@Borgminer, let's face to the facts....

Dom and Lee are two faces of the same medal (not gold medal, not even copper medal... lol)

Dom has 170 BTC of an overdue loan in pop with Lee (money he have to give to Lee).
Lee has 500 BTC on overdue loan in pop with a lot of investors (me included).
Dom has a failed IPO who left investors with huge loss
Lee has a failed IPO who left investors with a huge loss
Dom made a site to adopt ZNE and closed it after a month.
Dom and Lee are missing, non more communications on all channels, every try to reach them is a failure.

Those are facts.....

So take your conclusions....

Hi Dom! ...Your turn, prove me wrong 

Coin is dead. Only thing we get to hear is dev is sick. Oh boo hoo, like I said theres terminally ill patients that get on the net every 20 seconds this dev has no excuse.

This Developer is a scammer and probably also a criminal, cheated a lot of people out of a lot of money on BTCPop as well now on BTC Jam. He is not sick, he is just planning his next scam. Feel sorry for his family...

so you mean he is not sick.

or you actually meant to say he "is under" the weather.

Further to Recyclix now admitting that they're not actually a recycling plant, their website accommodates this new pivot excuse.

https://recyclix.com/services/

The first line is basically a vague nothing reference to a 'minority' holding in a recycling plant, which could mean anything at all but certainly does not mean "We are a recycling plant".

The second underlined statement is again another vague nothing reference which is so poorly worded it gives them the opportunity to spin it however they need to, depending on who is asking what question.

So, fanbois and shills, that'll be the explanation you wanted for "Bu. . bu. . .buuuuuut . . . .video footage!!!111!11!!"

It wasn't their facility. They gave some money to the owners of that rather small facility and then marketed it as though it was theirs.

Yeah, that's it, 'marketed', you know, so they can claim they didn't lie. Just like they didn't lie about having a contract with McDonald's or Plamika.lt, no those weren't lies made to sucker in more victims and to fool their 'investors', no, it was 'marketing' (note to fanbois and shills, because I know how hard thinking is for you: This means they lied).

Recyclix is a ponzi scam which is desperately morphing into whatever they can think of to keep dodging the legal bullets.

Yes, another good point! The recycling factory they were supposedly collaborating with explicitly denies any doings with them.

But that does not even matter;
- they can have a registered company (check);
- they can even rent other companies to do their recycling for them (no check, but OK it's possible);and,
- they even may have a virtual address (which does not prove anything, except that they took the trouble to register there).

The hard evidence and facts are clear:

They are setting their company up as a Ponzi in their very own policies.

They are being prosecuted by a member state of the EU.

They are asking for investments but fail to provide basic numbers in a prospectus or annual reports.

Even the basic information like bio's (or just names) of their executives is not provided by them.
(But that's understandable as one of them is actually part of the Colbitex fiasco.)

Actually the company is constantly lying, like for instance in case of their alleged dealings with Plamika and McDonalds.
(And they keep on lying [and deleting enquiries] about [into] that.)

Ample and factual proof has been provided; people should not be giving them money.

Do you really still don't understand the difference between a civil case (two civilians having a dispute) and a criminal case (when a crime has been committed) or are you just "playing naive"...?

Anyway, to get back on topic:

They are setting their company up as a Ponzi in their very own policies.

They are being prosecuted by a member state of the EU.

They are asking for investments but fail to provide basic numbers in a prospectus or annual reports.

Actually the company is lying, like for instance in case of their alleged dealings with Plamika and McDonalds. (And they keep on lying [and deleting enquiries] about [into] that.)

People should not be giving them money.

Ample and factual proof has been provided. Now please stop trolling.

Now you are confused again... First you talk about how:


Now you're switching back to criminal court again, talking about them "commiting a crime"... Or are you genuinely confused that someone must first have a stake with someone else before they can start a civil case?

Anyhow, they are being taken to court, remember...

So, again, you actually make an excellent point (for everyone to stay far away from this "company").