A general calculation of assets and BTC Total global assets ~ $900T Roughly ~ 15M available BTC If Bitcoin’s market cap acquires 1% of global assets, we have a $9 Trillion asset class. $9T / 15M = $600,000 BTC What are your thoughts on this Where and how did you find the global assets are 900 trillion? why do you think 15 million BTC are available? https://www.blockchain-council.org/cryptocurrency/how-many-bitcoins-are-left/19 million are mined no matter what anyone says all 19 million are 'possibly' available. Ie all 'lost coins' could simply be recovered and reissued by developers.Yes very simple... have fun with your new "developer" fork... ... So 1 percent = 5.2 trillion/ 19million = 273,684 USD a coin ...
That's not the price 5.2 trillion going into BTC would generate. It's the same like thinking that if someone bought 570 Billion $ of BTC now, it would only double the current price to 58000$. No 5.2 trillion market cap for BTC is not same 5.2 trillion going into BTC . I should be more clear as I did mention shifting wealth so it would seem like that I meant people spend 5.2 trillion to buy all the btc. As John Galt said it would be more complex than stocks trading for btc or gold trading for btc. But yeah if you tried to buy every coin in existence the market cap could go to 15 trillion. As for developers freeing the lost coins they likely will one day. Unfortunate that will take more than 30 years from now maybe 2080. So I won't live to see it. I am almost certain that if BTC does succeed those coins will be freed down the road. But it is arguing a point in time so far away it does not affect me and likely very few of us would be alive to see it happen. I don't see why any holder of BTC would want to have dormant or lost coins hitting the market and decrease their networth I can give you a long list of reasons why it will happen. But when you talk about the year 2080 no one really knows what is relevant. Just remember holders of coins do not vote since there is no staking. Well maybe one can say LN is kind of like staking. hodlers always have the last word. they choose which fork has value and gets used. now, why should hodlers value a fork where devs are distributing coins that are not theirs, thereby diluting the available supply, and even worse, destroying Bitcoin's NYKNYC-feature?
@philipma1957Sorry for my persistence, but I'm actually still waiting for some of your "long list of reasons" that answers my above question.... I won't be discussing any more than this one 'greed'. The only way forfeiting old stale coins does not happen by 2080 is BTC is not worth much money. It lost out to LTC/DOGE due to the superior reward structure of the scrypt algo for miners If it is 2080 and 2-3 million coins have sat in place from 2009- 2013 era a call for reclaiming them will happen. Thus boosting the payment/rewards for miners. Look at BTC as wealth for power which is pretty much what satoshi said it is. Look at LTC/DOGE as wealth for power it is an improved method of rewards for the power. Does this mean I think BTC is not a good as LTC/DOGE not really . I hold in dollar value 84 percent BTC 4 percent LTC 10 percent DOGE 2 percent odd ball crap But Other than my BTC DCA all coins in my stack are acquired via mining. So my mined coins are a discount buy in every case. If you look at a miner as a $$$ per watt machine the L7 is better than the s19 xp same watts in each case the s19 xp makes 141 x $0.0721 = $10.16 in btc a day the L7 makes 9 x $ 2.1832 = $19.6488 So if you are spending 75kwatts a day for either one which is better by satoshi's definition (power into wealth) the L7 is about 2x better. As time marches on the Scrypt algo will always be better due to Doge's set 10,000 coins a block. If you don't see this you are blind to the future. Le tus say 2080 (I will be very dead then by then as I would be 123 years old in 2080) LN won't really be the greatest fix for this as LTC and DOGE can do LN Of course the argument I make depends on POW existing in 2080. It is a long time from now. Which is why I hold 84% BTC and 14% LTC/DOGE Every ½ that happens from now on under current setup favors LTC/DOGE in long run. But as I said beta lost to vhs and BTC could certainly keep its edge over LTC/DOGE for longer than I think. In all practicality it does not matter to me as I won't live to see the issues I am discussing.
|
|
|
And someone won the lottery last year, and I've never won a big win. USB ASICs will definitely not be used by business miners. 2 cents profit per day on a USB asic for 299 euros as an example of the worst investment in mining.
