... re-jigger your feedbacks and list to conform very much more to current guidelines and advice, ...
You mean like your own 77 I take it? Must have taken you hours to go through your posts with a fine-toothed comb.
|
|
|
...
You haven't answered the last question: How can we work together to bring consensus between us, so that I "trust" you and that you no longer "distrust" me.
|
|
|
The Star Casinos in Australia (Brisbane, Gold Coast and Sydney) have drop boxes at their main entrances to enable patrons to drop poker chips/fiat and / or paper slips from the gaming machines (usually pokies - sometimes as low as a couple of pennies) - the funds are tallied up and donated to local registered charities. Presumably the others have similar drop boxes at their main entries. I would be surprised if overseas Casinos didn't have drop boxes poker chips/fiat etc could be donated.
|
|
|
Greetings and welcome to the forum.
What are your withdraw fees like? What is your "provably fair" statement? Are you looking for investors? Does your website accept Lightning Network deposits/withdraws?
|
|
|
Hi, I have a set of questions that I have been asking other Merit Source applicants:
Would you say that you are a part of any Clubs, Groups, or indeed Gangs here on Bitcoin talk? Please elaborate.
Do you feel that you are unbiased? Please elaborate.
How would you distribute merits? One per post? Ten merits per post? Some skewered in one direction, but not another? Please elaborate.
Given you are wanting to be seen to be accountable (my words, not yours) I can't help but notice this: My questions on this are: Given I am impartial by not taking sides, together with I don't trade (not often and when I do I am usually selling BTC, so I have all the risk) so there are no scam accusations, no (active) flags against me and since I took over the Known Alts thread it is no secret that I have taken a mostly hands off approach to investigating alts (so any investigations and their conclusions are multiple years old I.E. enough time to be proven or not). What have I done to warrant "distrust" from you? Please elaborate.
Have you given other distrusts to others who are similarly inactive in trading / non-scamming etc? Please elaborate.
How can we work together to bring consensus between us, so that I "trust" you and that you no longer "distrust" me. To clarify, if you are unprepared to work through differences you have with others, then I don't believe you should be a merit font. To further clarify, I neither trust you, nore distrust you simply because our paths have never crossed. Please elaborate.
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a set of questions that I have been asking other Merit Source applicants:
Would you say that you are a part of any Clubs, Groups, or indeed Gangs here on Bitcoin talk?
Please elaborate.
Do you feel that you are unbiased?
Please elaborate.
How would you distribute merits? One per post? Ten merits per post? Some skewered in one direction, but not another?
Please elaborate.
Am looking forward to your answers.
|
|
|
Nonetheless, BPIP is a great tool.
Agreed.Thanks for your support and feedback on this topic, I made mention a few posts back that there may be a decimal place that isn't being shown - I also wondered if perhaps the score/rank is being rounded up/down ?? It would go a long way to clarifying the ranks being equal but not equal.
|
|
|
...
I not you asked me a question, but when I responded, you didn't acknowledge me, instead went on to Troll another user. Post 5,726
|
|
|
After one week you're already about to leave the campaign for a more lucrative one... you must be a record breaker! Congrats sir! But you shouldn't ask for a payment here if you are an honest participant. I applied for the Chip Mixer SigCamp back in January or February - my very first application anywhere. Since then I have been in four or five campaigns which have paused, or closed. As you rightly point out: I'd like to know before I apply As you can see I haven't applied. And, when I was accepted here I withdrew my other applications in other SigCamps - with the sole exception of the Chip Mixer SigCamp (which I applied for in January or February). We all know it is unlikely that I will be accepted there, but as I said in my Chip Mixer application " I am throwing my hat into the ring." Let Hhampuz do his work and I think TimeLord2067 will remind Hhampuz as well if he was enrolled to a new one.
Any Campaign Manager will tell you (not just Hhampuz) that when they scroll though a person's posts each week they can see just how many other SigCamps each and every person has applied for.
@crazy-joe - don't you think it's odd that that other SigCamp doesn't advertise it's rates and no one seems to have noticed?
|
|
|
Right there you state he is alive, how you can possible come to that conclusion from the facts available is beyond me.
Feel free to lay that out.
