This is a launchdevmine coin.
No gui no instructions...not even a linux compile or nice ANN so he can mine from the beginning without us or the big public and get a lot and easy to mine coins.
Good luck.
And he's mining with a ton of hashes too. |
|
|
|
The POW queue is currently 77 deep this means it takes ~80 minutes from the time you solve a POW until the time you get scheduled to produce a block.
What does it look like when you 1) Solve a block 2) Produce a block |
|
|
|
"head_block_number": 3933,
"current_supply": "16818.000 STEEM",
21 STEEM produced every time a POW is included in a block
1 STEEM produced every time a block is created
The POW queue is currently 77 deep this means it takes ~80 minutes from the time you solve a POW until the time you get scheduled to produce a block.
Once scheduled, you get to produce 21 blocks over 21 minutes and you get to earn 21 STEEM each time you include someone else POW in a block you produce.
On average 1 POW is found every minute.
3933 blocks is nearly 3 days of mining at 1 minute blocks. |
|
|
|
|
Also for the wif format, is this dumpprivkey format ("L...") or bitcoin wif ("5...") ?
|
|
|
|
Current difficulty: 000001ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Most of what we are mining will be given away in the future, so what ever concerns there are about our early mining dominance will not matter in the long run.
Why not back off a little and let some miners find some blocks? I think you are getting them all. What is your hash rate? 3472172ms th_a witness.cpp:341 on_applied_block ] hash rate: 19417 hps |
|
|
|
Current difficulty: 000001ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Most of what we are mining will be given away in the future, so what ever concerns there are about our early mining dominance will not matter in the long run.
Why not back off a little and let some miners find some blocks? I think you are getting them all. |
|
|
|
user names should be all lower case.
What is the algo? ? ? ? I've been mining with 8 cores and have gotten nothing in 20 blocks. Either a bunch of others figured this out real fast or you are mining with asics. While any mining algorithm could be used, we would like to introduce a new algorithm that has several beneficial properties. The mining algorithm requires proof that the miner possess the private key for the account that will ultimately produce the block and receive the reward. The algorithm also requires the user to do an elliptic curve signature verification, the optimization of which will benefit the validation of all transactions and lower the cost of operating the network in the long run. The algorithm: Let HASH = a secure cryptographic hash function (SHA256 or better)
Let H = Head Block ID
Let H2 = HASH(H+NONCE)
Let PRI = Producer Private Key
Let PUB = Producer Public Key
Let S = SIGN(PRI, HASH( H ) )
Let K = RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY( H2, S )
Let POW = HASH( K ) To be valid the POW must be less than the target difficulty and RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY(H2,S) must equal PUB. The miner introduces randomness in either the selection of the NONCE or via the randomness required for elliptic curve signature generation. This, combined with the private key selection should ensure that no two miners are searching the same work space. By starting and ending the POW with a cryptographically secure hash function we can ensure that any vulnerabilities or computational shortcuts that may exist in the RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY algorithm or SIGN algorithm will ultimately cause the POW algorithm to revert back to a simple HASH-based POW. Great. But what is HASH() ? ? ? HASH() is SHA256, but the algorithm is dominated by RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY() and SIGN() for which there is no ASIC or GPU code that I am aware of. I would respond faster, but bitcointalk is rate limiting me to once every 6 minutes. Cool, thanks. Now, how many cores are you mining with? Because the diff is high. |
|
|
|
user names should be all lower case.
What is the algo? ? ? ? I've been mining with 8 cores and have gotten nothing in 20 blocks. Either a bunch of others figured this out real fast or you are mining with asics. While any mining algorithm could be used, we would like to introduce a new algorithm that has several beneficial properties. The mining algorithm requires proof that the miner possess the private key for the account that will ultimately produce the block and receive the reward. The algorithm also requires the user to do an elliptic curve signature verification, the optimization of which will benefit the validation of all transactions and lower the cost of operating the network in the long run. The algorithm: Let HASH = a secure cryptographic hash function (SHA256 or better)
Let H = Head Block ID
Let H2 = HASH(H+NONCE)
Let PRI = Producer Private Key
Let PUB = Producer Public Key
Let S = SIGN(PRI, HASH( H ) )
Let K = RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY( H2, S )
Let POW = HASH( K ) To be valid the POW must be less than the target difficulty and RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY(H2,S) must equal PUB. The miner introduces randomness in either the selection of the NONCE or via the randomness required for elliptic curve signature generation. This, combined with the private key selection should ensure that no two miners are searching the same work space. By starting and ending the POW with a cryptographically secure hash function we can ensure that any vulnerabilities or computational shortcuts that may exist in the RECOVER_PUBLIC_KEY algorithm or SIGN algorithm will ultimately cause the POW algorithm to revert back to a simple HASH-based POW. Great. But what is HASH() ? ? ? |
|
|
|
user names should be all lower case.
