Yeah I was kinda surprised with that different treatment between ATP and WTA lol. Did you guys kinda predicted that she will flop when you make that question?
Not really, at least not so early in the tournament. The odds on her losing against Alexandrova were over 8. Now we're just experienced enough to cover all possible angles most of the time  To be fair I expected her to do worse then in IW. Miami is always just a week later and same surface, therefore everyone assumes same conditions but they are totally different. I was planning on playing her to not win the tournament so I feel a bit robbed by the void. On the other hand I expected her to loose against someone much better then Alexandrova, would have never predicted an exit this early. |
|
|
|
Is it really possible that somebody is keeping sheet open for two days just to screw with me? I mean if you are a member of campaign, sheet will never be updated before I post here so no need to check it. And if you are not a member of campaign that is a real low life behavior to do it on purpose. I can always post a new one but that is extra 30 seconds I would rather not spend every week so please cut it off. This is new one just for this week, not linked in OP. We shall see how it will go next week. https://cryptpad.fr/sheet/#/2/sheet/view/FZrd1nZF3ZncDaR8m1SaHRmUZrRYCZHLc84lqblxIm8/I just know I never had this problem before we took igebotz back in. Be a sheriff and get to the bottom of this |
|
|
|
So, thisquestion is void and there is no need to use VAR? I thought that in case of elimination before the deadline, question still will be valid , same like last time with Djokovic.
Difference is this time conditions were written in the questions themselves. This one had a clause for void from the get go. It is not the same if you loose 1/5 possible answers or the whole question. If it is just 1/5 there is still plenty of different outcomes. That is why we added that to the question itself. |
|
|
|
OK, so for now I'm not the last one on the table even though I have yet to win a round in this season I tried reading the explanation that mv1986 provided, but I still have no idea why three of them have 3 games played while the rest of us have 4. But it doesn't matter. I trust our mafia duo and I won't break my head about it. Now on to the questions. EDIT: Ah, shit! I just submitted my answers that I based on a hunch and only after submitting I saw that I'm up against Trofo. Oh well... Maybe submitting answers out of my head gives me some luck.  Is this a hidden critique of my wording?  @slackovic, did you play against casperBGD so far? No. But did you get 3 points and 3-0 goals? Yes. So your position in the table accounts for a game and points and goals that you actually never played (but would be playing in the future if casperBGD were still around). Did mv1986 play against casperBGD so far? Yes. leea-1334? Yes. mitchr4? Yes. So no extra game for us, but only an adjustment of the former result into a 3-0.
I see there is still value in waiting until later today as Ruud and Medwedew are playing before the deadline. Sinner is probably going to start later than the schedule says for now. Your wording looks clear to me and more importantly everyone should realise what is happening just by glancing at the table. Not rocket science. @slackovic No point submitting answers for you. You are playing against me and you are loosing points anyway. And before you ask, I am not up for a bet, since I like loosing those and I need points here |
|
|
|
Jel netko drugi probao? Nakon ovoga što sam pročitao, sad neću sigurno.  Nije neka drama, najgore šta se može dogoditi je da moraš upucati par dolara kako bi izbavio lovu u slučaju da završi na nekom chainu di nemaš token u kojem se plaćaju transakcije. transakcije na tim chainovima nisu skupe tako da tih 20-50 centi šta sam izgubio mi stvarno ne smetaju. Štaviše siguran sam da ću probati opet u budućnosti jer ako proradi stvarno smanjuje hassle na minimum. |
|
|
|
games against casperBGD have now been entered as 3:0 for his oponnets for whole season. Extra points for all
Division 1| •POS• | ••Username•••• | •PLD• | •W• | •D• | •L• | •SF• | •SA• | •SD• | •PTS• | 1 |  jayce | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 2 |  chi20 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 3 |  cls63 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 4 | Slissy | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 5 |  Harkorede | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 6 | vd309 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 7 |  darxiaomi | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 8 |  notblox1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 9 |  Trofo | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 10 | mitchr4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 11 |  buwaytress | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 12 | mv1986 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 13 |  strongkored | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 14 |  slackovic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 3 | 15 | leea-1334 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 | 16 | casperBGD | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 45 | -45 | 0 |
