 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
Lets see how quickly this one gets out of hand.
I guess exposing the truth is getting out of hand for you  Nope I'm fine with exposing the truth. But that wasn't always what was happening in that thread. I prefer a distilled down version that cuts the crap but retains truth exposing. honestly the whole gleb vs josh restraining order thing didn't belong in that thread. That's not to say it doesn't belong on this site, but it's tangential to the BFL case. I'd much prefer a separate threads where it's easier to delineate the information and a cleaner fashion. Gleb vs Josh? What about it? I guess there is a huge chaos in your head. Are you really that clueless? |
|
|
|
Why was the other one locked?
A force majeure woke up the...too much shit was exposed. Don't worry. One day the LEO's will do their sweepings from the top to the bottom of this forum...  #ASKFTC #ASKFBI |
|
|
|
Lets see how quickly this one gets out of hand.
I guess exposing the truth is getting out of hand for you |
|
|
|
I don't get why it's so hard to believe that the business card is real. Yes, is he is a good artist. Yes, he might have an art blog. If he created that himself he would just say so and people would be fine with that.
0.2 BTC might be high for a business card but BFL & their antics will be remembered in Bitcoin history and a BFL Coffee cup & other items have already been sold here probably for that historical value or to have a piece of a company that fucked them over.
To pay this dude 0.2 BTC in order to remind all BFL customers that they never got their money back and that their funds were stolen. And yeah, everyone would want a memorabilia of Josh, the most loved barking dog of this forum. Hmm.... dude, I don't think that you are in the right state of mind  Who cares, if people want to buy it, they can buy it. Josh or not. Anyway, can't tell if this is a legit card or not. But then again, who cares. Someone who spends 56$ on a business card has enough money to spare, otherwise you would not buy it. I wouldn't, at least. Then why do you care? I find it quite amusing that you didn't reply to me. I don't get why it's so hard to believe that the business card is real. Yes, is he is a good artist. Yes, he might have an art blog. If he created that himself he would just say so and people would be fine with that.
0.2 BTC might be high for a business card but BFL & their antics will be remembered in Bitcoin history and a BFL Coffee cup & other items have already been sold here probably for that historical value or to have a piece of a company that fucked them over.
To pay this dude 0.2 BTC in order to remind all BFL customers that they never got their money back and that their funds were stolen. And yeah, everyone would want a memorabilia of Josh, the most loved barking dog of this forum. Hmm.... dude, I don't think that you are in the right state of mind You're not buying the business card, you're buying the history and the events behind it. It's something nice to have as well - not really but I hope you're getting my point. Dude, I already made my point in that statement that you quoted. But your logic is cracked... |
|
|
|
I don't get why it's so hard to believe that the business card is real. Yes, is he is a good artist. Yes, he might have an art blog. If he created that himself he would just say so and people would be fine with that.
0.2 BTC might be high for a business card but BFL & their antics will be remembered in Bitcoin history and a BFL Coffee cup & other items have already been sold here probably for that historical value or to have a piece of a company that fucked them over.
To pay this dude 0.2 BTC in order to remind all BFL customers that they never got their money back and that their funds were stolen. And yeah, everyone would want a memorabilia of Josh, the most loved barking dog of this forum. Hmm.... dude, I don't think that you are in the right state of mind |
|
|
|
|
BS. I would not buy that for a penny Zoran Kutuzovic. You make beautiful art. Don't waste your time with nonsense. Josh is nobody.
|
|
|
|
i don't think i will buy any more since the price is going up. i have bought whatever amount i wanted to and saved up when the price was low
Your thinking s very good. This is really the best strategy: buy cheap and sell when price is high. But, in my opinion, current price is still low and still is good time to buy bitcoin  Very low in comparison with last year. |
|
|
|
Is there a Chinese Bitcoin Embassy ?
Chinese bitcoin embassy?  |
|
|
|
|
Jiminy Crickets. You have to pound and stomp your feet about how much you have the god-given right to call a spade a spade by shysterly typing on and on and on about how stupid this, that and anyone else is "cuz yew sez so", all while no one had the right to call you (a self-proclaimed attorney) by your real name until you were EXPOSED through your own words! I'm shocked that you are even a practicing attorney as you claim, because there is clearly a lot wrong with you psychologically. Here you are still pseudo-lawyering up bitcointalk by drowning us in an incontinent verbal diarrhea that has no end in sight. Disgusting.
