Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=772456
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2742
Amount of EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 6
bech32 BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q9e7aymdh804lcge6jz73kpalf22f4946j7jutm

I'd rather they avoid doing another stimulus and instead approach the issue from a possible alternative point. As much as inflation could boost BTC price, it isn't really something I'd really want to experience, nor let others experience it. I won't be directly affected, yes, but there would still be some, and I honestly don't know how big those effects are, so I'd rather not take the risk.

Though it is indeed unavoidable at this point, I do hope Biden could do something to at least lessen the damages that it could bring. Hope he doesn't just think for his own interests.

Give up on trying to get back on your funds. You don't even try to know how once you get scammed tbh, to most of the time it's just impossible. If you were dealing with physical goods, maybe, but this is crypto, and it's on the internet, so it's really just impossible to get it back. As for reporting, well, there isn't really any organization you can report to but you can try to spread the word about the exchange being a scam. That's probably the limit of what you can do.

Well, it is for a fact that you are using their services, so there's nothing odd about them asking for payment for it. If you started blaming them, then the problem starts with you since originally, you were the one that looked for them. The issue is that most people that adopt such services think they'd get a guarantee payment when trading itself is 50/50 most of the time.
Well, it is called copy trading for a reason, and really, most of those that do that are just ignorant of trading and/or have no time to manage their own portfolio. If they're doing it as a sideline, it could be ignored, but if they were trying to learn how to trade? Copy trading isn't the key to that.

The goal of everyone that has money is always to make more money since money basically takes care of most of their issues in life tbh. The first step on that progress is to take care of any issues that can be fixed with money, and only after that should people use the money to earn more money. A 100 billion is a huge amount, more than enough actually to support countless families and their descendants as long as spent properly. I'd make a plan of finance for the next few decades (possibly till I die) and then invest the rest to multiple assets possible.

2 years is too little of a time imo to guarantee you making 100 billion more, the fastest way possible is to take a lot of risks ofc, but the most guaranteed way would possibly be creating a company of your own and letting it grow.

It could be a direct benefit, but it can also be quite risky imo. Well, they're diversifying their portfolio so I guess the risk isn't that big, but well, it IS public funds, after all, they have to take into account all risks involved. It isn't an easy call I must say, though I do hope that they'd push it forward, at least it shows that some part of the government recognizes Bitcoin as a possible investment as well as a safe asset (since afaik, only private companies have done so?). Plus seeing as his attitude is "it'll only go up", I suppose it means that they are planning for a long term investment instead of a short term one.

Err from how I understood this, isn't it quite impossible to deposit to your bank account if you don't present an id of sorts. That, or you don't have an ID so you're looking for any other way to withdraw your coins. P2P is probably your best bet. I'd recommend you to look up a few digital wallets available in your country but that does require verification if you want to withdraw your money most of the time, so that may not really be a better alternative.

CBDC isn't really released or used for what it was supposed to be, so that's why the polls were made as such. It's money imo, the government would make it as such, and would also make the public realize it as such. In the end, money can be defined as a medium of exchange that the majority approves (or is approved by a governing body), and seeing as it's under the government, you can expect it to be like that. As for crypto being money, as I said, money is just in the end a medium of exchange agreed upon, so yes, you can technically say that the poll is naturally correct. Most issues arise from the difference of money(fiat) and crypto is mostly on how fiat is centralized while the latter is decentralized.

And I'd be glad to have them. At the very least, the government is acknowledging it, and this could (rather, most probably would) increase the knowledge of the populace with regards to cryptocurrency. At the very least, they simply wouldn't be ignorant of them, and well, hopefully, would have a shield against possible scams and the like (that the government would take notice of anyway).

I guess it'd be ruling that doesn't really attack the core of what decentralized crypto is, but still possibly regulate it in an advantageous way for them. Quite vague, yes, but it can't be helped, crypto itself is quite young after all, it isn't that odd that rules and regulations have possible holes here and there.

Unplug the internet for a bit in the entire world, it'd probably stop then. Kidding aside, it's close to impossible, trust me. It's like asking companies to stop making money, when in the first place the very reason a company was made is to, in one way or another, make money. Not to mention that some people have that sort of mentality that whatever they would make would probably be "infinitely" better than what is on the market right now.

Hey look on the bright side at least, the very fact that they're trying to create more coins to exceed what is at the top right now just goes to show how good/great the top coins are in the crypto scene.

The second reason is actually well used by others who don't have much access to gambling sites in their country. They may be a small population, but they are still possible customers. It isn't anything odd, nor is it anything that should be shunned imo. It's a perfectly reasonable service, and really, it's just up to you whether you want to use it or not. As for the issue of why brokers ask for so much money, well, I mean, who would want to do a job that only pays what, $10,$15 right? Brokers do their job seriously imo (the legit ones anw), and they put in a lot of effort into it, so I guess them dealing with big money is understandable.