Division 2| •POS• | ••Username•••• | •PLD• | •W• | •D• | •L• | •SF• | •SA• | •SD• | •PTS• | 1 |  LTU_btc | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 2 |  cryptofrka | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 3 | jeremypwr | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 4 |  ulven | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |  slaman29 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 6 | Saint-loup | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 7 |  ralle14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 8 | vivekdkhyani | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 9 | Renato297 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 4 | 10 | Hhampuz | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 3 | 11 | imarios | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 3 | 12 | Jinetics1111 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 3 | 13 |  Igebotz | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 3 | 14 |  arallmuus | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 3 | 15 | hakan2217 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 1 | 16 | dbshck | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 0 |
Division 3A| •POS• | ••Username•••• | •PLD• | •W• | •D• | •L• | •SF• | •SA• | •SD• | •PTS• | 1 |  entebah | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 2 |  Rikafip | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 3 | B1g4udge | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 4 | Omikifuse | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 5 | execijutiere | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 6 | yassinmanai | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | Kara.aa1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 8 | Dittoup | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 4 | 9 | Kokee44 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 2 | 10 | CharafChenina | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 1 | 11 |  navidart | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 1 | 12 | BitcoinHunt3r | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 12 | -7 | -1 |
Division 3B| •POS• | ••Username•••• | •PLD• | •W• | •D• | •L• | •SF• | •SA• | •SD• | •PTS• | 1 |  MAAManda | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 2 | Spack17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | shogun47 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | ILuckyGuyI | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | PedroCunhaYori | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | bullrun2020bro | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 7 | goodpunt | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 | 8 | Patikno | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 9 |  Woodie | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 2 | 10 | Placeholder B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |  famososMuertos | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 0 | 12 |  LFC_Bitcoin | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -5 | -1 |
W - Games Won, L - Games Lost, D - Games Drawn
POS - League Position, SD - Score Difference, SF - Score For
SA - Score Against, PLD - Games Played, PTS - Points Earned
Round 3 - Results| _______________________________ | _______________________________ | _______________________________ | _______________________________ | Division 1
- buwaytress 4-3 leea-1334
- chi20 4-3 darxiaomi
- cls63 2-4 mv1986
- vd309 4-3 Slissy
- casperBGD 0-3 mitchr4
- strongkored 4-4 notblox1
- Trofo 3-4 jayce
- slackovic 3-4 Harkorede
| Division 2
- jeremypwr 4-3 imarios
- arallmuus 3-5 Saint-loup
- vivekdkhyani 3-4 LTU_btc
- ralle14 4-2 Igebotz
- Hhampuz 7-3 Renato297
- hakan2217 2-5 Jinetics1111
- dbshck 2-7 cryptofrka
- ulven 0-3 slaman29
| Division 3A
- entebah 4-2 Omikifuse
- Kara.aa1 4-3 execijutiere
- navidart 4-2 BitcoinHunt3r
- CharafChenina 0-3 yassinmanai
- Kokee44 0-3 B1g4udge
- Dittoup 5-4 Rikafip
| Division 3B
- famososMuertos 3-4 ILuckyGuyI
- Woodie 2-5 PedroCunhaYori
- Spack17 5-3 LFC_Bitcoin
- MAAManda 4-4 goodpunt
- Placeholder B --- Patikno
- bullrun2020bro 4-6 shogun47
|
|
|
|
|
i did read through the questions quickly and looked at question no 7 where the match was mentioned, Atletico (vs Villarreal) this match will be played on Monday April 1st.. Will this match still count?
