|
The first USDT was released on the Omni blockchain, the cost of withdrawing money from centralized exchanges started at $ 5, and the sending and receiving speed was slow.
Then USDT was issued on the Ethereum network and called USDT-ERC20. Withdrawal costs on centralized exchanges are around $ 4, the cost of remittances on the ethereum network is currently around $ 4, and can be increased or decreased with the network's GAS fees. Send and receive speed is slow.
USDT is issued on the TRONIX (TRON) network called USDT-TRC20. The cost of transferring money on centralized exchanges is free and on the TRONIX network very low (around $ 0.001). The sending and receiving speed is very high.
USDT recently released on OMG blockchain but it is not popular yet, I am not sure about their withdrawal cost and deposit speed.
|
|
|
|
What he means is the cost to create a token based on the AXAX blockchain. It belongs to economics, not the function of blockchain.
Probably it will be much less. I understand they are starting and errors and glitches could still be found. So how to say it's easier than Ethereum? As your explanation, AXAX only makes Ethereum better, it serves as a support tool.
Cause they have an improved blockchain? Remember scalability is important and considering tps of avax versus eth, you know who will win. Regarding environment assesment. I maybe bias about it, but we should see the potential of avax when it launched. Im an ethereum fan and but seeing the avax tech with much improved. Maybe I could chanhe that being eth lover. Will see when avax test waters already. Your answers are very vague and unclear. TPS is something today's blockchains are trying to develop. Now Solana, Polkadot has done just that. The DEX Serum is a concrete example of Solana's blockchain speed. I have observed on the web that the speed of AXAX is not impressive. It needs to be compared to other blockchains, not old things like Bitcoin or Ethereum. The cost of creating a DAPP is important. Ethereum is loved by everyone because it is easy to create DAPP cheaply, developers love it. Because of its low cost, there are too many projects running on Ethereum and slow down the Ethereum network. If AVAX has a higher cost, then surely no one will choose AVAX to develop. |
|
|
|
invest in Ponzi projects and get out quickly when there is enough profit (this way has the greatest risk).
All of the above are good
It mean invest in ponzi project is good and profitable? Tell me some ponzi scheme sites have you invested with your proof then  I haven't invested in PONZI projects for many years but my friends do and they do it very early. Of course, the returns are very high and sweet. I will list Bitconect 2017, Minningcity at the end of 2019 until now. I have made it clear in my post that they are dangerous and not recommended. |
|
|
|
|
How can you receive such a large amount of money? I guess that you used your money to join the liquidity pool because the people who get the most UNI are the liquidity providers.
Congratulations, like winning the lottery.
|
|
|
|
Is this project for the majority of people like Ethereum did? Can the poor also develop a Dapp on Avax's blockchain?
Everyone can join their dapp I think I heard that they are working on bridge to simplify the ethereum blockchain and avax blockchain compatible for easier deal on different applications. Im not sure though of the much specific details. What he means is the cost to create a token based on the AXAX blockchain. It belongs to economics, not the function of blockchain. The cheaper the cost, the easier it is for everyone to participate in the development of DAPP. One problem I am wondering is that AXAX is better than Ethereum but it uses the same programming language GO. So how to say it's easier than Ethereum? As your explanation, AXAX only makes Ethereum better, it serves as a support tool. |
|
|
|
|
When the ATM crypto card projects appear, in the future ATMs may support many different types of altcoins. What I am concerned about is that the withdrawal cost per transaction may be higher than regular ATMs.
|
|
|
|
|
Blockchain investment comes in many forms, the most common investment by which people are storing crypto for a long time before selling it out and trading it daily to make a profit.
There are other forms of mining crypto (such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, ETC, ETH ...), participating in investing in crypto derivatives (margin, future, ETF ...), working on organizing a cryptocurrency, set up a crypto project, invest in Ponzi projects and get out quickly when there is enough profit (this way has the greatest risk).
All of the above are good and everyone is doing it but if you don't want to be complicated then just buy bitcoins and keep them well, sell them when you have the right profit.
|
|
|
|
...i traded with my wallet at uniswap like 3 to 4 months ago but when i connected the wallet today on uniswap to claim airdrop uni tokens it says that my wallet is not eligible.
So what exactly is the criteria i thought it was for all wallets that traded on uniswap before 2 september but that does not seem to be the case. Anyone has more info please share here.
I also try to figure out the criteria because same like you I am confused. Seems like addresses created within one wallet are not eligible, only one will get the 400UNIn despite u used all of them, I had metamask where I created 2 additional addresses and only one was eligible to claim despite I used all of them many times to buy and sell on Uniswap and the volumes were a lot higher than 1ETH on each of them because I heard such opinions that minimum 1ETH volume has to be done but couldn't confirm this anywhere. In total, I get 3 times 400UNI, despite I have used 6 different ETH addresses on Uniswap frequently. PS Don't check if you can claim 400 UNI only by putting your ETH address into the search bar!!! Always log in using this ETH wallet address to Uniswap because it showed me "not eligible" by every wallet I used, but after login, I saw claim 400UNI button 3 times!!!3 accounts are too big, it's like winning the lottery. Liquidity pool participants also have a much greater volume of rewards. One has been with the liquidity group on Uniswap for a long time, and the amount he received is 128k UNI. https://twitter.com/Privatechad_/status/1306442323438510081 |
|
|
|
Perhaps the company has too much FIAT money and is looking to diversify its asset portfolio by accepting Bitcoin as a payment method.
