Nope. .44 doesn't work either.
this is exactly why the price keeps dropping, when purchases are not running, miners are lowering the price to get work that is NOT there. everyone, Please make sure there is a purchase running before testing lower prices! Don't worry, it was only temporarily set at that price (and my hashpower is insignificant anyway). I have it set higher than that pretty much 24/7. |
|
|
|
0.000047 seems to work
I second that! has been for a bit now. Still getting connection problems they're still stopping my backup pools from working still getting paid still don't really care =D Cheers for the site Pirate! Stopped now, is anyone getting any at a lower price? Nope. .44 doesn't work either. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there are certainly connection issues (right now actually).
|
|
|
|
Simply lowering your asking price doesn't seem to work on it's own, so I assume there's more to it than that. I've set mine pretty low, just to test things, and I'm not getting any bites...
You're not getting leased shares or changing the purchase price? Not getting any leased shares  Then either you are missing a 0 in your PPS price or just asking way to much.  Lol, it was the former  |
|
|
|
Simply lowering your asking price doesn't seem to work on it's own, so I assume there's more to it than that. I've set mine pretty low, just to test things, and I'm not getting any bites...
You're not getting leased shares or changing the purchase price? Not getting any leased shares |
|
|
|
|
Simply lowering your asking price doesn't seem to work on it's own, so I assume there's more to it than that. I've set mine pretty low, just to test things, and I'm not getting any bites...
|
|
|
|
|
I'd love to see Ars keep running. I don't use Eligius due to the long wait required to reach the payout amount (or at least that's why I stopped using it a long, long time ago, and haven't been back to check if anything changed).
To be honest I'd rather see Ars back up, even if under new management, than move back to Eligius though, just due to questionable decisions by the owner in the past.
|
|
|
|
Lots of rejects and "Pool 0 not providing work fast enough" errors for the last few hours |
|
|
|
Hi Giga, As a fellow BFL supporter, I'll have to give this some serious thought. It does sound tempting  Quick question, where will you be pointing the hashing power (just to get an idea of the PPS value)? I'd ask you to pool hop but that probably won't go down too well (until the better than average dividends come through obviously ). |
|
|
|
|
The BFL's run fine on GPUMAX with cgminer if that helps.
I haven't tried Ufasoft at all to be honest.
And yes, no paid work at the moment unfortunately (although there was a nice burst for a while last night)
|
|
|
|
No rush |
|
|
|
Correct, 6 months warranty. 100% more than the other FPGA offerings, but not quite as long as your GPU's unfortunately. There's less that can fail though, so that's good |
|
|
|
Given the current stability of Armory, I may consider RAM-reduction, address books, and system-tray notifications to be a milestone for Armory Beta. Mainly because it will at least be usable by everyone (even with 1 GB of RAM), and the networking-independence is going to be a pretty substantial overhaul under-the-hood.
Sounds good Imagine the combination of the Beta tag, and the RAM reduction will see a significant uptake in usage. That of course means more bug testing |
|
|
|
No probs, thanks guys |
|
|
|
|
The site's still down right (or is it just me)?
|
|
|
|
Sonny confirmed that other pools will be configurable in it at some point anyway, so all good. Right now it's a handy way to upgrade the firmware in the boxes if nothing else |
|
|
|
Sexy. I won't be able to use it until more pools are supported (or preferably an enterable address), but it's a great idea Looks like it handles firmware upgrades as well |
|
|
|
N(t) = N'(t) + N''(t) where N' has the unknown rate λ' and N'' has known rate λ'', then Var( N(t)/Δt ) = Var(N'(t)/Δt + N''(t)/Δt) = λ'/Δt + 0
Er, yeah! That's totally what I was just about to say... |
|
|
|
I've tried to set up an OSX VM no less than 3 times, but it's never worked. I just don't have the touch (they're very finnicky, because of strict hardware specs). Though if it does work, there's no reason the compiled binaries wouldn't work. That's how I compile the Windows binaries...
Maybe I should just convince my girlfriend her laptop is crappy and she would looove a new mac mini! "It's so cute! And you totally make enough money to afford it...."
If anyone can help me out with this, please email me. Either used hardware you could send me, help setting up a VM, or other ideas...
(etotheipi a t g mail com)
I'm pretty sure I used this ( http://www.redmondpie.com/how-to-install-os-x-snow-leopard-in-vmware-windows-7-9140301/) when I did it. That's obviously an older version of OSX, but if that doesn't matter then give it a crack |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