Thanks for catching it so quick. Will be fixed in moments |
|
|
|
Payments for week 93 have been sent. Tx. id: 3e1bee69528a511250fa5fcbf5585ed6f21beabafc8d3fbfcbdaabecc130b284 We used current rate of 1BTC = 65.792 USD This week we are rewarding following 3 participants with about 20$ worth of free spins each: notkre5 Harkorede slaman29
Username: Davidvictorson
Welcome back to campaign Send me your post count at the moment you change avatar/sig and check your details in spreadsheet*. You can start whenever its is most convenient for you. *When I manage to update it, this time 2 people in the sheet. Feels like we will need to change the service |
|
|
|
|
Applications are closed, we will go trough the candidates and pick one in few hours together with the payments for next week.
|
|
|
|
Ali čak i kad bi koristio multi-coin wallet, vjerojatno nikad ne bi koristio ugrađenu swap funkciju jer nekako imam osjećaj da što je nešto jednostavnije, veći je fee za trgovanje. Možda se varam, ali imam takav osjećaj.
Kad smo kod ugrađene swap funkcije, ona implementirana u Phantomu izgleda ludo. Možeš zamijeniti cross chain šta god hoćeš i još možeš uključiti da ti uz token koji uzimaš da i nešto malo native tokena šta će pokriti transakciju. Bio sam oduševljen kada sam vidio kako radi, fee je bio više nego prihvatljiv ali onda klasika.....negdje na pola puta pukne i ostane ti u walletu neki prijelazni token koji je bio potreban da se napravi swap. Moj primjer USDT sa Solane na USDT na Polygonu plus malo Matica. Tx je puknula na nekom koraku i ostao sam s USDC na Solani. jel netko drugi probao? Zanimaju me iskustva jer je ovo stvarno nevjerojatna funkcija za fresh blood koji nije na ti sa svim bridgevima i dexovima. |
|
|
|
Serie A resumes on Saturday; don't forge to make your Superbru picks!
Come on man, don't tell them that. This was my only chance to escape from the bottom of Serie A pool. Kidding aside thanks for keeping the topic alive. In addition to already mentioned game Lazio-Juve could be something to watch this week. |
|
|
|
Great week for me as I'll be scoring my 2nd consecutive 3 points
Really expecting to finish Top 2 this season; anything else would be unacceptable
Nice. In my duel against Jayce it is all about Italy tonight, I need them to not win for 3 points. @jayce come on, you were the only one that got england-brazil correct in whole BSFL and I have to play against you, not fair. But to offset it a little I got back at you on F1 which is something I never even hoped for.
We also have to wait night games to grade March Madness question so official results and tables will be live tomorrow. We will of course post a new set of questions later today. Have fun guys. |
|
|
|
|
14. Erin Blanchfield
13. Vicente Luque
12. Bruno Silva
11. Nursulton Ruziboev
10. Bill Algeo
9. Chidi Njokuani
8. Jamall Emmers
7. Loopy Godinez
6. Julio Arce
5. Dennis Buzukja
4. Anton Turkalj
3. Melissa Gatto
2. Caolan Loughran
1. Jacob Malkoun
NOT go the Full Distance 6
|
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 37, 27'
Game 2: 37, 27'
|
|
|
|
|
Better late then never....so GW29 winner is vd309.
Congrats on 1 mBTC free bet. This result was possible for you with nice Castagne/wood combo in a week where most template teams failed spectacularly. Not sure I like that team for WC that much but after week like 29 who knows.
|
|
|
|
It's is rule as 3:0 regardless of the scoreline, I'm one of the few people who even feel that 3:0 is a bit too generous and put the rest of the league at a disadvantage.
If they are going to count the original scoreline instead of 3:0 default walkover, then they would also have to render the result as a draw, if the player that's supposed to get the 3 walkover goes 0/10 in their answers for the week , right ?
