I like your exchange and I use it for some coins. But you can't expect people to buy coins while one person has mined 10,000 US$ worth of coins (250k SC) in 24 hours. I don't think people like to trade a coin from a chain that will be restarted sooner or later. This chain is dead, I advice not to buy/sell until the restart... Hmm, maybe better to stop this nonsense completely... SC2 will never be safe without programmers who know what they do (people like ArtForz). Source is not open, we can't even tell what more unknown vulnerabilities are in this client / network / chain. And as long as the creator has a button to stop this all, I wouldn't invest a single 0.01$ in it. You can loose it all... If CuntHunter really wants to save this coin, he releases the sourcecode and let some pro's fix it for him. |
|
|
|
I like your exchange and I use it for some coins. But you can't expect people to buy coins while one person has mined 10,000 US$ worth of coins (250k SC) in 24 hours. I don't think people like to trade a coin from a chain that will be restarted sooner or later. This chain is dead, I advice not to buy/sell until the restart... Hmm, maybe better to stop this nonsense completely... SC2 will never be safe without programmers who know what they do (people like ArtForz). Source is not open, we can't even tell what more unknown vulnerabilities are in this client / network / chain. And as long as the creator has a button to stop this all, I wouldn't invest a single 0.01$ in it. You can loose it all... If CuntHunter really wants to save this coin, he releases the sourcecode and let some pro's fix it for him. |
|
|
|
Anyone going to 51% this with a bunch of high-CPU AWS instances?
LOL fail. It cannot be 51% because of new design with policing peers. Haters gonna hate. There is going to be a successfull attack within 48 hours after launch. I was a bit to cautious on my side  |
|
|
|
Most hilarious launch since FBX 1.0?
This doesn't need a 51+ attack, it got killed by the creator. |
|
|
|
Anyone going to 51% this with a bunch of high-CPU AWS instances?
LOL fail. It cannot be 51% because of new design with policing peers. Haters gonna hate. There is going to be a successfull attack within 48 hours after launch. |
|
|
|
|
I just put the code through Google Translator and it translates it to Jibberish.
|
|
|
|
When will source code come available?
What if the final version has a keylogger or walletstealer inside?
TrojanCoin2?
Sorry... I won't run this without knowing if it is safe...
What if Windows has NSA backdoor ? You would never know it. Thank you for keeping off SC2. More coinzzz to me fools. Do you trust the creator of SolidCoin? |
|
|
|
I was looking forward to giving it a go too, but without the source code, it's a no-no for me.
I see no reason for closed software, unless there is something to hide... And what about safety of the coin? People like ArtForz found/fixed many errors/bugs but can't keep an eye on it anymore. I like to try out new alternate coins but I'll skip on this one... |
|
|
|
|
When will source code come available?
What if the final version has a keylogger or walletstealer inside?
TrojanCoin2?
Sorry... I won't run this without knowing if it is safe...
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to get 1mh/s using scrypt? OR the miner on Mac is just calculated the hashrate mistakenly? No, just error in compiling. It doesn't really earn anything... But it looks cool |
|
|
|
There is an Intel optimized variant of minerd.
You compile with the right flags for Intel, just like I did for the AMD variant.
Really?,would you mind helping me out step by step through PM if possible for windows ? Linux only, as far as I know. Perfomance under Windows isn't good for both Intel and AMD. I suck at Linux but with some help I pulled it of for my CPU. I use Xubuntu on a USB stick as a base, first get that up and running. If you read trough this topic from 4 pages back until now, there's enough information to do it yourself  |
|
|
|
I am a little curious about this currency? Why have you opted to make it GPU 'hostile'? What do you mean by this? I'm a little lost as I'm used to mining with GPU for everything else.Can GPU mining work but with limitations or is it all blocked from GPU? How can Tenebrix tell if CPU/APU/GPU/FPGA is used to mine it rather than being CPU mined like intended? Theoretically some guy can just point his GPU to a named worker set to mine this currency?
LOL. Read up mate. The algo is scrypt shit. Cannot be accelerated on GPUs. Only Linux 64 bit AMD plastic shit CPUs. No love for Intel on Linux 64 or even Windblows. For SandyBridge CPUs (corei7 with four digit model numbers).
git the package.
./configure
(screw the flags)
gedit Makefile
find "CFLAGS = "
Change that line to: CFLAGS = -march=native -O3 -Wall -msse2 -msse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4 -mavx
Brought my performance from 2.6kh/s per core (running one thread per core) to 3.66-3.7kh/s per core.
Tested with 6 threads, +2 kh/s in total.
HT works now!
Just needed some hardcore flags, that's all.
But not for HT cores? With HT enabled, kh/2s? My AMD Phenom II X6 has 6 cores, it doesn't have HT, so I run 6 threads at 3.5 khash/s. An Intel Core i7 2600K has 4 cores, does have HT, but with HT disabled it runs 4 threads at 3.6khash/s. HT isn't a real core, you can't expect the same performance as a real core. So I think a Core i7 is doing pretty nice. If Intel added 2 more cores, it would kick ass. |
|
|
|
LOL so it seems like anyone on here can lock and move topics as they please !? WOW. Only on threads they created themselves or on any thread !?
It seems like I can only move / lock my own topic but he was locking topics started by others so WTF ?
