I never thought this will be useful in future but now I realize I should have taken a note of it. Once I am able to sync the wallet, It seems better for me to move the funds and take note of the new block height.

Monero GUI is synchronizing faster [I removed feather] and it has the feature to set the block height.

@GazetaBitcoin, I was expecting a response from you in this discussion. I left you a feedback, mentioned you in a post however I am yet to PM you which I will do soon. In public, it is a good way to defend yourself when you are not afraid to admit the truth.

Do you deny the accusation of sending the above PM¹ to forum members?
You can chose to admit the truth or you can lie straight forward, those who received the PM from you will know you are a liar.

¹ Part of your PM. It censored so that you can not identify who shared the information and they become your target to harm their reputation.

PM sent.
/*edited*/

I am running the wallet for a few days. The balance is still zero [The required block height yet to be found], the wallet will find the block, I will see balance and then after the full sync I will be able to move the funds. 🤪

I will wait LOL

I am trying feather wallet, Monero GUI. Problem is with the synchronization. I had some Monero from a few years ago [I can not remember the specific year and month] and it's taking hours to synchronize. I needed something like Electrum for Bitcoin which is quick. Does Monero have such type of wallet or which wallet you recommend has at-least a faster syncing.
 

@DarkState, @Sim_card and @atookz you must had fun when working on the encrypted messages. I will read the messages later and will reward the merits. Right now I don't have access to my secure device.

Remove BTC > BTC, remove advertising aspect of improving privacy. The service will become a regular exchange service. It will not be that bad, if they want to advertise it in Bitcointalk.

Staked address verified successfully.

Report completed. The last part of the investigation is updated:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495227.msg64029632#msg64029632

bot, I will try to response you and others later when I think something needs to address.

Perhaps I will never response to this topic because I think I completed my job, it's the truth which needed to be shared. You will decide what you want to do with the truth, you are a free men, a part of the decentralized belief.

I need to log off now.

+1 for not allowing self moderated topic and not allowing to lock the thread.

Another good proposal but when a topic finished it's discussion material and a different discussion or similar discussion that needs to receive better attention then the locking of the old topic is usable to me without moving it to archive.

I locked the old thread so that the discussion do not spread in different area and it happens only here. The reason to create the new topic is to get more visibility and to learn about the information [confirmed information] directly before reading anything else that was written on the other thread which was slightly taken from confirmed information but most were from unconfirmed sources.

I think JackpotRacer is trolling JollyGood. JollyGood is the one who have such habit and his latest one was to make me look dirty which is the third link of the links posted on the OP.

Let's move the discussion to a new topic with the investigation I was conducting for the last a week. It needs the new topic to be visible for many and to find the original truth. Please read the topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5495227.0

I am locking the thread now.

The last few days [over a week], I read many discussions about mixers ban, related to Jambler, the role icopres was playing for Jambler. Anyone with a little sense can notice that when there were any "Jambler is a mixer" discussion were developing icopress was defending.

When defense was not enough he was attacking.

There is a Proverb: Attack is the best form of defense.
icopress was applying the technique.

When admin banned Jambler [it was because two campaign managers decided to report the conversation between me and HB] icopress decided to blame me, HB and a campaign manager [HB and me never reported anything to admin.]. Then for obvious reasons I responded and thought at least a neutral feedback warrants [by now I think everyone should know that my feedback for icopress explained better, he did not respect the forum admin's decision of banning mixers. By perfectly knowing this is a mixer he continued to manipulate the concept so that he can continue earning from the job].

Now icopress can see he has a neutral feedback and he needed it to be removed from the default trust feedback section. He decided to perform the secret dirty mission. Many members obviously follow him just to be in his campaigns [just like many did not check what Jambler actually is, they were trusting icopress's words].

But icopress has to be a great manager [at least he was showing greatness to a few of you]. When you will receive a direct PM from icopress, there is a chance that you will start thinking icopress is doing a dirty job, he is not great anymore. So icopress decided to use another account to do the dirty job for him and icopress himself can stay clean to you.

Who is this account we have now?  Here is the twist. It can be a spouse, friend, girlfriend/boyfriend, mum/dad, uncle/aunty, grand pap/mum, you name it, we have seen all of the stories in the past to cover undeclared alt accounts. But there are no concrete evidences.

Until now if you were thinking icopress [account] sent the PM, man you were wrong! The PM sent from GazetaBitcoin [account].

I suspect, the connection between icopress and GazetaBitcoin was perfectly and carefully hidden out. A positive feedback left from GazetaBitcoin for Stake Manager but after a few months a strange negative feedback icopress left for the same manager. icopress "~" some persons from his trust list, GazetaBitcoin [selectively] adds or keeps a good relationship with those people [the whole thing of one "~" and other adds happen in opposite order too, GazetaBitcoin first and icopress later]. Even GazetaBitcoin never let me feel that he disliked me, not even after suggesting all these members he asked to "~" me he did not do the "~" himself, where icopress was the first to start the "~" party. A thorough exploring to trust list regular exclusion/inclusion, remove from exclusion/inclusion will clearly show there are many opposite actions, steps were taken by icopress and GazetaBitcoin account to keep the accounts separate from each others. Openly and privately icopress account is transparent but secretly GazetaBitcoin account is doing the dirty job. On the other hand, openly they support each others arguments and in private GazetaBitcoin mostly forwards business offers [vouch for icopress]. A suggestion of a legendary account to another legendary works very well in business after all [it's not a bad thing but what motivation? There are no free meal].

