What I can say here is that the mindset of most gamblers is not right from the onset and this is very bad. In this sense, there is nothing they can do that will be right because anxiety will linger as most people will not even view gambling in a neutral way and will not even view it as a revenue to have fun, but a means to make money, which is very wrong and infesting. This is why I often implore people to learn gambling before dabbling into it, they should not undermine it just because it is an informal avenue that is easily accessible. They should know that it is very risky and can cost them more than the money they lose.

Also, people should learn how to preserve their minds when gambling, and even if you have a weak mind, you should find ways to work around it to avoid more issues for yourself or you should steer clear of gambling. Gambling can infest you and get you addicted if care is not taken, but with a strong mind, one may say No, and that ends it. But that is for those people who have strong minds that can help their Willpower. Otherwise, it will only grow worse.

And for those who have a weak mind, a simple cautiousness is key here, it will help them in preserving their doings towards it so that it will not entirely give in to gambling. Above all, let us all learn discipline in gambling and never think of it as a means of making money, otherwise, it will collect more money from us and also make our lives miserable.

That's good advice, I do not know why people like to cry foul when it is obvious that what they are complaining about is not wrong. There are laid down rules in casinos' terms and conditions of offering, we can't change that and the ignorance of it doesn't exonerate us no matter what. But attacking casinos will only show our folly. This is why the way of operation of casinos should be well-known before signing up for them and so far they never preached to you that they will not ask for the KYC, it is upon you to complete it soon or later even if they did not ask. However, if you did not complete it and they ask you to complete it later due to one reason or another, they are still within their right in all entirety.

Lol...OP no one is going to stone you, or your conscience is pricking you? But what I'm curious about is how you write the name of the casino when you are seeking suggestions from us. That is suspicious because these days on the forum, people are now wiser in making adverts in such a regard that most people will not suspect. And the more you make this thread active, the better you propagate that name.

That is by the way though, it may not be so but most likely so. Regardless, if you need a serious casino to replicate an idea, why not take a look at Stake.com, you are not going to regret it. However, another curiosity is that someone like you should have known what casinos and gambling sites have to offer on average instead of asking people. The reason is that if you are not deeply rooted in yourself, you may not get the idea you seek. Targeting the most popular and reputable ones is enough, and they are not difficult to locate.

I believe people only help better in testing and giving feedback when the platform is ready.

Well, I sense marketing here, notwithstanding, I don't give it a thought, but you can't be sincere about it, that's the issue. Let me make this clear, though I don't know for others, I do not jump on casinos anyhow and no matter how you preach to support what you are stylishly selling, I am one of them who will not give it a try, at all. And I am happy to tell you that this attitude saved me 100% from direct and indirect fraud on the internet.

As for the calculation and argumentation you made above, come off it, it is just a means to lure people, casinos can never be trusted about the high winning possibility in a certain way as preached, that is a lie. If such a secret of 100% or 99% winning you made is true then it can't be long for people to know and ruin that branch of the casino. Casinos are no joke, they are in for serious business, so I wonder why they will bend the standard so much to the extent that gamblers will have an easy means to exploit them.

In the end, if people start losing through it, you will hear casino is a game of luck, who doesn't know that? But why preach more winning possibilities?

Reviews are good and I am happy to say that it is what has not made me get scammed till today. Many have been scammed on the internet and it is mainly because they just dabble into whatever they see online but this is very risky. Many companies will have the best designs and even have complete top-notch UI and UX, but they could lack reputation and integrity. They will write a lot that is sugar-coated on their websites, but in the end, it is either they cheat you even with a little bucks you deposited to show how hungry and shameless they are or scam you entirely. But till today, I am not a victim, especially in trading, because if I count it, I would have had dealings with at least 75 different online brokers, which is way more than the casinos and sports books that I have had dealings with.

But mind you, there is a need to follow the right cause for this, there is a need to review through the right websites and platforms, and if done very well, the chance that the gambler will regret it is so slim. Also, looking for casinos with high liquidity is a very good one, they can't be so greedy with your small amount of money if you are such that is depositing less than $2,500 or so. It is the hungry new casinos or the ones with low liquidity that are so desperate for the money.

I don't like people sounding weak or preaching weakness to people, investment is risky generally and what I only realise in what you posted here is that you merely repeated what people are generally saying about risks and "investing the amount you can afford to lose," forgetting the fact that it is merely relative and depends on the situation on ground, the asset and the person in question. Besides, if any investor could fail in Bitcoin, Ethereum or BNB, then the investor should consider another professional or means of earning passive income because no asset can accommodate them safer, they will fail.