He was the topicstarter. Examples that proof me wrong? |
|
|
|
I am a little curious about this currency? Why have you opted to make it GPU 'hostile'? What do you mean by this? I'm a little lost as I'm used to mining with GPU for everything else.Can GPU mining work but with limitations or is it all blocked from GPU? How can Tenebrix tell if CPU/APU/GPU/FPGA is used to mine it rather than being CPU mined like intended? Theoretically some guy can just point his GPU to a named worker set to mine this currency?
LOL. Read up mate. The algo is scrypt shit. Cannot be accelerated on GPUs. Only Linux 64 bit AMD plastic shit CPUs. No love for Intel on Linux 64 or even Windblows. For SandyBridge CPUs (corei7 with four digit model numbers).
git the package.
./configure
(screw the flags)
gedit Makefile
find "CFLAGS = "
Change that line to: CFLAGS = -march=native -O3 -Wall -msse2 -msse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4 -mavx
Brought my performance from 2.6kh/s per core (running one thread per core) to 3.66-3.7kh/s per core.
Tested with 6 threads, +2 kh/s in total.
HT works now!
Just needed some hardcore flags, that's all.
|
|
|
|
Yes, so why has he got the power to close the threads   You have the same power... Look for the "lock topic" button... Scroll down and look at the left side of your screen... |
|
|
|
LOL 600 khash/s !!! Any plans to merge mine this shit with Fairbrix and Litecoin ( as they are all using scrypt AMD shit ) Or else I'm going to Solidcoin thank you very much. Bye. |
|
|
|
Simplecoin looks like they are not showing a different difficulty for namecoins then for bitcoins. It seems from the stats that they show they will pay equal amount of NMC o BTC which is not right as namecoin is at a lower difficulty and should be solved more often. I hope that this is just a stats issue and the extra NMC is not going to the pool owners.
I am wondering if them pool owners are getting all the NMC mined as I have not seen a single payout listed for me in either the simplecoin.us or masterpool.eu that I have tried for more than a few hours each with the same result no NMC in the account. Since there has been 26 blocks solved since the merged mining took place someone is getting them coins not the miners it seems though. So has anyone ever seen payout into their account at them two pools? Yup, Masterpoo.eu pays: Transactions Show: ALL • NMC • BTC 2011-10-09 13:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.22554176 NMC 2011-10-09 13:00:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.04708532 NMC 2011-10-09 12:50:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.15025803 NMC 2011-10-09 11:00:08 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.19144280 NMC 2011-10-09 07:40:04 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.87369882 NMC 2011-10-09 07:20:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.36526410 NMC 2011-10-09 07:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.92725398 NMC 2011-10-09 00:10:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.96039066 NMC 2011-10-08 22:00:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.37045288 NMC Yes I have had a payout there now although nothing like yours going by mine at the time you got your payouts particularly this one 2011-10-09 13:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.22554176 NMC I got 2011-10-09 13:10:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.03681885 NMC so roughly 33x less and was using 800mh/s to get it leaving you at ~27gh/s compared to mine were you using that much hash power at the time? It was a short round, I guess you didn't get enough shares in. If you would not mind what was your hash rate at the time 33x less than you seems a little excessive even with short round unless you have huge difference compared to me.. 1200 Mhash/s. Damn I had 800mh/s as I said so not a whole lot more I'll give it a try again latet with 1200 on it for a few hours and see what I get for payouts on the block now I know what I should be seeing close too. I was using cgminer 2.0.5 you? Yup, Cgminer 2.0.x |
|
|
|
Simplecoin looks like they are not showing a different difficulty for namecoins then for bitcoins. It seems from the stats that they show they will pay equal amount of NMC o BTC which is not right as namecoin is at a lower difficulty and should be solved more often. I hope that this is just a stats issue and the extra NMC is not going to the pool owners.
I am wondering if them pool owners are getting all the NMC mined as I have not seen a single payout listed for me in either the simplecoin.us or masterpool.eu that I have tried for more than a few hours each with the same result no NMC in the account. Since there has been 26 blocks solved since the merged mining took place someone is getting them coins not the miners it seems though. So has anyone ever seen payout into their account at them two pools? Yup, Masterpoo.eu pays: Transactions Show: ALL • NMC • BTC 2011-10-09 13:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.22554176 NMC 2011-10-09 13:00:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.04708532 NMC 2011-10-09 12:50:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.15025803 NMC 2011-10-09 11:00:08 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.19144280 NMC 2011-10-09 07:40:04 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.87369882 NMC 2011-10-09 07:20:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.36526410 NMC 2011-10-09 07:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.92725398 NMC 2011-10-09 00:10:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.96039066 NMC 2011-10-08 22:00:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.37045288 NMC Yes I have had a payout there now although nothing like yours going by mine at the time you got your payouts particularly this one 2011-10-09 13:10:06 Earnings from submitted shares: 1.22554176 NMC I got 2011-10-09 13:10:05 Earnings from submitted shares: 0.03681885 NMC so roughly 33x less and was using 800mh/s to get it leaving you at ~27gh/s compared to mine were you using that much hash power at the time? It was a short round, I guess you didn't get enough shares in. If you would not mind what was your hash rate at the time 33x less than you seems a little excessive even with short round unless you have huge difference compared to me.. 1200 Mhash/s. |
|
|
|
Where is the "three macbooks" thing coming from ?
I said 6 3-year-old macbooks. Referring to my 3-year-old macbook seeming to have 1/6 of the power. How many CPU's are you using for mining?
Two. I think something is wrong on your side. No way you are getting 600khash from any CPU at this moment What miner are you using? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
