Yeah thanks, but do you think this is the right workflow? You're pissing off of a lot of people here, I' sure I'm not the only one. As much as I'm a DRK fanboy, this fork was quite a fuckup. About time to introduce some notification method which could even prevent a wallet from launching. |
|
|
|
|
Can you already come up with a working Mac wallet?
What is so hard about applying the trivial changes and compile it, takes less than 5 minutes.
Or put a qt project file out on git which compiles out of the hat?
|
|
|
|
|
How about a working Mac wallet?
Can't sync anymore with 0.9.4.6. Stuck at 74603.
What about p2pool?
I'm mining on a working node, but is it the right chain?
|
|
|
|
What's going on with XC? Dev claims to have an anonymous wallet. Claim seems spurious, considering there's no whitepaper and only an extremely superficial explanation of how the technology works. Vaporware scam?
Can't get more anonymous than nonexistant.  Don't underestimate XC despite the lack of wallet right now... they could deliver a mixing service and evolve on it. They seem to have plans for the future. We'll see how it goes, competition is good. XLB on the other hand seems vapor. Its all vapor, nobody else has anything ready. Smoke and mirrors. Lots of bla and bloat, lots. |
|
|
|
|
I tweaked sgminer to run more than 10 gpu threads.
Running 12 now, more crashes it.
It has little to no impact.
Its defined in the file driver-opencl.c - from line 324
|
|
|
|
|
Where in sgminer are the value ranges for the arguments defined?
Can't find it. I'd like to increase the max value for GPU threads.
|
|
|
|
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64. i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards best i can get is 2.9mhs Sounds weird and took me a while, but many GPU threads seem to work well on 290s with this kernel. This is what I run now on 290 TRI Xs under PIMP, gives me about 3,4 MH. It crashes sometimes on startup, but once it runs its rather stable. There seems to be a limit of 10 threads in sgminer, wouldn't it sound legit to have 11 threads then?
"intensity" : "15", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "1", "thread-concurrency" : "25601", "expiry" : "1", "auto-fan" : true, "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "gpu-threads" : "10", "vectors" : "1", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "gpu-fan" : "40-100", "gpu-engine" : "1055", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", Thanks for the tip, which version are you running, the one compiled by RRT5ON? Also what clocks do you have set on your 290 Tri-x? And finally which drivers please  Its Catalyst 13.25.5 and PIMP/Debian 3.12.9-1 I compiled it right on the rig. Clockspeed is 1055 more or less. I have a batch of cards which makes it only to 1025 though. |
|
|
|
Try fiddling with worksize, i.e reducing it.
Tried 32, 48, 64, 96, 128, 192. The best result was 2.74 MH/s at --worksize 64. i have same problem by my 290, it seems that improvement is not support for 290s cards best i can get is 2.9mhs Sounds weird and took me a while, but many GPU threads seem to work well on 290s with this kernel. This is what I run now on 290 TRI Xs under PIMP, gives me about 3,4 MH. It crashes sometimes on startup, but once it runs its rather stable. There seems to be a limit of 10 threads in sgminer, wouldn't it sound legit to have 11 threads then?
"intensity" : "15", "worksize" : "256", "lookup-gap" : "1", "thread-concurrency" : "25601", "expiry" : "1", "auto-fan" : true, "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "gpu-threads" : "10", "vectors" : "1", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "gpu-fan" : "40-100", "gpu-engine" : "1055", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", |
|
|
|
THE FACTS ABOUT CRYPTOHUNTER
|
|
|
|
Troll or no troll, its not the first time ppl have stated those facts. Ive heard it from trusted members. Do you claim he is lying? Yes, I claim he is lying about his intentions and the reasons to "inform everybody". |
|
|
|
Buying XRP now is throwing value away. With Jesse Powel's resignation there sure is more bad to come for the mother of all premines (edit: metaphorical of course).
The coin is not the interesting part of the company. The technology is. The coin comes just as a bonus to whoever is buying the whole package. I'm quite confident it will perform, once the cat comes out of the bag. The people leaving were in direct conflict of interests with any potential investor. |
|
|
|
|
Given the rising value of DRK, the 1.000 coins necessary to run a Masternode are under a permanent high level threat.
Wouldn't it be nice if somebody would offer a security audit for Masternodes, as a service?
A spin off, or a reputable contractor, briefed and hired by the coin's crew?
Intrusion detection and monitoring, banning of attackers?
Exchanges could play a role in it. They operate under high security standards.
They could offer Masternode hosting under their umbrellas.
It could be as easy as clicking a button on your balance page, to start a node for every 1.000 DRK of your deposit.
If you'd need the funds, you'd just kill it. Much like a money market account.
|
|
|
|
I feel sorry for the uninformed buying now. There is something like 9,000,000,000 (yes, BILLION!!) XRP being dumped in two weeks.
Someone with a quarter of a brain would realize that this will cause the price to drop significantly.
Yeah, sure basher. Its a well spread rumor, probably by YOU. Why would the dude be so stupid and dump it on the market, destroying his own fortune? Come on, insert just another tabloid phrase here. |
|
|
|
|
Judged by the amount of accumulation of liquidity, you might be right.
Darksend starts tomorrow. Once the net is up and running its a whole new ballgame.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to know that DARKCOIN is a real threat to this MOB. They have an agenda.
They are deeply involved in one of the biggest SCAMS of all time, which is LITECOIN.
Its the same gang trying to jump on the anon coin bandwagon now, pumping the shit out of crap like Monero.
Advertising anonymity, although they have nothing working at hand. Their software is a proven train wreck, it'll never work.
They can't even put a decent wallet together. Mining is a nightmare, orphans, nothing but orphans.
The blockchain is bloated to 8 times the size of Bitcoin's, due to their poor, unscalable implementation, and on and on it goes.
Call them out, keep this thread going.
|
|
|
|
...What makes this coin a complete non-starter....
Yo, a non starter. REALLY, A TOTAL NON STARTER. I hasn't even started, is that what you mean? |
|
|
|
|
Its called "market making".
Nothing new or irregular about that.
Where were you when .net stocks were hyped.
A freak babbling about shit on CNBC was enough to raise billions.
Thats how things get started. Same same but different.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
