I'm sorry I'm using a wallet and the fee seems to be 0 again https://blockchain.info/tx-index/9b6c99845d32cf386491823a97f32ec36b17105423e625f8e491cfa703dacb33

Hopefully it won't take that long this time but you can also start on this once it confirms if you would like. If I go afk I will be back online tomorrow.

Ok, half is on it's way. Other half after you produce the first two. Deal?

ok deal, but they better look damn awesome

I am definitely happy with your work. How much would you expect to make such signitures?

Also you can see that Small is still spreading misinformation claiming that Gebbit was hacked when it was never hacked.

Small, the only legible name is your signature and this is the picture you only sent me today well after this thread was made. Also, I am sure with your previous payments having made a lot more per hour than the average person in your country you can afford to go to a prints hop as we've suggested to you for days now.

There was only 1 person who actually sent payment aside from the liquidity provider. However, that is at all not the accusation. The truth is Small was caught lying about his work. He had been paid already for the previous 2 or 3 weeks prior. At first he did do good work but it became evident that he was not following instructions and was only doing the type of work which was unverifiable. I had my suspicions but no proof. However, when I caught him lying red handed I can only believe that instead of him being such a terrible worker that he indeed didn't do other things that he said he did. If I had to guess his time theft in total significantly exceeds the hours he's requesting to be paid for now as the time theft started before the previous week.

I know someone justified not paying because he didn't actually cause the site to gain any traction but that is not at all something gebbit would do. We had an agreement and we will keep that agreement. Since we know that he lied about having fulfilled his end of the agreement and that we cannot take his word any more we are in a sticky situation but only because we are not impartial in the matter. However, I can't imagine an impartial party thinking we should pay for services not rendered. We have no idea however exactly how much time theft Small is responsible but if I had to guess it would exceed the amount we owe him. 

can you escrow for this campaign?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=987965.new#new

Escrow seems to be standard practice so we're happy with that. The scam accusation with Small is bunk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=986642.0 so no need to worry.

Thank you! Feel free to sign up!

UPDATE  Escrow is on and competition will end April 7th as per and earlier statement I had made that after escrow there will be 10 days.

Dear designers,  

Gebbit.com is a place to buy and sell Bitcoin.

We would like to have a signature campaign that promotes both our main site as well as our Bulk Trading Feature. Here are some of the benefits of Gebbit


0% commission on Limit Orders
Bitcoin payments go straight to cold wallet
Insured live wallet
Fast processing times
Very Low spread

The benefits of Gebbit's Bulk Trading can be found here

https://gebbit.com/BulkOrders

Unlike Coinbase, trades only occur once the user accepts a rate. If the user is not happy with the rate given they can wait for another rate or they can have their payment sent back after a small processing fee. There are no surprises.


We need signatures to be made for :

Hero Member
Member


All contestants are asked to provide a signature which includes the 2 features of Gebbit. Screenshots for submissions are of course accepted.
The best design, as voted by us, will receive the bounty of 0.15 BTC upon delivery of the BB source code.

To design your signature, please take color, fonts and ideas from our site Gebbit.com

Our logos
http://imgur.com/Anlkvw3

and a couple gifs







Everything must be clickable and redirect to the appropriate website url.

Is that 2% on the fiat or BTC side? If Bitcoin doesn't die it seems hard to believe that bitcoin returns from HLODing won't exceed the returns of this program. The arbitrage would have to make returns on the current bitcoin price and exceed the fact that the funds are not always in BTC. Finally, it would have to account for situations where users get goxxed.

It's hard to believe that this isn't a waste of time and a losing proposition when compared to simply HLODing.

Please explain to me where my logic falters.

Please email support@gebbit.com in that case. That way we won't muddle up this thread. Anyone else that is interested can email support@gebbit.com as well.

Poll has been changed to be visible before voting.

Gebbit.com was scammed by the user Small as already detailed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=986642.0

Because he was angry at being caught he decided to lower my trust rating. What exactly do I need to do to fix my trust rating?

Be careful, Small scammed gebbit.com

Here is a link to the thread which includes his picture. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=986642.0

Any new provable information on Small is being rewarded.

I'm looking for someone to manage a signature campaign for gebbit.com would you be interested Mitchell? If not I'm also willing to consider other members.

Also, it is worth noting I have a low trust rating because I got scammed not because I scammed anyone.
Link  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=986642.0

Was this the last auction or will there be one more? If there's another when is it, will it be the last and how many BTC will be sold?

Also I sent you an extra dollar as a tip. I sent .01BTC but only asked for two banners to be made so there was nothing shady going on here in case you are wondering.

I'm sorry about the wait superstar. I'm glad it finally confirmed though.

If this actually happened it would not be Lloyds but probably the bank teller who stole it.