Currently Dan is unable to pull a scam, since he is known face-to-face so to speak, and he was present at a hearing (if I remember well).
Currently Dan is the most trustworthy altcoin dev out there.
I don't know anyone that has personally met Dan but I've met many other alt devs. I don't recall Dan being present at any particular hearing. What are you basing your trust on? hearing, meeting, whatever... Dan was present at something which was crypto-related, alongside other team members from BC, anyway. If you don't know that, means that you've not been here long enough Clearly your misinformed. I've been here since the beginning. How about a link? There are many very public and real name alt coin devs. They have videos speaking online and show up at all sorts of events. Dan is not one of those dev "personalities" for lack of a better term. [EDIT] Thanks for the follow up info guys. This an not an attack on Dan, just trying to understand the blind trust. |
|
|
|
Currently Dan is unable to pull a scam, since he is known face-to-face so to speak, and he was present at a hearing (if I remember well).
Currently Dan is the most trustworthy altcoin dev out there.
I don't know anyone that has personally met Dan but I've met many other alt devs. I don't recall Dan being present at any particular hearing. What are you basing your trust on? hearing, meeting, whatever... Dan was present at something which was crypto-related, alongside other team members from BC, anyway. If you don't know that, means that you've not been here long enough |
|
|
|
I'm gonna pass on this. I don't trust Dan Metcalf and I especially don't like the newbie accounts spamming in this thread with half-assed english. Good luck though, I know how hard this business can be and I truly do hope that this is not just another scam.
Currently Dan is unable to pull a scam, since he is known face-to-face so to speak, and he was present at a hearing (if I remember well). Currently Dan is the most trustworthy altcoin dev out there. And btw, since when did using a perfect english on a multi-national forum became a mandatory thing you prick? Are you the kind who thinks that english "must" be perfectly spoken by everybody on this world? If yes, go kill more of your own kind for petrol  Wow, that has got to be one of the most hateful posts I've seen so far. Enjoy your placement on my ignore list. It's not hateful at all, but I was judging you, as you did... "spamming in this thread with half-assed english" ... we all know what kind of people judge by those "standards" now-days. PS. cut the crap with your ignore list, curiosity it's still the most powerful feeling  |
|
|
|
I'm gonna pass on this. I don't trust Dan Metcalf and I especially don't like the newbie accounts spamming in this thread with half-assed english. Good luck though, I know how hard this business can be and I truly do hope that this is not just another scam.
Currently Dan is unable to pull a scam, since he is known face-to-face so to speak, and he was present at a hearing (if I remember well). Currently Dan is the most trustworthy altcoin dev out there. And btw, since when did using a perfect english on a multi-national forum became a mandatory thing you prick? Are you the kind who thinks that english "must" be perfectly spoken by everybody on this world? If yes, go kill more of your own kind for petrol |
|
|
|
Yap, we can make this a true decentralized WEB. No more google, nsa and shit. Pure p2p. It's a long way, but we finally have the means to achieve those things, the blockchain |
|
|
|
Decentralized exchange MUST be the priority with this one...
Some other ideas: - decentralized encrypted email service (free service) across the BlockNet, implemented into all wallets. User/password one way encryption to access your account, email auto-destruction feature after read, etc. - decentralized VPN service (paid service, paying dividends) - decentralized domain/web hosting service (paid service, paying dividends), with integrated web browser right into the wallets. Websites and domains hosted into the BlockNet should be accessible only within the network |
|
|
|
|
Decentralized exchange MUST be the priority with this one...
|
|
|
|
I think some feel like anonymity has no longer a big upwards potential since there are so many coins offering anonymity or at least claiming it. this perception is fundamentaly wrong imo.
true Anonymity in crypto that really carries on with satoshis vision and doesn't give up core advantages of bitcoin is still in its child shoes and the roi is gigantic if you happen to catch the one bringing it first.
i think XCs ad hoc mesh mixer will be this milestone once its really bulletproof and ready for mass use. this point is just around the corner.
all this chat , storage , backed by ganja type of shit is nice but true privacy in satoshis sense is bigger than all combined. If i was 100% shure of a coin to bring this, and i'm like 99% with xc , i would buy everything up to ten dollars and wouldn't even think one minute about it.
XC is privacy the satoshi way. not a step back.
If not for anonymity why would I care? I can continue using my Credit Card...lol, idiot.. |
|
|
|
Blocknet may not be the be all and end all to cryptos issues and certainly is not the be all to its ultimate future and success. It is an idea not yet implemented, one that needs to prove its worth before elite tech joins in!
If this was about money purely then we would all be for the blocknet because apparently its going to solve all crypto economy issues! There is nothing stopping Shadow from joining in the blocknet later but in my opinion its wise for the core team to just focus entirely on their own project and hammer out its core foundations..
I also, personally think that Shadow has the potential to solve all of this within one network! An that is something you will have to kick back, relax and soak in! Its not fair what some of you are saying..fact is the dev team and project need to focus on their project and the blocknet is just another distraction that can be persured later on if need be. But again i think all this can be solved within Shadows network, it certainly has the potential to hold its own and certainly the plans and tech ideas for teh future that will completly change the way you think, see and interact with the Internet and online currency!!
The decision is wise in my opinion because Shadow is about to launch some extremely useful projects and needs all the team and its supporters energy focused on that. It certainly does not need anymore distractions and because it is able to enter blocknet at anytime it is not a loss or damage to anyone..It is just a very wise choice.
I advice some of you to accept it without dragging my name through the gutter again and again..some of the things some of you put my name to are just bonkers and you should really re-read what you are even insuating!!!!.