Those three cryptocurrencies are the top-rated coins and have behaviour that can be well-predicted. One may buy them and keep them for years, and one may buy them and keep them for a little while. For the latter, upon the detection of a bearish pullback, liquidate them and buy back at a low price, and repeat the process over again. This approach is very simple with these three assets because they are high in liquidity. But I certainly do not know where the preaching of fear comes from, or do you believe the gaming coins are safer than them?

Could you believe that I rushed to the profile of the OP immediately I read from you that he is not a newbie here, and truly, he is not. I never gave that a thought because he wrote like a newbie here because I never thought anyone would be alleging a company for their right this way. He should have known that he needed to provide all the required documents no matter what transpired before them before he made any allegation, but he never did. Aside from that, what I also see as unfair is the fact that you make an allegation about a company and when such has been resolved it was abandoned. Even if the thread can't be locked, he should have at least written [Resolved] in front of it. This is an uncared attitude is common on the internet apart from this place where people allege companies, and when the issue is solved, they just move on and keep people in the dark thinking the company has not resolved it which is not fair.

This mindset of yours has already condemned you in gambling and I will not be surprised if you lose regularly, because you never think positively but negatively. If you must know even if you will not admit it, I am a testimony to gambling regular winnings, so I can counter you with all sense of positivity that gamblers can win and stay positive. Despite that luck is important as well, it does not solely rely on that. This is why I like to move to the well-known fact that there are classes in gambling, we have casinos and sports betting. Generalizing for the two like you did is so unfair. In casinos, agreed, one can lose in the end as the house has control over it, and once they set their difficulty internally, it becomes a problem. This means that one can race perfectly against the algorithms you never know how it was coded and that can be tweaked in a certain way, so luck is important here and I say the person will have to be so lucky to be winning consistently in the casino.

But for sports betting, I tell you that you are not accurate about it, the skills and smartness of the gambler are very crucial here, and even as luck is important, you can still manage your gambling portfolio rightly in such a way that will limit the importance of luck in it. Needless to say, as this thread is concerned, it is all about sports betting which is why I believe the OP shared his trading strategy which I also know of to be working. If this strategy is used well, I am sure that cheap success is possible, but with the right combinations in betting and proper management.

I have not seen any country apart from El Salvador that accepts Bitcoin as a legal tender, and I believe that other countries are trying to be more reasonable about it. Fine, any country may conclude to invest in an asset, it is a different ballgame, but agreeing that it becomes a legal tender goes way more. There are factors that will be considered, especially the informal nature of Bitcoin, its decentralization and the privacy tendency that could aid anonymity in a way.

This calls for strict and serious regulation even if they accept it to be their legal tender, but how many countries have the capacity to regulate a decentralised asset like Bitcoin? This is why I believe countries are avoiding it as the risk could have outweighed the benefits in terms of security, lack of control, money laundry tendency that could aid enough illegality, and the risk of its high volatility that could make it unreliable at times.

Options trading is not a new name in the world of the financial market, however, these days, they've added cryptocurrency to it, but the options trading I've seen with crypto exchanges and gambling sites are deviations from the traditional ways, which makes it more difficult for people as they've wired it in the favour of the house/exchanges and have increased the difficulties of what was initially difficult to predict (more issue).

Now, the main options trading was planned in a way where you choose the direction a market will follow at a certain time. If you choose a buy, you Call and if you choose a sell, you Put. Those are the terms, but mind you, you are also betting against the time which makes it more difficult than trading that you are just trading without the stress of the duration expiry. Take for instance, Bitcoin is at $70,000 and you choose a Call option for 1 hour. After 1 hour of the bet, if Bitcoin's price is above $70,000, you win the bet, but if it is below that level, you lose the bet. That is the principle, and it is as simple as that until they are making it more difficult.

Oh, I never knew you knew the basics, I wouldn't have wasted my time explaining as above. Regardless, this is not a kind of trading like the regular one, it is more of a betting that links trading with time, you are trying to get the two (right direction and within a correct period) predicted accurately.

For this, it is better called Option trading than mere trading since it gives you the option of time in addition and not only the Call and Put (direction) option as in mere trading.

If you like betting, you will like option trading, although it is a lot easier and more reasonable than gambling in casinos. Once you know how to speculate well and use your instincts, you have a better chance of success. It is also a better chance to multiply your money pretty fast than trading in which you will have to be very patient for the trade to be positive. You can have that winning within seconds on some options trading platforms.

