Not sure I would recommend that.  Me and others have reported corrupted wallets when attempting to send more than 2.1 billion from the wallet. My biggest successful spend was 1.9 billion.  Would recommend making backups of wallet.dat file before.

See 10k thread at the following link for discussion.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=942977.msg11121257#msg11121257

Yep issues I brought up this morning appear fixed. Thanks.

Ya I went all bullish yesterday when I heard the news 3000 MMXIV bought up all 10k to 300 and balls only a couple billion.  The site has some issues for me.

I don't see existing orders until I make a new order or cancel an existing one. Then the books fill.  Started happening after latest MMXIV audit. Although I'm not sure they are related. Find myself ordering 1 MMXIV worth at 1 sat to get the books to fill same thing happens on balls market.

Another illusion is that the volume graphic is not showing volume for buys but only dumps. My 1500 spent yesterday shows green for price move but volume doesn't show.

Should get more interesting as more people deposit on the site as the cut over date nears.

Ya no kidding. I wrote off 100 million as lost because they sent to me on old 1.0.1 wallet and chain. Funds are sitting at my address but my 2.0.2 wallets never shows them being received and don't stake. Proof is at the tx 6c9fe5692c1165a1a14f4e3076af3c6fe24aa234533b8908fa403bbdec5f6fa9  the block explorer I suspect is/was also on 1.0.1 chain so the transaction resolves.  Seems like a lot but I bought them for 100 MMXIV so like $2. Not the end of the world but annoying.

After first year from 2014 coins at 2014% per year gives around 650 billion and after second year it's billions of billions it will blow right through 1 sat when the time comes. 

Umm... I remember paying 3.9million sat for 1 in the beginning.  The compound interest should push the price to 1 sat by the end of 2015 or 2016. Dumps are the norm with coin, it's a gamble where you are sure to loose if you not staking.
If you want to compete against the bots then buy some QTL and run one for yourself.  QTL is cheap right now.

Figured I had lost them because the wallet.dat file got corrupted.  Luckily I do run backups and had an earlier version of the wallet.dat available otherwise Ya lost private keys. Lost.
Did a withdraw from yoBit and consider them lost because I can see them on block explorer but they never got to my wallet... That was 100 million lost. I believe the exchange sent to me on 1.0.1 wallet.  Maybe I could restore backup of that wallet restore it on the 1.0.1 wallet, reclaim amount sent from exchange then upgrade to 2.0.2 wallet?

Since block explorer is on wrong chain, it's hard to look it up on the web. But if you run the wallet right now it's 200 billion or more. I don't think there is a plan to cap it.  I think the experiment portion of it is to test how big it can get.  It's still growing very fast 10% of the time it grows at 10,000% which averages out to once or twice a day if your steak shards are large enough.  To get priority on the steak the shards need to be large.  The coins need to be spent because the block explore only shows 2000 transactions. I guess more importantly the steak shards get too small and never have enough weight to steak.  Which gives rise to sending yourself the biggest shard you can which is a problem after 2 billion.  I did successfully do a 1.9 billion spend. Got into the 2's and got error quoted above. Figured I had lost them.

The following worked for me. Would recommend limiting transactions to under 2billion. Not sure the exact amount but after attempting to send 2billion I got the error above. The error above appears to corrupt the wallet. Luckily I had made backups of the wallet.dat file and reverted to the backup file, dump every other file in roaming\10k folder. I also rebooted, not sure how important that was.  Restart and re download the whole chain and there they were.  The attempt to send had failed and the coins were still at the original address.  I think the crash had corrupted the wallet.dat file.

Ouch,  I get the same error.  tried to send 2Billion. Tried the restart, error gets called before blockchain starts to download.  Wallet just crashes.   

Forks chains same thing right?  Who runs the explorer?  Was looking into how it works a few weeks back and read that it binds to a wallet. Is the wallet the explorer is bound to version 2.0.2?  Silly question but explorer is not accurate.

Thead is about to get really long...  this confirms to me that the block explorer at 10k.blockexplorer.cc is on 1.0.1 chain. being on block 400070 and not having a block in 40min's from 400069 to 400070  

wallet A  getpeerinfo returns the following...ed removed 2.0.2 nodes.  wallet B is even farther down.  I do see entries for version 1.0.1 with block height of 400064  where as all the 2.0.2 versions are more like 41k...

