I just started researching pools, but I am still very confused. You send them the money. Can they scam the investors? I mean, they may not do it the first time, but once they get reputation and the big millions start coming in, they can just disappear with the money, instead of collecting small fees every time.
Is is a possible scenario?

I think they are piggybacking the DAICO term that Vitalik Buterin introduced. They may really be a decend project, a decent team with a decent idea. But I am a little bit skeptical when sound marketing tricks and techniques are used to get attention.

The price of privacy depends.
If you are an Average Joe with average salary nobody will ever care about you, your money, your habbits and your naked pictures.
However, if you aspire to become wealthy successful and influential person, then you are an interest for a lot of people, who want to exploit you.
And here is where the privacy issue is coming in.
How much assets do you own? How much impact you can make in the world? How many people will benefit or lose their slice of the pie because of you?
The price of privacy is going to be proportional to the forementioned factors.
If you are Edward Snowden just about to shutter the most powerful agency in the world, then privacy is priceless. Privacy is life-saving.
If you are a homeless guy, then the price of privacy is basically zero.

These ICO rating sites are everything else but rating sites. Most of them are paid for featured spots. Experts are not experts. Some bots give random ratings. Awful service. Don't use them. Zero value in them.

Rivezt is a security focused project that sits on around $20-25M for a while. The problem is the circulating supply is only 10% of total supply, thus the it can be argued that the market cap is actually $200-250M. But it is worth a look in my opinion.

There are so many things that has to be mentioned.
But the problem is that the field is developing so fast and so much money are involved that more and more scammers are attracted to it. As a result, the schemes are constantly developing as well and new ones emerge. So it is a topic in constant development.
What is true today, may not be enough tomorrow.
We have to constantly update our knowledge on security.

Nexo, Fusion, Yggdrash, Sentinel chain. These are the names I am constantly hearing left and right, but I haven't done a deep research on them. But still, the hype around them is there, so it is a good start.

I really love the projects that Amazix run. They are getting one of the best ICOs.
Wapinter is a great bounty manager,too. Check out his campaigns. He is very focused and professional.

Yeah, probably he will sell it too at all-time high, with some bullshit reasoning like "avoiding conflict of interest". I don't see future for Litecoin. So, I would have done the same probably. But not citing some bullshit reason.

Steemit has still a small audience compared to the big guys, so we are all in a good position to start.
But never forget that content is King. If you provide valuable content, your audience will grow. I admire your efforts to spread the word here, but you have to be more engaging if you want more traffic.

Wtf, is there a daily ranking now? What about an hourly or a minute-by-minute ranking?
Also, aren't this the top 5 coins in the ranking?
So, what is the goal of this post? I don't get it?

I am surprised he has devoted time to anything else than throwing rocks at Bitcoin Cash.
I don't trust this guy.
And he seems to like copycat projects, that have no chance against the original.

Has there been ever a crypto for everyday use? I mean, cryptocurrencies are not used for anything yet. What are you talking about?
Probably Ethereum comes closer to that, because all that is done is ICOs so far and people need to pay gas.
I don't think we are searching for the next. We are searching for the first.

Most of them can be, if you follow the guidelines. Monero and Zcash tops the list.
A lot of others are mentioned, but you don't want to keep much money in shitcoins that may die every single day.

Why do you think it is a bad project? The team seems legit to me, and they have a contract with an airport in Lithuania.
I agree that having just a single test location is far behind the leaders in the game. I can't recall names, but there are 2-3 companies that have a lot of hubspots and a lot of users around the world.

Blockchain needs a lot of things. First of all is adoption. We may have to wait a lot for it. It won't come without security. So it needs reliable code and tech.
Blockchain needs smart investors. Not the dumbasses that flooded the market and will cry to the SEC the first time they are scammed.
Blockchain needs a lot of things. And we need the blockchain as well.

How does the pooling work? Is this an open pool that everyone can join freely?
I am hearing a lot of good things about Nexo from a lot of sources.

Viberate again? I am gonna make a personal mission to police these sock puppet post emerging every hour and downgrading it every time in the first comment.
This is absurd. I thought it will be for a week or two, but it seems to never stop. Every time I open up the altoins section, and I am faced with this ridiculous spam.

Stick with the established bounty portals and bounty managers. They have a long track record. The side benefit is that they are also experts and they do the due diligence on the ICOs they work for. They have to, because they are paid by the ICO as well. So they are doing the work for you. But for a commision of the funds of course.

As a competing consensus mechanism - NEO.
As a level of adoption coming close are NEO and WAVES.
As architecture, Cardano, EOS.