Do you really think that this Nazi can help, France and its citizens? We very often make mistakes, choosing the wrong candidates.
Why is that anyone who wishes control immigration and shut down the open borders is always tagged as a Nazi? Perhaps you can enlighten me to which of her policies equate her to be being a Nazi, any Jew gassing or invading neighbouring countries in her manifesto? In the current era of rabid political correctness, anyone who doesn't believe in the ultra-leftist ideology is portrayed as a neo-Nazi. Take the example of the Swedish Democrats. Their policies are center-left. And still, the media demonizes them as Nazis. Hitler also started with spoken words that people liked him. What it led to we know. Now any rhetoric that somehow blames the people along ethnic lines is perceived as fascism. Marie Le pen largely blames Muslims and offers to solve the problem of deportation. Isn't that fascism? |
|
|
|
|
As Trump speaks, it appears someone briefly threw a bunch of Russian flags up in air in front of the pool camera.pic.twitter.com/1dt8VMtRlWAs It seems that not all were convinced by the PR campaign Trump.
|
|
|
|
It's hard to believe how he treats being the president. He doesn't take it serious or put in the time or effort that should be put into it. He wants everything to be handed to him and now he is upset that it hasn't been. Upsetting...
Trump thought the President is like the Queen in chess is the main figure and goes as he pleases. In fact, he was a pawn. It goes only to those corridors where it is allowed. He is not much like it. |
|
|
|
Most on the economic left start from the assumption that it is all things being equal a bad thing that the state takes our money from us, but hold that this prima facie bad is justified by the public goods which taxation makes possible. Well-meaning [UK] public intellectual Alain de Botton encourages us to think of taxation as charity: we give up what’s ours for the greater good of our society.
You can get the same results by itemizing the things you want done, letting people donate for them, and then giving the benefits to those who donated. This is what a cooperative does. Cooperatives are voluntary, act like governments, are worker/member supported, are beneficial to all members, and itemize where the money is being spent so that people get what they pay for, but don't get what they do not pay for. A properly formed cooperative would be the absolute best form of government... no taxes... only purchases. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative for more info.  For example, I heard such idea. That you cannot give alms to the poor. We do not know for what God is punishing this man. Such actions we get involved in divine punishment. Moreover what happens if the money that you will give him he will drink alcohol and kill someone? |
|
|
|
The reason AI can be better than human is that it is a master of one thing, so to speak. A human is better because it can do multitudes of things, but none of them as well as the AI. It's kinda like comparing an ASIC computer with a standard super-computer. The ASIC can do approximately one thing very, very, fast. The super-computer can do many things, but not as fast on any of them. There are exceptions. For example, I heard that the most powerful computer can't win a chess person. Perhaps there is still some feature of human thinking. |
|
|
|
If so, why?
Of course, I don't hate muslim people. Besides not all of them are bad people, But the only thing which I don't like is their religion belief. Because when it comes to that matters for the sake of their belief almost all of them are willing to kill other for the protection of their religion. And that is not a reason for hatred? You live and don't know when they will strike. It would be like to leave the jeep and walk on foot through the Savannah. For any shrub you could be attacked and can not attack. Roulette. |
|
|
|
|
It's just a theory. Firstly there is no evidence for this, and secondly if you think so then you need to close within the country and do nothing. Just sit silently to wait for Kim, will create a rocket capable of reaching the United States. I agree this is not an option.
