Whether it's appropriate or not is not up to me, but depends on how Girona does during the season. If they do well and consistently from the first to the end of the season, reach second place, winning the La Liga trophy is also their right.
Once again, whether it is appropriate or not does not depend on the statements of people like us, but depends on them.

For me, that's not enough to prove they are worthy. It would be considered appropriate if they were able to maintain their performance until the season ended.
If since the last match they lose and continue with poor results in subsequent matches, then that is not appropriate for them.
I think in that case you really understand.

The fundamental step before entering the amount of money you have collected into the exchange to trade is to learn all about trade because to find out how the level of risk that will be obtained even though the purpose of trading is to get a minimum profit of 2x from capital.

One user has provided a link that allows you to visit it.
For me, learning to find out about trading before trading is a good suggestion because not a few traders who suffered losses despite a long time to trade.
If you only think about profits with available capital, indeed anyone will be tempted. But trading should not be blind.

If Barcelona can't take chances from the results of two matches, Girona loses and Real Madrid draws, what do you think is worth mentioning for Barcelona?
For those who say this is an easy job for Barcelona to achieve which will shift Girona's position in second place in the standings, maybe that person has strong analysis, but I doubt that.

Atletic Club or Bilbao as I know it just beat Atletico Madrid without mercy in the 2nd leg of the Copa Del Rey semi-final.
In the Copa Del Rey, Bilbao met Atletico Madrid in the semi-finals because Bilbao managed to get rid of Barcelona.
Nevertheless, my feeling is that I want Barcelona to win against Bilbao because Girona does not deserve to be in second place.

Halving is the most anticipated by many people because it is an important event in blockchain. The price will also increase.
To be able to find out whether halving is good in Bitcoin, you need to read this article from investopedia -> What Is Bitcoin Halving? Definition, How It Works, Why It Matters.

ETFs are part of an inevitable decision by the SEC and ETFs are one of the causes of high demand which has the effect of increasing Bitcoin prices for now even though there are other factors that drive high demand in the market.

Greater luck than skill.
Correct. This is nothing new for those of us in gambling. When I first touched gambling, I took it seriously every time I played, even though it was all nothing if we think about it. After observing what I said above, gambling is just for fun.

This is the same as what people who have repented from gambling say, that something they hope for will not come as expected. It's the unexpected that often succeeds.
Betting on small money or betting like the gambling mafia feels the same.

This March, I suspect, is still closely related to the situation at the end of February. Yesterday the price should have reached $64K but was unable to break through and returned to $60K, even though now as I write this the price still feels reluctant to go above $63K.
If the situation at the beginning of March or in the first week of March is still like the current situation, my estimate is that March will not be the same as what happened at the end of February.

I have experienced all of this very often in many types of betting, not just in football matches.
When we place a bet and our minds focus on the expected results, but in reality the actual results are different from expectations.
In fact, when our concentration on betting is not really serious, the results are actually good.

This is the fun of gambling. Don't take your feelings seriously.
Very often experiences like this occur in lottery gambling. Pay attention to the basic output numbers to match the latest output numbers for that day by not then buying them, when they are opened they are even accurate even though the bet is not big.

That's enough. We can understand it well and we must stand behind it even though we are not citizens of El Salvador.
We often read about the IMF's emphasis on him, but he remains in his position as an intelligent person.

There is one other country that is similar to Bukele regarding support for Bitcoin, namely Argentina. Their new president is also pro Bitcoin according to what I know. If there also had principles like Bukele towards Bitcoin, it would be really nice, wouldn't it?

AS Roma's game during the change of coaching from Jose Mourinho to De Rossi has indeed become more interesting. It could be said that AS Roma's game has now developed.
Monza would fall victim to De Rossi's effective strategy with two goals in the first half.

My fingers stopped pressing the keyboard keys for a moment because I was watching the second half. Dybala will score because he just provided an assist. Another player I think will score is Paredes.

Reading the principles of Nayib Bukele always gives me positive energy. From his quote which says 1 BTC = 1 BTC, we who always support Bitcoin want every country to have a leader like him with advanced thinking who can make the economy develop amidst the loss of value of fiat currency.

Half of the total ownership will probably be released or sold when the price reaches $100k or more in my opinion and he will think of a new strategy again even though my thinking is not necessarily justified.

