Denke es geht bei der Einführung eher um das gespamme nur wegen der Kampagnen... Eventuell sollte man bei Kampagnen ein post muss über 15 post pro Woche untersagen...

I found the user mithrim has repeatedly posted merit stat graphs and tables, which were originally created by zentdex and posted in the threads:

[1] Merit Stat from theymos data
[2] Where the Merit Pours?

to German local threads and LoyceV's Merit data analysis.  Thanks to these posts, mithrim has collected 11 merits so far.

The problem is that mithrim typically does not cite zentdex, and seems to be pretending as if the materials were created by mithrim.  mithrim sometimes gave a credit to zentdex, but the citation is very small: For instance, you can see "*Quelle" at the end of this post for a link to zentdex's original post.

zentdex signed like "stats: by zentdex" in some of the graphs / tables, but not all.  As zentdex's analysis is quite informative, I understand people want to share it, and zentdex would be happy about that.  Needless to say one needs to give a correct credit to zentdex's hard work.

The correct way is to quote zentdex's original posts.  However, mithrim never quote the zentdex's posts.  The following is the current list of mithrim's posts.  I must say they are plagiarism, please check them carefully.

The list of mithrim's posts copying and pasting the graphs and tables created by zentdex

This post copies 2 graphs and 3 tables from [2], and mithrim obtained 4 merits.
This post copies 1 graph and 2 tables from [2].
This post copies 1 graph and 1 table from [1], and mithrim obtained 1 merit.
This post copies 1 table from [2] and mithrim obtained 2 merits.
This post copies 1 graph and 1 table from [1], and mithrim obtained 3 merits.
This post copies 2 graphs and 1 table from [2], and mithrim obtained 1 merit.

I'm fairly new to the crypto world but I want to make my own blockchain and I want to target a specific industry and have tokens only allowed on it if they're SEC compliant.
For a non-programmer, I think it looks pretty easy to use previously written code, change a few things (with the help of a blockchain developer that i pay hourly from upwork.com) and deploy it.
Will I have to mine tokens myself?
Will I have to have very fast internet and an expensive computer to do that?
What are some things I'm not thinking of in this process...it sounds too simple.

WEEK #2 [14/03 - 20/03]

Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/CryptoPawz
Retweets:
1. (20/03): https://twitter.com/MsxNetwork/status/971289462612418560
2. (20/03): https://twitter.com/MsxNetwork/status/974122021897437184

Facebook Link: https://www.facebook.com/crypto.rick.74
Shares:
1. (20/03): https://www.facebook.com/crypto.rick.74/posts/377746925968303
2. (20/03): https://www.facebook.com/crypto.rick.74/posts/377746882634974

Wenn du bereit bist, dir die Mühe zu machen, mal mein Vorschlag: schreib eine neue Bitcointalk-Anfänger-FAQ in Deutsch.
Zephir ist seit fast 2 Jahren nicht mehr aktiv, es wird also Zeit, seinen alten Sticky zu ersetzen.

Ich wollte nicht zu negativ rüberkommen. Nur darauf hinweisen, dass ein einfaches "Zusammenkopieren" von Content in meinen Augen keinen Merit rechtfertigt. Ab einem gewissen Volumen würde ich das schon wieder anders sehen. Und wenn die Grafik wirklich von dir ist, schick mir kurz den Link zum Originalpost per PM, dann kann ich dort Merit für geben

Everybody can signup on March 27, I'm very interested too and just waiting for the launch 
This exchange will be huge in my opinion!!

You have already been red tagged for exchanging merits with your alt and you will be tagged for being a spammer and you have created 3 threads, one in the Beginners and Help another in Altcoin Discussion and other one here. What merit has to do with Altcoin Discussion? This clearly says you are a spammer with very low posting quality. You have posted around 200 posts and you can't even receive a single merit.There are people short of 5 merits to become a Full Member and you still cant earn even a single merit

Hm, du hast da ein paar Übersichten zusammenkopiert und den Rang-Kalkulator von iasenko nur sehr klein als sein Werk gekennzeichnet.
Dazu verlinkst du auf den alten Forums-Regel-Thread von Zephir, der aus einer Zeit stammt, in der es noch keinen merit gab.

Normalerweise bin ich großzügig, was merit angeht, aber in dem Fall muss ich ehrlich sagen, sehe ich das als zu "billig" an.

So wuerde mir dieses Forum dann doch einiges weniger Serioes erscheinen.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account <account> has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to <email>. The current date is <date>.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
<insert address here>
<insert signature here>
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Here is the unedited post where I posted that address: ...
OR
I sent that address to someone in a PM with PM ID#...

additional stake =  merit x A  / number of post
 the A is the amount of stake bounty managers willing to give to good posters.
they will still have the based stake based on rank.

I tried, sadly they said they can not help me. This was the message:

I saw this link https://www.coỉndesĸ.com/EOS-halves-token-amount-for-block-one-leaves-tokens-to-be-claimed/ and thought it was a legit coindesk link, so I didn't check the following link and got phished.

