your buddy icebreaker quickly dumped his National Front banner. Why was that? Not quite the quisling you hoped for?
Don't ask other people to speak for me. If you have a question, be a brave boy and ask me directly. I've only changed my avatar once, for the duration of the last French election, in honor of those slain by invaders in Paris. Im sure Parisians can sleep at night knowing you have their back....  already asked you directly here |
|
|
|
I hope that they get 75% miner support right away so that I can watch their miners saying, "Oh shit, we just mined a ton of worthless altcoins!".
  |
|
|
|
it's the chicken game of Bitcoin.
It's Chicken Little running around squawking about the sky falling Speaking of chicken, what happened to your National Front logo? |
|
|
|
The only people who can seriously do development and maintenance work are core devs.
I think you will find, with open source projects, that is a false assertion. Any attempt to subvert that process will ultimately fail. |
|
|
|
I hope that they get 75% miner support right away so that I can watch their miners saying, "Oh shit, we just mined a ton of worthless altcoins!".
I have to question your understanding if you can make a statement like this. |
|
|
|
More gavineries:  Sweet irony.  Ah, hdbuck, you have a place where all you right wing collaborators can hang out and lick shiny jack boots together. (What? no theymos yet?  ) Im genuinely happy for you. PS - your buddy icebreaker quickly dumped his National Front banner. Why was that? Not quite the quisling you hoped for? |
|
|
|
Made a killing on Hashfast. Made a killing on Icedrill. Now Monero. Like a boss  SFYL  but needs jumping bronies.... |
|
|
|
This drop is brought to you by the good folks at Bitcoin Classic. Hopefully ya'll enjoy being hard forked into double digits prices  Is MP dumping her coinz? lol #endgame |
|
|
|
Bloody hell. A trio of French fascists. What were the odds? Honestly. Thanks Blockstream!
They are well suited to FN. It has its roots in the old État français which was the puppet 'government' in France during the Nazi occupation. As soon as the jack boots arrive, there are always the simpletons who line up to help their "New Leaders". I suppose every totalitarian regime needs its 'collaborateurs' Vive la résistance!You know nothing about french resistance. Unfortunately, neither do you. Apparently..... |
|
|
|
Bloody hell. A trio of French fascists. What were the odds? Honestly. Thanks Blockstream!
They are well suited to FN. It has its roots in the old État français which was the puppet 'government' in France during the Nazi occupation. As soon as the jack boots arrive, there are always the simpletons who line up to help their "New Leaders". I suppose every totalitarian regime needs its 'collaborateurs' Vive la résistance! |
|
|
|
Wow, this is clear proof of sAt0sHiFanClub's dishonesty. Compare his post to my original post here. d'oh! I do apologise - genuine mistake. I will update that post now. I could say many things about you, but bigot would not be one of them... |
|
|
|
blunderer is a bigot? Who knew.... |
|
|
|
Thought I'd lost all the bitcoin's I have stored in Core. Balance reset to 0, thought my life was over  Dont worry, Core are busy working on new and exiting features that will take your balance to zero, without the inconvenience of hanging your PC. |
|
|
|
I have an economy degree
You certainly do. i get the lolz. |
|
|
|
The example represents a severe performance bug in the bitcoin core software and should be fixed by software changes that make an inefficient operation efficient or restrict very large transactions if this proves too difficult. There is no reason to limit blocksize because of this.
This guy gets it. Unbounded memory use, as well as poorly designed propagation methods are issues that should be addressed by code review, not by adding layers of complexity. When you look at it from this perspective, you see how the whole 'scaling debate' is being jury rigged to deliver a fundamentally altered version of Bitcoin that suits one particular commercial interest. |
|
|
|
I have an economy degree
You certainly do. |
|
|
|
and do that while maintaining the integrity of the system. Not people tinkering with an existing variable that has known tradeoffs if you set it lower or higher.
Because 1MB was not arrived at arbitrarily, but through exhaustive research and testing? You're not saying that 1MB is simply a meaningless number Satoshi randomly selected because it was always meant to be increased long before it was reached, are you? Because that couldn't be the truth of the situation according to what blockstream says. Satoshi selected a much bigger number originally (was it 32MB?). It was changed temporary to 1MB for reasons already in the past and not in effect at the current moment. He didn't have any limit - the 32Mb you are thinking of is a message size limit on the underlying p2p protocol. For Satoshi, bitcoin was... unlimited. |
|
|
|
There was someone here who claimed he had a Coinbase account and he discovered a vulnerability in their site which he told them about and got paid for. He said he discovered another vulnerability, told them about it, then his account was closed and he was banned. If he was telling the truth Coinbase was asking for trouble. Nobody likes a clever dick. |
|
|
|
I'm open to discuss ideas that would benefit Bitcoin.
What is your opinion on the idea that Bitcoin is ultimately governed by the code people freely choose to run? https://i.imgur.com/Mpd1dWq.gifIf this is the case, is there any way to hold back the invisible hand of the market? CHARLATAN GIF SPOTTED Ah, the gif that made core devs feel "unsafe"? source: here |
|
|
|
Yes, that's why I'm phrasing it more like a hypothetical 2x - because it's not 2x in practice. In essence, a 2MB with segwit is actually >3MB without - from the numbers they are giving.
I think you are missing an important point in that segwit is not (in itself) about scaling - the 1.6x space saving is a side effect - its about removing malleability* bugs in scripts so that complex contracts ( for payment channels) will work. At present most of the script functionality has been removed/disabled due to malleability. Thinking that segwit is part of the immediate capacity issue is wrong. These are long term developments to support bitcoin in the future. But they are being rushed through now under the guise of 'scaling'. Dont get me wrong - I like segwit - but it needs to be introduced in the correct context, with the correct due diligence. * but tragiically still fails to address all of them.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