Please do read the stats. How do you plan to expand the # of people that will actually use/accept Shadow coins? How can SDC possibly become a currency with only 300 or so people??!? The problem with SDC at its core is that the coin distribution is really skewed to the people that mined it at the beginning. You can totally tell from the rich list. http://sdc.blockexplorer.cc/richlist/index.php?min=0Look at these stats: Only 381 addresses with at least 10 SDC Only 290 addresses with at least 100 SDC (~$7 USD) Only 215 addresses with at least 500 SDC (~$35 USD) Only 177 addresses with at least 1000 SDC (~$70 USD) Only 101 addresses with at least 5000 SDC Only 33 addresses with at least 50000 SDC Only 18 addresses with at least 100000 SDC The whole SDC basically is owned by under 350 people (some wallets for sure have more than 1 addresses). (Not to mention that pookielax and mr.boh have a huge portion of SDC waiting to dump on our ass.) That can only mean that this coin is not distributed evenly and in the long term, the coin will not survived if we don't expand the number of people that owns SDC. I really need to reconsider my position in SDC after this debacle.... They all start with one person! and have done, please i don't see your point of argument other then to state something that can be said about any coin including bitcoin! You have a point i just don't see how it is applicable to just this project in light of the topic here which is the blocknet! And for the a line points to you being sour about something that really has nothing to do with how many people hold or wont hold it in the future! Let's not even talk about Blocknet. At this point, that's water under the bridge. What's next? How can we distribute the coins to more than 200-300 at most. Right now, there's only around 150 with more than $100 invested in SDC.... What do we do to distribute to more people since we are way pass mining phase now. No significant new coins are being created to be spread to more people.... Most of its founders seem to be invested in its future knowing full well its tech and ability to change the way we think about this industry and interact with it. So until Shadow (and ill remind you its only a few months old)..until it makes a more robust core to then build upon. It is being modest and the market cap and amount of people invested and looking at it reflect that.. That will ultimately change when people/founders are comfortable at a price they wish to sell their holdings for. I cant speak for them but you cant just shuv a coin down peoples throat with bs marketing and graphics and expect it to be a project of integrity and worth; just to solve the distribution issue.. Shadows primary function is not really to be a currency to be honest and i think its foundations being built and its current tech are proving as such. If you just look a little deeper and away from bittrex charts. Its more complicated and has far more substance. Some of the tech that is in it and will be in it; will literally change the Internet and the way we interact with it; if you allow it to.. Its currency aspect will ultimately motivate people to look while its primary function is to be a showcase of that cutting edge cryptography tech which will and is useful and will further be relevant as time rolls on.. This also motivated by money, i,e its ability to reward contribution to its network of featurs held within its code. It will ultimately encourage more growth within its network of talented devs/supporters building on it (apps, Internet games, business systems ect ect) thus making it more exposed and attractive to not only crypto enthusiast but the world. Simply put, the tech within it will be monetised at some point and people can and will need it to use its features..that is something that is a long way down the track and comes with mass mainstream adoption but right now the important thing is to focus on its core and hammer that out in my opinion..its amazing tech and people will come, thats a given but it must remain focused and its trying to do that! I really encourage you to take a look at it and its community..no one has been trying to shuv it down anyones throat yet...Its like the ball effect when you hold it under water..once you let it go you know its going to explode to the surface to be exposed to the world and it will make a spalsh right?!! You say join Xbridge, I say Join Shadow
No dude, you say "Buy MY coins, cause I want quick buck"... I'll wait for your pumps whenever that comes...should be fun considering that the dev of this coin is acting like a kid... |
|
|
|
Well that's unfortunate..but your call.
well, that happens when a coin is controlled by whales All coins are controlled by whales but they will always dump and move on eventually, the coin and it's features will still be there..the majority of XC is also held by a few i know i have been with XC since the start and hold a shitload of them. Whales never dump (sell all their coins), they only manipulate a market, making more of the main thing which is BTC. Anyway, after this move made by dev, I'll find my way out of SDC as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
Well, that's good news, considering that coin is owned by a hand of people. Whales bitched out about this to the team? , they paid out to keep their "investment" under control? I hold around 200k of SDC I hold enough too, but I know for sure that somebody out there have a strong "word" to say... Unfortunate... |
|
|
|
Well, that's good news, considering that coin is owned by a hand of people. Whales bitched out about this to the team? , they paid out to keep their "investment" under control? |
|
|
|
The dumping is going to continue.... alot going on behind the scenes on this one  you call ~10 BTC panic sells dumping on a coin with 2mil marketcap? |
|
|
|
finally, some panic seller  |
|
|
|
Doesnt take alot of balls to point out a fact... you guys will do anything to hype this coin, yet bitcoin magazine, web 2.0 and blocknet doesn't change a thing for it.... Dead coin, hasn't passed 190 in about 3 months probably wont again, and doesnt even have a mac or linux build of most recent wallet... Windows only, dont make me laugh
that shows how retarded you are...not being able to download the freaking client...moron... Dead/Alive coin is not about about price or pumps... |
|
|
|
4 @rdnkjdi See what I'm talking about? The value is in quality, not the idea alone... |
|
|
|
Dev hasn't been active for a day now, what is happening goddamnit?
go dump your coins goddamnit, shitcoin |
|
|
|
Now this looks promising, good chance for other coins coming into the fold here too!
*Rolls eyes* This is the SuperNET re-invented. Why do you guys re-invent everything? Being #2 is not going to pay off ... Being #2, #3, #4 does not matter at all, being the best is the only thing that matters...so stop rolling your eyes like a little girl... |
|
|
|
I am psychic, Anon will not be released this week... and the price will go to 1.1k. I. am. ready1
let's hope so, I can get my 5% that cheap? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
