I use a Keepkey and like it also. I also have a Ledger Nano S special Litecoin edition, but I have not used it and it remains unopened. Who knows, it might be a collectors item one day.
|
|
|
Does anyone have hard numbers on what they have mined so far for a May batch machine? I sold mine, but would like to know if that was a good choice or not?
I just got a payout from ProHashing, so I looked at my ROI spreadsheet this morning. Currently my single L3+ from the May 5th batch is 42% ROI in Bitcoin terms and 99.5% ROI in dollar terms. At the current difficulty (and not counting additional profitability from multi-pools), I'm about 80 days away from ROI in Bitcoin terms. That's the only number that's important to me. I always want my miners to produce more cryptocurrency than they cost. On a semi-related note, I use Google Sheets to keep track of my mining and other Bitcoin investments because it provides a mechanism to automate the spreadsheets via simple scripting. My spreadsheets gather the received Bitcoin coming in to my mining addresses and include that revenue in the ROI calculation. Also, Google supports BTC to USD rate conversion. I had to add LTC, because they don't support it yet. So when I check on ROI for my miners, pretty much all I have to do is open the spreadsheet in a browser and refresh it. Most of the time it works well. Every once in a while something gets "stuck" (probably some Google caching algorithm) and I have to make a meaningless edit in order to get it unstuck. I have a forum post on this subject somewhere, but the scripts I used then are pretty old. If any one is interested, I'll start a GitHub project and post my latest scripts and instructions. That is a great Idea. I would love to try it out... I get LTC payouts from Hashnest hopefully i can track those in my Google spreadsheets. as well. I made a quick and dirty github project here: https://github.com/edonkeycoin/gsbitcoinutilsLet me know if you have any problems with the script. Looks nice. A question, how do you distinguish the ROI between two miners / workers at the same pool using a single payout address? With the same miner type & hash rate then it is pretty easy, but I would like to use this to calculate the ROI of various miners that are of different generations (S5, S7, S9 etc) if possible.
|
|
|
It was the next morning before I could login after registering. I think it said to wait two hours but it took much longer than that.
Tried to order just a few minutes ago with no success. No errors, no out of stock, just refreshed the page and would not add to my cart.
I finally gave up.
|
|
|
I hope the good luck continues for all my friends here.
Good wishes.
|
|
|
I have noticed the same thing. No stats other than the expected reward for the next block.
|
|
|
I know I read about another having this issue, but I cannot find the post for the life of me. Even Google search failed me.
So my ANTMINER S9-B13, 12.93 TH/s has one hash board showing 4x - 5x the hashrate of the other two. Floats between 16 to 20 TH/s. AwesomeMiner and the pool both show around 12.88 TH/s which is what it should produce.
Should I be expecting an impending failure in the future? As long as it is "working" do you think it is safe to let it run or would I be at risk for more damage this way?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
Another block and with a decent fee too!
Nice!
|
|
|
Happy days with a new block ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Welcome bit2255! Glad you are here ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
So for those running Claymore's Linux version on a 480, what speed are you getting? Is there a seperate thread for the Claymore Linux ZEC miner?
|
|
|
Of course, if the moon and the stars were to align so that CKPool were to pay out better than any other pool in the history of Bitcoin, well let's just say there would be no complaints from me... or any other miner here either I imagine ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) One can always dream ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
Well I am not too picky. 1 1/2 blocks at our current hash rate, or 2 blocks per day with a proportionately higher hash rate. Either would work for me
|
|
|
Will someone turn loose of those blocks please ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Hoping to see us get back to an average of two blocks per day. That makes it affordable for me to point all of my hash here. Just ordered an R4, which will probably replace an S7. I may send the S7 somewhere to be hosted with less expensive power. Maybe up north to CryptoBoreas in Canada. Others here seem happy with their service. Any suggestions on what the declared value of an S7 would be for the VAT?
|
|
|
I second more API access for Awesome miner!
|
|
|
Very nice. A little green for the cold weather on the east coast ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I swear I think I just saw Kano Klaus ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thanks Kano!
|
|
|
Merry Christmas to all my fellow miners here. In about three weeks I can check off one year @ Kano CKPool. Glad I found this place. Great bunch of folks here.
|
|
|
Thanks Kano. I went for the trial and error method and got it right on the second try. I did not have a lot of stales but since my pings dropped from the 90's to mid 20's so I figured why not make the change.
|
|
|
So the ping times are better to NY than Vegas for me (being in Virginia). So if I was using:
stratum+tcp://stratum80.kano.is:80
Would I now use this?
stratum+tcp://stratum80.nya.kano.is:80
Thanks
|
|
|
|