Well, people may say this is not an anniversary because it is not official, nevertheless, they celebrate it yearly, so what is that?

For me, Pizza Day is now symbolic of Bitcoin because it is a monumental event that flashes back to May 22, 2010. This is the day that Laszlo Hanyecz bought 2 large Pizzas with his 10,000 Bitcoins.

This is the first-ever transaction performed with Bitcoin, so the day is special and it has become a day to celebrate by all Bitcoin lovers, and invariably an anniversary because May 22 is happening every year, so it is now annually celebrated.

If at all no one celebrates this day elsewhere, we users on the Bitcointalk forum celebrate it in one way or another. As part of this celebration, a Pizza contest is often announced to celebrate it by giving out monetary gifts to the winners.

Why not? The world is getting more digital and with the acceptance of cryptocurrency in many climes, there is no way some banks will not be transacting in the USDT and it will be easier for them if their country is such that is crypto-friendly. But this will be cryptocurrency banks because there are wide distinctions between the USD and USDT, and I can't possibly think that any central bank would want to mix that up. First, it is the USD that can back the USDT and not the other way around. Also, the fact that the central bank can not oversight and control the USDT, they will not be able to allow the regular commercial banks to get involved in such.

However, special crypto banks will be doing that, and I believe it is already happening with the current ones, though I have never used them before to know their mode of operation. Nevertheless, for a bank in China to involve itself with illegal underground USDT operations in a country that frowns so much on cryptocurrency means that even the commercial banks that are dealing with fiats will still try it despite knowing that it will never gain the support of the central bank.

Link: https://www.theblock.co/post/294777/china-busts-1-9-billion-underground-banking-operation-using-usdt

Don't worry yourself so much my friend, I believe the natural campaign economics of the forum is now pushing the merit sources to what they were avoiding initially due to the scarcity of alternatives. Many of them are now in the gambling campaigns because they do not have a choice, they need the money, which is natural, because you can only prove boss when you have a choice.

Many that you could have thought had a choice are now in the gambling campaigns, but the merit distribution in that section of the forum is still very poor. This could only mean one thing, they just have some kind of reservation/resentment towards the gambling sections, but who cares?

Let them do whatever they want to do, the forum continues to breathe.

Well, whether good news or events will trigger Bitcoin or not, the $1m worth is too inflationary, I do not think this will ever happen. It will even further show the unseriousness of Bitcoin and cause more laughter on the cryptocurrency. Many of you might be looking at the value alone and what it can do for you but this value may not be a reasonable worth in the end. This may even be a reason why the government will now focus their beam on it again and find the means to compress it just like Gold in order to curb some excesses.

Have you ever wondered why Bitcoin is close to $70,000 with a market cap of almost $1.4T, while Gold is at around $2345 with a market capitalization of almost $16T, which is more than 10 times greater than the market capitalization of Bitcoin? The reason is what I mentioned, it is a compressed commodity asset and it happened because the government planned it well from the beginning so that it would not cause inflation and too-high economic disparity.

But who planned Bitcoin to be cautious this way? No one. People are just interested in the money to be made from it. Regardless, I do not think it can bless people to the point that 1BTC will now be worth $1m, at least, not in the next 10 decades.

You have to be patient my friend, even if Bitcoin will not perform as hugely as people expect, I am certain that it will still edge towards a profitable investment for you. This is why you have to learn and have a full understanding of what you are committing your money to. Every investment is a risk and you should never invest more than what you can afford to lose regardless of how promising that asset is. This includes Bitcoin as it will always have its ups and downs moments since there is no asset that can be moving up in a straight slope, this is why they say the market is dynamic, you can't always accurately predict it.

But one thing you forgot to mention is the price at which you struck the asset, it would have helped me to guide you better. Above all, if you buy Bitcoin at a high price, do not think you will gain much since your risk is even higher than those investors who struck it at a low price. Such like you should also be so proactive and speculative about this so that you liquidate your position when a confirmed bearish mode is activated.

Lastly, my advice for you is to go and learn more about trading and investment and not rely on what you hear or what people dictate to you.

This issue of poverty is very large, many would say that you are the reason for being poor, well, this is true in many cases, but in some cases too, it is false. This is why I like to say that" we are equally made but not equally talented, and we are equally made but are not equally exposed." Some people are just the victims of their locality, the environment is too remote and primitive, there is no access to education and motivation, they are just living their lives like the people of old. If that is how you were born and what you ever know, that is what will ever stick to your head. And even if you had the time to go to the urban areas, you would go and leave because all your life has ever been like that, that is what you and what everyone around you are used to. As for these people, they may never break forth, except for some exceptional people among them and if the government help them through education and creative thinking, to know that life is beyond this circle. Religion is also a setback in some climes.

