Yes. All of his posts appear to be AI generated.

Post: #msg63468866


Post: #msg63475586


Post: #msg63489418

Just check out the archived web pages at this link: https://archive.is/http://bitcointalk.org/*
You'll find numerous examples of how the forum looked with the banner ads back in the day.

Here's an example:



The banners were shown below the first post in the thread, in the same spot where the factoids are still displayed now.

You know, I was just thinking we maybe playing right into this guy's hands.  Feeding his ego, making him the center of attention - basically giving him exactly what he wants as an attention-seeking troll.  Clearly he's got an agenda and time to kill, but we'd be wise not to take his bait. 


Way I see it, dude wants a stage and an audience.  So I say we stop shinin' the spotlight his way.  Starve him of the reaction he's fishin' for and he'll likely move on to other pastures.  Ain't no one got time for that nonsense anyhow.

When you start trading, it can feel kinda overwhelming trying to stay on top of everything going on in the market and figure out what moves to make.  It's easy for beginner traders to mess up and lose money if they don't know what they're doing.  Thats why it makes sense to practice first with a demo account so you can learn the ropes without worrying about losing your hard-earned cash. 

Demo accounts let you try out different trading strategies and get used to the platform you'll be using, but without any real money at stake.  It's like a practice run so you can gain some experience under your belt before diving into actual trading.  Going this route helps you avoid costly mistakes down the line when you transition over to trading real money and  once you feel like you got the hang of things and are trading profitably on a consistent basis in your demo, then you can feel confident about moving forward for real.

Pa, zapravo, budući da si stavio grinning smajlić na kraju, uvijek se možeš izvući an sarkazam. 

He speaks with such conviction, as if this were his only alt... 

Btw, I thought it was "Legends_Never_Die"?

Let me guess, your "new-born" account is aptly named "Shenanigan"?  

---

What "power" are you talking about? You are assuming something that may or may not be true. But if you feel that way, the solution is simple: Never contact LoyceV by email. Case solved!


It seems that suchmoon's assessment of your character was accurate:

Pa, mislim upravo zbog ovakvih pokušaja prevare. Frajer pošalje 3,982 USDT i tvrdi da ti je poslao $3982, a ti brzom provjerom na Tronscan-u ne uočiš ništa čudno.  Da je pored toga naznačena i fiat vrijednost u $, postojale bi još dvije znamenke iza decimalnog zareza (ili točke) te bi na taj način odmah bilo jasno da se radi o $3,98 USD, a ne o $3982,00.

If we're being honest, the only reason you're complaining about JollyGood's judgment is because it hit you personally. And you're not exactly in a position to play the victim card here.


I'm glad your "recent instance" put an end to your shitposting.  So it appears that DT has prevailed once more.  And I'm sure you'll be more careful who you hire to write your posts in the future.

Paste the transaction ID into a reputable blockchain explorer, for example mempool.space, and check the "Fee rate" value. It should be in sat/vB.

Even if there was such a strategy (I emphasize the "if"), why do you think anyone would share it with you, or anyone else on a public forum?  Sharing such a strategy would only serve to attract the attention of sportsbooks, who would then be able to adjust their odds and make it more difficult to profit from such a strategy.

You got it wrong. LoyceV doesn't have the privilege to access other users' IP addresses, but he shared a link where each forum member can view their own IP addresses for the past 30 days.


The screenshot you provided as evidence was not shared by LoyceV, but by Peanutswar.

I'd suggest asking folks to share what percent of their monthly earnings they bet on average.  For instance, I wager around 5% of my monthly pay each week and  i won't say exactly how much I make, but let's pretend I bring home $1,000 a month.  In that case Id put down around 50 bucks a week on average.  That's a pretty small cut of my income, meaning I'm likely not going overboard with gambling.   

Of course, everyone's situation is different.  The percentage that works for me might be too high or too low for someone else.  But looking at it this way gives a rough sense of whether the betting is sustainable or if its getting out of hand.

The software for crypto wallets can help optimize how much it costs to send transactions around.  But the biggest thing deciding transaction fees is the type of system the blockchain uses at its core and  Solana uses something called Proof of History to get transactions confirmed, while Ethereum's going with Proof of Stake.  These are totally different, which is why moving crypto on Ethereum costs so much more than doing it on Solana.  Ethereum's fees jump all over, depending on the network's traffic and congestion. That's why you have cheaper swaps on the Solana network compared to Ethereum.

Because this is a public forum for discussion, people are allowed to speak freely.

Next time, if you still feel like limiting who is allowed to reply, I suggest you create a self-moderating thread.

First things first, I didn't actually tag anyone here.  I was just trying to clear up where the confusion came from.  I agree, it's real important that we don't go accusing people without proof.  And we should definitely look more into things before pointing fingers.  If someone gets wrongly accused, they can always speak up to defend themselves.  At the end of the day, its up to all of us to decide whether or not we trust what someone says.

We talked before about those AI detecting tools and how unreliable they can be sometimes.  They can flag human-generated content as AI-generated.  Or the other way around too.  But just cause someone figured out how to trick the system doesn't prove they aren't using AI or some other techniques to pump out content fast.


It's plain as day that the user in question is a shameless shitposter.  I think we can all agree on that.  Does he deserve a negative tag for all the excessive shitposting?  I suppose that's up to each person to decide for themselves and, personally, I might start a reputation thread first to see what others make of it before going the negative tag route.  But the fact is, he's already received a few neutral warnings, but those obviously didn't work.  The negative did.  So there's that.

You weren't tagged for changing your staked wallet address. You were tagged for excessive shitposting and spamming the forum with low-quality, AI-generated content.

BC.Game kampanja ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Sr. Member-a.
Plaća se maksimalno 30 postova tjedno. Nema minimalnog zahtjeva. Postovi u Local sekciji se broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions

I disagree. I believe that those who commit plagiarism, perhaps unintentionally or unknowingly, deserve a second chance to redeem themselves. It's a mistake that can be corrected.  However, this doesn't mean that every banned account should get the same treatment.

No, that's not how it works. Not even the shitcointalk admin would be that foolish to put its members at such risk. To "teleport" your account, all you need to do is to use the same username and add a link to your altcoinstalk profile on your bitcointalk forum profile (e.g., under your website link) to verify ownership.

But I guess there might be users who are "dumb" enough to think they have to use the same password too.

As for forum admins (or mods) knowing your forum password, that shouldn't happen either. Generally, passwords are stored in a database in a hashed format, which makes it difficult to reverse back into the original password. However, this doesn't mean that people should blindly trust every online platform to have honest intentions.


I agree. Also, use 2FA wherever possible.