What is the algo? ? ? ? I've been mining with 8 cores and have gotten nothing in 20 blocks. Either a bunch of others figured this out real fast or you are mining with asics. |
|
|
|
And what error are you getting? It is a simple cmake system. git submodule update --init --recursive
cmake .
make
I built it. Can you make an example of how to start the miner. I'm getting json errors. Will any wif key do? # ./steemd --miner='["EclipseCrypto2016","WIFKEYNUNYA"]' --witness="EclipseCrypto2016" --seed-node="52.38.66.234:1984"
179291ms th_a main.cpp:158 main ] parsing options
179291ms th_a main.cpp:160 main ] initializing node
179291ms th_a main.cpp:162 main ] initializing plugins
179292ms th_a witness.cpp:92 plugin_initialize ] witness plugin: plugin_initialize() begin
179292ms th_a witness.cpp:132 plugin_initialize ] 4 parse_error_exception: Parse Error
Unexpected char '69' in "EclipseCrypto2016"
{"c":69,"s":"EclipseCrypto2016"}
th_a json.cpp:433 variant_from_stream
{"str":"EclipseCrypto2016"}
th_a json.cpp:478 from_string
179292ms th_a main.cpp:196 main ] Exiting with error:
4 parse_error_exception: Parse Error
Unexpected char '69' in "EclipseCrypto2016"
{"c":69,"s":"EclipseCrypto2016"}
th_a json.cpp:433 variant_from_stream
{"str":"EclipseCrypto2016"}
th_a json.cpp:478 from_string
rethrow
{}
th_a witness.cpp:132 plugin_initialize
|
|
|
|
Hello, we are looking for someone to begin working with us on a new logo, images, website, etc. to help establish the Eclipse brand so we can begin moving forward in other areas.The reward for this work will be paid in EC and will be negotiated based on the services provided. If you are interested, please reach out to us via PM or email at admin@eclipsecrypto.com. We will also offer a small finders fee for anyone who refers the person we choose to work with. If you've got suggestions on a top notch designer, let us know and you may receive some EC! Original EC thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.0
|
|
|
|
EC Bounty Offer:As noted previously, we are looking for someone to begin working with us on a new logo, images, website, etc. to help establish the Eclipse brand so we can begin moving forward in other areas.The reward for this work will be paid in EC and will be negotiated based on the services provided. If you are interested, please reach out to us via PM or email at admin@eclipsecrypto.com. We will also offer a small finders fee for anyone who refers the person we choose to work with. If you've got suggestions on a top notch designer, let us know and you may receive some EC! Like we've said before, we're not going anywhere. We'll try to be better about staying in communication, but please do not assume we'll have a daily "update". More to come. Don't lose faith so easily.
|
|
|
|
Things have been quiet, I'll offer a few suggestions that maybe the devs could offer bounties for?
1. New logo, branding, etc.
2. New website
3. IRC/Twitter/Slack tipbot
4. Signature campaign
5. Blog articles, etc.
In addition, more frequent communication w/ the community would go a long way. Just my 2 EC.
Great ideas! I'm looking forward to see where this is going. The logos that were posted by one of the other members was pretty nice looking. What happened with that? Ultimately we are looking for more than just a new logo. As was suggested above, we agree it's time for some updates and we'd like to work with someone who could design a logo, additional artwork, design the website, etc. rather than just a new logo. If anyone has any suggestions or has the skills personally, please send us a message. |
|
|
|
Any news??
Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich what are we watching for?   We are waiting a week or so while Eclipse gets traded on C-CEX to improve the distribution. Mostly because the coin didn't get a lot of attention at first, the distribution is not very good. Hopefully, being on an exchange a while will fix that. Miners should be in good profit right now. After we have been on C-CEX for a week, we'll start better communication. |
|
|
|
Any news??
Purposefully no. We are letting things mix up on c-cex. Right now is the time for the faithless to dump and the brave to buy. Keep an eye on the big address. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/#!rich |
|
|
|
Any news??
Hang tight gents. Rome wasn't built overnight. Enjoy the trading. Market is pretty thin. |
|
|
|
with roadmap released i see this heading much higher.
coin supply price cap
shadowcash 6,5million 19k sats $530,000
eclipse 2.1million 2500 sats $21k
with only 20k on sell side 100k sats lol
maybe.... if devs continue to support EC... We aren't going anywhere. You'll see.  |
|
|
|
Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll.
If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted.
LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Please let us know if you find any. I wont need too! you'll find them soon enough. We fixed the main one from SDC, which was the bug that completely deanoned the shadowcash chain. It was a good fix and SDC copied it, scrapping their own fix hours after we pointed out flaws in theirs. If we find more bugs, then we will fix them and, like our anon fix, SDC is welcome to copy them. |
|
|
|
Hello, we deleted several posts quoting a particular vicious troll.
If you were deleted it was not because of the content of your messages, but because of the specific troll you quoted.
LOL that wallet has more bugs than a bait store....Good Luck! Please let us know if you find any. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
