 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
My forecasts so far have been impeccable:  This is the results of my latest forecast, I have actually underestimated the price. And this is the extended old prediction, vs the new data that has happened since then:  It's a 7.404% error, for a multi datapoint dynamic forecast, that is very impressive!Now the interesting thing is that the forecast predicts the price to rise at about 1485723600 unix time, which is Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:00:00 GMTThis means that there are only 1.5 hours left until the price rise. And with the new data, that I have added to the model, it also confirms this:  So there is an incoming price increase in about 1.5 hours according to my prediction. It may or may not happen, in which case I have to redesign the model, but so far the model has been accurate. And also this is not an auto-fulfilling prophecy, if you know this or not, the event is supposed to happen according to this model. We shall see! Im guessing this did not come to fruition? Not sure. |
|
|
|
So no pool for direct mining to exchange address without large fees.
Dwarfpool is 0.024 to exchange, and 0.012 to Personal address. I set mine for 5XMR and auto transfer with fees of 0.024 XMR. That comes to some 6 cents for each withdrawal. |
|
|
|
I dont think pascal is even profitable to mine now right? I checked what to mine calculator and it doesnt look like it is. But the nanopool 6H calculator shows something else.
The price is not profitable any more, unless the price is over 0.001 BTC, miners were crowed in pascal mining. We need to clam down becuase the price is crashed, the game is over. Thanks. Thats what I thought so as well. But not sure why miners still mining when other coins are more profitable to mine. Meh! |
|
|
|
|
I dont think pascal is even profitable to mine now right? I checked what to mine calculator and it doesnt look like it is. But the nanopool 6H calculator shows something else.
|
|
|
|
My rig speed is on HALF with NANOPOOL MINER!!! my cards model are R9-390 and R9-290x, the R9-390 for example on the solo mining was getting 600MH/s+ but with NANOPOOL MINER only 340MH/s
pleaseee could anyone help?
The variance is too high. So wait a while until it(pool) stabilises. I mined for one hour and noticed that it was just throwing numbers between extremely low and unrealistically high. If you want to take chance then wait for 6 hour rates. But by that time you would be loosing money mining on Pasc vs others. |
|
|
|
keep on getting these messages (look below" on my single gpu rig.
keeps disconnecting & reconnecting too.
all other rigs are ok.
small improvements at nano now but just the message below is annoying & sometimes it shows at poolside & sometimes it's not there.
"Error Deleting a Pending response message id:2 method:miner-authorize"
"Error Deleting a Pending response message id:4 method:miner-authorize"
I am getting the same error as well |
|
|
|
|
Late to the party yet again. Sigh sigh sigh. Actually I have never been right on time to any party. Except for scam coins.
|
|
|
|
Ok I will order 6 sapphire rx480 nitro 8giga cards. They are better for tweaking yes? Good cooling... With these I safely get 740 hash and sub 800 w in total yes?
Yes. They are good cards, with the best (lenient) mosfets and good cooling. They didnt go cheap like Gigabyte or Powercolor. But remember you may still need to tweak you bios / strap timings to run it efficiently. |
|
|
|
|
Tried with 3 Rx480's. 2 days back. Found 0, quit after 8 hours. Wasting time. No difficulty is through the roof like the price. Sigh, always late to the party.
|
|
|
|
those are the different power levels for the gpu. so the lowest is for 2D mode when you're no utilizing the GPU, the higher ones are for more demanding application calls.
What power usage per card do u have at 740 hash? I am at around 360W with 3 cards (RX480) and sys power. 410W Including CPU Mining (i7 4790K). |
|
|
|
If not mistaken (and I maybe way off base here), but a 470 is just a 480 with some of the CU's disabled. Try rI of 504 for the 480's. 760h/s is about as good as it gets, atleast publicly announced numbers are that. Someone here posted 835 h/s: http://monerobechmarks.byethost5.com/index.phpThat's ~10% more than RX 470, so sounds about right. Hard to buy that man, and that too with claymore AND with 90W. Meh, happy with what I have now. |
|
|
|
Guys, any ideas why I get the following message? cannot find block data:
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"},"result":null}
cannot convert blob data I returned everything back to stock settings and it stopped. Dunno Whats going on. maybe because overclock and big raw intesity sometime same card even with same memory not have same quality, so you can give them same setting. for example i have 2 powercolor RD RX 480 8 GB, 1 card suitable with 2180 Memory Setting and 512 raw intesity, the other just 2130 Memory Setting and 508 raw intesity. And could / may also be pool dependant. I get low difficulty share when I have overclocked or undervolted too much. |
|
|
|
On some algos, thoses 2 cards are actually pretty close, it's the case for XMR, your numbers seems about right.
