He should remain anonymous. Coming out could be dangerous for him because he's probably not a very rich person who lives in a secure mansion. We all know what happened to traders who were bragging about their profits and the same thing could happen to Satoshi.
If I were Satoshi I wouldn't reveal my identity. Maybe I would make sure it gets revealed after my death or something like that.
|
|
|
I don't like shitcoins but delisting is usually unnecessary even delisting of a coin run by an angry liar like faketoshi. If people don't like the coin they should vote on it by dumping and not buying it. They shouldn't look for higher power to remove the coin for them.
Exchanges are abusing their power by delisting traded coins and forcing people's hand to dump before they are no longer able to.
|
|
|
I don't have a favourite kind and I don't buy lottery tickets. This is a waste of time and money because your chances are very low. So low that in many lotteries it's more probable for you to be hit by a lightning than win the main prize. I also don't understand people who keep playing even when they don't win anything for years. I know such people myself and they have a habit of wasting money on lotteries.
|
|
|
it be interesting to see a gambling site where be bet on insects. spider fight is very common in the philippines, kinda like a cock fight here and those who are fond of it knew the rules about the game. i however don't think there will be a lot of bettors since this isn't like MMA where wee know the status of the fighters.
For this reason it could succeed in countries where animal fights are already popular. In countries where dog fights are banned and people aren't used to seeing animals fight even insect fights wouldn't become popular. There would be a lot of people against it and they would ultimately ban it from public display. I don't know what to think of it. I'm against dog fights so this is wrong and cruel too.
|
|
|
If he said so, then maybe he has knowledge about satoshi. But I think even if he would reveal the real satoshi and satoshi would still not claim that he is then the real identity will still be left hanging. It would end up still in a debate of whoever is satoshi. Mcafee maybe credible enough but the satoshi will always have the final say.
I don't think that he has. It's a PR stunt by him and we can all watch it develop as news sites write about it and people like OP make threads on forums. McAfee is known for talking too much and changing views. He made a price prediction last year and then acted like he never did it and did it all on camera. I expect him to later change his mind and decide not to reveal Satoshi's identity.
|
|
|
This isn't popular here in Europe because there aren't many vicious spiders around here. Almost all spider species in my area are very safe to handle and not aggressive. It gets interesting when you live in Australia or South America because some spiders there are some big specimens that eat much bigger prey than flies.
With all the nature protectors in the EU I don't think it could get popular here.
|
|
|
This is a normal site , it is not better and not worse than other sites
It's not much better or worse than other legit sites and it has the advantage of being one of the most popular ones. There are some scam attempts in the gambling industry so you should always choose trusted and popular sites to play on. Don't consider other options like graphics or fees before deciding which site has a history of legitimate and fair gambling.
|
|
|
I like that all of your scenarios are short term bullish. They are a bit different from what most people are drawing.
The most popular scenarios that you can see online predict that we will fail to break resistance at 6000 and go down from there, with bears seeing it as final capitulation below 3000 dollars and bulls as a drop to 4000, failure to break previous support and another try at 6000 later this year. You see much higher prices in the near future and I hope you are right.
What is your opinion about hyperwave theory supporters who say we need another leg down before we pass 6000?
|
|
|
BSV delist good news for Bitcoin or bitcoincash, because BSV investors will move to Bitcoin or Bitcoincash, that means the price of Bitcoin or Bitcoincash will increase
A lot of the SV value is fake. When it was listed it did not start from 0 but from 60 dollars. What gave it that value? Why on the first day of listing it already had 100 times higher price than Bitcoin in 2010? It's based on unrealized gains and estimations. Many people did not claim SV at all and will never do it and if it falls below 50 dollars there will be no more money that can go from it to other coins.
|
|
|
The only secret you could have in order to be a good poster is to share your own personal idea without faking it. Sometimes, shitposting happens when a person's shitpost was kept unnoticed. Since this forum is made for cryptocurrency and also considered as a forum for the financial industry, professional must always be applied and adopted.
For us to be able to help the community and keep the said professionalism. We have to adopt being professional and become a good example from the newbies.
The key word here is idea. You need an idea before you post which is something you want to share with others and this has to be on topic. If you think that sharing your real opinion makes you a good poster you are wrong! You can go to any spam topic and see that most people share their ideas there. The problem is that their ideas are simple obvious and repeated many times by people above them.
|
|
|
“Cryptocurrency should not exist at all. It interferes the development of commodity production. And making money out of money is detrimental to the entire population of the earth. Those who work in this market are speculators,” the parliamentarian said.
