There is definitely some content ready.

For now, the ICNX index is ready and already published on the website + a Slovenian finance journal,
The perf.fund will be opened in Q4, and the platform should follow soon after.
It will probably take - at least - a few months to get the first results on the perf.fund, I'll give you that.
Same for the platform which doesn't only have to be operationnal, but attract new FIAT monies and fund managers too.

I agree with you that it won't skyrocket on day one, but I expect it in a matter of months, one year tops.

Merci. 
Medium stats on the last hour are exploding for this article BTW. 
I hope so, although I've pretty much given up, if they were to do something about it, I would have heard / status would have changed, by now..

I like your argument. 
I expect decentralization and transparency, as advertised.
I expect communication, which was pretty good when the fundraising was still on, but has gone AWOL since the closing.
Just take a look at here + the slack channel. **tumbleweed passing**
Last but not least, I expect contents, which were delivered a lot until now (except for the actual funds doc), so I'm pretty happy with that.

But let's be honest, out of this almost 300 pages thread, there are 50 pages of lambos, 50 of bounty whining - which I'm not so proud to now be a part of -, 50 of approximative-english p'n'd posts saying "to da moon", just checking in for the sig bounties, 100 pages of dumb questions which were, most of the times, answered in the very page, the previous pages or the blog posts.

This gives us what, 50 pages of actual content ?

Let's go to Reddit already, and upvote what actually matters. You'd be surprised about the upvoting on the recent change in the calculation of bounties. 
But, yeah, I forgot we can't go to reddit anymore because the AMA and a certain "weirdgod" messed up a bit there. 

Agreed, particularly on Skyrik's thread. I don't understand sh#t at Russian, but it seems like the guy made an awesome job. I'm genuinely happy for him he made some serious dough with it. He deserved it.
Agreed too, on the fact that no one would've expected to raise that much money, implying huge bounties. But my point isn't about actual values of the bounties. Rather on the "redistribution" which happened in a quite shady last-minute-complete-change-of-rules, at the very very very end of the timeframe used to calculate said bounties. Oh, and the fact that said rules apply to some people, but not to others...

I think they won't. This was organized. Otherwise, why working on another sheet instead of the Gdocs, and publishing new rules while copypasting the -prepared- results just before the closing of the bounty campaign ?
So much for transparency.

I'm losing a lot of trust here too.

I don't really give a sh#t about 2k ICN but it's more on the principle. The way this has been done feels like a prepared plan to redistribute bounties at the last minute in a more "convenient" way. Convenient for whom ? You tell me.
So much for decentralization.

It's a shame because although I like this project and its team, this single event is making me considering a drastic change of strategy. No HODLing anymore. I might just dump everything when satisfied with a bit of profit. If any. I read every now and then that we shouldn't invest based on emotions. Still, confidence is crucial in crypto. This stinks. Better safe than sorry.

Edit  :  motherloving french autocorrect

Must be someone's brother or something...

She's done !!

there are :

131 * 10 stakes
52 * 30 stakes
23 * 60 stakes

TOTAL 4250 stakes

Blog bounty for 10 stakes (per article) : 705.882353 ICN
Blog bounty for 30 stakes (per article) : 2117.64706 ICN
Blog bounty for 60 stakes (per article) : 4235.29412 ICN

All of this to say that I've been stripped of about 2117 ICN (a bit less, since each stake would have been worth slightly less in that case)
I'll think about that when each ICN is worth $1.... 

24 people monitoring Sladana copy pasting 

Fair point, I guess if anyone knew how the rules would change, he could have earned a lot of ICN without even investing a single sat'. 
Of course no one knew the rules would change, that would take insider info and that doesn't exist in the real -unregulated- world of crypto...

Right now, it's a bit like :
- Fuck your rules, I make my own!
- Yeah, but it's your rules that state that [...]
- Then, fuck MY rules, I make my NEW own...

There you go bruv

https://medium.com/@vincent.rvt/quest-ce-qu-iconomi-et-pourquoi-investir-2dc1147cc5fc#.f9iyuzrx6

Agreed.

Though I agree that all blog posts definitely aren't equal in quality, I'm a bit surprised by this decision to change the calculation rules of a month-long bounty campaign during the last two hours...

On top of that, looking at the google sheets for accepted blog posts, I was wondering if they would be able to review all the blog posts by the deadline they set (today, 6 PM).
And 2 hours before closing, they now add an extra layer of reviewing ?

Wow, let's wait and see.

EDIT : I just saw that my second article (French one) was refused RIGHT NOW, after being accepted for almost two weeks.
It's definitely original content, not an ANN translation, more than 1000 characters, with two links to the ICO.

I didn't think I would turn into one of those bounty-hunting whiners, but here I am, and this is unfair. I guess I won't get any explanation now, and considering the closing approaching in less than 2 hours, team is apparently just botching their way out of the task now.

Way to go ICONOMI, stay classy.

Nope. Just read the post.
ID is required if you invested in FIAT, and if you invested more than 1000 EUR or 1000 USD.
Any FIAT investment below that threshold or in crypto, whatever the amount, isn't subject to ID providing.

If everyone could just HODL until the platform goes live and the first dividends start to add up,
we would all be rich people in a matter of months.

Oh damn, daydreaming again ... 

Iconomi team has nothing to do with that.
You should probably contact myetherwallet directly and ask them if they're prepared to add it.

They're probably dealing with thousands of emails right now, on top of having to deal with the BCT, slack, twitter, reddit and telegram threads.
It must be a bit tricky to prioritize, particularly when you have to sort out the actual investors experiencing actual problems, and the bounty hunters, spammers, pseudo propositions of collaboration and "to the moon" BS.

I guess you'll have to be patient if you want to receive your very own official reply.

No, and there won't be until the tokens are released.
That is, Oct. 11th at best.

Hey everyone,

Since the new KYC+2FA update on the ICO website, I got myself new fiscal questions here :

I made two investments in the ICO, one is EUR, one is ETH.
I was above the FIAT threshold for the EUR deposit (still banging my head against the wall for that), therefore had to fill in the KYC form, which means ICONOMI now has my personal details.

What happens if they get investigated by the IRS (ofc, a "kind-of IRS", I mean any EU fiscal gov entity) ?
I know we're in uncharted territory here, but I see two problems :

First, the ETH-EUR split. Would the team have to declare the EUR deposits only, or both FIAT and crypto deposits, for the accounts which were credited with both ?

Second, considering one can just send the tokens to an ethereum wallet and from there, doing pretty much anything "off the grid" (sending to another address, to an exchange, etc), what's the point of collecting these personal details if they become useless as soon as the tokens leave the website ? I guess it's for regulation / compliance purposes, but, am I missing something here ?? Could those details still be of any use ?

Anyone is / has been in the same situation ? Any tips from the community ?

Thanks.