|
Whatever language you're using, none of us understand it.
No, you do not know which post made the account banned. It's likely a copy & pasted post or a number of insubstantial posts that resulted in a ban.
|
|
|
|
|
Please DON'T tell us who it is.
How come every single one of these accusatory threads never point out the person/evidence BEFORE it is requested? Jesus.
|
|
|
|
So if you take Nike's logo and change its color, then the logo will be yours? Well Lauda is right, discussing it with you is really wasting my time. If you take Nike logo cut it in 3 and from those 3 pieces you a new form with new color and add something that's yours, yes it's yours. This is essentially what you're doing:  |
|
|
|
I always fallow the rules, but I think that is unprofessional for a forum admin Shows how ignorant you are. Lauda is not an admin and has never been a forum admin... unless you conform to the ridiculous idea that Lauda = Lutpin = satoshi = theymos  to abuse his power when he doesn't have a forum rule to back his action. In this case, no one showed me any link to a forum rules, that I broke to deserve the negative trust. Trust can be sent for any reason at all. It is completely at the discretion of the users that send it... Like how you, for example, sent a retaliatory feedback. Like I said before, share with me the rule that I'm not allowed to have someone's signature, and please show me all the signatures that I'm not allowed to have. The rule? Common fucking sense. You can not invent rules just because they serve your interest! The rules are for everyone, and admins should enforce them, so show me the rules that I've broke, please, and as obedient citizen that I am I will fallow. You don't seem like the type. |
|
|
|
So you will support plagiarism purely because you don't want to lose money?
Will you also support a ponzi if some signature campaign is revealed to be one, even though you're participating in it? I feel like you have a skewed sense of justice . |
|
|
|
@Altradex see, this is how retarded you truly are. You leave me negative trust saying: "leaves negative trust, possible alt because email changed" Could you please tell me where exactly I left negative trust to you or your alt Accounts? Just pathetic.. Wow, incredible. Your email changed but your password didn't. It's obvious that the hacker is a genius and wants to use your account undetected! /s
Lauda, We'll talk face to face  How do you plan on doing that when you're still in middle school? |
|
|
|
since I am no longer the owner of that one. Now if you still didnt understand this or thinks that this is still not an english one, disregard thanks There's no way to prove that you are not the owner of the account. When did it get hacked? Why didn't you assign an email to the account? And if you did, why didn't you lock the account with the new security feature?
Lots of problems with claiming that your account was hacked as it absolves you of responsibility. Thus people who want to scam can simply state that the account was hacked. |
|
|
|
You write in a very similar way to Lauda and in this message you are answering as if the lawsuit was against you.
Could it be that both of these accounts are the same people?
It would make sense. Lauda giving everyone negative feedback and aTriz trying to run all of the bounty campaigns. Don't run yourself down into this hole about alternate accounts. You'll just be made fun of more. Next, you'll start comparing their time zones and start saying how two accounts must be from Sydney!
Assuming a fact directly will force the mind to perceive false validations of that very fact. Consider astrology, as an example. |
|
|
|
We do not feel stupid writing this at all.
Yes, we will sue someone over a meme that is slanderous towards our team member and we will win, 100%. It's a cool oxymoron we've got here. What do you plan to do when you finally realize nobody cares about your lawsuit threats? |
|
|
|
No problem, but it is not a big deal or amount. Its just 0.15 btc. 1K USD is usually considered a significant amount by most people. So i see no point to getting things complicated. It does not complicate the contest much more than just adding a secondary layer of security (maybe delaying payments by 1-2 days). Moreover this is not a signature or bounty campaign. If i will not pay that promised prizes, my account will tagged as red which i dont really want to. ... and? A member account is worth way less than the amount people are expected to lose if all the prizes on your contest are taken. Seems a bit mean, but this is how it is. |
|
|
|
|
Do you want to put the money in an escrow so that any participants can be sure that their funds are going to be kept safe?
|
|
|
|
I know that buying accounts in general is strongly frowned upon. But if there's an inactive account with a username I like, and I have managed to contact the original owner through external social media, can I purchase the account? I will publicly state that I own the account, and don't plan to do anything but on that account. Something is missing here, did you mean to say you don't plan to do anything but own that account, or "do anything but ...post... on that account"? If you don't plan to use the account at all, what good does it do you? Might be a little confusing, but here's the likely interpretation of it: "don't plan to do anything but on that account" implies that Decoded will abandon their current account and move all activity to the new one. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's the only way it would make sense given his post. |
|
|
|
AFAIK, when Lauda know that you bought account, you will got red-ve immediately. ( Her principle : to combat account sales ) or AFAIK, when Lauda know that you bought account, you will got red-ve immediately because the account that you bought has scam attempt on the past For example bitcoin boys's case : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2347166.0So I think you will got negative trust as soon as you purchase account except she grant the permission for you to purchase that account I believe this is a misrepresentation of the ideals behind combatting account sales. Having multiple accounts so long as it doesn't pose a threat to the forum's cleanliness in terms of scams and spam should not be a problem. Take hilariousandco & hilariousetc for example. He's not spamming. He's not scamming. He's simply using two accounts.
Decoded has a benign reason for having a second account and I would absolutely not expect anyone to send negative trust solely because of the alternate account. |
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Chartbet:94,775,220
|
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Mines:94,582,980
|
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Hilo:94,654,675
|
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Blackjack:93,655,516
|
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Roulette:94,776,061
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
