|
I think you should move this to reputation board. The user attempted to sell their account. A neg tag for account trading is enough. He has nothing done so far to create scam accusation.
Edit- The 2nd quoted post seems scammy. I doubt a chipmixer participant would sell their account. Even if anyone sells, the account will be caught and red tagged within few days of hand changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Neither BTC will reach $100000 nor LTC will reach such hig value. However, we can expect new ATH when BTC got a bullrun. LTC at $750 is a dream in my opinion. They do not have new developments. Although LTC is good for payment, still it is a project with no future goal. I do not think without some real development a project can have better future.
|
|
|
|
|
If you generate private key from risky sources, chance of your wallet being hacked is high. For example, if you generate private key through bitaddress online, hacker may get access your private key. It is better to use offline method to generate that. There are a lot of ways to be saved. Using offline wallet/ hardware wallet are best.
|
|
|
|
|
This is true indeed. When I translated the whitepaper of Epic Cash, it seems like Epic cash will be one of the most popular coin after bitcoin but in reality, it turned into a shit. It is very risky to invest in a project depending on whitepaper only.
|
|
|
|
Grin looks very good, this is a new project, in my opinion they appeared in early 2019,
Grin seems to be a good one for privacy, as far as I know grin uses Mimblewimble protocol which cut the tx details and help users to hide their tx details and be untraceable. However, I have not used Grin yet. So far, to me Monero is the best one. |
|
|
|
It's a new hot escrow scam method for the last couple of months. I have seen in this forum and some other community people complaining to be the victim. You must have searched about the site before you deposit. The one who bought the domain from you should be a part of that scammy sheme.
No one bought domain, the buyer is the main culprit here. The domain where OP received fund is owned by the buyer. The amount was just a number. It is a common scam method for some days. |
|
|
|
so lets cut that to 10 overs and then try to impress new sports fans   . That would destroy the real fun of cricket. We have seen t10 cup some days ago and to be honest, it was kind of bore to me. May be we are not comfortable til now. The duration of three hours is perfect. You are spending above 2 hours behind watching a movie too. |
|
|
|
It's not an easy work to find out which project is legit and ehich one scam. However, scam projects have some common silly mistakes. Most of the scam projects use fake team. So, check if their team is fake or real. If real, the chance of being legit is high. There are many ways like checking the ratings
Rating website never do research while giving feedback. They just list it in their website. On the other hand, project pays for listing on the rating sites to get traffic. |
|
|
|
besides that reason maybe he is still resting because some time ago he managed a project that ended scam https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4862980.0His decision was more appropriate at this time, it was better to be quiet than to have to promote another bounty scam It's not so easy to detect scam. If it was so easy, investors would not lose their investment. A lot of research have to be done before launching a project. On the other hand, back then he was not an experienced bounty managers. I want to ask what about bounty detective?
He seems to be launching a lot of projects. I do not know if they are scam or not but most of the projects are shit. |
|
|
|
|
The author of the medium article and the poster here is the same one. So, there's nothing with sharing the article with the community. But when someone just copy and paste an article with source link in order to increase their oost count, that will be plagiarism in my opinion. People must have summarize an article in their own words and share the source.
|
|
|
|
|
That's sound good. I have been offered by a few projects in the last couple of months to manage their bounty but I refuse them the project was not looking promising and they sound like scammer. Later, the projects were managed by some shit campaign managers and the result is usual.
|
|
|
|
Not true always. For example, I always become happy when I see BTC price decreases. I am getting paid in bitcoin from one project, also by bestchange signature campaign. If the price decreases, I will get more BTC in my holding Wall observers have traders, holders. So, some will be happy when price increases but holders never care whether price increase or decrease. |
|
|
|
If your thread and the other thread relate to the same occurrence of scamming, then your thread (being the later created) is invalid no matter how golly-gosh!! you think you can do a better job creating threads.
The other flag creator have not created any thread. He just used the thread of the original post (quoted above), this thread can be deleted anytime and thus make the flag less trusted. Creating flag must have linked to thread which will not be deleted. |
|
|
|
SteveSats is offering bitcoin interest account which gives 8.9% interest a year. Here is the quoted message- I have over 60 Bitcoin interest accounts that have been KYC verified (currently 38 in use). We keep the balance of each account under 10 bitcoin so we can get the highest possible interest rate. Interest on BTC, ETH or GUSD is 8.9% a year, but if balance is rolled over compounding brings each account yield to over 10% a year in interest. Payouts are the first business day of each month. No minimum lockup. If you would like to place more than 10 bitcoin we will splice across multiple accounts for you to ensure a high yield. Get in touch on telegram for more info: @SteveSats
I think DT must tag this person so that no one fall in his scam method. What about creating a flag? Should I create a flag for this?I see there is a flag created by someone else but it was directing to Steve thread. That's why I have created new one- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2092 |
|
|
|
I've suggested this in the past. I don't think it would be a bad thing if all new users are essentially shadowbanned until a mod has approved their post or account. It would at least get rid of bots pretty effectively.
You will lose them if it takes days to approve the post. In addition with spam replies, moderating posts and approving topic will be a huge pain for the moderators. Now if some of the newbies post get approved with delay the chance of losing them is high. I'm sharing my personal experience based on facebook group. Can you share link of that discussion? |
|
|
|
|
Why most of the people join here? To get solution of their problem and discuss about problem they face. If low ranked users are restricted, how will they share their problem? You are requesting for a feature which will damage the purpose of a forum.
|
|
|
|
I think someone wants to declare this exchange scam as I have noticed there are two Facebook pages for the same project. One has 800+ followers but the other one has no like no follower. I don't see the post on the 800+ follower page the post which you have shared here but in the comments section, the fake FB page has given the same comments for BTC grand awarding which is no doubt totally fake and scam.
Now I got the point. I was looking for such a post from Crypcore to see if they have really posted the scam but I was not able to find that. The scammer is trying to impersonate crypcore, which has nothing to do with the original project. I think someone must reach out real crypcore and make them aware about this issue so that they can post awareness in their all social media. |
|
|
|
I am not aware of direct buying process of DOGE with paypal but you can look here in bestchange for the best option- https://www.bestchange.comMake sure you are dealing with a reputed exchanges with good feedback. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