Is it worth it? Well, it depends on your situation tbh. If you have the money, and not the time BUT you do want to bet, then feel free to do so. But if you can do it yourself and you wantto do it yourself, then do so.

Looks like an issue on their side. Probably just clearing things up or something, nothing to worry about especially since you're doing sports gambling and not casino gambling. If you're THAT fearful something happened, you can go check out bitsler's faqs about their provably fair system. You can read others, but there may be some differences here and there, but just to make sure anyhow.

There's also something here that says that they change your seed every 90 days of using your seed, so you can just go check on that if you indeed used it, but if not then no need to bother checking. You can still use your old seed as they said anyhow. Here's a link to their info about it:
https://www.bitsler.com/en/provably-fair

If you were to gamble online, or just regularly without any strategy, then there's no difference between a large or a small capital. However, if you were to coordinate with the casino owner (especially in physical casinos), there's a small chance that they may, just may, remove their house edge for the duration of your play. Though tbh, you'd need to spend an astronomers amount before they would even think of doing so, just so that you can play more. Still, this doesn't honestly mean much, since you'd still rely on luck to win. There were some instances of such examples, like the few people who won against gambling casinos iirc. Looked some samples back then which was why I saw it.

Can't exactly see who's the authority behind it (the legality whatnot), so I'm afraid reporting isn't going to do anything. The era of the internet literally lets anyone create their own websites, whether it is legal or not after all. They can easily avoid being tracked with various methods, so it's always better honestly to look for where the site is located (their agency or something similar) before doing bets, as well as looking if they have a license to actually work. Simple things yes, but these simple things are the ones that can help you as well as many others from being scammed.

Well, I'd just suggest that it was not really your luck, no matter how many what-if situations one can think of, it doesn't change the fact that it would never happen if it's already way back in the past. Besides, blaming the crash for you missing the opportunity seems like an odd move, yes I understand your pain tbh, I myself felt it since I sold early for this bull run, but doesn't change the fact that we ourselves were the ones who failed to take advantage of the situation at hand.

Plus, history pretty much showed a constant growth every 4-year cycle, it isn't a guarantee yes, but hey, it's a metric you can take into account when you want to invest again.

It doesn't take a genius tbh to realize that, especially with the current price of Bitcoin. But honestly, can you blame them? They had those coins way back in the years where crypto wasn't a thing, it wasn't even becoming one. It only rose up to attention after a few more years. It became prominent, yes, but it didn't have that assuredness that it would be one way back then. When I heard Bitcoin I just thought of it like "what's that?", and that was with my friend being all gung ho about it back then.

There's different types of situations on how people get hacked. Some just get simply scammed, while some store their coins in an online wallet/exchange, and well, visited a phishing site letting hackers enter their pc and basically access all sorts of data stored in there, which is basically how they get ahold of your funds. I actually haven't heard much of any hacks of the latter(but it does happen), but the former is well known tbh. There are countless victims out there since most people are prone to be fooled by the sound of easy making money schemes.  Really, it's rather easy not to get hacked tbh, though there may be some funds needed to guarantee it to the max. Just don't visit any suspicious sites, use a hardware wallet, don't believe others nonchalantly, and DYOR.

I wouldn't call it as banks refusing to transact with Bitcoin, it's at most banks just well, being outdated at times. Not to mention that there are some restrictions depending on your country. And add on to that, your situation isn't the only situation out there, there are a LOT of people who use Bitcoin, who trade it daily, so you saying that you can't, or why you can't understand it, just simply means that it is your own inability to understand (or you just refuse to that is).

P2P is basically just like any other transaction out there is, you send BTC, the other party sends money, easy as that. There are also stable coins as mk4 said, you can let it sit there for a bit before trying out ways to exchange it to fiat.

It isn't really a good measure to base upon, but most of the time it does happen. This doesn't guarantee that it always happens though, just that most of what alts seasons in the past have shown significant growth when Bitcoin experiences a bull run, BUT not all at least. DYOR about that, and you should easily identify altcoins that have shown such patterns. Still, I'd advise you to actually not follow those trends and just do your own research. But when your research does show that the market follows such trends, then do as such. Long story short, don't follow whatever trend society dictates, still do your own studies about the market before anything else.

Check any suspicious activities that your email went through. It should be possible to trace how the hacker was able to access the account through that since as you said, 2FA was still enabled. Also, the issue of "Invalid authenticity token" seems like it stems from your browser settings or something similar. Try looking it up, it may not be a site-specific error but instead, your browser refuses to or blocks you yourself from entering the forum. As for contacting them, well, you tried and that didn't work. I myself don't know how to tbh, other than through their email or whatever info they have publicly available.