Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
BCRz5k4XnkpZAFZZ7C7v7WTaFh3PnaNmYo
|
|
|
I like them too. They seem to have a great future. I am collecting them and if I decide to sell, I will look you up.
|
|
|
.025 USD for one feathercoin? So that giveaway thread for them is basically giving out 12.5 cents worth??
|
|
|
Bitstamp charges $1USD for each 225XRP.
If you want to get rid of your XRP from the giveaway and receive Bitcoin, at the current price of $98/coin you should not give out more than 22,000 XRP to get 1 BTC. Here's a handy chart:
50,000 XRP for 2.27 BTC 40,000 XRP for 1.82 BTC 30,000 XRP for 1.36 BTC 22,000 XRP for 1.00 BTC 20,000 XRP for 0.91 BTC 10,000 XRP for 0.45 BTC
You logic is totally flawed. So Bitstamp is selling it for an inflated price and you are saying everyone else should sell for the same inflated price? Bitstamp's price is WAY above the current market value. Only noobs with more money from sense buy a lot from them.
|
|
|
isn't 50 litecoin worth about $180? 25K XRP is worth about $75 at current market value. those are rough estimates but not so far off. Of course any trade between consenting adults is fine but you may have some difficulty finding some takers with this one.
|
|
|
rpiX6uDBTTr7b9xaFocCt4LNfRQczdnM6x
|
|
|
Yes I agree that it is frustrating but I can see why they do it. I think I'm finally out of newbieville and looking forward to joining the rest of the forums.
|
|
|
Yes all these new customers and interest should help BTC in the long run for sure.
|
|
|
I mean, if you have random rigs laying around. Why not put a farm somewhere where you don't pay power (dorm room perhaps)
Or like, leave a netbook running at work, or your work PC on.
I mean hey, if I was still an undergrad working in my college's PC lab, I would have miners set up on every single machine.
well I'm a grad stud, and due to the fact that I'm writing the thesis I'm not using my CPU at all and I was thinking to make good use of my machine in my drastically underpaid job to make some spare change to buy amenities XD I have an i5 750 on my university machine... But it isn't turning so well, if my home computer mines 6 times faster with an underclocked ATI 4850... (and maybe I'm in any case mining in loss since electricity in Italy is damn expensive) In any case the main objective is still trying understanding a bit more about hashing, parallel and GPU computing, and maybe even economics, in the spare time away from my thesis, by watching on the other side of the fence what can be achieved with a thorough community.
|
|
|
I CPU mined the whole weekend in mining.bitcoin.cz pool with cgminer using a quad i5 desktop core, and got just .01 BTC
My rate 9 MHash/s on average (pretty bad uh?!)
Am I doing something wrong, there is some way to use the processing power of CPU more effectivly (maybe with pools that make use of the higher instruction x86 architecture have) or is just pointless mining?
|
|
|
Well I can always change cards... In any case at home I have a 4850 that get 75 Mh/s undervolted.
Just being able to configure correctly understanding what to do and so on will gave me insight on graphic card setting in RH6, and GPU-driven calculations in general. In any case I will soon make some consideration about this economic experiment of mine... e.g. the concept behind this mining difficulties, and so on... (what is the general aim of a currency that let only the most powerful computer mining for coins instead e.g. putting a floor to the computational power connected to an IP and such?)
|
|
|
pardon for the wrong quote! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I get an awful 8Mh/s on my work PC with an i5 core... ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
trying to install the necessary cuda libs... maybe I can get over the problems with cgminer too! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you for your suggestion Donshrents
|
|
|
We had serious issues using iMac for heavy duty simulations. I too wouldn't recommend using a such an high-value/low capabilities platform over the duty it is designed to take.
|
|
|
no coins, intrigued, hoping to be an explorative miner soon ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) @Brian Puccio: 24GHash/s is an incredible amount, isn't it?
|
|
|
Hi everyone, I followed the bitcoin project for a little bit, intrigued by its implication and P2P economic vision, and now wanted to start mining (not for making real profit, mostly for learning purposes).
My PC at the University, that I want to use mostly, is an i5 with 8800 GTS with mounted CentOS 6.2 I tampered with it for more than the whole morning not being able to running GPU mining with cgminer.
Of cgminer There is the repo version 1.6.2 that is compiled without GPU predisposition, and is working just fine. I download the tarball installer of the latest 2.7.5 version, but while configuring the compilation it exit with the following error:
OpenCL...............: NOT FOUND. GPU mining support DISABLED
I'm pretty sure that I've OpenCL installed (in /usr/lib64/nvidia/ there are some libcuda.so and some libOpenCL.so), I tried to hardlink with LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib64/nvidia but without results... any comments or suggestions?
Do anyone know if the is the intention of baking a repo version for RHEL6 with GPU support?
|
|
|
New to Bitcoin, started CPU mining, inscribed for issues with GPU mining... Started watching for it as distraction from writing PhD thesis as a maddog... ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|