I am not good at finding connections between accounts but there are many genius we have in the forum who are exclusively skilled to find connections between accounts. I hope some of these geniuses will find some concrete evidences. If the accounts are not connected then why GazetaBitcoin decided to do the dirty job for icopress?

Some information about GazetaBitcoin and my relationship.
I can not remember when GazetaBitcoin came close to me, but he came close to me [at least he pretended and used me successfully to achieve his dirty deeds in some forum dramas] tricky enough that I thought he still was. Not long ago he used me as his front speaker [used my forum influence] to destroy a forum member [he used many others too in this mission] because [I realized later] the member was rude to him, insulted him openly in an argument. He knew I was the best person to support him because I did not have good relation with that member. After achieving his dirty goal he wrote to me.

I have information that GazetaBitcoin keeps the secret good relationship with other members [using these members as his close fake circle, like I was used] in private and use the relationship to use against someone when he and icopress dislike and target a person.

If you are thinking GazetaBitcoin/icopress is your close forum friend, a well wisher then it's time for you to create the distance with him because you can be his next target.

You are reading and thinking I am influencing you to reset your trust setting? No, I am not, please don't. If I was sick for my trust page and feedback page then I would built my account that would look 100+ positive feedback and very strong DT strength at-least before this "~" party. I care for my trust page and default trust status but I never wanted to get it by using ass licking, secretly grouping and manipulating the feature. I care for an organic development.

With this investigation report I give you the truth. If you think this is the reality now for the forum and you are fine with this reality then I think it's not a good example we are setting for the future generation in the community. Many genuine members already left and there are many others who are preparing for the exit. After a few years the forum will be left with the ass lickers, fake DT members, fake highly trusted positive feedback [earned from manipulation and faking support to each others] owners. All these will be motivated by only one goal which is earning from advertising.

TL;DR;

After this openly false and dirty manipulative post a PM was sent [make your guess about the sender] to many members [The members were carefully selected who: have bad experience [don't like me because I am not afraid to talk on their face] with me, are directly or indirectly financially effected by the jambler ban, loyal and close to icopress because he always give additional benefits to these member in his campaigns] plant a believe that the admin determined to ban Jambler because I influenced him^[part-1]. If I have any contribution then [1.] I made a post which described Jamber's connections with their partners, [2.] Described clearly explaining the PHP code that they provide to their partners.

^[part-1]


"To only name a few..." very interesting [silently going to the brain to create a point that the sender wanted for the receivers]. Of course the PM does not have any mention for many members who clearly described Jambler as a mixer.


The PM was sent to achieve only one goal^[part-2] which is quite clear. "~BitcoinGirl.Club" so that the neutral feedback I left for icopress disappears from the default trust feedback section.
Who is the liar?

^[part-2]


After asking the opinion, the silent suggestion [in the last paragraph "My belief about ~BC.G [...] he already ~BC.G"]was given nicely. [Obviously the user knows this campaign manager and I had a massive face off in the past]

I hope those who were responding with: they did not see where it was asked to "~" me, "it means I [BitcoinGirl] was lying", you don't believe anything like that can happen; can now see how this dirty job was done, it all happened secretly.

I am still working with the last part of the report and will post it in the reserved sections soon.

If anyone think their messages are misinterpreting then they can share details and correct it. I censored the author names so that none of it become an issue for them openly. Many members have good reasons [attacked by group and becoming a target, losing DT position, losing spots in campaigns, misinterpreting their opinions] not to share the words openly but they felt comfortable to share in private. The following quotes are part of responses from many members which I received for the investigation I was conducting last a week.







Font edited to highlight.

Last a few days I was working to collected and verifying information. User @Who is John Galt?, @Parvati_j, @albert0bsd and @tech30338 when possible please decrypt the following encrypted message and confirm the contents.


Decrypted message

+1
The feedback page is the timeline for any forum member or a business. But when only the feedback is old enough. Some may abuse it that leave one now after a day leave another one. For short period of time, it's better to remove the old one and replace it with the new.

On Bitcointalk the community are very careful and smart about providing private information unless you can show yourself that you are trustworthy and genuine.

Please don't get it wrong, how would we know you are working for the company? It's difficult but a few ways can at-least help to get the idea that you are perhaps the right person. [1.] You provide an official email not a gmail account. Email with @propagatecontent.com [2.] if possible upload a .txt file on propagatecontent.com with contents something like the forum username and give the url.

I have not heard about the portal propagatecontent.com but I am sure if it is a reliable and famous platform then others heard about it.

Why would you use a fake ID, don't you think if you are caught then you will loss everything that have in the exchange, you may also be charged for faking identification. If you are honest and legal owner of the fund then I suggest you ID yourself to avoid losing the fund.

What is 9ja board? I am assuming Nigeria because if I am not incorrect then Agbe is from that local board, earlier I saw flumpnuggets becoming a staff.

I would like to know where exactly you kissed theymos? In the butt hole or somewhere in the opposite side 😂