Well, they might be close, but I still don't think it's quite right. I mean, I've just set identical clocks for both cards (1185/1750) and they hash at exactly the same speed. RX 480 is a tiny bit slower actually, since its memory is at 1375 timings and not at 1250 timings like the RX 470 memory. The thing is, I'm using identical settings for both of them, which is probably wrong? RX 470 runs with rI 512, gpu-threads 2 and worksize 4 - the standard settings that seems like everyone is using for rx 470. I tried different settings for RX 480, but everything I tried was slower than these same settings that I've got for RX 470. Tried increasing and lowering raw intensity from 512, but it always results in slower hashrate. What do people use for RX 480? Which intensity, threads, worksize? If not mistaken (and I maybe way off base here), but a 470 is just a 480 with some of the CU's disabled. Try rI of 504 for the 480's. 760h/s is about as good as it gets, atleast publicly announced numbers are that. I dont know if anyone crossed that mark. I am using 1500 timings and running my 480 at 2000 mhz. And wolf's miner at 504, 2, 4. With a 100W or some such off the wall (1167 / 2000). |
|
|
|
Account in Singapore in the process of opening. It's a process that requires a lot of time and coordination. Today the working account is an account in the Czech bank, that was opened in Europe due to the fact that it provides us with an opportunity to work officially with digital money (tokens), since the Czech Republic, one of the few countries where this is legally permitted.
What do you mean? The company is claimed to be registered in March 21st of 2016, and you didnt have time to get an account? And why have you forwarded only details of the Singapore company? What about the company details in Guinea? So you are all a bunch of czech guys, who registered a company in Singapore to dig for gold in Guinea? |
|
|
|
Please provide us with a video walk through of yourself introducing your company ehst you stand for and why we should invest. Also walk us through your bitcoin farm so we can see it ourselves. I will invest of you can do all these things which sre all very reasonable for any investor.
Dude, they shut shop and vanished with all the investments. A lil late to the party, luckily =) |
|
|
|
Why the change of mind,I thought you treat it a scam site now and you are ready to give everybody a red tag those who are involve here..
Maybe you don't have the nerve to give the campaign manager and all those who participates
Can you show me how to. I will start with you. Cant understand your english, could you elaborate your point on the latter or what you are implying, that is, if you are making one. If you are just trying, try harder, you will make it one day Im sure! |
|
|
|
|
Hi Dev,
Very exciting project. I am exited much very.
BTW can you please provide the below information for verification :-
EntrePass application / Details as such
Any other applications submitted to the Govt of Singapore which shows their seal / signature. Ideally you should have around 4 - 6 such documents (Bank, Accounting, HR / EPF(If applicable) etc. The one document that you have shared is not a valid Singaporean doc.
Thanks! Hoping to invest millions in you and make a billion!
|
|
|
|
i earned every day guys by investing in bitconnect, than mocking other user why you all dont try the investment program btw
You invested in the interest program IMO, don't you think that high interest program is an obvious ponzi scams? Get your principal back asap, or you will cry. Exactly! I am still a part of it as they dont let you withdraw in the first 299 days. Fingers crossed hoping to get past those 299 days to get my capital back. So far its been ok, 50% back, waiting on the other 50% + initial capital. Not sure if I will get it back, but hoping for the best. |
|
|
|
I think you can start with edwardad the signature manager and all the signature participants can you please read the rules of the signature campaign it says "you need to post one or twice on official thread" ..
this is why i did not join campaign before but any dev will ask .
I think you are the one without a comon sense signature campaigner are like that..
Lol. A loser like you, believing scamsters telling me I dont have common sense. Funny. yes you can start now here is the signature campaign link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1692930.0give them all red tag for shilling and wearing signatures of Bitconnectcoin and check for the other coins that dies too like Lithium,vitalair rbies,coexist chesscoin you have the whole week to do that .. You seems to be in a wrong forum asking those signature campaigner to give red tag for a site that went scam you can also ask Theymos to grant you to be the police here .. Wow. Much shock. Such defence. Wow. Thanks though. |
|
|
|
Yeah, those noobs defended for this obvious scam, I feel angry to those signature shills, maybe OP only scammed less than 100 BTC, but claimed 1500 BTC. But 100 BTC is still serious lots of money
fortunecrypto and aoic both gave me " red trust" for pointing out that they were shilling for an obvious scam.... wonder if they will have the balls to admit that they were wrong...... So can we give them Negative / Red Trust score for the obvious, blatant disregard for common sense, and trying to push others off a cliff for their own self profit. Is that allowed, I am not sure. I think you can start with edwardad the signature manager and all the signature participants can you please read the rules of the signature campaign it says "you need to post one or twice on official thread" .. this is why i did not join campaign before but any dev will ask . I think you are the one without a comon sense signature campaigner are like that.. Lol. A loser like you, believing scamsters telling me I dont have common sense. Funny. |
|
|
|
|