|
|
|
|
Trump is way better than Obama. The President is one man. He is surrounded by people who advise him, some being on his side and some being against him. We have already seen people more or less betray Trump. The actions of Obama have set up all kinds of problems for America that won't be able to be straightened out for years. If there is war, it is not Trump's doing. Trump has simply been "stuck" in the position of taking care of a war that Obama set up to happen. If there is economic crash, Trump simply didn't have time to stop it when he was stuck in the driver's seat. Many former presidents used the office of President for personal gain, and for gain for their cronies. Cleaning up the mess, and turning America around to be for the people, won't be easy. Here's what I mean via an example. The IRS income tax is illegal for several reasons. The IRS is simply a private company, the Internal Revenue Service, even though it is written up in what looks like law. The tactics it uses is to threaten people and companies, taking them to court using tricks of law that people don't understand, is the only reason why the IRS wins in court. Now, imagine that Trump decided to show people how to beat the IRS every time. What would happen to the economy if he did this? Probably 90% of the people would stop paying income tax, right? In the long run this would be a great thing for the country. In the short run it would probably be economic chaos. Why? The legal and lawful places where Government can get tax money are export/import between the States, and between the USA and other nations. If there wasn't any income tax, Government would have to get its money from export/import tariffs. This would change the whole structure of international business. Suddenly, like over night, companies that moved out of the country would have to come back, or they just might lose everything because of extremely different taxes on export/imports. The economic crash that followed the, above, two changes - big drop in IRS tax, and big increase in export/import tax - might be devastating. Yet, those two changes would make all kinds of things in America to be more legal and lawful. So, how would Trump pull it off if he decided to do it? It would be a difficult thing to do and yet keep the economy from being harmed, and keep people and business from being harmed. Yet, it would be the right thing to do because it would take away a whole bunch of illegality and unlawfulness out of America. In the long run, this simple thing would make America the strongest nation in the world, with all other nations formally bowing to her, and liking it that way. It would, also, take away the desire of a large percent of so-called American patriots to want to fight their Government. Change is not easy. Cleaning up the mess of Obama and many Presidents before him will not be easy. It will look like Trump is doing all kinds of bad things for a while. But that's the only way he can make changes for the better in the mess we are in. You have listed only promises Trump. Action and never will be. I refer to Trump as the host of the show "I am President". In addition to public relations and narcissism I see nothing else. If it is not confirmed that he is an agent of the Kremlin. Never before in America was not Secretary of state-a friend of Putin. |
|
|
|
Organs donated and the rest burned?
This option can be even much better. After death, you can give your healthy organs to the sick people who need it, and burn the rest. And the remnants of the cremated body and make them cubic Zirconia. I heard that there is such a technology. It seems to me very convenient. No need for cemeteries. All generations can be stored in one vase. Wow, that's wonderful! Different people different thoughts and ideology.  Why do you think this is disrespectful? In India always burned the corpses, and the ashes poured into the Ganges. No it is not considered disrespectful. The human body in the decay poisons the land and the graves makes no sense. The memory of the man lives in the minds and not in the monuments. |
|
|
|
Nor is it said that uranium is sold because the developed countries need it, not for war but to guard the sovereignty of their country and to protect any future threats, pakistan is only a small country that gives a lot of money to build its country, I think that factor is Making Pakistan sell its uranium to various countries. Not on a group
I don't think that Pakistan has officially sold Uranium to any of the world nations. There is a risk of them providing highly enriched Uranium to Saudi Arabia, in exchange for monetary benefits. This can trigger a retaliation from Iran. I doubt that Iran is able to strike at Saudi Arabia. Nuclear technology Iran is still very thorough. Besides, Saudi Arabia is a strategic U.S. ally in the middle East. Iran fought Iraq for 10 years. USA fought with Iraq for 20 days. |
|
|
|
NATO can help the people of the country to eliminate authoritarian regimes. This is because democratic elections in these countries cannot be undertaken. It is the responsibility of people what country they will build in their country. Where the state has influence in Russia there is devastation, and where the West there is prosperity. If NATO is so much bothered about democracy, then it should first overthrow the monarchies in the GCC region, especially in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. The biggest oppressor of human rights in the world right now is Saudi Arabia, which happens to be a staunch ally of the NATO. I think so too, but agree it is not a reason to kill all Muslims. Among all people there are exceptions. Are you ready to take responsibility for the death of a Muslim which is really a good person? |
|
|
|
And I guess not all muslim are bad. But majority of the muslim that I encountered was having not a good attitude, so I don't wan't to stay close to them.