Everything has its own use case, not everyone is a businessman or a large investor who can afford to build a large farm, it's easy to tell OP to ditch the USB miner and go build a 100MW farm with all M50s or S19 XPs and make a few million dollars in profit, ya that would be a lot better than a few cents a day, but then that would be dumb advice. Something like R606 by GekkoScience does nearly 2th at 80w, costs next to nothing to run, and has an ok chance of hitting a block compared to an S9 that consumes 1000w and needs to be placed somewhere far so people can fall asleep, so for anyway who doesn't want to spend much on the power bill, run a silent small miner for a lottery, USB sticks are a great option. yeah pretty much r606 or the Apollo are cheap to run. I play with an old L3+ using a good platinum ATX psu. I set it to 80% speed for hash I set it to 12% speed for fans I solo mine Doge. I run it in a cold spot in my home that needs a space heater in the summer as ac makes the runs too cold. Same spot is too cold in the winter so it needs a space heater in the winter. So I would be running a space heater on low or running this L3+
|
|
|
Not posted in a while just trucking away with dca and stacking. Was out in the world enjoying life and started to notice Btc in general life, from billboards, graffiti, bitcoin atms etc. I’m not sure if it was always there or not but what do we think about this type of engagement with Joe Public. I wonder has anyone found their way here from something like seeing a btc atm in their local area.
I’m having some serious internal debates on whether to over allocate into Btc this year, I had set some targets around totals with what I felt was balanced and am approaching these way sooner than I thought was possible. With WO’s who have over allocated before any learnings to help me with my own decisions?
Another one been wrestling with is continue to allocate same during a bull and new ath, or under allocate for that time. I see comments about oh know if you bought at the top it’s bad but wouldn’t all dca’rs have bought at the top?
Well lets pretend your investment stack of buckets is 20k if you are under 50 and you are 18k not btc 2k btc adding just BTC for the rest of the year could be a good idea. The ratios of your investments could go from: 10% btc 90 % not BTC to 20% BTC 80% not BTC the younger you are the harder you could push BTC Just remember investment money is more or less what you can afford to lose or hodl for a long time. Thanks for the response! I set it at 5% and figured out I can increase it to about 13% without any impact this year. Next year can move it to 20%, so like 20% of my fun money goes to Btc, and 80% to other investments. The bit I’m wondering too, is in the year it breaks the current ath should I reduce allocation for dca(don’t stop it)and put aside for buying on the way down or just keep going with current allocation. One miner q for you do you hold much weight in price to mine 1btc that the big miners are sharing to the SEC each q. Is it realistic the price to mine is currently in that 20-30k range? I’m not sure if it’s a true correlation but the bottoms in cycles seem to be really close to the avg price to mine 1btc. I wonder is this a better way to understand true bottom Vs stating it’s some %drop range from ath’s Its hard to answer that cost to mine a btc question. But I will try. An established miner with gear paid off. Lets say he has 400 s19 pros. All paid off. 400 x 110 = 44000 th they burn 75kwatts each day for each one. or 30000 kwatts a day for 400 . 110 x 7.2 cents = $7.92 a day for 1 unit 75 x 5 cent power cost = $3.75 for 1 unit 4.17 profit a day right now today for 1 miner 400 x 4.17 = 1668 dollars a day for all 400 miners So in 19 days boom a Btc. pure profit. or 19 x 400 x 7.92 = $60192 worth of btc earned which is 2 coins 19 x 400 x 3.75 = $28500 in power spent which is under 1 coin. now what did I skip cost of the gear as My example is with paid off gear. I also skipped labor for those 19 days. I also skipped cooling for those 19 days. I also skipped cost of your building And I used 5 cent power to calculate power cost. Gear is not a sunk cost as gear lasts 2-5 years must be churned and replaced. Your building may be paid off and has at least 20 years life in it. I am not a big miner I may have 100 units of gear. All paid one or two are always broken Lots of labor. But runups are glorious and mining becomes a lot of fun. At the moment its a grind. You need under 8 cents power cost to be in the black. and 5 cents power cost to be doing well. Also I am using no loan examples. If you carry loans to get your gear you need 2-5 cent power to survive.
