Croatia vs Scotland: 0-2 Czech Republic vs England: 2-0 Sweden vs Poland: 1-3
FJ Username: YHOE505
|
|
|
My opinion: You just focus on the participants you want to accept, just let them register, sometimes in situations like this there are many things a campaign manager like you should consider.
• today a manager saw a participant without a 5 merit requirement, maybe in the next campaign the participant marked as having 10-15 merits he has, today maybe a manager can't hire that participant, maybe in a future campaign it's eligible in the campaign rules.
Conclusion: the wheel is always turning, sometimes down, sometimes up, today is not worth it, maybe in the future it is worth it.
In this situation, sometimes I've also seen CM campaigns, participants who register have (red trust and 0 Merit) the manager still thanks the participants who apply the application when the slot is open, although not accepted. So, let's just let a situation like that float without having to mark it, with a situation like that, participants think they work harder to do constructive posts to be included in certain campaigns.
That's my opinion. Regards.
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me what other legit bitcoin casino that pay fast and safe thx
Because I'm not native to the United States, that's why we can discuss this forum, especially about gambling, For this reason, the information below might help you to find an illegal gambling site that is friendly to Bitcoin in America. https://www.legalbettingonline.com/bitcoin/There are several casinos listed as below. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fzizihub.com%2Ff19030.jpg&t=663&c=LO7qIg4Ze4MQdQ) Who knows it can help solve the problem you are facing.
|
|
|
One won the WBO champion and the other won the WBC champion, these two bettors have perfect strength, both are from the Philippines, for now the Philippines has a good reputation in the world boxing championship, I recognize the Filipino boxer athlete who has the fastest punch to beat his opponent. Who do you think will have the edge? and will Unify the Bantamweight Title
If I may be honest in the match between Donaire Vs. Casimero.And from the experience that I have seen boxers from the Philippines, my belief is that the champion this time is won by Donaire, of course, there are reasons for me to choose Donaire, the simple reason is: Of the many Filipino boxers besides Pacquiao, Donaire is one of the boxing athletes who was selected in the world event in four heavyweight championships, this proves that Donaire has good potential in winning the championship this time, except: there are other elements that we don't know yet because they are both from the Philippines.
|
|
|
I tried to check some of the accusations against the FAIRLAY.COM site, in this forum, there are 2-3 same accusations have been made against the complaints, by different users. But I'm curious about FAIRLAY.COM users, no one takes what happened to the victim seriously. The proof: these accusations:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2383672.0I don't see any warnings on the @FairlaySupport profile. Because I've never played and visited their site, so don't really understand what's going on with the OP, even though you said so. However, for that, try to contact @FairlaySupport user first, who knows if there is a solution for your case.
|
|
|
You should be even more enthusiastic in doing posts that are construction, especially for you and others, it's okay to be happy, when other people give sMerit/award for you, but you have to make giving by people a ledge Moment for the next and make your motivation higher, that you can do and earn even more (sMerit) from other members in this forum. Do you guys have similar feelings when your post get merited ?
Yes, the feeling is definitely there. What crossed my mind instead was not happy and happy when other members gave me sMerit, actually anxiety haunts me, questions often arise in my mind, is this the last sMerit I got, because I really have to give the best especially for myself and others in achieving 1000 Merit based on the system that has been run. That's my feeling....! other people I don't know what they are thinking.
|
|
|
If you really have expertise in a particular board area, that is very much appreciated here, as you mentioned not everyone masters a certain field, but for that you have to share your expertise in that part of the board.
But most of the members here master several fields, to help others in problems, they don't escape the knowledge they learn, that's the meaning of forums that we don't know to know, because they share with each other.
On to the OP's next question: you are indeed mastering one board with 100% it will be the biggest reward for you, quite the opposite, there is not a single reason, if you understand one board to ban you.
|
|
|
Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)1. vasilisc555 (Archived)2. vasilisc55Proof:Bitcointalk UserName: vasilisc555 Telegram Username: @pauliuchenia Ethereum Wallet Address: 0xe4baa1588397d9f8b409955497c647b2ede9defb
Forum Username: vasilisc55 Telegram Username: @pauliuchenia ERC20 Wallet Address: 0xE4Baa1588397D9F8b409955497c647b2edE9dEfb
https://archive.vn/wip/Tm5jbRelated Addresses:ERC20 Wallet Address: 0xE4Baa1588397D9F8b409955497c647b2edE9dEfb
Miscellaneous:related account cases are: breaking the rules (25). which says:25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]
And the account below is linked to the account found by: @lovesmayfamilis, The case is also the same: (Ban evasion).Ban evasion.jaan1984 Autoban userzain3339 bannedETH Wallet Address: 0xDbEd844b97B16630E3BB802Fa70b08e51Cc72370
ETH Wallet Address : 0xDbEd844b97B16630E3BB802Fa70b08e51Cc72370
[ archive ] Accounts Connected:3. Pak123Proof:Forum Username: pak123 ETH Address: 0xDbEd844b97B16630E3BB802Fa70b08e51Cc72370
https://archive.vn/wip/XjW82
|
|
|
Of the total tokens: 100Million, 90% is allocated to the Bounty which means it is distributed to the Bounty participants, another 10% is lost / burned, a rough calculation of the possibility that the token has no value on the marke, investors are not familiar with these tokens, and one more thing that can happen, they will buy tokens from Bounty participants at the lowest price, next they will develop those tokens in the market, It's like a game, they play the price and they also play the market, after the token is successfully purchased 70% of the bounty participants.
