Does that 1 million price is for 10 apartments? And there will be new opportunity by the end of the year, right? At last a decent project going in at Thailand. Depending on the apartments budget that possible another projects will be done sooner. But I prefer those apartments to be good or even great than an ordinary one. I asked it because they said there would be new opportunities in October and November. |
|
|
|
I'd actually like to hear your point of view on my previous post, Admin. It's rather discouraging to see that you choose to ignore a comments that sounds their concern about your attention to customer's wishes and input.
In regards to the post, may I also highlight that months ago, you said that exchange will come after you have a demand or tangible products or something like that, I failed to recall correctly. I failed even more to see what "preliminary" achievement you need to finally decide that you have enough "foundation" and decide it's time to enliat and be more visible to users worldwide.
Before you got any idea that I was a mere pump-rider or anything around that kind of species, allow me to inform you that you may rest assured, I have a firm belief of your company's future, and I have no intention to sell at all. I even "lock" my tokens by crossing them to the ETH gateway. I understand that land and building business need years to cultivate.
What I don't like is, or rather are, your company decision to keep delaying an exchange that has a potent to bring more awareness of the token. You may argue that this project is more focused on "something real" or a "long-term utilities" and you couldn't care less about exchange and their speculation-enabling-feature, but you might forgot that you're standing on crypto, on a field that's basically cheerish trading and speculations. If your company doesn't care about such and prefer to have your focus undisturbed on establishing tangible product, then I should ask your initial decision to reach crypto. Was it a mistake due to a poor decision? Why don't you reverse the roadmap to make it more suitable to your concept? Namely building offices and reputation for years, establishing yourself, and only after you're well known, you reach crypto. It will surely safe you a lot of time answering demands about details and exchange and price.
If you failed to see how this decision to keep ignoring demands for exchange could affect your progress, allow me to point out one factor, namely community's support. Some with high visionary and firm belief and strong investing knowledge (the name goes on) would stay, true, but some will also eventually lost faith if you failed to show good progress. And this leads me to my second dismayal, namely bad response. Either a bad company culture or a community manager with bad attitude, depends on who in charge of answering posts.
Before you pass judgment, I'll humbly ask you to review back few pages to see that I have never clashed way with you, so I'm confident when I said that this is nothing personal, it's not more than a simple observation, that your responses to criticism, be it possitive or negative, are mostly cam hardly be seen as warm or... diplomatic, if you prefer a more official term. A "how is not doable?" from someone who represent business space rental that operates worldwide is certainly least to be expected, and certainly discourage people from interacting well by dissuading them from saying what they want to say.
Unfortunately there is no proper communication after the ICO, especially in here. Nothing personal with that support person but I'm not sure if he has some certain knowledge about the project and I don't like the manner of that person either. |
|
|
|
Does that 1 million price is for 10 apartments? And there will be new opportunity by the end of the year, right? |
|
|
|
Before releasing rumors about inactivity of Oceanlab into the world, just look at their website https://www.oceanlab.eu (don't forget to scroll down) and look into the active Telegram. Not rumors. Isn't it true that things didn't go as planned? People are putting their money, hopes to their words. |
|
|
|
What is the development plan, in which countries will the service be available first?
Greetings. Recently we announced that Waves is now available on Ledger Nano S, CEO Sasha Ivanov has started negotiations with the Maltese government. Now the team is working hard on implementation 2FA, Waves Keeper. All official statements and announcements including development can always be found in: our official Telegram ch - https://t.me/wavesnewsOfficial Twitter - https://twitter.com/wavesplatformSpeaking about availability, Waves Platform is available worldwide for sure. In case if you have any difficulties concerning connection, then you can always use VPN (EU countries are preferable) Best wishes, Waves Community Manager For me Waves Keeper is quite a big thing. Is there a timeline for the development? |
|
|
|
Postponment wouldn't be surprise for me but they went on mainnet in the recent acnnounced time frame. Now I'll closely try to watch the projects are being built on the top of Tezos. |
|
|
|
I think that Waves project has the future^ but so many challenges for Waves at the moment:
- Smart contracts
- Spam tokens filtering
- Attraction of legit projects
I think that success in nearest future will depend from implementation of this tasks.
At least non turing smart contract is done. And yeah that spam token issue has been headache for a while. About the legit projects, we haven't seen solid project lately on Waves. But if they can do some good moves about security tokens, they can attract many entrepreneurs. |
|
|
|
I took a look. And even they say they will open the promised 5 offices by the end of 2018, it doesn't seem possible to me with this pace. Even London is still under contruction. They said they are still on pace for it. Amsterdam: check Berlin: check London: almost check NY: final negotiations Singapore: most unknown How is that not doable? Hope it will be done. But as you know we saw many delays before which makes me cautious. And again as we saw in previous ones it is not quick and easy job even after you close deals. |
|
|
|
Bitfinex is pleased to introduce trading for Tezos (XTZ). Trading for XTZ will be available against BTC and USD. Margin trading and P2P funding will be enabled gradually as liquidity develops. https://www.bitfinex.com/posts/281It was expected by many. Now waiting other big exchanges for the listing announcements. |
|
|
|
|
Trading and holding. Different people, different mindsets. For me I'm a holder and if one can succeed, I'll be happy.
|
|
|
|
ethereum has already proved its strong infrastructure with its blockchain, smart contracts and several token standards. on the other hand waves is still in the beginning of its developing stage and need to be useful to prove itself.
