From this graphs, imo things didn't fall that much.... Other than the airlines who took a massive dip, everyone else doesn't look like they had too much of a problem. Hotel occupancy only fell by half for example.

The global economy was obviously going to recover pretty quickly after lockdowns were lifted and I think it'd still be doing quite well since california and San Francisco seemed to lockdown early and that's where a lot of the technological parts of the economy come into play afaict...

Yeah I think resources available will have a massive impact on the economy but the more people that work in a country the richer the rich can get as more people can work for them and labour is cheaper (it's also easier to separate yourself from the ground workers imo). But this probably tops out somewhere and we see countries thriving with populations as low as a few million with some as high as around 100 million (I'm not sure of any countries with a higher population as I'm not sure if there's something they can hide better).


Yeah moved thanks! Couldn't work out where to put it...
And of course fewer people means more government/society watching of each individual and a potential rise of the smaller number of people taking up a jobs of a higher role...

---

Just need to add by "immigration" I mean completely voluntary immigration where the person can return back to their home country whenever they like...

I'm using monetary inflation (based from monetary policy) and effective inflation (the price increase of certain "essential items" taken as an average increase in price.

Typically speaking is a population fall for a country or a certain area that uses the same currency a problem as the cost of standard items will increase and the value of the currency will fall because everyone might have more of it (other than a few that may still have nothing) potentially due to inheritance and a few other things.

Has something like this ever happened on a long term or do a government normally incentivise reproduction/immigration if something like this were to happen (causes of this could be anywhere from a nuclear explosion to chemical tests/contamination to a change in socioeconomic attitudes). I'm just wondering if this is a massive problem if this isn't corrected by a government.

If we climb past $9.5k then I reckon we could see a surge higher. I'm a bit more pessimistic and there's a lot of bearish sentiment atm so I can imagine a break further to 8.4-8.6k at least is probably likely...

I'm currently (unleveraged) short but I could be wrong you could always wait for a break one way before scalping it with tight SL's.

We could be trolled to $11k and we might be but I still expect some sort of correction, whether 8k is enough of a correction I'm not sure...

Why would I do that - didn't realise v8 was different oops 🤣 explains why it didn't work though lol...

---

Yeah I just reinstalled it, should've tried fiddling more with the coach first to see if that did anything though.

Are a lot of terrorist organisations not advanced enough to know what's best to use for security... Also if this goes through I doubt companies are going to make separate versions without back doors... (perhaps this could incentivise Asia to produce different devices or Europe/australasia to start producing better secure devices that don't have random holes for the US government).

Where's the delusion China is communist with everyone?

There affect on other economies and minimising spread to other countries wasn't like this though (effective) and they should've started their lockdown a lot sooner, are they still in lockdown also? Most European countries are transitioning out - maybe people were right about China being worse affected than weve been made to believe (I think 20 million sim contracts went cancelled around the peak afaik)...

I get a crash report every time I start electrum for android, has there been a new update or something or have I fiddled with too many things again and need to reinstall it.

I'm fine reinstalling it but I'm not sure what wallets I had so might have to find a way to extract the data (all the seeds are backed up anyway)... So does anyone have a way of me trying to fix this without reinstalling (maybe there's a way to keep data but reinstall the app - I installed a different version on a different user account on the phone and thought it would be fine - which is what caused the problem...)

When I check to see the details of the log also it is completely empty.

Did they provide a reason for the year's delay?

If you managed to charge back a bank transfer once why can't they do it again or was it a different way to pay you used? The statute for charge backs is 360 days afaik at maximum so that could be a reason but I wouldn't trust a site to hold my funds for that long...

If you weren't going to scam, why would you say 100 of 500?

What country are you in? Was it caused by a bank error, if it's in somewhere like Europe I'd phone up your bank and ask them about it (and if they put the phone down, walk in and demand an appointment) I assume the liability will lie with them if it was them who accidentally charged it back and resent it... You can keep claiming with paxful too though.