True, true, I was not really serious about asking of course, just that thinking of scenarios if DRAWS happen at end of season and you lose on goal difference just because your opponent didn't show up on time (but you would have won if he made it earlier). I don't think it will ever happen for sure, but it's a possible scenario @Trofo @cryptofrka What happens if the actual scoreline is better than 3-0 in a walkover win, will that be counted? I guess not really, but just curious if this ever happened to anyone Nope, as Harkorede said, 3-0 is quite generous already. We might even tone it down in the future, football has it as 3-0 so we used that one but in real football it never really happens, while in BSFL it does. The thing is that if you get 5 correct ones, you feel 'hey' I would have won this 5-0, this is unfair', while in reality you'd probably win 5-3, or even draw/lose. I feel that 3-goal differences are quite rare in BSFL so yeah, 3-0 is the best you get. Maybe not even that in the future Agree, but I'm just thinking of scenario, where the late guy submitted, and if he was on time, the score would be more than 3 GD, and it makes a difference in season end. It's not important, but if it happens, it would be very unfair for the guy who couldn't control his opponent being late. OR, what if, final game of season, and points are same for 1st and 2nd and 3rd, so GD is important. Or one guy needs 4+ goal difference to beat relegation, but opponent decides, he will f that guy up and give walkover for only 3 GD or less in future. So in totality I agree, 3-0 is too big difference, but maybe, maybe, one option is for late submitter to be penalty 1 point, but make their next round a double round. So like they will take their normal round opponent but also the previous round opponent, like double game week. They don't have to do extra, just both guys face each other again next round, if the missing guy AGAIN did not submit, THEN 3-0 win is awarded. I know I'm making a lot of noise it's actually not important just enjoying my free week Never gonna happen. We need firm rules that aren't open to interpretations. Problem with late submission is that we don't know when that submission will come. It can be late 5 minutes, late a day or not come at all. To cover all possibilities with rules is quite impossible. And then you also have a situation where something changes between deadline and submission. For instance we have tennis question regarding Djoković, he does not play in that time frame between deadline and submission but there are news popping up about his injury. First of all we could miss those news and then even if we are aware of it how to grade it? Event hasn't started but person submitting late had an advantage which we don't know if he used or not. Double rounds are not fair to person that submitted on time. What if he had 8/10 correct in initial round and 1/10 in repeated round? I don't see any way we can tweak this except change 3:0 to some some other number but I will argue even here that 3:0 sounds the best to me. |
|
|
|
I am also stoked to see Osaka through to the round of 32 after beating Svitolina, she
now faces Garcia only the fourth time this year!, Fourth time lucky perhaps,
She does seem to be getting stronger with more match time and she is favourite at 1.43,
I'll try a straight bet.
With Osaka talent was always there, problem is mental state. I don't know what is happening with here and if she is in "good place" now but she is not going on any tickets I am playing. One wrong word from the audience is all it takes for her to break apart, there is just too much variables involved to bet on her. I feel sorry for her and would love that she manages to overcome those issues but I can't even phantom circumstances that made it happen first time. I hear much worse almost on daily basis when playing with my mates |
|
|
|
^
Yea and I agree with you there too but unfortunately we cant manufacture our own player
pool, that will happen organically. On a positive note the GOAT's have laid down a legacy and
a target for other players to work hard to try and emulate their successes. There are records
there which I would like to see broken, hopefully there is someone to do that.
And also from a betting point of view, there is definitely money to be made when there are
the likes of those top 3 players around.
And on top players Sinner plays today against countryman Vavassori and is 1.02 favourite,
best to parlay him with someone else like Humbert 1.23 who plays against van de Zandshulp
and maybe Paul 1.10 who plays Damm?
There is really no use in using that odds in parlays; yes they are the big favorite but surprises always happen and there is simply no value in odds like that. Everybody has a different strategy but more often than not, the bet with the lowest odd in a parlay will fail. I don't really play a lot of parlays anymore, prefer single value bets. Totally agree with this. Odds that low are usually not worth it. I am always looking for handicaps in situations like that. I mean we all agree Sinner is favorite but if bookies are offering 1.02 on his win and 1.6 on his opponent covering 6.5 handicap I know which one I am taking. |
|
|
|
Brazil won, but I needed England to score.
Same here, I was sure England was not winning this one but I also thought they will be able to score a goal against Brazil. Their defense is a new one and it was really surprising to see them keep a clean sheet. Croatia winning on penalties, nothing new here Not important for BSFL but it was the game I watched. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
