 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
Oh look there is more! Hands are a bit shaky  Ok must go to work now. Work Work. Must work... |
|
|
|
Im not good with posting pics. Sry   Don't envy much though. I will not run it until the day after tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
Well guys guess what I have here. Hehe
|
|
|
|
|
I plan to use my home server PSU. it is 350W The server itself drains <100W. Will the PSU handle this?
Is two molex connectors enough for one blade?
|
|
|
|
|
This is fantastic service. Honestly I did not expect it was possible.
|
|
|
|
Nice, have they all been shipped already then? *bounce*
I've had no call.
I'm currently in Shanghai, but will be leaving tomorrow evening. I asked if it was possible to deliver it by that time. |
|
|
|
I have just been called by friedcat. He told me the blade will be delivered tomorrow morning.
FANTASTIC
This is breaking news in the ASIC customer world Congrats ASICminer!  Congrats. This is your 1000th post. |
|
|
|
|
I have just been called by friedcat. He told me the blade will be delivered tomorrow morning.
FANTASTIC
|
|
|
|
Again I see little difference between one central regulator and 10 major players. It is not a peering network. Heck I gues even 10 players won't last for long. It somehow always goes to two entities. Republicans vs democrats Intel vs amd iOS vs android Coca cola vs pepsi Paper or plastic  Ok this is offtopic. I'm going to stop here. |
|
|
|
|
Over time this may be the large problem. ASICMINER may become rouge itself.
I see little difference between central bank and dozen mining companies. Especially if half of them will be in one country.
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding ASICMINER, 10% of hashing power is a very high share for me. If we end up with few players that constitute 51% of hashing power, that would be a threat to stability of the system, thus reducing it's trustworthiness.
I understand that having 10% rather than 1% is more profitable, but it may ultimately hurt the whole bitcoin ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
But will it matter? You have the chance to earn more or less in a week, but mostly its an average. Because it is more or less you wont lose anything in the long run. Of course you can earn less in the first week and more in the next week when the difficulty raised but it can be the opposite way too, so i dont see that this is a big problem.
It matters for someone. Consider your employer pays you either $200 or $300 this week depending on pure luck. Somebody would not take that risk(for ex. he has a loan to pay). Risk alleviating instruments cost real money. Wages are fixed because most persons give away their complete wage each month for fixed costs and so on. But the AM-Dividend cant be foreseen. At least i had to learn this when i tried to get a loan. It didnt happen and it was good this way because the dividends dropped down lower than i thought. So it wouldnt make much difference in this case i believe. Seems I was misunderstood. "Wages" was an example to illustrate my point that profit variance is a bad thing. It may be not "a big problem" but It may as well be depending on circumstances. Thus sometimes it is better to have lower but more reliable profit. That is purely accademical statement. |
|
|
|
Anyone got payment received confirmation?
No. |
|
|
|
But will it matter? You have the chance to earn more or less in a week, but mostly its an average. Because it is more or less you wont lose anything in the long run. Of course you can earn less in the first week and more in the next week when the difficulty raised but it can be the opposite way too, so i dont see that this is a big problem.
It matters for someone. Consider your employer pays you either $200 or $300 this week depending on pure luck. Somebody would not take that risk(for ex. he has a loan to pay). Risk alleviating instruments cost real money. |
|
|
|
|
5b0b877dcf383c4efce20703b3f08405336304751918caf3d929e2052e065545
|
|
|
|
|
I have 52.99354187... the hell
|
|
|
|
John, wouldn't it be less work if you counted from last valid bidding post backwards? I'm only guessing you're working your way through a lot of too low bids. But probably with good reason Anyway thanks for the massive work. Don't forget - If two people bid at the same price, the person who bid first will have his slots filled first Yup, he'll need to do some backtracking and pop some items from his stack It is very simple. Place bid on top of existing one. If you want absolutely no brainer Imagine this: whoever bids less is a winner, so lowest bids go on top. |
|
|
|
|
I havent seen lenny_ posts where did he come from?
|
|
|
|
|
I think John did it already. Check table3
|
|
|
|
|
I think John should unwind this from the end. His nightmare will end sooner this way.
|
|
|
|
|