This made me laugh. He said making money out of money is detrimental for people. So the concept of banks is wrong according to him? Does he think we shouldn't have banks at all! The main activity of banks is to receive money from depositor and pay them interest and give loans and receive interest. So in short, they make money from money. And I don't see how banks are detrimental to population in large. Despite, banks are one of the biggest helper to economic development. They are making money from borrowing. It's not exactly making money from money because you are lending to the bank for interest and bank is lending other people for bigger interest. Even mining bitcoin is not making money out of money. It's making money out of electricity. He got it all wrong but at least he calls bitcoin money.
|
|
|
A nice professionally made summary of the news. This mining farm than went down reminds me of the stories of miners filing for bankruptcy in 2015 or running away and leaving their bills behind. The money is probably unretrievable they will never make this much back to pay their contractors. You got one happy dog there
|
|
|
about 900 million children are hungry in the world at this moment..
They don't want to help the children. The NWO wants less people on the planet so you won't see them feeding the poor. They will rather give them outdated vaccines and other medical supplies to thin the herd. When the cathedral gets rebuilt there will be a memorial somewhere inside with all the donors and maybe even their company logos. They want to be immortalized.
|
|
|
I don't know why they are existence, but it's a pretty popular direction now. This way exchanges strengthen the credibility of their coin too. For example, as did the exchange Binance.
Really? After so many opinions in this thread you still don't know why they were created? Exchanges need money to expand to other countries so they are offering IEOs. People want a safe profitable investment and are tired of ICO scams. It's a pretty straightforward relationship.
|
|
|
There will be no BCH mining profitability if SV is worth a few dollars. This chart is showing that it could be profitable o mine SV because its value has dropped. If tomorrow it falls another 10% the profitability will skyrocket again but it won't mean that people will mine all of a sudden. Miners want to be able to sell after a while and still get a good price. SV is here today but it can be delisted almost everywhere next month and lose 50% of value.
|
|
|
Hehehe...this thing will be flooding in the internet for some time.Already this has been a hilarious issue and as different exchanges started delisting SV so Craig Wright is being going crazy.He will again trying to prove many things we may again listen to some new things going on.Since the hard fork occurred the things has gone south for Craig Wright.Many people have considered him to be psychopath.
He is sure acting like a psychopath. Falsifying records threatening people suing people changing allegiances like gloves. Yesterday there was a post circulating on the forums where they caught Craig lying again about buying some domains or something in and the transactions were sent years later. I'm not even following all the news about him and his lies. He's so full of shit it could be exhausting.
|
|
|
How I see here is a lot of followers of Bitcoin SV. What is the main difference between BTC and Bitcoin SV? And Why now such a lot of exchenges delist BSV?
Bitcoin is bitcoin. It's the first and the most popular cryptocurrency in the world. BSV is a fork of a fork. It's a less popular version of an altcoin created by Roger Ver. It doesn't have much in common with the real bitcoin. This is the greatest difference between them. BTC makes the network faster and cheaper by adding a network outside the chain. BCH wanted to make transactions cheaper by increasing block size. SV is doing a similar thing but increases the block size even more. Both BCH and BSV weren't popular for transactions even when BTC had no LN.
|
|
|
I also think nobody can predict the crypto currency, but for me you can also hold your bitcoin to wait for a higher price increase in the future, because for me saving bitcoin or other altcoins is also a good thing to make a profit
You can do it if you gather a bunch of analysts and each of them chooses a different path. One of them will be right and he'll be the winner You can never be sure but most predictions come down to 50-50 and when most analysts are bullish it's a good idea to get bearish instead. With bitcoin's history of going against the majority if you swim upstream you have 80% of making money. If you scream bull run in the end of a bear market you will probably get it right and many famous analysts became famous by doing it.
|
|
|
If those measurements are required to fight money laundering then why not accept it? I also feel more safe (some how) if they want to play by the rules, as that means that it will be more stable for them to make their clients to withdraw their funds without any government issues. As well for them, if they need these sort of "approvals and agreements" for them to keep running without legal issues then we should consider is ok to have them.
Why would you care about someone "laundering money". Their illegal activity shouldn't concern you unless you are some government worker or the police. I really don't care if someone wants to move money around without telling their government spies about it. If your government bans bitcoin you could find yourself loundering money too.
|
|
|
Ripple is currently undervalued and if you look at it last high around January or February last year, you will agree with me that ripple has done well then and going as high as $4 dollars that it was then may not happen this year but in two to three years to come.
It's only undervalued because the crypto market is undervalued as a whole. If Bitcoin and the other top coins go up in value they will probably take XRP along for the ride but people are getting tired of all the talk and not much walk from ripple labs. They were promising to be a bridge with banks but banks are choosing to invest in BTC or make their own coins instead.
|
|
|
|