Childish part of your post aside, the discussion has moved on from there. I can't recall seeing other Flags where the OP gives a running commentary in their OP of the discussion that follows. If I change it to read: I have just seen this thread and discovered "Bruno" is alive and kicking. That can only mean he scammed me when I donated personal funds (and Known Alts funds) to his "Plead" to cover funeral costs.
If "Bruno" is not dead then the funds were taken under false pretences.Would that stop you frothing at the mouth?
|
|
|
No not one place - thirteen positions... I've shrunk the image so you can see the rest of the text which you've quoted.
DT1 "election" at the beginning of May could have caused some trust scores to change. If someone with a score >= 70 dropped below 70 it could have helped you move up those 11 positions between April 25 and May 13. Yes, that's true, I hadn't thought about the DT elections - it's also occurred to me just now that your scores might have a decimal place portion of the score that is not shown, hence a dozen people can appear to have the same score, but are ranked differently together with my score improving as the trust feedback positives have occurred in the last 12 months. Would that be right?
|
|
|
But not by you as you continue to reply. Time to come down off of that fence.
It's not a fence and I am just pointing out you are spouting off opinions as if they are facts ( and creating conclusions based on those non facts that you then try to force an action from us) so the onerous is on you to provide evidence while I have made no statements other than there needs to be an investigation which I think the supporting evidence of that is self evident.Go right ahead and investigate.So, outline where I'm wrong then.
|
|
|
I have made zero effort to do any investigation into this,
Hence your sustained criticism. all I have noticed is unsubstantiated opinions being put forward as facts and have noticed you paramount in spewing those forth.
As the creator of the Flag, that's my job. So why don't you try putting all your comments into a post with proper supporting evidence and then maybe your posts will receive the respect you think they deserve.
You're a mind-reader now? Until then they will be ignored as the rant that they are.
But not by you as you continue to reply. Time to come down off of that fence.
|
|
|
and spreadsheet something different: The spread sheet is the cumulative total of all participants - check out the previous pages, that value changes on each page.
|
|
|
Hi Guys, just a quick question: What's causing my " Most Trusted" rank to slowly climb, even thought my actual score hasn't changed? I'm sharing a value of "70" with many others, yet I seem to be climbing to the top of these other "70's" - On the 25th of April, my score was 70 and the rank was 244 (see this link). And on the 13th of May it was 70/233Thanks. This is a dynamic score. Someone like Phinnaeus Gage above you, got lately a lot of negative feedback so his trust score dropped and you went one position up. Simple. If you have an archive of the most trusted you can compare and find who went down. No not one place - thirteen positions... I've shrunk the image so you can see the rest of the text which you've quoted.
|
|
|
Archived for future reference: [ 1a], [ 1b] Who said I talked to you via PM? I convinced several members of the Turkish community to drop an invalid flag on you, and this was your response. Just because you were the only unreasonable one in the equation doesn't mean mediation didn't occur independently of you. Has anyone else noticed the link Tecshare posted as "proof" of my fantasy response was actually a link to a quote by Tecshare.??quote author=TECSHARE link=topic=5247427.msg54514850#msg54514850 date=1590642536] Who said I talked to you via PM? I convinced several members of the Turkish community to drop an invalid flag on you, and [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181723.msg52379325#msg52379325]this was your response[/url]. Just because you were the only unreasonable one in the equation doesn't mean mediation didn't occur independently of you. [/ quote]
I'm laughing at you Tecshare. (or whatever your main alt is)
|
|
|
...
Nice deflection. Nothing responded to. Post 5,718
|
|
|
My whole statement was about the Phinnaeus Gage account in general as it is the only one with activity post mortem. Two flags currently (hence Flag plurality). Your OP should be updated to include the more proper flag and include the link to the one started by nutildah. Probably also shouldn't be editing others' quotes without understanding the world doesn't revolve around just you.
Not withstanding there are actually three flags just against Phinnaeus Gage [ Link] [ Link] AFAIK there are no other Flags other than the (so far) four I have created that link to this thread. The rules on Flag creation are quite specific - You can't have duplicate flags for the same occurrence - same goes for a thread being locked invalidates a flag. I'm sure @theymos can confirm that one for you. This thread is to discuss the four flags that I created, not to give running commentary on other flags in other threads. You seem to be fence sitting on these four flags.
|
|
|
How about an automated ban if you create 100 topics without getting a single Merit?
(it could happen)
|
|
|
|