|
|
|
just reply them 'scammer' and hit the block button or adjust your social media app to block unknown strangers, there are many of these people on telegram, Twitter, Reddit etc
Redt, istagr, Tw, tlgr, the fields of fraudsters to carry out their actions, social media targets that are often successfully used by fraudsters, especially telegram, if only a few percentages of people think the same as you to ignore every incoming message by offering various benefits through investing in crypto, maybe the fraudster is a little tired to launch the action. Sometimes they speak very sweetly in carrying out their actions, in fact some of them sacrifice a little of their wealth, To get bigger results, be aware of such modes to people you just meet on social media, before yours is drained.
|
|
|
"IS MONEY THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL?"
Isn't money categorized as an inanimate object, in my opinion, money is not the root of evil? 'money' is neutral, everyone needs money, no exception, but if someone loves money he is the source of the 'evil' loving money can make humans greedy, money is earned by doing anything, no matter the victim even if it's from their family, not even taking care of their own health, because of the love of money, with this factor evil can appear everywhere, which is basically: the root of evil is not money, but greed and evil committed by humans.
As said by:@Ucy. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. - 1 Timothy 6:10
|
|
|
You wrote very long about Satoshi, i don't know where to read first, but it doesn't matter i will read if i have more time, it seems. As far as I know Satoshi doesn't have a real story, he's a mysterious person, that's to my knowledge, he's just a Bitcoin creator and Bitcointalk Forum, as you can see today. If, like your story, maybe Satoshi's whereabouts were discovered long ago and all the media would invade his residence, that's my general opinion, maybe it's different with your thoughts as a journalist/book author. For that I really have to have time to read your writing, so that I will not be ridiculed by many people, if I tell about Satoshi.
|
|
|
What do you think?
I think you don't have to worry about China, you just do what you have to do with Bitcoin. To solve your problem with China's actions against Bitcoin, you must study the history of China's treatment of Bitcoin since 2013 ago and until now. You need to read china do scenario against Bitcoin below.China's History of Bitcoin Bans"While [a ban would be] disruptive for miners in China, its [sic] a nothing for bitcoin and miners outside," Back, generally skeptical of the idea of a ban, further noted on Twitter. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fzizihub.com%2Fcac523.jpg&t=663&c=c5JI6KtA3e-Tog) Bitcoin appears to be on its way to recovery from its latest drop to the $33,000 range. At press time, Bitcoin is trading just below $38,000. With the information above, at least it can make you a little relieved China and Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Now I'm wondering, does implementing a tax on a gambling platform will really help a country?
Technically yes, certain countries automatically increase from the economy, apart from corporate tax revenues, mining, industry, land, buildings and so on, Gambling companies such as casinos are currently the largest income to cover the country's current economy, you certainly know the expenses that must be issued by the state are a larger percentage of taxes, including humanitarian aid and so on. Not a few countries that make tax rules against gambling companies, the percentage of gambling tax depends on the country, overall now i see a good effect, except: taxes are imposed for gambling players, but if for casino sites or houses it is fine. There are many good sides than bad, if the government imposes a tax on gambling companies.
|
|
|
If I could see what would happen to the price of Bitcoin in 2022, I would say something to you, that's the thing, nobody knows.
Before doing something the bottom line is: trust, Bitcoin is currently trading at $37,743, long before it broke through $50,000, meaning this could also happen as you expect in 2022.
No one is forcing someone to buy Bitcoin it all happened of their own accord, if you feel sure what you are doing is something that is best for you, at least 2022 could reach $100.
|
|
|
Can anyone help me? a very simple ,and trust walet only for deposit and receive from gambling without issues because gambling moviments,like coinbase do.
If you live in portuguese, now your country already has a crypto exchange called 'Binance' currently withdrawals or deposits on gambling sites are mostly done through the Binance exchange. Compre e venda criptomoedas em minutos
For more information you can review about Binance below. Binance is Now Available in PortugueseBINANCE APPI think Binance can be prioritized in gambling.
|
|
|
I am from a country gambling is not taxed which makes me not to know about the taxing,
If I'm not mistaken your country has started to apply the two-claps taxation rule, (1). Against casino gambling companies, (2). To the winner/bettor. I take point 1. Casino tax rules in nigeriaIf it happens that the tax collection on the casino is applied as in the article above, I agree, the casino does not suffer a loss, it is a profi, any casino that pays taxes, is safe, the bottom line: gambling addicts already feel safe and comfortable from negative actions. Point 2. I object to this, if the tax must be imposed on the players in gambling. Example: DOES TAX PAYMENT IS REQUIRED ON SPORTS BETTING WINNINGS IN NIGERIA?This can be burdensome on the part of the bettor. point 1, I agree, point 2, no.
|
|
|
|