i didnt know that fiat is now an asset . almost any business can accept btc and when i say almost any , that includes big and small. its not about the money how much they have but its the passion or love for it , these people are like us and wants to help the awareness of cryptos . this is also an easy way for them to acquire btc and they can save fees than compare to buying a btc online . FIAT is considered a stable asset, man. It helps companies or corporations maintain stability and flexibility when making any investment deal. I don't think multibillion-dollar corporations love crypto. They only love money and they will do whatever they can to make a profit. Bitcoin could be the new target they are aiming for. |
|
|
|
This project is not a scam
agree, it is not a scam, it just failed to be a successful project, there is no development, mining power is low and it is easy to make an attack to the network it is a surprise for me that ETC is still within top 50 projects, not to mention that ETC was in top 20 few months ago, i expect that it will go down in the future, does not offer anything new, there is no projects that are implemented on this block-chain and active development is on a really low level Yes, sure, ETC is like a phenomenon at the end of 2017. In addition to just exploiting and trading on exchanges with derivatives such as margin, future, ETC is not useful in the crypto community. Old technology, few users, few miners, and in the top 100 biggest market cap currencies. It's a dangerous joke, ETC has no potential in the future. |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the company has too much FIAT money and is looking to diversify its asset portfolio by accepting Bitcoin as a payment method. Other large businesses may pay more attention to bitcoin and accept it as Aviatrade does today. Great news for the bitcoin and crypto community.
|
|
|
|
At this point who really pays full price for ETC? I mean if you are a trader or an investor, would you really consider ETC as a real coin?
I totally see them as a failed project, they didn't want the fork to happen so they did a hard fork themselves and kept the old and useless and not even good ethereum project with another name called Ethereum classic but it turns out the old system wasn't as good so it got burned to hell and now it is getting 51% attacks over and over again, which is why I believe there is really no reason why people should believe them or buy them.
I feel like it should go outside of top 1000 right now, they are really nothing but a scam coin at this point, I wouldn't spend a single cent on them and I would suggest everyone not to do it as well.
This project is not a scam but they were very bad at upgrading the technology for ETC. Most of the altcoins mined at the same time it switched from POW to POS or combined POS, POW, and added a primary node to reduce the dependence on the miner. As miners mine less, the system is manipulated and a 51% attack will occur. Now they are so confused, maybe they are begging large mining pools to adopt ETC mining to help balance the network. I believe they will have to improve ETC's technology even more. Currently, POW is not good. |
|
|
|
|
An investigation is needed to find out which exchange took your funds. Maybe it was just a small mistake in the deposit process and they ignored your money. MXC are a good swap despite their volume as manipulative, virtual, and virtual. I have made deposits and withdrawals continuously and feel everything is fine, no matter what happens to my money.
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to comment on this topic last week but today I have to do it because this old man was wrong.
Bitcoin at the moment is $ 10900, if anyone buys it at $ 10000 they are about 9% profit. No other asset has grown so fast. Right now, institutions are continuing to buy bitcoins as their reserve fund. Bitcoin's future will be higher than the present.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with most of your opinion, when the market gets active again there are many problems such as fraud, manipulation, and trading risks.
Number 14 is not true since the major exchanges support cryptocurrencies, we should leave them there as long as we do KYC, secure our accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
I know him, a talented blockchain developer. He created BOA, TOB, and XAMP, his community on telegram has about 7,000 members. His projects are only personal but extremely creative.
He doesn't like Binance or CZ very much because their way of doing is centralize and copy projects from decentralized space.
|
|
|
|
|
A project was built too quickly and did not meet security standards but was still confirmed by 2 audit organizations.
They were attacked three times, previous times with the amount of about 1 million dollars, this time even bigger than that.
A large amount of ICO fundraising is worse than anonymous projects like sushi or spontaneous projects like YFI.
|
|
|
|
|
Storing in large exchanges and implementing AML / KYC and many other layers of security are better than trying to keep them in devices like Ledger, Trezor, or on a computer. They are at risk when we lose the device or get a virus.
I usually keep my money on exchanges for many years. Most of them are reputable exchanges and large exchanges because they have better security systems and can return the money I had stolen if that happened.
|
|
|
|
While there are projects and ways to test them, we have to wait until they exhibit our deceitful nature to realize.
This morning I just read an old topic that BCnex was cheating users after 8 months of operation. Everything was smooth until they found the user could not withdraw money from the exchange.
Or maybe they cheated by slowing down the project's progress after raising an ICO, even though their team looked great and reputable.
The most important thing that I believe to avoid scams is to know the team that leads the project and if profitable, get out of the project if you don't see the potential. Though it may seem emotional, I've been right a few times.
I think the news is quite long. but sometimes we can't analyze it well, like the case in the BCNEX project. they seem convincing by paying their participants in their campaign and operating for a long time. but by claiming the campaign reward you have to put a deposit first should let some people know if something is not right with this project. They are very sophisticated in creating a reputable bounty program and doing things well in the eyes of others. It is a well-invested plan. No scam project yet, they reward users with XRP value. Other scam projects have never done so. |
|
|
|
Reversing transactions is possible but it is best to return the money to the person who lost the money and burn the wrongly deposited tokens. That would be better than the way he reversed the trade because people didn't like it.
He needs to take responsibility for his mistake whether it was accidental or intentional.
Crypto transactions are not reversible but here the user made deposit to the wrong address which result into permanent stuck that is why CZ wants to burn 800 tokens lesser than the tokens they have to and return the 800 to the user but at the end no one lost or gained from this changes but this shows the centralization of cryptos. Yes, I was wrong to assume that trading is reversible. Binance focuses on what they are. From the way they create Dapps on their platform (developers pay a sizable fee to generate tokens) shows they are going against the principles of cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency developers have also voiced their opposition to Binance's approach. https://twitter.com/burn_the_state/status/1304995734354231296 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