20:19:38

getpeerinfo


20:19:38

[
{
"addr" : "201.82.236.232:11082",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429057166,
"lastrecv" : 1429057165,
"conntime" : 1429039048,
"version" : 60008,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.6.4/10k:2.0.2(v2.0.2.0-unk-beta)/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"height" : 411799,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "98.174.25.33:11082",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429057167,
"lastrecv" : 1429057173,
"conntime" : 1429039290,
"version" : 60008,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.6.4/10k:1.0.1(v1.0.1.0-unk-beta)/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"height" : 400054,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
Wallet B getpeerinfo
[
{
"addr" : "5.250.177.28:11082",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429057271,
"lastrecv" : 1429057271,
"conntime" : 1429039404,
"version" : 60008,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.6.4/10k:1.0.1(v1.0.1.0-unk-beta)/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"height" : 400054,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "98.174.25.33:11082",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1429057270,
"lastrecv" : 1429057249,
"conntime" : 1429048800,
"version" : 60008,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.6.4/10k:1.0.1(v1.0.1.0-unk-beta)/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"height" : 400064,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

Even stranger things are happening here.  First, I sent 1.9billion from wallet A to Wallet B.  Wallets are both 2.0.2.  wallet b received the coins at THPPAs5hpLrzFvEwVbDjLfSZ5bL1erMNzK however the block chain still has them at the walletA TJ9yx1R1For3sHaF4cj1UTLqhm2utdGrTq?  the coins are staking on wallet b.  Explorer has no record of the stakes when I look up by transaction.  

To complicate things I had Yobit withdraw another 99990999 to wallet A and the block chain reports they arrived however wallet A has no record of them, they are not staking.

block explorer says last block is 400054 where wallet says last block was 411838. difference of 11k blocks... there is defiantly multiple chains here.

Starting to get concerned.  I know it's an experiment and experiments sometimes fail, not sure how to proceed.  I would guess that it looks like the explorer is forked.  

See page 1. Btcpool.exchange buy for MMXIV for best rates.

FYI. C-cex has a lot of trading pairs against 10k.

Nice trick, horribly insecure since as soon as seller get btc seller could just spend the 10k from backup location.  If you bought it and balance was in there, and didn't spend or added more to it the seller could monitor and sell them at later date.

Just found Yobit.net https://yobit.net/en/trade/10K/BTC  has MMXIV market. 

Ya bittrex and most other exchanges do not have 1 address where they dump all the coins together. They maintain addresses per user and would not expect any of the top addresses to be an exchange. Simply lookup the address you send to when deposit you will see it's usually your own deposits at that address. Like wise after you trade the coins move off that address.

That's impossible since I am #1 on richlist with mmxiv. Been there for months. Stake around 2500 a day or so. Just moved 5000 to btcpool to try and make top #5 on 10k richlist. Bought around 2 billion so far.  Spots is probably talking about my orders placed last night. Messed up with 0 and accidentally sold 50,000,000 balls at 28, added too many zero's. Site sold because someone had a order for 28. So I covered all the low buy orders in case someone makes the same mistake I did.
Btcpool needs a lot of work.
They need a confirmation page or pop up that states the order and asks if you are sure.
Site also need to work out the math on the buy side so if I hit max Mmxiv then it solves for the correct number of 10k coin, as is you have to solve that for yourself.
On my iPhone Roboform browser the cancel order buttons do not show. So I place bad order it gets left up there until I get home and log via pc and cancel.
If he is referring to the piles of 10k coin up there then it's because it takes forever to move a billion or 2 so put them for sale until I get around to getting them moved off.
I know I am not the only one buying up 10k  At least 1 buyer was willing to pay 1440 MMXIV sat.  
Cheers.

The wallet inaccurately displays the wrong balance.  I've been watching it for months. Something about after having staked for over a few days some how the logic that builds wallet total misses the withdraw portion from a staking transaction. You have to follow your balance on block explorer. Which is also problematic since explorers were not built to handle the volume of blocks 10k produces which causes also causes issues.  Everyone that has 10k has to use explorer to find balance creates high traffic to explorer site.
Basically before you go start spending you run repairwallet from debug console if balances are off from explorer. That seems to get balances straight.  If you have un mature coins then you must assume the balances are off a bit because of the stake op.