I just checked the EPL table, which refreshed me of the last 5 matches of Arsenal, I shuck my head for them, they've missed opportunities, so poor a club. At this juncture, I don't expect anyone to praise Arsenal anymore, if they can't get the cup, they are the biggest loser this season despite having the chance to be second.

Man City will always prove to be the better team this season, all I could see is their impressive display yesterday. I actually bet against Arsenal, I wonder who could do otherwise against Man City.

You should know this already, 'It's called the stand of living.' You can't compare the standard of living in the US with that of Turkey. Even the power of their currencies varies, and the exchange rate of the USD in Turkey and most countries will make it feel that it is worth more. But it's still the same USD in the US, and its effect can't be felt the way it will be felt outside the country.

I can't blame the US for this, they have a good trade balance most times, they don't force countries, and they produce attractive goods and services that other countries might not be able to resist. To further with, the US is more capitalist and the government is not the one taking money directly from other countries, however, the citizens who gain through the system are entitled to pay their dues. I see no chetaing here. It's their standard and a floating market system and I believe is pure economics, therefore you shouldn't blame them for that. No true economist would.

This is affecting them truly, it's one of the reasons why countries are turning to China and the like, even US companies go elsewhere to set up their factories to produce less costly goods. But the US still remains atop, for how long? I can't say. Nevertheless, the thing that is certain is that the US can't reduce their standard for any country or trade, they get to this level due to the economic boom and floating market.

Some countries with good standards of living and valuable currencies will continue to patronise them.

You are actually contradicting yourself here, @Cling18 is right in some, while you are right in some as well, yet, I will reply directly to yours. The term "gold digger" in a relationship can't be determined by you but by only the persons in the relationship. A comfortable lady could be a gold digger since you don't know her mission in the relationship, so are less privileged ladies. They only can tell of their purpose there, not the external advocates.

Also, splitting of responsibility in marriage is not the main reason why it crases, neither is their financial status, it's a misunderstanding, ego, unforgiveness, cheating and many more that cause it. I've seen marriages that are standing for over 28 years where the wife contributes more than the husband financially, and have seen ones where the man did 100% but it has crashed.

So, when we are talking about relationships and marriage, we should not be so rigid about our positions. It's kind of unexplainable as what you think might be the issues might not be it.

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3491360
Current amount of posts: 1386
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 155
bech32 BTC Address for payouts: bc1q3ha87zytcxxlxuk2kwl9cnjap4h6w0f2854sjz

What if you lose the draft before you have the chance to preview it?

Thank you for this exposition and advice, they are helpful. Still not perfect though as per the limitations. Also, I don't like external apps while working on BTT, and neither do I use Tor which is still a setback. I hope @theymos can still consider this in the near future.

Like seriously??? No one knows it all. Have you tried https://investsocial.com/? To make it easy for you, I just deliberately did one on the site:



This has nothing to do with the browser, it's the internal program of the forum, and when the forum is programmed to work that way, all browsers would be able to save the drafts as you type.

Hi guys!

This has been on my mind for a while now, though I'm not a coder yet I've seen it on many forums and websites and it had availed my work from being lost many times in the past. If possible on BTT, I believe it's time that we have the 'autosave draft function' on the forum. I'm somewhat aware of what this could take but a unique forum like this is long overdue for it.

I don't know about you, but I've lost many of my drafted posts/topics due to my multitask attitude, system/browser malfunction, personal error and other reasons, which could be painful.

A simple function that could save our drafts as we type (provided the browser is connected to the internet) will go a long way.

Thanks!

#Edit: For those who doubt if it's possible, see an example that I just deliberately did on a forum below:

You are right, ignorance is not an excuse in law and one can be legally punished or cheated for it. You have to endure reading the principles of operation of the casinos or any companies you are dealing with painstakingly. This might be cumbersome at times, which is why I still like to implore companies to always produce the concise version after the full version so that the lazy ones could read and still get the full gist of the whole epistle.

Let the court interpret this jurisdiction of a thing before you conclude, this is not the first time SEC is suing a company and vice versa. I will only advise that we should sit back and relax as things unfold. Frankly, the overbearing nature of the US regulators is much, they were the reason why Ripple was delisted by Coinbase in 2021, and a lot of issues have risen afterwards which ties the hands of crypto companies in the country.

They are following the path of traditional market trading, which later backfires as most of the trading companies that started in the US moved elsewhere at the time regulators started their unfavourable dramas almost 2 decades ago. They are safeguarding the same occurrence now, but still with unfavourable conditions.

Web3 is the supposed next-generation technology of the World Wide Web, it's now much anticipated but the project might not have begun yet. It's still a work in progress and needs to be patiently waited before any ascertained conclusions should be made about it. My studies indicate some conflicting ideas about the initiative from experts and how a fake decentralization could be promised through it.

Gambling or no gambling, it promises to help in more privacy but I believe time will tell about it rather than believing something in anticipation.

Roma has been tailing the present 4 clubs ahead of it for long, but I would still say that it did a good job of not diminishing more than necessary. What you narrated is very possible, nonetheless, judging by their last 10 matches, I would say that my preferred one to hold the 4th position remains AC Milan, they are still better than Roma this season.