|
|
|
A general calculation of assets and BTC Total global assets ~ $900T Roughly ~ 15M available BTC If Bitcoin’s market cap acquires 1% of global assets, we have a $9 Trillion asset class. $9T / 15M = $600,000 BTC What are your thoughts on this Where and how did you find the global assets are 900 trillion? why do you think 15 million BTC are available? https://www.blockchain-council.org/cryptocurrency/how-many-bitcoins-are-left/19 million are mined no matter what anyone says all 19 million are 'possibly' available. Ie all 'lost coins' could simply be recovered and reissued by developers.Yes very simple... have fun with your new "developer" fork... ... So 1 percent = 5.2 trillion/ 19million = 273,684 USD a coin ...
That's not the price 5.2 trillion going into BTC would generate. It's the same like thinking that if someone bought 570 Billion $ of BTC now, it would only double the current price to 58000$. No 5.2 trillion market cap for BTC is not same 5.2 trillion going into BTC . I should be more clear as I did mention shifting wealth so it would seem like that I meant people spend 5.2 trillion to buy all the btc. As John Galt said it would be more complex than stocks trading for btc or gold trading for btc. But yeah if you tried to buy every coin in existence the market cap could go to 15 trillion. As for developers freeing the lost coins they likely will one day. Unfortunate that will take more than 30 years from now maybe 2080. So I won't live to see it. I am almost certain that if BTC does succeed those coins will be freed down the road. But it is arguing a point in time so far away it does not affect me and likely very few of us would be alive to see it happen. I don't see why any holder of BTC would want to have dormant or lost coins hitting the market and decrease their networth I can give you a long list of reasons why it will happen. But when you talk about the year 2080 no one really knows what is relevant. Just remember holders of coins do not vote since there is no staking. Well maybe one can say LN is kind of like staking.
|
|
|
A general calculation of assets and BTC Total global assets ~ $900T Roughly ~ 15M available BTC If Bitcoin’s market cap acquires 1% of global assets, we have a $9 Trillion asset class. $9T / 15M = $600,000 BTC What are your thoughts on this Where and how did you find the global assets are 900 trillion? why do you think 15 million BTC are available? https://www.blockchain-council.org/cryptocurrency/how-many-bitcoins-are-left/19 million are mined no matter what anyone says all 19 million are 'possibly' available. Ie all 'lost coins' could simply be recovered and reissued by developers.Yes very simple... have fun with your new "developer" fork... ... So 1 percent = 5.2 trillion/ 19million = 273,684 USD a coin ...
That's not the price 5.2 trillion going into BTC would generate. It's the same like thinking that if someone bought 570 Billion $ of BTC now, it would only double the current price to 58000$. No 5.2 trillion market cap for BTC is not same 5.2 trillion going into BTC . I should be more clear as I did mention shifting wealth so it would seem like that I meant people spend 5.2 trillion to buy all the btc. As John Galt said it would be more complex than stocks trading for btc or gold trading for btc. But yeah if you tried to buy every coin in existence the market cap could go to 15 trillion. As for developers freeing the lost coins they likely will one day. Unfortunate that will take more than 30 years from now maybe 2080. So I won't live to see it. I am almost certain that if BTC does succeed those coins will be freed down the road. But it is arguing a point in time so far away it does not affect me and likely very few of us would be alive to see it happen.