Also, we are talented differently, and there is a zeal difference, for this, there are people that would be born in the best places with the best accesses, but yet, they will not be able to use those benefits well due to the lack of zeal or they are not just talented/creative. Despite that, others will still find the means to learn talents if they are not born with them. This is why I said from the beginning that some should be blame and others should not. These kinds of cases have to be treated individually to ascertain who is to blame.

You've spoken well like someone who means well for Bitcoin. But let me start by saying that Bitcoin has its issues even as it has its own advantages, and yes, it is being used for donations and fundraising, except that Bitcoin is digital, so introducing it in a traditional donation will only cost the person money because many donors/philanthropist may not even know Bitcoin, while others that know it may not have access to it not to mention of giving you the money in Bitcoin.

Fine, if the person planned it in such a way that Bitcoin is an alternative here, then it is a very good way to go about it. But the person should also know that it is the risk he is taking. You can imagine if people donated $100,000 worth of Bitcoin to you, and in the next 30 days, due to the sharp drop in the price of Bitcoin, the worth now moves to $89,500, for example, it is surely a disadvantage. This could be in the favour of the person as well if Bitcoin rises, but an asset that is fluctuating that much is risky for a serious donation.

Regardless, many online fundraising channels are now accepting Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but I know that patronage can't be much when more stable fiat is still accessible. However, if it is online and the person has a reasonable converting means as soon as the Bitcoin is received, I think it is a very good option, especially if it is a global donation, so as to give people wider freedom and accessibility to choose their payment system and for the donation to be seamless.

But still, making Bitcoin an option while there are other active means to receive the donation is the best way out.

If this is true with you, then it shows that you have not tried many other jobs, if that (job) is appropriate in this context because many will even argue to you that investment is not a job. Even if it is a job to some people, it is certainly not a job to many others, it all depends on how you do it and take/view/use it. Regardless, do not forget that there is Trading and Investment, if you can call investment the hardest job, what about trading that is way more harder than it? Needless to say, there are many other jobs out there that are more difficult and tasking than both trading and investment. Perhaps, you wanted to state that investment is risky. And indeed, that is best describing it.

There is no job/task without its issues, notwithstanding, without mincing words or causing controversies, the distinction between a true investor and a gambler is that the true investor fully understands what he is doing and does it according to the plan, but gamblers will always deviate from the plan, and this is particularly caused by emotions and some unforeseen factors, but are all psychological.

That's nice, and by now, you should be called meme master...lol Memes have been so spectacular since the first one was introduced and I do not think they are ready to go any time soon. Like I told a user a while ago, he should perish the idea that meme coins in the cryptocurrency industry will die or disappear, it has come to stay and that is the final. It is a very strong section in the cryptocurrency industry and recently, I've noticed that the sections that are better performing are Defi and Memes and I think they are for obvious reasons.

People seem to prefer them because memes are often reliable when it comes to multiplying the investment of the investor when many other coins/tokens are sluggishly moving. While the Defi is an objective project that has good future prospects. I see it continuing like this and also an eye-opener in the next bull run when they've retraced already.

But for your Dogemob, I can only tell you to be careful. This is where some people are being scammed or fall victim to crypto projects that will not perform much. Mind you, a $5m market cap is so little, I don't even know why you are excited about that.

With this current rewrite, you are very correct, but it is unlike the last one you separated the Profit and Interest. Besides, I am just saying that based on experience and wide searches over time regarding the subject matter, regardless, no one is perfect. Also, with my understanding of forums, they are the places to have some communications, corrections, agreements and disagreements if need be, but in the end, we all learn one or two things, that's the gist.

Now, back to it, both the trading and gambling you mentioned are so similar but we can't use them as sole examples because they are not just the same thing, the modality of their operation and the susceptibility of them toying with our psychology vary. It is aggravated in gambling simply because people can gamble for fun (Interest), but can you trade for fun? That will be senseless. This is why the context of Profit and Interest separation is even better fitting in gambling than in trading. But in trading, the two have to be looped together because anyone trading can only have an Interest in it only for one purpose, which is Profit making. But in gambling, you can have an Interest in it either for the fun or the Profit (winning).

All the best!