And now you demean what happened in Paris.... no words.
|
|
|
|
Well I be a butterfly! It sure does look like Stephen M. Reid was acting against section 7.3 of the model rules of professional conduct of the American Bar association by soliciting his business here on BCT. (Not surprising as he advocated BFL's lawyers were acting professionally too.) It's a good thing then (for him) that he deleted those posts and got the remainder of these incriminating posts deleted by the moderator... What is even funnier that Stephen Mark Reid (Brush242) is having a legal signature attached to his pseudonym.  Funny? Why is it funny? It's a standard disclaimer such that people realize the limit of what comprises legal representation and legal advice. In fact, directly below my disclaimer is BCT's disclaimer. Followed thereafter by someone who thinks it's odd that casinos would have legal representation. Who do you work for? |
|
|
|
Oh yeah, rocket scientist, do a little ~more~ research and you may find that some attorneys even have >gasp< webpages! Ads in the yellow pages, even! If that still exists. Stephen Mark Reid da ghost attorney! The master creator of many pseudonyms. Looking for clients on bitcointalk and fighting all the idiots out there. |
|
|
|
(Xian01 tells me that this thread was created because of messages I removed in a thread about BFL)
I don't know and don't care about "dox". I removed a ton of posts that have absolutely nothing, not even any claim, of having to do with BFL, that were basically making it impossible to find the one in ten posts that were actually about BFL.
For the abstract question ... harassing people is not okay, but there are limits to what can be done about it. A load of bull-menure! The guy was deliberaty derailing the topic and deserved whatever he got. Which, of course, is simply untrue. The overwhelming percentage of my posts in that thread concerned either a) the idiocy of burying good information under torrents of BS, 2) the idiocy of thus ruining one's credibility such that those that matter (sc.: da gov't) tend to dismiss your points, and d) how TROs work. That isn't derailing the topic. More accurately, it was an attempt to get the thread to be of much greater value. Stephen Mark Reid you still did not tell us who you work for. For an attorney you seem to have a lot of time on your hands. |
|
|
|
|
@maxwell. I understand your position. But this is not kindergarten. And you cannot ground people in the corner. People are gathering information and at times they make jokes. Keep in mind Maxwell that FTC has been referred to this list several times because many of us have gathered an enormous amount of information. We are trying to make their job easier too. It can very well be considered as tampering with evidence. Considering what happened last night, you can warn people from time to time not to overload the thread with too many pictures. But be careful with overzealous deletions.
|
|
|
|
There is more to that. Brush242 did not manage to hush people up; "" It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt" --Some Guy, Late 1800s I didn't offer anonymous service, or even pseudo-anonymous service. I would not be anonymous. Any client will be able to confirm my legitimacy in the jurisdictions where I am admitted to practice law. Depending on the extent of the services needed for legal representation, clients and I will enter into a written representation agreement that covers fees, costs, scope of service, et cetera. For other services, a standard business agreement." See for yourself https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=492749.msg10050629#msg10050629So then comes a force majeure and caboom... everyone's posts are gone. A very interesting coincidence |
|
|
|
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt" --NOT Some Guy, Late 1800s but Abraham Lincoln
I didn't offer anonymous service, or even pseudo-anonymous service. I would not be anonymous. Any client will be able to confirm my legitimacy in the jurisdictions where I am admitted to practice law.
Depending on the extent of the services needed for legal representation, clients and I will enter into a written representation agreement that covers fees, costs, scope of service, et cetera. For other services, a standard business agreement.
Why don't you state in Linkedin the name of the company you work for? www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmreid |
|
|
|
Well I be a butterfly! It sure does look like Stephen M. Reid was acting against section 7.3 of the model rules of professional conduct of the American Bar association by soliciting his business here on BCT. (Not surprising as he advocated BFL's lawyers were acting professionally too.) It's a good thing then (for him) that he deleted those posts and got the remainder of these incriminating posts deleted by the moderator... What is even funnier that Stephen Mark Reid (Brush242) is having a legal signature attached to his pseudonym. |
|
|
|
He was posting in a Butterfly Labs thread, and derailing, ergo, he had SOMETHING to do with Butterfly Labs, even if it was a passing interest in joining the discussion. Would you not agree ? Define harassment ? Would you not agree that taking pre-order monies, not delivering products for months on end, and then antagonizing their customer base on these forums with his legendary bad behavior constitutes harassment ? Economic violence even ? Lawyer dude decided to poke the bear. He was doxed for his derailing in a BFL thread. He cried harassment when he was unmasked. You came in on a white horse to his rescue. Is this an accurate read ? I'm not clear on your line of thinking, and what you are trying to rationalize here. EDIT: Also, how on God's-green-earth is this thread not considered harassment, and should be deleted by your own standards (Information is hacked, stolen, published for the sake of harassment and intimidation, and allowed to stay up) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325772.5Very much agree! Beautifully said. |
|
|
|
|