|
|
|
USA record heat is helping hash rates drop. https://www.bitrawr.com/difficulty-estimatorLatest Block: 800551 (10 minutes ago) Current Pace: 90.4356% (200 / 221.15 expected, 21.15 behind)Previous Difficulty: 53911173001054.59 Current Difficulty: 52328312063443.84 Next Difficulty: between 47387336739304 and 51319279060781 Next Difficulty Change: between -9.4423% and -1.9283% Previous Retarget: Yesterday at 8:39 AM (-2.9361%) Next Retarget (earliest): August 9, 2023 at 3:21 PM (in 12d 17h 50m 32s) Next Retarget (latest): August 10, 2023 at 8:11 PM (in 13d 22h 40m 35s) Projected Epoch Length: between 14d 6h 42m 3s and 15d 11h 32m 6s Copy stats to clipboard https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-weather/2023/07/26/phoenix-heat-records-that-remain/70470808007/#"It's no shock that the current heat wave beating down on the Phoenix area has been nothing short of record setting. Wednesday's projected high temperature in the Valley is 119 degrees, which, if it even gets to 110, will keep the current 26-day streak of days of 110 degrees or higher alive, pushing it to 27. Additionally, those in Phoenix woke up to a low of 96 degrees on Wednesday, one degree short of the all-time low of 97 degrees set on July 19 last week, making 17 straight days of having the daily low temp at 90 degrees or higher. The July 26 low, however, did surpass the previous daily high low of 94 degrees set in 2018." https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-weather/article/houston-hottest-days-july-weather-temperature-18192567.php paywall for this one. https://www.currentresults.com/Yearly-Weather/USA/TX/Houston/extreme-annual-houston-high-temperature.phphttps://www.nbcdfw.com/weather/weather-connection/nbc-5-forecast-2/2286145/https://www.kxan.com/weather/forecast/todays-forecast/"AUSTIN (KXAN) — Austin is on track to tally its most back-to-back 100-degree days on record next week as unseasonably hot, dry weather continues. Temperatures reached 103 degrees Thursday in Austin, our 20th-consecutive day. Hazy skies continue, brought on by a cloud of African dust. Austin’s air quality is expected to be moderate due to the dust through the coming weekend." https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/18/weather/heat-wave-end-phoenix-texas-climate/index.htmlthese numbers are suppressing the Diff . May last 20 or more days. So with luck we drop two more jumps maybe?
|
|
|
Yeah the key is getting a "certain" payment fuck variance.
So viabtc.com will pay a set amount at the moment 7.2 cents a th.
so a 100 th unit pays you $7.20 worth of btc.
you can set payment threshold as low as 0.0001 btc which is a very low level.
you have 850 th point 550th or more. at viabtc you get 39.60 a day and a shot to hit the block with the 300th.
whether you do
800 certain 50 solo
down to
400 certain 450 solo
you get certain coin
me I do.
2.4ph certain
40th solo
|
|
|
They would "have" to do a rug-pull because if they don't and just start cutting rates because the inflation is getting low, then real estate would jump and, therefore, the forward looking inflation expectations would increase as well, defeating the whole carefully orchestrated "program".
Exactly. It has to look like a complete blindside accident. But keep an eye on the equities market. It's slowly melting up. Clearly the Wall Street insiders already know what's up. Also, the U.S. interest payment on debt is complete unsustainable long term. And they know this.yeah 2001 or 2000 was last plus year. So a crash and burn will happen if not 2023-2024 maybe when Trump gets reelected in 2024 they use him as the perfect fall guy.
|
|
|
The Fed and Jay Powell is so so so full of shit. They'll look at all the seasonal spending over the summer (which would be a completely normal, typical level of spending by the way), call it "still inflation" and hike again in September. But who the fk cares at this point. It really doesn't matter what they do for the rest of this year. They've already signaled that a change in monetary policy is coming next year. They are already signaling that rates cuts are coming. But why, out of the blue, would they just start cutting rates come first of next year? Hint: they won't. There's no fkn way they start cutting rates without a valid reason. That reason is the (planned) rug-pull event they already have hashed out. Whatever the trigger will be, whatever dominoes they allow to fall, it will be a shitshow. And the Fed will be all like, "Oh wow, who could have seen that coming?? Hur dhur, I guess we have to cut rates now." ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) They would "have" to do a rug-pull because if they don't and just start cutting rates because the inflation is getting low, then real estate would jump and, therefore, the forward looking inflation expectations would increase as well, defeating the whole carefully orchestrated "program". this is the third time i have watched them do it late 90s ended kind of okay 2007-2008 crash and burn 🔥 2022 to now ?
