COOL:
But people would be more aware, no?
- remotemass
|
|
|
I have one question for you:
What will happen to the bitcoin price when everyone starts receiving empty bitcoin paper wallets with everything they get on the post?
You can always put a paper wallet in my mailbox. I will welcome it.
- remotemass
|
|
|
To teach us the importance of VRML to our future.
A bit random, but could not think of anything better...
|
|
|
wtf is this??
Well, I am the author of the video, but give all rights to share, reproduce, distribute, and will put the torrent magnet link and youtube link on this thread in the next hour or so. Feel free to share it, broadcast it, talk about it and make it viral. But please do respect me and my Work. - remotemass Please keep seeding it: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:bebeafddb63e475197881303867adb7e5b39cb59&dn=20211215_1234497235_Just%20Chatting.mp4&x.pe=94.46.167.5:42200&x.pe=10.76.0.6:42200&x.pe=192.168.1.3:42200&x.pe=192.168.56.1:42200
|
|
|
Hopefully, we will have GPS trackers (that can harvest energy from radiowaves: to perpetuate their autonomy) - smaller than a grain of sugar - inside our bodies, able to send signals to the internet. We already have them, and we can put them inside pretty much anything that can be stolen: like a piano, a TV, a tablet or a motor-bike. I want to live in a world where everything is being tracked to the clouds at all times, and where everyone's voice and biometric signals (including pupil dilation and Galvanic Skin Response) are being recorded and analyzed.
|
|
|
Thanks garlonicon, for pointing out that no one would agree with a fork for something that can be done without it.
One thing I think a lot is if it wouldn't be wise to have a hardwired burning address that was so supervised that even in a dystopian quantum computing breaking of bitcoin public-key cryptography, would make it utterly unlikely that an attacker would be able to spend coins of such a hardwired burning address.
By hardwired burning address, I mean an address that, by definition, the bitcoin protocol would never allow having its funds being spent, unless there was a further update to the protocol.
The first thing I propose in the mentioned post is that we unite to have such a hardwired, well-supervised, burning address.
|
|
|
https://gist.github.com/cubicpostcode/a6e7348a1506ae5c6b981ccd622b8057Your task is to create a document in English explaining the salient innovations discussed at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=790883.0You should make it a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) that has the likelihood of being accepted by the Bitcoin Core development community. You will be awarded if you show you did contribute to a good outcome in a crucial, promoting collaboration and sharing of your insights at all times, discussing and highlighting important matters in a critical way and if your final proposed BIP document (saved as a pdf and available on GitHub with a permanent link for sharing it) is well written, clear and shows academic proficiency in English and in the layout of your terse and concise essay. Good luck. I may tip the best collaborators, extra. Be open and collaborative. This is an important endeavor in of itself, independently of who wins. Feel free to say who do you think should be awarded the bounty. Discuss in the comments here, extensively with other peers and with the bitcoin core developers at the "Development & Technical Discussion" of Bitcointalk discussion forum. This is a technical discussion. Please be considerate of everyone's time.
|
|
|
Why not just sign a transaction funding an address I own from an address that I'll get rid of later and make that spendable after a certain block? That way, I'll keep my signed transaction and the private key of the funded address without having to worry about third-party failures.
Simply, gently, decentralized-ly.
Yeah, you are probably right. Anyway, just an idea...
|
|
|
You can use a conventional time-locking third-party as well. It is unlikely that both gmail and the third party time-locking service both fail.
|
|
|
And what happens if the email never arrives?
You blame Gmail, I guess...
|
|
|
Here is a simple way to time-lock your coins so that you can only spend them at a future date:
1) Create a new gmail account. 2) Create a paper wallet and load it with the coins that you want to time-lock. Use BIP38 and make sure you will be able to remember the password later, at the future date. 3) Change the gmail account password to a random password. Don't write down that random password anywhere except in the following step, 4). 4) Schedule an email to be sent a future date (it's a new gmail feature to be able to schedule emails to be sent at a future date). In that email attach the BIB38 paper wallet for which you know the password and the gmail account random password, that you will not keep or write down except in this specific place.
You will receive in the future date the paper wallet with BIP38 for which you know the password and also the password for the email account that you created for this so that you can use it again. Since you don't write down the gmail password: you will need to receive the scheduled email to be able to know the gmail password again of the gmail account you created for this time-locking.
What do you think? Any questions?
- remotemass
|
|
|
just curious, why post it here? there are a lot of better ways that you can show and possibly discuss your proposition to elon musk, yet you chose to post it here. also, I doubt he has an account here even with all his stunts he had done about bitcoin and other cryptocurrency.
Your logic of reasoning worries me. - remotemass
|
|
|
You can use BING if you want. All participations will be evaluate but we are required to complete the job.
|
|
|
I will buy it for the cheapest place that sells it with bitcoin.
-remotemass
|
|
|
Yes, it would need to go into some serious music production, indeed.
Cheers mates! Love your comments.
- remotemass
|
|
|
|