Unfortunately, you are unable to read despite this thread having only 3 posts before yours. I literally stated in the above post that coinbase uses a communal wallet to send coins, rather than attach both txinputs and txoutputs to a single address owned by a user.

If they simply do self-moderated threads then that curbs the majority of the spam, so long as the owner cares enough. I found that when I made self-modded threads the expected number of replies declines significantly.

---

The feature won't see that much use anyway considering the fact that most threads nowadays are started for the sake of spam.

But it's not.

#1063
#1068

A single post suffices, with edits when you have new additions.

Never said that you made 6 posts after. Read my quote again: "In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection."

That sentence follows chronologically. You made 6 consecutive posts. Then, 28 minutes after your last post, TL posted about the repeat connection.

I disagree. The cost of getting a bunch of Hero/Sr signatures plastered all over the Bitcoin forum with a bunch of shitposters who will spam is about .0225 per person per week (they will post a lot for such an amount). In equivalence of the cheapest ad spot that was auctioned (1.2 BTC), 53 participants can participate in this campaign. 53 participants at 30 posts a week means that you'll see 1590 posts across the forum, most likely in the crappiest but high-density viewing spots.

We'll be looking at Bitcoin Discussion, Economics [Speculation], Gambling [+ discussion], Altcoin sections. Since shitposters will continue to litter amongst one another they will also continue to participate in these places and you'll see that demographic exposed to your ads as well.

---

It seems more efficient to simply create shitty campaigns and hire low-brow participants to spread your product in their waste.

You could probably even get by with .015 pp / week, making it 80 participants for the same price as the cheapest slot.

That doesn't work as coinbase simply sends out bitcoins from a communal wallet, rather than individual address tx input/output.

Coinbase removed the option to sign messages some few months ago for some unknown reason, thus screwing over a bunch of users.

If you have access to the internet then you can clearly improve your English using online services. There are free English teaching resources out there. At the very least, learn some basic grammar and sentence composition. Most of your sentences are run-on (and stick a random 'sir' in there) and are pointlessly long. Don't strain the length of your sentences but be articulate and concise.

You seem quite butthurt. In only the Timelord post did he disregard the feedback - to which after 7 minutes he made the second post reflecting upon his mistake. Seems like he didn't exactly 'pass off people's works as theirs'. In comparison, you made a shitton of consecutive posts (6!) and TL posted 28 minutes later about your repeat connection.

---

You can always disregard their feedback.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.0

No harm in putting a secure PGP address down on the forum. This eliminates a single point of failure. With accounts being hacked consistently it would always be helpful to have a secondary way of showing identification.

Keep PMing.

Lauda can be wrong. After all, if you're arguing with them then it clearly means that you find their opinion wrong. Hence why is this any different? Thus I repeat myself: there have been cases in which accounts were retrieved with a means other than signing a message with PGP or BTC addresses.

There have been cases where accounts have been recovered using other means. Not too long ago, either. If you've actually dug around enough then you would have seen such threads.

---

In terms of email confirmation, some people don't want to use any email for BCT. That's where PGP and address verification comes in handy since they're way easier to make and dispose of.

---

And the JS captcha for logins was added because...?

Because of Curacao licensing or even a lack thereof.

There's chess engines and there are Backgammon engines. Backgammon is even simpler than Chess to compute. http://www.gnubg.org/

Just some simple standard deviation. After all, accounts are hacked all the time and people do make threads... but just in this particular time period, a lot more people notice it (or attempt to recover their accounts {and it could be slightly because they see threads about hacked accounts and follow the format} from the hacked status) and hence post more often in Meta.

Way to leave out this very important quote:

---

The BCT DB was leaked sometime after you created your Dorky account and hence someone could have infiltrated your account, given that you had a sufficiently weak password. So... not an inside job. And it wouldn't matter that your password wasn't found on any other site.

And supposing that the account was sold for 0.3 - 0.5 BTC, I'm assuming that it was some time before 2017, where the price would be sub-500 for the account. There is no way that it would have been sold for such a ridiculously high amount post-2017.

You are not so much asking a question as you are trying to imply something about the current Default Trust members. If you have a problem, then speak out in Reputation. Use an alternate account or a throwaway if you're too scared to voice your opinion publicly. These passive-aggressive stunts don't serve a purpose.

Totally nothing to do with forum rules at all. Trust is given out at the discretion of the person who sends it. Unless you are able to convince Lauda that you are the true owner of the account cripperz with concrete evidence, I believe that is unlikely that the red trust will be removed any time soon (if ever).

Don't be sad, now that you can't join signature campaigns anymore. Since you had such a good time without them in 2011, what's the difference now?

LOL, you're kidding right?

No, they wouldn't.

The bounty.betking.io accounts do not work on betking.io. If you are trying to log into that one, simply make a new betking.io account.