|
|
|
The Fed and Jay Powell is so so so full of shit. They'll look at all the seasonal spending over the summer (which would be a completely normal, typical level of spending by the way), call it "still inflation" and hike again in September. But who the fk cares at this point. It really doesn't matter what they do for the rest of this year. They've already signaled that a change in monetary policy is coming next year. They are already signaling that rates cuts are coming. But why, out of the blue, would they just start cutting rates come first of next year? Hint: they won't. There's no fkn way they start cutting rates without a valid reason. That reason is the (planned) rug-pull event they already have hashed out. Whatever the trigger will be, whatever dominoes they allow to fall, it will be a shitshow. And the Fed will be all like, "Oh wow, who could have seen that coming?? Hur dhur, I guess we have to cut rates now." ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) It is not like they have not done this before. Although I am guessing they pivot sooner than you think. Sept --hike +0.25% Nov -- Pivot -0.50% Dec -- drop -0.25% Maybe you are right in fact it is more likely they end the year at todays rate of +5.08% or maybe +5.33% Then a lower number such as 4.50% but I am hoping for a fall pivot which would be the Nov change.
|
|
|
Not posted in a while just trucking away with dca and stacking. Was out in the world enjoying life and started to notice Btc in general life, from billboards, graffiti, bitcoin atms etc. I’m not sure if it was always there or not but what do we think about this type of engagement with Joe Public. I wonder has anyone found their way here from something like seeing a btc atm in their local area.
I’m having some serious internal debates on whether to over allocate into Btc this year, I had set some targets around totals with what I felt was balanced and am approaching these way sooner than I thought was possible. With WO’s who have over allocated before any learnings to help me with my own decisions?
Another one been wrestling with is continue to allocate same during a bull and new ath, or under allocate for that time. I see comments about oh know if you bought at the top it’s bad but wouldn’t all dca’rs have bought at the top?
Well lets pretend your investment stack of buckets is 20k if you are under 50 and you are 18k not btc 2k btc adding just BTC for the rest of the year could be a good idea. The ratios of your investments could go from: 10% btc 90 % not BTC to 20% BTC 80% not BTC the younger you are the harder you could push BTC Just remember investment money is more or less what you can afford to lose or hodl for a long time.
|
|
|
I've heard say you are always 100% luck away from hitting a block no matter what you've done in the past.
yep every time you spin a die your shot of rolling a six is 1 in 6 even if you made ten sixes in a row or made 50 rolls with no six.
|
|
|
A general calculation of assets and BTC Total global assets ~ $900T Roughly ~ 15M available BTC If Bitcoin’s market cap acquires 1% of global assets, we have a $9 Trillion asset class. $9T / 15M = $600,000 BTC What are your thoughts on this Where and how did you find the global assets are 900 trillion? why do you think 15 million BTC are available? https://www.blockchain-council.org/cryptocurrency/how-many-bitcoins-are-left/19 million are mined no matter what anyone says all 19 million are 'possibly' available. Ie all 'lost coins' could simply be recovered and reissued by developers. so use 19 million not 15 million as for assets here is an estimate for 520 trillion not 900 trillion. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/25-wealthiest-countries-world-assets-121841637"This study estimates that as of November 2021, the global 'balance sheet,' which comprises of the real assets in the economy as well as financial assets, had $510 trillion in financial assets held by corporations, $510 trillion in assets held by households, governments, and others, and $520 trillion in assets for the real economy." So 1 percent = 5.2 trillion/ 19million = 273,684 USD a coin vs 600,000 USD a coin my ideas on 273k to 600k are: in 2025 138k in 2029 276k in 2033 552k
|
|
|
Hello everyone
Usb Bitcoin Miner ! is that recommended for a newbie?
