01-08 0 Offline Ratimov2 Brand new 2020-11-01 0 Offline Ratimov_SCAM Brand new 2021-01-01 0 Offline Maxim Ratimov Brand new 2020-01-28 0 Offline RatimovGandon Brand new 2020-11-01 0 Offline RatimovGandonn Brand new 2023-12-02 0 Offline Congratulations Ratimov Brand new 2022-03-10 0 Offline Congratulations Ratimov. Brand new 2022-03-10 0 |
|
|
|
Where is the Thank You for all the years he's been running the forum?
Thank You for what? Because he surrounded himself with close favorites (LoyceV, noorman0, ETFbitcoin, Little Mouse, PrimeNumber7, decodx, GazetaBitcoin, Royse777, etc) who do what they want here and no one scolds them for it. The forum has been dying for a long time. And the ban on mixers only exposed the long-standing growing mass discontent of users Why are some given powers (LoyceV, etc) while others are forced to delve into shit? This is not fair. |
|
|
|
His forum is rules.
Ok, then don’t tell any more fairy tales about decentralization on the forum. Let's see what happens to him if all users leave the forum. Without users - a forum is nothing But for now, demanding answers to all our questions will not change theymos decision since he already provide his point on how he come up to the decision.
No one has the right to prohibit discussing the admin's actions. If he doesn’t want to answer these questions, then that’s his choice. If admin's trust option is not blocked from distrusting or redtagging, it means he doesn’t mind being discussed. If admin was against being diststusted and redtagged, he would have blocked all these buttons on his profile. This means he doesn’t mind being discussed equally with everyone else. |
|
|
|
If he was given a court order, he couldn't confirm it even if he wanted to. So all of your questions will not get any answers. What is it exactly you want to achieve? Don't you know he can't answer to those questions?
Do I understand you correctly that you forbid me to discuss this? No, you can question anyone you want, I'm saying if he was given a court order, he couldn't confirm it, do you understand that? By a court order, a person can only be ordered to prohibit engaging in any activity. It is impossible to prohibit a person to shut his mouth with a court order. Otherwise this is already an encroachment on the freedom of expression of a person, which is contrary to US law. Do you understand that? |
|
|
|
I believe that from now on, the detectives on this forum will get down to work to find out which is true and which is false, whether Ratimov sold his account or not.
I can imagine how these detectives will be disgraced and fall into a trap if they also base their accusations on assumptions, if it turns out that Ratimov was actually not selling his account. Then Ratimov will have every right to open a counter-charge of libel. There is no need to throw around empty accusations. People tend to change |
|
|
|
If he was given a court order, he couldn't confirm it even if he wanted to. So all of your questions will not get any answers. What is it exactly you want to achieve? Don't you know he can't answer to those questions?
Do I understand you correctly that you forbid me to discuss this? |
|
|
|
|
Evidence is required for this charge. So far I see the subjective opinion of one user from the locale board #10.0
|
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly that the reputation of forum participants is being discussed here? Then I would like to discuss the actions of theymos, admin of this forum. theymos is also a member of the forum and must adhere to common principles of trust system. And this means he, as a user, is also subject to discussion. If the admin does not consider it necessary to adhere to his own trust system, then let him delete this topic immediately Trust of theymoshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=35This is not an accusatory topic. This is just a discussion of his actions. And questions to him As we all already know, theymos banned mixers. In this regard, users have accumulated many questions, but the theymos does not respond to them From everything I read on the forum, I formulate general questions that users have for the admin theymos1) theymos, was there pressure to you from the authorities? 2) theymos, are you currently cooperating with the authorities? 3) theymos, do you have any unspoken agreements with the authorities? 4) theymos, will casinos be next to be banned? 5) theymos, do you plan to introduce KYC on the forum if the authorities so require? Dear users, if you have questions for theymos, ask here, let's collect requests to him here in reputation section instead of clogging up the meta section |
|
|
|
|