The signing issue was mainly a problem in case you needed to prove ownership to an exchange or something, it's also more effort than it's worth to me... I could use it temporarily but I normally use native segwit (other than those exchanges where you can't - sometimes for random reasons where they pick when they want to accept native segwit or not)...



Yeah this is the only way I use trezor with bitcoin but it might be a good idea to suggest we all use it for signing this addresses in the hope it gets accepted as the standard as its more widely available than trezor...


Oh it was just meant to mena like a sanity check at run time. Electrum takes so long to generate a signature that it seems likely it'd also spend time verifying the signature with the message and address in the process...

I think you'd be paying a lot in fees for the whole thing. Unless you're going to set up a base in North America, Europe and potentially Asia (you just need one person for this) then otherwise currency conversion might be expensive.

I also can't work out what exactly you'd be trying to use this for, why would I come to you instead of just going straight to coinbase? You'd have to kyc on amounts over $1000/€1000/£1000 too afaik (at minimum but it could be 5000 of each of those units).

I don't know if cryptocurrency lawyers easy to find or not, stuff probably depends on the state you're in, I'd imagine new York has quite a few but you can just search for your state I imagine...

I don't think there are many options of wallet for ios (it has a pretty small market share especially in Europe).

There's a list of ios wallets here you can use: https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-wallet/ios-iphone-ipad/

I think I've only heard of greenwallet though in the past and I'm not entirely sure it's the one I know (and coinomi but thats closed source so not as trusted but I have stored funds on there in the past).

Do we need trust in the lightning network? Normally you can set a force time lock for non cooperation and have to sign all your transactions for a new channel state. If its like 2 weeks then you shouldn't need to trust a server or a watchtower as you can handle your funds and maintain them (as long as you can come online once every two weeks)... They'll probanly release software - if they haven't already - for producing your own watchtower.

---

The new release looks quite interesting I'll have a look at testing it out tomorrow if there's a portable version I can put $5 on a channel and have a test with it...

Can 1xbit be added to the list, apparently they're selective scammers; trust ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2122225

I haven't used nested segwit for a long term address and it seems to have so many compativilities that is probably a bad idea to try to (I'd probably pick legacy over it even with the fees)...

Is it possible to verify one when you use electrum if you generated it from electrum or can you just not generate a trezor signature eon a nested segwit address? I didn't think it'd be possible to create a signature without electrum then wanting to verify it before displaying it...

High cap alts normally all fall together as people lose hope that have more power to start buying back bitcoin...
But bsv would've caused bch to drop as I said...

There was less hype on bch too and a greater amount of bad rep on one of its main sponsors and also they called standard bitcoin bitcoin core...

Did bch start to be valued at 0.15 too or was it 0.015 (from the start) I think it dropped a lot of its the first or remained stable if it was the second (it's been so long ago since I claimed my forks)...

@stompix Google says there are 500 million addresses that have had a history, if we assume 20 billion addresses have been sent to a server and these are just hashed versions(?) then it sounds bruteforceable still (but I could be wrong).


A bug through tor is probably similarly likely as a bug through clearnet, clearnet might be less exploitable as more people look into improving its security and cisco/net gear and a few others are paid to maintain it afaik.
A dot onion doesn't stop people doing forensics on your system still, some connections don't even fully close when some apps close (even if the application programmes for it, the operating system could hang on it, get an interrupt and just not come back or it can be interrupted during normal functioning so an unsafe shutdown occurs).

There are some really stupid os enforced bugs that neither tor nor clearnet will protect you against though too...

It might have caused people to believe that anyone with any sort of slight incentive could start their own coin however bitcoin and ethereum have great benefits so I wouldn't attribute anything of their recent activity to bsv, btc was lower in price when bsv was released wasn't it too?

Everyone with bch got bsv so that definitely had an affect but bch and bsv are kinda scam coins anyway that have an overinflsted market cap (bch, to me, is a less secure version of ltc, without any other differences).