And the OP claims that he didn't try to sell his account. Had you left a reference on his trust rating. you could have avoided this whole thread.

Tottenham was easy money. Come on Chelsea!!

I do not know who's right here or who's wrong but I feel OP!

Lauda, You didn't give me a red trust for spam, which I'm glad,  but you did made an unnecessary comment here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1738828.msg17395877#msg17395877. When asked to explain, you said that you don't have time to analyze each and every post.

I do believe when you are spoiling someone's reputation on this forum by giving them a red trust, you should find time to analyze their posts or use all the tools at your disposition to find out if the account is breaking rules. Not merely by looking at their recent activity and connecting everything to signature spam. You could be right, you could be wrong. All I'm saying is give enough thought before you spoil someone's reputation.

Even on this thread, you say that you don't have to explain why you gave a red trust just because of your rank. I'd call the abuse of power mate. Remember, you are in a responsible position.

Disclaimer - I have no relation with the OP, This is just a personal opinion.

HT : Leicester 0 v 1 Chelsea
FT : Leicester 0 v 2 Chelsea

United - Liverpool could very well end as a 0-0. With Mourinho, 0-0 is never out of equation.

Too risky. I wish you good luck

Back Tottenham and Chelsea to win today. Tottenham must be very confident after they beat Chelsea. So, I expect a win streak from them. Chelsea showed their hunger to win in the FA cup after losing badly to Tottenham and Leicester is in a pretty bad shape. So, I expect Chelsea to win. good luck.

Also, check this thread that I've created - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1751989.0

I have an interesting idea for a fantasy league betting game -

The rules are -
1. At the beginning of each game week, I will create a list of games for that week.
2. You can enter a game by selecting 3 players(could be striker, midfielder, defender, gk, doesn't matter) for that game and bet 0.01 BTC.
3. The prize pool for that game is calculated from the number of entries to that game.
4. At the end of the game, a score for each entry is calculated based on player scores from fantasypremierleague.com
5. 3 winners with maximum score are selected at the end of the game and 1st prize would be 50% of the pool, 2nd prize would be 30%, 3rd prize would be 20%
6. You can enter a game multiple times if you wish to by choosing different players in each entry.

Until I build a website around this, we could use escrow services from this group to conduct this game.

But, before that I'd like to know if anyone would really be interested in playing a game like this.

I only used dice game as a metaphor. It's not exactly a dice game.

I think users would trust a third party bet verification than having verification in the site itself. no ?

Some great feedback here. Will take all of this into consideration.

Seriously ? you call these tips ? bets with odds 1.09, 1.16 ? Even if you lose 1 in 10, you fall back to 0.

I'm building an exciting dice game and I'd like to know what are the features that users would prefer to have to choose a particular dice game over another.

Thanks. received it.

Stunna, are you there ? I've been trying to reach you since yesterday about my refund with no luck.

small and smooth trade. Thanks.

transferred.

ok. PM me your skrill email.

I can try a small amount of 0.005 BTC for our first transaction if your previous price still holds.

Stunna has promised to refund my losses and fix the issues on their website. Marking this as resolved and will lock this thread in a couple of hours. A lot of people have contributed to this thread. Thanks.