There are two types of Muslims. The first type consist of individuals who openly display hatred against the infidels. The second category consists of people who hate the infidels, but don't show their animosity openly. I think so too, but agree it is not a reason to kill all Muslims. Among all people there are exceptions. Are you ready to take responsibility for the death of a Muslim which is really a good person? |
|
|
|
|
At least five of the strikes came at dawn into the ammunition depot, which is located near the airport of Damascus and used the Iranian contingent. The explosions caused fires in a closed military area that is used by Tehran to supply weapons to militants operating on the side of the Syrian government army. It is unknown whether it was a missile or air strike.
|
|
|
|
His wife's son is older than him. Isn't that a bit weird to you guys? Or is that a common situation in France?
Indeed, usually his girlfriend's mother is younger than him (president)  Maybe he can borrow carla bruni  You should not laugh. A lot of women age better than stupid young girls. Can be for sex he has a mistress, and to live and socialize him better with his wife. |
|
|
|
And also, didn't Russia just ANNEXED Crimea?
Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 to 1954. In 1954, the ethnic Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea to Ukraine illegally, despite the peninsula having a solid ethnic Russian majority. As a result of ethnicide from the Ukrainians (such as ban on the usage of Russian language), the Crimeans voted to go back to Russia. There was no annexation. The world does not recognize the annexation of Crimea. Only Russians think so. Also peoples have the right to self-determination but only a part of the country on whose territory they reside. You forgot the reaction of Russia to self-determination of the Chechen Republic? |
|
|
|
|
The Minister of foreign Affairs of great Britain, Boris Johnson said that London does not recognize the annexation by the Russian Federation Ukrainian Peninsula of Crimea."We insist on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all European countries and refuse to recognize the illegal annexation by Russia of the Crimea", - said the head of the British foreign Ministry. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Japan is a country where individuals live their own isolated lives. There is not much friendship or personal relations. This may be the reason why the people feel depressed and think about committing suicide.
I have a cabin in the woods by the river. I often go there and stay there for several months. There is no one neighbor. Only the forest. To me there is not boring and no depression I have. Probably another reason. |
|
|
|
Do not tell me. What Koreans can do against the Americans? Old Soviet weapons? Americans do not need a North Korea. They will not fight in the woods. They will destroy the entire military infrastructure, and Kim. Then the Koreans themselves are happy to join with South Korea.
Remember the resistance faced by the Americans in Vietnam? To get an idea about how tough the DPRK will be, imagine that the invading forces will face ten times as much resistance as they faced in Vietnam four decades back. Why do you think that the Americans will carry out a ground operation? I think the Americans will just destroy the rockets and bombs the entire infrastructure of North Korea and the special forces will destroy Kim Jong UN. This will be enough. |
|
|
|
Do you really think so? As an armed group of special forces may be in full gear to enter the territory of the country, to eliminate the person who is under the supervision of the secret services, pick up his body and calmly to leave the country? Don't you think it strange?
Let me explain. American special forces are already stationed in Pakistan, for various purposes. I didn't claimed that Osama bin Laden was under the supervision of the secret services. His presence was known to the Pak ISI, but he was being protected by the Taliban. During the conflict with India Russian support of India, and the Americans in Pakistan. During the war in Afghanistan, the Americans supported the Mujahideen through Pakistan. Yes, and nuclear weapons they were probably using US. All this indirectly indicates the close cooperation of Pakistan and America. |
|
|
|
Too many people participated in the robbery, they can not share the stolen goods and will have to remove some of the participants if greed takes over.
As they will not be able to share? They stole a huge sum. There's almost a million for each member of the gang. Such a sum they can easily share. They might have already shared the loot, and dispersed to various countries, such as Brazil and Bolivia. The Brazilian region bordering Paraguay is mostly pantanal (swampland) and these people can easily remain hidden for many years. I certainly do not support such methods, but the money people stole a lot. To Paraguay and Brazil, it is generally the cosmic jackpot. Although I doubt with that kind of cash they can go unnoticed. They will still spend the money and it will be noticeable. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
