If you have btc to contribute to the cost of the miners + the psu, you might be able to get someone to lend you the money plus host it until the loan is repaid. You would effectively be paying for electricity though.
|
|
|
I highly doubt that OgNasty did that do a dog. Do you have any evidence to support this?
|
|
|
That is actually the current cold storage address for bitfinex. It is not the stolen/hacked coins. edit: I just checked, and the last time any of the stolen coins moved out of the addresses they were sent to in the August hack was in March of this year.
|
|
|
[...] I think it is sad how multiple people can run around extorting people without any kind of consequences. If you think that in this case there weren't "any kind of consequences" then you either weren't paying attention or you're plain lying. As this reply was right here in this topic: It seems to be the latter... Okay, fair enough, he has suffered some consequences, although his co-conspirators have not, at least not directly related to this incident. Lauda also still has significant power/authority that is not appropriate for an extortionist to have.
|
|
|
There is nothing wrong with his rating. I'd probably tag you as well, but it does not seem to be worth the effort. probably i will start a new account, but Vods actions force honest people to multiaccounting.
Avoiding a rating with a new account -> permanent negatives on all new accounts created by you. i just don't care anymore. i haven't done anything wrong you are just lazy to get in to situation. bye Good job in getting one more person to leave the community. /s
|
|
|
So as an US resident, I understand that we can't send them FIAT. However, can we still send/withdraw in a form of BTC?
Yes. Are you sure? https://www.bitfinex.com/posts/216It is not 100% clear in their statement, but they write: Furthermore, over the next 90 days, we will be discontinuing services to our existing U.S. individual customers. We will be communicating further with affected users on timing and specifics. Our intention is to reduce disruption as much as possible for our U.S. customers. For me this sounds like US customers won't be able to do anything at bitfinex ?! I am sure. They are referring to verified US customers. Verified corporate customers within the US and unverified customers can still use their platform. I am unverified. So i can still transfer/withdraw btc from bitfinex? Correct? Yup. You are correct.
|
|
|
Its funny how QS find him self on so much drama on this forum.
I think it is sad how multiple people can run around extorting people without any kind of consequences.
|
|
|
So as an US resident, I understand that we can't send them FIAT. However, can we still send/withdraw in a form of BTC?
Yes. Are you sure? https://www.bitfinex.com/posts/216It is not 100% clear in their statement, but they write: Furthermore, over the next 90 days, we will be discontinuing services to our existing U.S. individual customers. We will be communicating further with affected users on timing and specifics. Our intention is to reduce disruption as much as possible for our U.S. customers. For me this sounds like US customers won't be able to do anything at bitfinex ?! I am sure. They are referring to verified US customers. Verified corporate customers within the US and unverified customers can still use their platform.
|
|
|
So as an US resident, I understand that we can't send them FIAT. However, can we still send/withdraw in a form of BTC?
Yes.
|
|
|
Being that China recently banned ICOs, in addition to the fact that ICOs are somewhat frowned upon in the US, and that only one person has purchased 0.02 BTC worth of coins so far, I think I will pass for now.
If your ICO starts to gain more interest/steam and/or if the landscape changes, I may reevaluate in the future.
|
|
|
Vod unfortunately is incapable of thinking for himself. You will need to get some people in the default trust network to agree his feedback is invalid and he will promptly remove his rating.
|
|
|
It would probably increase your chances of finding a willing trading partner if you were willing to travel across the bridge into New Jersey.
The Legal/Regulatory landscape in NY (including NYC) has caused many Bitcoin related companies to simply stop doing business there.
|
|
|
That said, sadly if I had sufficient assets to repay the loan if the ICO is not successful, I wouldn't be in a position in having to request this investment-cum-loan, albeit that's perhaps a misnomer given that many multi-million-dollar entities seek additional funding for their respective projects in spite of their coffers being adaquently topped off.
Well I guess my question is, what would you do if the ICO is not successful? Would you be in a position to repay the original loan amount? I am also, not entirely sure I am understanding what the proceeds of the loan will be used for.
|
|
|
I am trying to understand the terms you are offering. Is it correct to say you are asking for a loan under the following terms: Loan Amount: 2BTC Due date: October 31, 2017 Repayment amount: greater of $20,000 (paid via bitcoin at exchange rate at the time of repayment), or 2.2 BTC
I am also trying to understand the relationship between you and TuTu.Co.in. Is this your project? Or did someone else create this project? Where do you fall into play regarding this project?
Where will the funds to repay the loan come from? How will the funds from the loan be used? If the ICO is ultimately not successful, what funds will be used to repay the loan? Do you have sufficient assets to repay the loan if the ICO is not successful? Are you personally guaranteeing this loan?
I assume you are able to provide some kind of signed message verifying your identity as Bruno/Gleb.
Thanks.
|
|
|
This guy created fake lauda account on slack which you can see from his pictures. I cant believe someone is as dumb as this guy. Isnt this kind of behavior banneable here at the forum? I don't think he is really all that dumb....his accusation was designed to crumble upon close inspection
|
|
|
I would find this unlikely. They are already a market leader and would not gain much by acquiring btc-e.
I would find it unlikely but if they could acquire for a decent price it might make good business. What i was wondering is why do they need a takeover in the first place, they already announced customer losses of 45% and they have the remaining funds in coin. What does new investment provide. The funds a potential investor would pay for partial ownership of btce would be used to repay their customers.
|
|
|
Securities or project development, depending on the details.
Thanks.. i posted it in securities.. project development probably do ban etter. Should i repost in there and delete post on securities? You can move it to project development if that is where you want your thread.
|
|
|
I am sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but coinbase is your best bet.
As mentioned above you can use LBC, however this will result in you getting a much worse rate versus coinbase.
|
|
|
I would avoid this kind of deal. Fraudulent traffic is a problem with google and they are actively trying to combat the issue. There is the potential for google to reverse the payment, deduct the fraudulent portion of a payment from future payments and/or attempt to collect fraudulent payments via civil lawsuits.
I would consider this kind of deal to be similar to accepting PayPal, with a longer period that payments can be reversed.
|
|
|
Securities or project development, depending on the details.
|
|
|
|