me too, login is broken using ie11.
site works with firefox.

anyone got an explanation for that crazy bot buying high, selling low 0,01 chunks ?

hy!
is there some info on how the candles are computed?

is it that just all trades during the timespan of the chart (1m, 3m ...) are accumulated to a candle?
so take all trades that happen during (x)m and put them in a candle (high,low,first,last)?

or is there some other rules?
thx

i wont give my data unless its a trusred third party, such as a notary.

you trying to place orders? python? try

payloadobject = {
         'request':'/v1/order/new',
         'nonce':str(long(time.time() * 100000)),         
         'symbol':'ltcusd',
         'amount':str(amount),
         'price':str(price),   
         'side':'sell',
         'type':'exchange limit',
         'exchange':'bitfinex'
         }

so here´s my bet

4466-100000; 0.1%
2818-4465; 0.4%
1778-2817; 2.0%
1413-1777; 2.0%
1122-1412; 3.0%
1000-1121; 2.5%
891-999; 3.5%
794-890; 5.5%
708-793; 8.0%
631-707; 14.0%
562-630; 18.0%
501-561; 17.0%
447-500; 9.0%
398-446; 6.0%
355-397; 4.0%
316-354; 2.0%
251-315; 2.0%
0-250; 1.0%

about the minimum order size in btcusd:

{"message":"Invalid order: minimum amount for margin order is 1"}

0.01 only applies to the webinterface? on the api its 0.1

hy,
tradable_balance is not decreased according to the amount of open orders.  as one is not allowed to place orders exceeding the tradable_balance, wouldnt it be logical to decrease tradable_balance according to amount in open margin orders? (analog to the balance on exchange beeing decreased because of open orders).

how it is, one has to compute how much of the margin is left for orders, when an order is open and cannot rely on tradable_balance, or do i miss something?.
thx

whats the difference to a ponzi scheme, if only the oldest incestors can liquidate??

this fund´s performance curve is essentially the bitcoin price. so they put up a fund that is doing nothing else than buying in and dont let the people out.. poor millionaires, thy should have invested in gox instead

DKmPNqsUSDokGHY87qef4gAGBHiTrQzHNK

two id's is hard. i think its just a measure to minimize the risk of forged id's. but if one forges one id, why not two..

the difficulty i suppose, is to find a balance between what the banksters impose on the exchange and what the customers are prepared to give, i dont believe the kyc terms of the platforms are made out of fun, there is surely some lawier in the background who is doing his research and who is also on a trial-and-error-trip, cause nobody knows, which kyc regulations are to be followed for a worldwide exchange! imagine you open a bank and from day one on youre doing business potentially in every country of the world, thats a legal nightmare..and above that you need fincen or what the fuck theyre called, registration and licence (which in europe cost a fortune).

i personally wont upload any id to any exchange NO MORE, since gox databases are out in the wild and supposedly there´s a version of the dump containing the id´s of verifyed people. furthermore i wont give away any personal info on my financial situation to a entity that could be hacked, UNTIL i get a certain degree of certainty that my info is securely stored. same applies to companies such as dropbox or other, imagine some super-rich-fuckup buying that companie and giving away the data stored there..

my 50c:

propose a free service (payed by the plattform) of a recognised lawyer or notary who is doing the kyc for you and who is the only entity storing the submitted infos in paper and who is acting on behalf of every verified customer (and with recognised,i mean european or U.S.). that would be a good thing ! the lawyer would only give the plattform a flag: veryfied or not customer. a lawyer is obliged to act in the interests of his clients (in most countries of the world..) and if authorities would ask for the kyc informations he would have to ask the client before that and so the client would have the chance to get involved in some legal-procedure where he could try to hinder the authorities to get the papers (not in the u.s. where you have those orders from secret-courts, against which nobody cant do shit..)

yeah, but arent kraken the ones in cooperation with bifidus-bank?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510850.0;topicseen

while we´re waiting for the plattform to reboot; and because there´s news that some guys try to sue the shit out of karpeles...
(not that i would be worried for karpeles because of that, compared to the methods of some silkroad-guys could apply..)


in europe we got so called "consumer protection legislation".
part of that is that a company cannot change its terms in relation to a consumer without notifying him 2 weeks at least before the change and giving him the opportunity to cancel the contract.

any company not doing so cannot put in effect the changed terms for the consumers.
so if, lets say, a bitcoin-platform installs withdrawal fees, it has to give the customers two weeks time to think about if they wanna cancel the contract or accept the change.

during that time consumers can withdraw theyr money without the new fees beeing applied.
if the company doesnt give the time to think it over, consumers are entitled to get the fee back.

such law suits are easy-going for lawiers. it´s so easy going, that even some countries´ governments installed so called customer-protection-clubs, which do nothing else but sue the shit out of companies not complying to the consumer  protection acts.

thats why consumers shouldn contract with offshore-companies, cause the consumer-protection-acts dont apply to them..

but wait, the european union, namely the european commission found a way to bypass that (they copied the us government):
they tell the off-shore company:
hey, if you dont comply with our rules, we dont let you make no more business in europe.

thats how they could fine us companies, such as microsoft, cause if they wouldnt pay the fine issued by the commission, bye bye bussiness in europe .

ah, while thinking about it, there is another jurisdiction to tell about:

basically it says: no matter where in the world you have your bussiness, it´s the laws of the country, from where you conduct your bussiness, that counts.

so, for example, if you are a french guy, living in france, and you are conducting a bussines in, lets say, uganda, but you are still living in france, doing alle the book-keeping and mail and decision making from france, hey guess what, french laws could apply; and there we are back againg: consumer protection acts.. 

so maybe it would be a good idea to comply with good-practices established in broad parts of the world, to avoid that people to try to have laws applied, what would be leading to our wonderfully unregulated bitcoin world beeing regulated until death..there the circle closes, law suits against gox all over

plattform is in crap mode right now as it seems - bitcoinwisdom not showing trades since 21:05 for btc/usd, api showing another btc/usd price than bitcoinwisdom and offer swap is broken

there is something wrong with bitcoinwisdom right now, also i got trouble to borrow, there is swappable balance shown, but the money does not show on the manage wallet page

hy,
nice writing!
could you explain what "immature coins" means?

full ack. "effectively insured" can only mean: no insurance, but never mind, it´s safe.

well i think it´s bitfinex trying to reposition itself. now that gox is away and the toal sum of lended $ approaches 17 Mio again, maybe they think: no more need for the geek-hangout-style site, now we are big bussines..
imho the market is going to crash hard soon and face a very long bottom-time until it goes up again, maybe more than a year, maybe the higher fees are there to accumulate some reserves.. or to cash out as long as it works..
anyway, my guess is, that they´re not gonna discuss tha changes

i wonder, are they actually reinvesting profit? and if yes, in which features? i got the impression service doesnt get better. do you remember the discussion when the guy left bitfinex and claimed that he´s not an employee but a share-holder? there were stories about investors that greatly helped to fund the site and this one chinese guy who provides the insurance and so on. could it be that those guys made such good deals, that nearly all the profit goes to them? btw, is the bitfinex forum open again to new users?

full ack +
please repair the website for android browser
+ websocket api
+route to stamp feature
+dogecoin
+no more timeout on the website session /no redirect to garbage-screen after re-login

thx for the clarification giancarlo, i better understand your explanations than the ones of your college, his way of writing doesnt seem to fit my synapsees well..

and when is the fee due? on making an order or on execution? (is oyvinds right with  his explanation?)