im willing to start mining using 6 of those USB but im not sure how and where to start
if anyone have tried this please give us some TIPS or advice please
You can buy a usb miner or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6. But they are very costly to buy. The cheapest way to mine btc is buy a used bitmain L3+ point it to nicehash and have it pay you in BTC. Or if you want to directly mine BTC use https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340015.0 Futurebit Apollo
|
|
|
Yep and the older guys I know all have 2-5% BTC. But they have BTC. The question is how much will they shift. To go up to 10%-15% is likely all they will do. They will not go to 85-15 as blackrock asks them to as they do not need to. So they have a ton of wealth with not much need to shift to btc. But they are shifting a bit. Should be fun to see this unfold. Their 5% could easily become 30-33%% with bitcoin going up 10X and 10% would become about 50%. I am going out with one of them today to bargain shop at Target and Stop n Shop. I mine at his office as his power bill is 80% subsidy. We hold over 0.1 btc from his mine location. To him the mining is fun and games. Although his is interested in buying a warehouse placing solar on the roof and mining at a much higher level. He was part owner of a Bank in Lakewood NJ. USA rules state under 14% is all you can own. He has good money maybe 30 -35 mill. Yet we are going to Target for cheaper eggs today. You are correct that his BTC hodl of 5 coins which is 150k out of say 30 million or 0.5% could grow to 5% if btc shot up to 300k. Still in his case he simply does not need the money. He was working class guy that did well in stocks and cable ownership. He parleyed it into part owner of a bank. The bank did well he sold it. He has real estate stocks bonds metals cash BTC and a few private loans where he finances guys with ideas. These are the typical wealthy people I met while living in NJ. maybe a dozen guys and 1 women (she is a widow of my friends partner). all of them were middle class 'norms' that did well. All of them would stand to gain money they don't need if BTC goes from 30k to 300k. Most of them would hodl it as they don't need the extra wealth.
|
|
|
wow i wonder what they will be building with it?
|
|
|
Weekly DCA hit at 11:15 pm EST
|
|
|
Yep and the older guys I know all have 2-5% BTC. But they have BTC. The question is how much will they shift. To go up to 10%-15% is likely all they will do. They will not go to 85-15 as blackrock asks them to as they do not need to. So they have a ton of wealth with not much need to shift to btc. But they are shifting a bit. Should be fun to see this unfold.
|
|
|
Down the road maybe 2032 if btc is 600k with a market cap of 6 trillion it will not be tied to the other wealth sources.
The whole line of reasoning about the interconnections of large asset classes seemed interesting to me. But after all, if to think about it, all assets, even large ones, are part of the global world economy, and even when an asset ceases to follow the patterns of some larger assets, it still remains interconnected with them. Then, logically, the model of interaction and interdependence of graphs simply becomes more complex, but still does not disappear. Isn't it? Fuck you finally did a really good post. I will have to merit it. I have two older friends that were bankers. I am 66 they are 76 and 83. They are wealthy not billionaires but say 25 million and 35 million for each of them. I am way poorer then they are maybe 1/10 the wealth. Both of them are well diversified and have the ability to do nothing and live well or do more and live well. I met more friends of them some worth 5 million some worth 50 million one worth 800 million. All are 10-20 years older than me. First off everyone of them would give at least half their wealth to be forty vs 76-86. All of them are not looking to burn their wealth. They play around with various investments more or less for a hobby . So shifting from bonds to metals to real estate to stocks to cash is something they all do. They all like BTC as one more value/wealth bucket to shift into. All of them hodl and churn their holdings. They pay attention to ratios. They all like the idea of fleeing the country and having a wallet when they are in a safer country. So my look at the upper 1% is a bit skewed as I know guys in the 25-800 million dollar range. Obviously they are in the lower part of the upper 1%. But they really match your question close to perfectly. So yeah the interrelationship of wealth/value buckets 🪣 will change as one grows more than the other . Silver was 50 usd in the late 70s gold was under 400 say 8 to 1 now silver is 25 and gold is say 2000 say 80 to 1. so those buckets shifted bigly. to say btc cap at 600,000 billion and gold cap at 12 trillion is 20 to 1 I could see btc gaining and being 6 trillion cap vs 12 trillion gold say 2 to 1. The real question is not that stock up btc up gold up btc up but how much leaves the wealth/value buckets of all the other assets. and fills the btc wealth/value bucket.
|
|
|
|