Actually I believe both are at the beginning phase of development. Both have their own strong and weak sides when compare. |
|
|
|
not that surprising that tezos didn’t go up when most alts are in green. With all the money this project has, they won’t even get tezos listed on decent exchange.
I think exhanges are waiting for the mainnet release and I don't think there wil be any fee need for getting listed. Exchanges had no problem listing EOS, Cardano, IOTA, Wanchain and almost every ICO before the mainnet release. Thats just a poor excuse if you ask me. those were ERC20 tokens at time of listings. and besides... Betanet Expectations In an effort to better prepare the community for the betanet, we would like to once again communicate expectations for this network: The betanet is a functioning network. It is a preview of the Tezos mainnet and its full functionality. During this experimental period, the intent is that transactions from the betanet will irreversibly persist into the mainnet. The betanet is experimental and should NOT be used for important or high valued transactions. The betanet will likely suffer unscheduled downtimes and experience emergency hard forks. A broader mainnet launch will follow the betanet after it has sufficiently matured. These actions will align with the project’s efforts to continue to improve the overall security and stability of Tezos. http://tezosfoundation.ch/news/tezos-betanet-expectations/Exactly, those were ERC20 tokens which was already intgrated and no security risk for exchanges. Pears and apples... I don't think IOTA ever was ERC20 token, they were on testnet, but not ERC20. Otherwise it would not take them more than a year to deliver coins after the ICO. Besides, if gate.io can list it with no complications, other exchanges can too. I think risk factors are different for top exchanges and mid-volume exchanges. Even baker rules are diffent now than it should be. I hope you are right. Tezos did miss tons of opportunities for its investors by delaying launch several times. Mainnet deadline is by the end of this month. lets see what happens I don't know the current situation but it wouldn't be surprise to me if they postpone the mainnet launch. And I think it is okay for many if it is happening for good. |
|
|
|
It is old interview but good for who haven't read yet. And it is time to see action on smart contract. |
|
|
|
Tried the platform, just a small hour,
it's really fun and helps people learning fundamentals.
It looks like a game and you can challenge with token trading or just play on a simulation.
The site is well realized. Will try again for sure.
I'm planning to try soon. And hope team can achieve to create some buzz around. |
|
|
|
I don't have any tokens but it would be nice to have investor dashboard that investors can follow the investments stages, process and more. |
|
|
|
We're not used to see this kind of price moves from Waves even on this kind of exiting milestone days.
What do you think about it? It's the start of a bull run or just fakeout? Personally I think that we'll see a bull run (which was due lol) but it will be nothing compared to what will happen when many projects will start to build on top of waves thanks to smart contracts We witnessed many times that when Waves release something price didn't move or went lower. Finally it is good to market reacted as it should be. And it can get some new attention from others in this bloodbath. |
|
|
|
Team is wonderful, they just fulfilled their promise and launched the platform.
Keep up the good work
Finally they launched  I haven't tried yet, is there anybody tried? Now I'm waiting for big marketing as they mentioned before. |
|
|
|
not that surprising that tezos didn’t go up when most alts are in green. With all the money this project has, they won’t even get tezos listed on decent exchange.
I think exhanges are waiting for the mainnet release and I don't think there wil be any fee need for getting listed. Exchanges had no problem listing EOS, Cardano, IOTA, Wanchain and almost every ICO before the mainnet release. Thats just a poor excuse if you ask me. those were ERC20 tokens at time of listings. and besides... Betanet Expectations In an effort to better prepare the community for the betanet, we would like to once again communicate expectations for this network: The betanet is a functioning network. It is a preview of the Tezos mainnet and its full functionality. During this experimental period, the intent is that transactions from the betanet will irreversibly persist into the mainnet. The betanet is experimental and should NOT be used for important or high valued transactions. The betanet will likely suffer unscheduled downtimes and experience emergency hard forks. A broader mainnet launch will follow the betanet after it has sufficiently matured. These actions will align with the project’s efforts to continue to improve the overall security and stability of Tezos. http://tezosfoundation.ch/news/tezos-betanet-expectations/Exactly, those were ERC20 tokens which was already intgrated and no security risk for exchanges. Pears and apples... I don't think IOTA ever was ERC20 token, they were on testnet, but not ERC20. Otherwise it would not take them more than a year to deliver coins after the ICO. Besides, if gate.io can list it with no complications, other exchanges can too. I think risk factors are different for top exchanges and mid-volume exchanges. Even baker rules are diffent now than it should be. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
