The role of the Ledger nano team is questionable now. How a user data would be leaked by the next day (if it's true what wrote by @dkbit98). We can suspect that one or more members from the Ledger management or support team are involved with the scammers. Ledger can't skip with such an excuse. If they can't stop that kind of behavior, then most likely Bitcoin users will start to avoid them and will find some other hardware wallet. I am also a Ledger user, but I am worried now even when I see update popups.

Anyway, thanks OP for the warning. I hope the community will be aware of such a scam.

But it seems that the person wrote 15 hours ago and he bought Ledger a week ago. Somethings suspicious there if it's true.

When you divert yourself into fiat, means most probably you have to use your personal documents like KYC. It's quite complicated to skip when using a credit/debit card. Because you can't use cryptocurrency directly via credit/debit cards. The crypto funds will be converted into fiat via a third party. I have seen a few services those offering card even without KYC but there is no warranty if you face the further issue. I will suggest if it's possible to use, then collect a card from your local banks. So, you shouldn't worry about KYC leakage.

Surprising! 40 countries? How is that possible? It wasn't an easy task by the way. I am assuming he is around only crypto-friendly countries. I can't imagine how he has been managing everything with crypto only. If it's really true, then it's one kind of bitcoin adaptation. He is finding goods for bitcoins and o the other hand he has been spreading words about Bitcoin as well. I think many new people will meet with the bitcoin in this way.

Since you can buy thousands of fake Google reviews, it means they faking their reviews by themselves. It doesn't matter many positive reviews are there, you have to verify the download source. I never download any Bitcoin-related apps from any untrusted source. I have remembered when I downloaded Electrum wallets apps from the official source. Their apps link that will be redirected to the Google apps. Whoever is in crypto, should be very careful with the wallet software. Otherwise, scam or hack might happen at any time. Just don't download any apps bases on Google review only. Must need to verify the source.

Reported by the way, let's see how Google handle it.

I am not using Neteller or Skrill but recently heard they are disabling add funds for a few countries. As a result, most likely they disabled BTC deposit for your country and may have opened other add funds options. I haven't noticed such an announcement from official links. I am not using both of that wallets due to bad experiences some of my friends like disable accounts or limit accounts. You may mail to the support and ask the reason for disabling BTC deposits.

You may read here, https://www.neteller.com/en/policies/cryptocurrency-terms-of-use

It's quite complicated to say where to invest either its DeFi or IEO. Honestly, we can't say safe any investment into the crypto. We know all that what happened about ICO. I believe the same thing will happen with DeFi. It's because many scammers already enter the DeFi ecosystem to scam us. I wouldn't agree to invest DeFi out of exchange if really you need to invest. If you buy a DeFi token via an exchange, then you can say alt least they would skip instantly with your funds. Of course, you have to choose a well-reputed exchange for that. Pump dump is your own risk since there are whales for that. Otherwise, better to avoid buying the initial token for DeFi.

Exactly, I wondering about that. This is something OP should make sure of. Sometimes I made the same mistake, mix up the authenticate codes with each other. OP would try by using all the codes. If it's not working even time is synchronized correctly. Otherwise, you have to raise support to reset your Google Authentication codes. If you can provide reasonable evidence accordingly, then hope they will reset it.

I can't recall the thread, but I think this subject has been discussed previously. Honestly, I hadn't bought a bitcoin directly. The first time I bought Payza and PM and invest somewhere. When I meet with Bitcoin then had withdrawn bitcoin from the platforms first time and that's how I involved with bitcoin.

Unfortunately, my holding was invested (during a trade) on some shitcoin and now holding and trading a small amount of bitcoin. Most likely I will buy some if incase found a hard dip. But I don't think so we will see any hard dip.

Accepted, Please update your signature and avatar. Make sure your BTC address on the spreadsheet.

We are full now.

week-4 & final payments have sent out.

The campaign has been ended. It was a pleasure to work with guys. Everyone has done a great job during the campaign. You are free to remove your signature.