This time that Juventus is back to its rightful position, it seems to me that the table is balanced as it is now. The final result might look like what it looks today as Napoli takes the cup and Lazio becomes the 1st runner-up and the rest holds their positions.

I trade both, not only them, other sectors of the financial market included. And with my experience, the preference of people makes them choose between Forex and Crypto trading, while many people are dealing with the two together. More opportunities are in cryptocurrencies as they are also used for payments against regular fiat, and many that are not even trading/investing it still deal with it, hence the reason for their high popularity these days.

Mind you, the number of Forex traders and the market size are far beyond that of cryptocurrency. The FX market has an average daily trading volume of almost 7 trillion and it keeps growing yearly (Investopedia attests to that: Why trade forex). While the cryptocurrency market has far less trading volume. Just choose what suits your investment and trading plans and you will be okay.

Besides, almost all factors that affect the forex market affect the crypto market because they can't stand in isolation and they are actually paired with fiats in most cases.

Frankly, I share your view in this regard, still, there are local government-controlled hospitals that are accessible to the people. This might not be enough but you should be aware that the standard of living in the US is high and their medical insurance system is top-notch for those that plan their lives well. For this, many would be able to afford it, and it's also a means of generating more money for the economy.

Nonetheless, when anyone can't afford it, they can go to another country for the same service, e.g neighbouring countries.

I understand you perfectly well, but this doesn't change the fact that people are doing it and they have their reasons. I believe they must have weighed their options before jumping to such a conclusion. Flying in and out of the US for medical treatment plus the cost of the service might still not be up to half of what they would be billed in the US.

So, the option might still be worth it.

C. Ronaldo is my man but clubs need to spread their strength if I would be sincere about this. I noticed the scoring dependence on C. Ronaldo on the pitch just like you, and to me, it's not the best practice in football and as a team that is planning for the future of the club. This affected Barcelona when Messi left before they were able to stabilise, thanks to good management.

That's the team that didn't make it as obvious as what is happening in Al-Nassr FC. No team should be so dependent on someone for their scoring.

Congratulations! It's true, I replied directly to your entry when I saw "9 rounds," of which I just read "7 entries" maximum on the first post of the OP. You are still covered, you have the grace to this level as you had inputted your entries before he replied and put an exception.

I always go to the first post of the OP for my regular updates on this thread since I can't read all pages after months' intervals. It's the place that needs to capture all the recent updates so that new people will be able to see it at once and @fillippone has been updating it regularly for our guide.

Regards!

I don't expect you to counter what @jostorres has iterated because it's just as sensible as anything. He means that anyone should not be too sure about their betting style or beliefs or strategy, I don't think anything is wrong with that until you complicate things with luck. Fine, luck is good and people might be gaining from betting through it, but can you control or conjure luck?

This indicates that his point is more valid against you that want someone to believe in luck that can only happen at any time, not all the time needed.

You might want to read the updated rule of this thread before you keep requesting merits at the bi-weekly interval. Updating myself before fresh requests at at least 2 months interval guides me.


In other words, every user has the grace of a maximum of 7 requests. And since you already have 9 requests, you might want to delete the last 2 that have not been attended to.

Just an advice though!

Let me assume that the OP is new to gambling, if not, such will not be asking for what is impossible. Gambling by definition means that it's an unpredictable betting that might favour you or be against you, no one can control it and the outcome will never be even. As to this, it has to be done with our management and plan, and without thinking that anything must come out of it.

And when we are lucky, then it's our turn to be happy, not that we will believe there is a fixed approach to making money through it.

The issue of the carbon emission increase caused by cryptocurrency will not soon disappear, still, measures are being put in place to minimize it. One was the Ethereum transition to PoS last year, but such is not feasible with Bitcoin soon since it's fully decentralized. PoS will surely reduce its decentralisation though experts say it's possible. And as the value of Bitcoin rises, the number of miners will want to measure up to gain from the share of this easy money. This, I'm afraid will continue for long.

According to RMI data, 127 terawatt-hours (TWh) a year, which is higher than many countries' power consumption is being utilized by cryptocurrencies activities yearly. Also, the US estimates carbon emission of between 25-50 million tons yearly, which are not acceptable.

But one thing is certain, alternative energy will reduce all these and remove Bitcoin from the wrong spotlights over time.

You are laying emphasis where you shouldn't, whether you are rich with fiat or crypto, being rich is being rich, they are the same. Just like someone that has gold and other precious metals in their possession, they are rich if they are many, it doesn't necessarily mean that they have the fiat money. So long as the crypto could at anytime easily be converted for its value, then it will always represent well.

However, money is volatile, no one should depend on one investment because we don't know the future. I advise that whether you are having lots of fiats or crypto, try to invest them more in other things to spread the risk.

"Don't put your eggs in one basket."

You wrote like someone that understands gambling. It's a thing to gamble and not understand how to preserve your account or be affected by the outcome, and it's another thing to gamble, fully understand the risk and have the managerial calculation that will never let the outcome bothers you. Gambling with a huge amount is just off, if there is money, gambling could be well planned and divided into different games that if one loses, the other will win. That is wisdom, and no one should risk more than what they can afford to lose.