The Op post probably suggest he is betting for the prize and not to enjoy or have fun with gambling. I think you should be able to quite If your money/time spent on betting is too much, and you were/are not really attracted by the fun or pleasure & use it to suppress a problem in your life.
In my opinion, spending too much time/money on betting without minding your loses could be considered an addiction.

Buying the dips should be done with amount of money one can afford to lose. It's possible to just automate the "buy dips" with just $50(depending how much you can really afford to lose). I think it could even help a crypto community prevent serious price dump like what you fear would happen. I guess we could call this an unintentional dump prevention mechanism.

If you are regular gambler (except maybe you automate your bet to bet longterm, amount of money you can afford to lose ) without being profitable, then I guess you are somewhat addicted. Besides, am not sure if people make consistent profits from playing probability-based game like dice. People mostly play to get lucky and win huge available prizes.  Guess the prizes are worth playing for in moderation.

Didn't participate unfortunately. Wished I saw what the site's owner/owners, researchers or bots comments suggest. I guess their conclusions should be based on well researched, factual/honest materials. That could end up helping addicted gamblers and probably help prevent others from becoming addicted.

Hope it becomes possible in Crypto future to quickly freeze money made through easy-to-prove scams like this (assuming it's really scam) and return the coins to their owners.
I think scams like that will probably be handled better in well decentralized community.
Including the feature in decentralized systems will help discourage  people from attempting that kind of scam

How do we handle the case below...



*Crypto people share ideas for the benefits of real decentralization,  and other people (mostly those who don't believe in true decentralization) copy the ideas, maybe make some modifications and patent them. Do you think this is ok?

I strongly believe ideas shared in Crypto communities or for crypto communities should only be used for true decentralization and not patented.
I am sure true crypto people wouldn't care who use their ideas, as long as the ideas are not used outside of making truely decentralized things and are not patented. .
 I guess every community in Crypto space should state this clearly to prevent people from patenting our ideas and getting wealthy from them?

Too risky to give out your important email address just like that or use it on any kind of site. Better to handle your most important email address like you would handle your private keys. Decentralized platform is probably one of the safest things I would trust such email address and other personal identifications on.

I wonder if the spam attack still happens or is it reduced? Been long fees went up that high.
I wonder exactly how that was fixed(assuming it has been fixed). IP ban? Or through some other means?

I usually call them semi-decentralized exchanges, but I wonder if that is the appropriate name for them, considering that few individuals who know themselves well or the exchange owners may be dictating the rules and how the nodes behave.
I guess we should just let them be with the semi-dex tag. Decentralization is Decentralization. If things become too confusing or complicated, we use Real Decentralization

Wish you had the video on a more popular video sharing site like YouTube. I am not sure if I have ever used the site you posted the video on. People should remember to trade with what they can afford to lose, and not be tempted to take too many risk.

Interesting. Your service requires proofs I guess. You could let some reputable members on this forum test your service for some times (maybe one or two weeks). This will probably help your reputation here a little. Maybe if you win consistently for over one year, the reputation will increase more.

Dice is luck or probability based game. I doubt it has a dependable or consistent strategy. But I feel like the physical ones could have unknown strategy/strategies.     Will likely be very difficult to develop a consistent strategy for the online provable fair ones without cheating

I think It's a good idea to test it first before going public. This should help you determine what will be successful and what will not.
Hope you could comment on fees or how the you/owner intend to earn from the game. And also reply my question on "what happens if no one wins"

I guess it depends on what currency people find more useful and safe.
I think if such events occur, people will most likely use Bitcoin if they know about it and if still censorship resistant, easy to use and access.
A Well decentralized Bitcoin or cryptocurrency really has a chance of doing well in such situations.

The assets should probably be unmovable in their underground locations if necessary.. maybe chained, or something?
Only their owners should be able to unlock and move them with their private keys.


Note:   If the "unbreakable" container adds to the cost of the assets, the buyer can agree to take only the asset & leave the container for the seller. Once the seller verify that the container is there, he/she confirms it and part of the escrowed fund(the container cost) is returned to the asset buyer.

Example:
- Put valuable assets in "unbreakable" containers that can only be open with Bitcoin/crypto private keys.

 - Get them buried randomly in hidden locations

- Tag them with RFID, GPS or/and use some natural or artificial beacon

— Buyers go through the online list of available assets buried & hidden at the locations of their choices. *The list should be public for the sake of transparency & the law of land.

- owners sell to buyers who verify they exist as described, and are also legal assets
. *Escrow could be used here.

- the buyers leave the sellers positive/negative ratings, depending on their mutual contracts and quality of the assets

- Only the owners know where the assets are buried and only them can access the assets with their private keys

- the assets is reburied in another random location by the owners or taken home.

✴The soil properly covered to avoid erosion or something. otherwise buyers that leave them uncovered get some negative rating.


This's closely similar to Treasure hunting, I guess.

Probably better to create bots to earn from the fluctuating price of established cryptocurrencies. This is safer and can earn you consistent profits. You just need to properly set the bot to buy important dips and sell bit by bit as price recovers. You could just leave some amount of coin for long-term increase in price

Where then do you sell the tokens after staking? Are there exchanges it is listed on or you sell peer-to-peer to those that still find it useful aside the monetary rewards they gain from it? What exactly do people find useful about the coin? Never really had time to research how the coin works or worked in the past.

Not a good idea to repeat the mistakes of fiat currencies in cyber world. But incase it happens, there definitely will be "neutral" digital currencies (cryptocurrency for example) people will fall back on when their countries become tyrannical, or start falling apart or when disasters strike or when evil/lawlessness/corruption reigns. That currency or currencies will most likely be well decentralized currencies/cryptocurrencies.

Or people should probably just use signals from traders who are consistently right. Many of those groups are not worth risking ones hard-earned money. They could even be buying up coins that don't deserve investments and dumping on their customers. 
I guess it's better to just use free sites like TradeView.