Part 1 - Scam Websites

Situation/Danger:
A fairly simple and unfortunately widely used form of scam is the cloning of a well-known website in order to fool the victim by giving it a false sense of security with the one goal: to get its data.

Normaly you can see whether a website is legit or not by checking the green "https" in front of the URL


So always be on the lookout for a green "Secure" and "https" in front of the URL address of a website. This is a sign that the website and the company have received the proper Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificates. Obtaining an SSL certificate indicates that the company behind the page can be trusted, normally (later more on that).


If you are attentive, you can easily see that it is not a legitimate site or legitimate entity because it doesn't have the proper certification to be trusted.

Coinsmarkets.com has neither a green "Secure" nor "https" infront of the URL. Instead, it has a gray "Not Secure" and a regular "http" in front of the URL.
As a rule, scam pages are quickly detected and removed. If you are now trying to visit coinsmarkets.com (please do not;)) you will receive an error message.

However, some scam sites have found a way to display the green "secure" and "https" in the website URL, and then make an incredibly subtle change to the URL.


At first glance, URL for the popular cryptocurrency exchange Binance seems quite legitimate. You can clearly see the green "https" in front of the website URL and also the name seems to be correct.

It usually is more or less impossible to know how a site obtained an SSL certificate that allows them to display the green "https" in front of the URL. This also applies to scammer pages. At the same time, getting an SSL certificate from a less trusted certificate issuer is pretty easy.

If you take a closer look at the second picture, you will see small dots under the letters "n" in the word "binance".

The two dots under the Binance URL show that this is not the real Binance page. Instead, it's a very well-made clone of the page, whose sole purpose is to tap user data that unsuspecting users enter there. Even an activated 2FA authentication does not protect you, as a scammer can enter this data immediately after you have entered it on the real Binance page, where it will still be valid. Thus, he gets access to the account from then on.

Especially wicked are those pages that show an error message after the first log in, saying: "The service is temporarily unreachable, please try again in 10 minutes." In this way, the user doesn't even suspect that he has just revealed his data and a scammer uses it to gain access to the user's account.
If the user then tries to log back in 10 minutes later, he gives the scammer a second 2FA code, which he may use to initiate a transaction or even disable 2FA.

Even if you are attentive, such a site can be difficult to spot because everything seems familiar at first glance.

The example shown here is called PunyCode, which is used to create certain special characters (here the dot under the letter "n").
In another example, Bittrex was linked and used the cedilla under the "r" (looks like a comma). Cedillas are widely used in languages such as French and Portuguese.

Example for PunyCode:


Tipps:

In principle, you can not say 100% whether a page is "real" or not. There are only a few things to keep in mind.
4 simple steps, 4 simple steps with which you can check most pages (if it is an established page):

1. Google the page and look at the results. It's best to use an add-blocker such as uBlock Origin so you do not accidentally click on an ad link (popular trap).
2. Check the URL for presence of https . Many fake sites use only the http protocol
3. See if the connection is identified as safe by the browser ( lock must be green ). In addition, you can still click on the lock to see the details.
4. Check the URL yourself. Look at whether special characters have been used or whether PunyCode can be found in the URL. The best way to copy the URL again directly into the Google search, it is corrected, it is a fake.

The best way to avoid a scam site is to enter the URL completely manually in the address bar of the browser or to use a bookmark.
There are also web browser extensions that you can download to prevent phishing/scams specifically designed for "crypto enthusiasts" like the Cryptonight Extension for Chrome.

So please be alert and check everything you do twice or three times. If you want to go one step further, you can also use a sandbox if you want to surf on new, unknown sites. This does not protect you in the mentioned PunyCode case, but there are many more potential risks that you may face on a daily basis.
Be safe.

---

it will be fair an excellent poster (the one getting a lot of merits)is a sign of good communicator and competency, they deserve more. anyways shitposter will be just ignored by the vast majority so a signature is useless. but the main problem here is more post will be created to increase their merit chance, perhaps should be:

 additional stakes= merit / number of post.

with that only competent individuals will get more stakes

This is a great Idea in principle, but I think your numbers are a little off to start. Achieving the number of merits needed is a mighty task (I speak as someone who has a much greater number than needed so this isn't personal) working a number that starts at 5% above the base rate and then increases every month by a % or two would in my eyes work.

Managers all need to embrace a minimum standard level, and it may even be an Idea to get the managers to join a club? Where only the managers that employ a minimum standard can join - that would enable the advertisers to know that they are only employing the best standard of managers and therefore the best applicants

Probably fighting spammers and leading the merit charts.I'll tell him you miss him.

OP: Why does threads these days have to be extra long and verbose ? Putting it graphically makes you look like hunting merits is one of your intentions behind creating the thread. (which you did)

I hope someone posts a tl:dr version of the same.

how about getting more when they increase their merit during the campaign, they will try more constructive, helpful post during the campaign.

Hey OP , I'm pretty sure crestonium is a scam.  I've seen a lot of serious allegations against  it.  You may want to research more before wasting your time on their sig campaign.

I really do hope someone run a signature campaign and the sole payment is a merit or two.

That's being said the thread seems to be perfect, We all agree to the same conclusion merit is highly needed in this community have we not?