---

Follow my campaign management thread   to stay updated about the new campaign. Feel free to leave your feedback there about my service, it would encourage me to bring more projects for you. Expecting we will work together very soon once again.

week-4 & final payments have sent out.

The campaign has been ended. It was a pleasure to work with guys. Everyone has done a great job during the campaign. You are free to remove your signature.

---

Follow my campaign management thread   to stay updated about the new campaign. Feel free to leave your feedback there about my service, it would encourage me to bring more projects for you. Expecting we will work together very soon once again.

Most likely the website uses Bitpay API to accept bitcoin. I have experienced before on the Namecheap. Before adding BTCPayserver on the Namecheap they accept only Bitpay. There was no option to send funds from another wallet either its web or noncustodial wallet. You had to send fund Bitpay first if you are holding funds on another wallet. But good to see that now they are accepting bitcoin via BTCPayserver, so there is no issue sending bitcoin from anywhere.

That's what I was worried about when I heard that PayPal going to allow their users to buy/sell Bitcoin. Why account should limit since they have been allowing their users to buy and sell Bitcoin? Why not they just limit the trading amount for each week or month? They why should buy Bitcoin via a PayPal account? They just make the bitcoin system more centralized.

I haven't found yet about their chargeback terms for the Bitcoin, but I am expecting it's the same as previous and doesn't matter if it's crypto since the transaction isn't broadcasting on the blockchain. At least I am not gonna hold penny crypto on PayPal.

It's pretty sure YOSHIE made mistake, but not by leaving feedback. He made mistake during provide a reference link. @YOSHIE should revise his feedback by providing appropriate reference links.

Anyway, can you explain briefly why have you used the same ETH address on a campaign that you accused of? According to campaign rules alt account should join at a time. So definitely there is something wrong. Please clear the case by providing appropriate counter-evidence.

Due to the lack of appropriate Full Member participants, I am merging sport for Sr. Member. So, I am increasing Sr. Member spot and reducing the Full Member spot.

---

4x Sr. Member spot open.

If someone calls Bitcoin is gambling then although they aren't right, but they aren't wrong as well at the same time. Isn't life is a gamble, do we know what will happen tomorrow? Same here, we don't know what will happen with Bitcoin tomorrow, it would bump or dump as well. So, if during that time you are a bitcoin holder then you are on a gamble. Technically it's not a gamble, it's just a cryptocurrency. But automated gamble happening here. Honestly, very few peoples realize bitcoin technically.

Posting an image wasn't necessary for that post. It will discourage the reader to read your post. I was just about to send merit on your post, but unnecessary images discouraged me.

Accepted, please update your signature and avatar within 12 hours from now. Make sure your BTC address is correct in the spreadsheet.

---

8x Full Member spot open. 

 

Do you think all bounty hunters have enough time to do their own diligence? Always we blame the managers if the project turned into a scam. But what is the role of hunters? They have been spreading the word about the project and that's how investors notice the project. So, hustlers have a responsibility to identify legit projects. Perhaps there are a few hunters who care about their time and research before promoting a project. But sadly, a big part of hunters doing nothing except spam on social media. They even don't care if they receive the tokens, I have experience with that. I fight for hunters but no one from hunters supports us.

To be honest, when I have been reading your post then I realized something suspicious there. And when read Lucius's reply, then it's become clear to me. Yea, you may suggest investing in a Ponzi scheme from where you may earn a commission. When peoples should scam by others since you are here .

I don't think you will succeed in your intention. Forum users are enough careful except a few greedy. If we can't save our assets then no one can save us, that's true. There are many users on the forum who have been helping newbies. I don't think they need any special helps from you.

But still, it would consider as plagiarism or copy paste. For such a post, OP should mention there that "I have read on Telegram (source name) or on news". Also at least OP should use Quotation mark (") on the post to avoid plagiarism. Add source link on the post also help avoid plagiarism. If this isn't plagiarism then many users will do the same. But, really this wouldn't consider as heavy plagiarism. Most likely temp ban for such a case would appropriate IMO.