Somebody who post in the thread Anita Sarkeesian - Feminist Frequency should consider not posting offtopic posts there, but post ontopic posts here. What do you think about these 2 personalities?

That's Jordan Owen and Davis M.J. Aurini. Are they fraud?
Sourced from the website



But instead of ranting that whomever x person might be a fraud it's good if you also explain the reasons. Nobody is going to take you seriously if you behave in such an immature way and the Bitcoin community will have a long way to go, until we can expand.(the message has come out, most people today know about Bitcoin, but will we just be an old conservative Bitcoin community or are we going to take on new challenges?)


That nobody posted here I see as a sign that the thread about Anita Sarkeesian got attacked by trolls and only trolls. Something towards the end of the thread points to something that looks more like an argument so the thread is going in the right direction.

This thread is about what you think about The Sarkeesian Effect. Are they fraud in your eyes? Is anybody who is getting involved with things that Sarkeesian has worked on being a "fraud"? Also it's good not to post nonsense on threads where you know consciously that you are posting offtopic. That's why this thread exists so you can actually post ontopic. I don't say rants belong here but I would say that telling your opinion what you think about these people and their project might be useful.

If you noticed, in my first post I mentioned somebody/something that donated Bitcoin to Jordan Owen 42, and I was surprised there's no reference on Bitcointalk about it. Anybody know anything?

αλάνι, you're just another person focusing on me. Please stop being ridiculous. Do you even play any games, and what games do you like? Any ones that are covered by Anita Sarkeesian even?

This is in "Project Development" for a reason. People:
Focus on the subject matter --> Feminist Frequency

Also games are a part of popular culture.

Obviously the point for you was that feminism is about women hating on men, not women posting irrefutable arguments on the internet about something incredibly important like sexism in video games. Haha, yeah!

This wiki is even better than Wikipedia http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Feminist_Frequency

I may consider talking to McIntosh about Bitcoin. I somehow feel he knows. That way he could redirect the donation to Anita
Why hasn't Anita answered my question whether she wants to learn about Bitcoin? https://twitter.com/PKBitcoin/status/532570946918711300
CoinMode your part of the Bitcoin community looks like a very anti-education part. Stop doing that. You can open a new 'we all hate Anita Sarkeesian' thread. This is not a thread where you can go rant blindly.

Yeah, that law about 2nd amendment passed in 1791. Good to have some background for us non-Americans...A law that has lived for more than 200 years of the right to carry guns and shooting weapons. I guess we Europeans are too "uncivilised" to have the right to carry guns as part of our basic freedoms.
Though TECSHARE I didn't know that the 2nd amendment say that you can threaten anybody you like. That's what happened to Anita. You claim somehow that the 2nd amendment gives somebody the right to threaten anybody they like anyhow they see fit, or you try to bring some message that all it had to do with was the 2nd amendment and nothing to do with threats. Maybe she didn't want to die for nothing. I think she should come to Europe more. She has come to Sweden multiple times. Also DICE is in Sweden, so yeah it has happened already.
More Anita in Sweden please! Don't lose your energy in USA, there people shoot first and ask questions later. 

You care by posting here, but what did you mean?
Donating to Anita Sarkeesian or Tim Schafer? (do you have anything else to add? hint: reasoning behind expressed feelings)

Tim Schafer is one of the people who think that Anita Sarkeesian's ideas are worth building upon.

If we just focus on him and what he knows about Bitcoin, since he has appeared on Humble Bundle which accepts Bitcoin and here's his tweet from May 10, 2013
https://twitter.com/TimOfLegend/status/332901644809420800
I wonder if anybody knows if Tim Schafer now knows more about how Bitcoin works? On the other hand donating to Tim Schafer in Bitcoin might be more probable as Anita Sarkeesian has mentioned no thing about Bitcoin(no time with all the harasment going on) while Tim Schafer has(as can be seen in the tweet).
He's clueless as how it works and seems to be willing to learn more, that's positive in my view  
Anybody up for the educational introduction?

You misunderstood. I'm asking your opinion on Anita Sarkeesian. Is that interpreted as asking for money

Alani123, is there anything you don't agree with here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian#Terrorist_threat_at_Utah_State_University

? Maybe you have some insight which you would like to share and improve the article in its factual accuracy? The talk page exists so that you can add your point of view + arguments. Maybe your part of the Bitcoin community is afraid of Wikipedia talk pages, generally
The most innocent of pages are talk pages, which is for discussions minus rantings(though you can rant, you are allowed to but it's not like your argument is gonna get any further with adding any rantings)

http://bitcoinwoman.com/index.php/articles/54-hot-news/219-dev-version
Bitcoin Woman

You can't really stop about focusing on people's person instead of content. An unhappy user of Wikipedia? Guess you wouldn't donate your Bitcoin to Wikipedia

To everybody else: You wanna contribute to Wikipedia? Take the hint that there's no "critisicm" section at the Anita Sarkeesian Wikipedia article. If you find any I'll be surprised.

Do you consider that some people are censoring any information from the Anita Sarkeesian Wikipedia article? Can you provide sources or will this thread just continue with rantings minus backing up claims?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anita_Sarkeesian

Check the question "Q1: Why is there no criticism of Sarkeesian or her work?"

You didn't watch her video so you couldn't see what I explained. Mostly likely is that you are afraid that you will agree to some of her points which then will make you feel embarassed.

"Being a gamer" and "criticizing games" are two different things.

It's like the politicians would ask you to be a politician if you were to criticize politics. Not required to do a critique.

Here Anita is showed holding a gamepad in her hands

She also holds some white game controllers in her hands. One in each hand, separately. What are those called? TECSHARE, no I don't think it's the instruments she used to warp your brains

source: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/22/utah-state-university-defends-handling-gamergate-anita-sarkeesian-threat

The information is about the old threats. The new one is a fucking school shooting and you have nothing to say.

Stop derailing this thread. You are completely offtopic. Make your own threads.

Ok, you won't donate to Sarkeesian, we got that point. Maybe you will donate to one of her opponents? Then start your own fucking thread but don't derail and go offtopic on other ones.

It is you who claim any division.

I'm merely asking if anybody is interested in donating to Anita Sarkeesian. She doesn't accept any Bitcoin. She has visited DICE offices. Do your own damn research: https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/251735220292820993
On another note, do you consider yourself a gamer and have you taken offense that Anita Sarkeesian has/(or is) considered/considering herself as a gamer?

Men and Women and whatever past, present and future subcultures of humanity which may not identify with neither, right?

Stop focusing on my person. It is getting predictable. Focus on my arguments please.

Because you are too angry to even be able to explain exactly why you feel this way?

Maybe you should watch some of Anita Sarkeesian's tropes vs women in video games.

You didn't link to anybody specific, you only told me what to search for. Maybe you should do your own research. This is what I found after searching for the first search term you suggested: Thunderf00t - Busted
Checkout video by L0G1C B0MB(Thunderf00t speaks from 12m4s and L0G1C B0MB replies at 12m17s) and it ends at 13m1s. It shows the strippers in Watch Dogs(2014) which thunderf00t claims are 'not being objectified' which is a show of plain ignorance.

Usually one finds too many videos by searching on youtube on whatever search term so better be specific rather than not. Also Anita Sarkeesian has subtitles for all her tropes vs women in video games so criticising her is not difficult, though nobody in the thread managed to do it(yet).

I think a bit of Trust no one(but yourself) will do some good. We also have Mycelium for Android. If I let Coinbase store my money then I treat it like a bank. Why not use Bitcoin's decentralised nature instead?