They were beaten badly by Lazio with a score of 4:0 at the Stadio Olimpico at the end of January 2023. At that time Lazio appeared to be a pretty good team. At this meeting, I doubt if AC Milan can get full points to target the runner up position even though Lazio this season is not very good because they appear at home, Lazio is different when playing away.
The home match factor makes me doubt AC Milan will win.

Good calculation skills. 0.169 Bitcoin for me, then I can treat the people who live around my house to tea. I will invite all my neighbors to drink until their stomachs are bloated. Lol

Selling at $64k seemed to me the wrong decision because $69k was very close. If there is other income that can cover daily needs, maybe I will hold until Bitcoin breaks the price of $100k.
So later I can invite some neighbors for a holiday. Lol.

30 conceded goals is a sign that their bottom line needs to be improved. Laporte is good as an anchor below to guard Al Nassr's defense, but he himself will not be able to carry out his duties well if other defenders such as Amri and the two wing-backs forget their position when the team is building an attack.

What a good idea you offer that Al Nassr's defense is in trouble. Al Nassr's rival, Al Hilal, who will face Al Ittihad soon, has just conceded 10 goals.
If Al Nassr's bottom line is good, then they need to pay attention to defensive midfielders to help Brozovic.

I just wanted to register on Kucoin, but because it required KYC, I stopped continuing with the aim of giving my mind a chance to consider whether I wanted to continue or not. Why? because there are already two local exchanges that I have registered and actively use.

If you have problems with withdrawals, it usually takes time to wait before everything is handled. If you have contacted their support, just be patient before there is another solution.
5,000 USD is a decent amount for me.

Only against a team in the relegation zone, Al Nassr had to accept the reality of a draw at home.
Saying it's because Al Nassr is without Cristiano Ronaldo makes no sense at all. Due to the draw against Al Hazem, the opportunity to catch points from Al Hilal will become increasingly impossible because Al Hilal are in their best form this season.

Three goals from Talisca and one goal from Sadio Mane via the penalty spot in 4 minutes of added time, were answered by Al Hazem players in the 90+9 minute.
What bad luck for Al Nassr in round 22 of the Saudi Pro League.

This is better than taking the risk of trading it, although it does not rule out the possibility that if you trade it you will make a profit.
I think with Bitcoin price movements almost reaching the previous ATH price considering that the halving is still several months away, putting it in your wallet and holding on until the highest price is reached would be better in my opinion.

If you choose to trade futures, it can be done with small capital. But for now holding and storing in a wallet is best.

Therefore when I say honestly that in a short time it will not be possible to change something 100%. Erik ten Hag is not a bad coach because he has good potential as a coach. He hasn't managed Manchester United for long but changes can be felt when Manchester United returns to the UCL.

Even if the club brings in a new coach to replace Erik ten Hag, then if the new coach is only given a short opportunity to be able to bring about fundamental changes, of course he won't be able to.
For me it's about trust and timing. The least time is five seasons. Think of the first and second seasons as a transition. In the third year it will be possible to see whether there is a positive impact on the club's progress.

On the basis that you bought 2 Bitcoins that year to hope for a profit on the return of the price, then choosing to hold for a while would not be wrong if desired.
If the price has increased far from the purchase price, then other things, such as mistakes, whatever they are called, people don't care about them.

Holding Bitcoin up to this point makes perfect sense bro. $60k and on its way to $69k. What percentage of profit has been obtained from the purchase price at that time.

The aim is to find out the transaction history, such as how much has been deposited and what withdrawals have been made by a player.
I didn't pay attention to whether there was this feature because I played without caring about how much money I had played because I played to entertain myself.

BTW, that's an interesting discussion because gamblers also need to occasionally know how many transactions have been made.

I once read an article that Nayyib Bukele was firm in his stance on holding onto the Bitcoin he owned. With El Salvador's total Bitcoin ownership, when the Bitcoin price reached the current price of $60k, El Salvador's investment profits would have doubled.
If it's like this, then Nayyib Bukele will be a person who should be happy because his stance on Bitcoin has never been in vain.

What else do those who oppose Nayyib Bukele's attitude regarding Bitcoin investment think? Indirectly, those who oppose Bukele can no longer assume that Nayyib Bukele's decisions are bad.