I like to ask why the bounty exchange thread was deleted by the admin? I noticed some other deleted bounty thread recently, Is the reason for the removal known?
LATOKEN decided to stop the bounty program ahead of schedule. I do not know why There were some misunderstanding between them and the administration as I remember. Good it's sorted out though. Seems that LAToken don't know the rules of the forum?  Well, everybody can make a mistake. LAToken behaves quite properly on the forum and follows all the rules. Exactly. And they're offering compensations. |
|
|
|
I like to ask why the bounty exchange thread was deleted by the admin? I noticed some other deleted bounty thread recently, Is the reason for the removal known?
LATOKEN decided to stop the bounty program ahead of schedule. I do not know why There were some misunderstanding between them and the administration as I remember. Good it's sorted out though. |
|
|
|
LAToken declined wholesale bids becouse their fundmental strategy. Do you read about it?
Not yet. I can't give you a link for this right now bcz i am little buzy, i will do it little later, if you really needs. But in short, the essence is as follows. Why ICOs are selling most of the tokens at lower price to whales? They do this to make feel that they are in deficite. To do hype. LAToken does not count on hype. They expects to achieve high costs of LAT by developing their business, rather than by hype speculations. The sale does not look very good in comparison with the declared desired volumes, but nevertheless they have more capital than most of the top 50 tokens. How can an ICO collect funds without hype? By selling useful opportunities and not a hyped piece of nothing. |
|
|
|
|
I think there will be data mining using deep machine learning.
|
|
|
|
This is great timing to take risk on this project I hope this will go to the moon.
Yes Dear This is great timing. The team is working now. ASAP they prepared it. just wait few time latter you will see your success. Yes, the platform is going to undergo significant changes now. Some inside?  Can be more? It's not an inside, this is logical. They'll appoint trustees and there'll be need to improve the platform. I'm looking forward for the constructor app for new types of assets. It will be interesting to experiment with it. But I'm afraid it will not be soon. Me too! And NAV is looking delicious. |
|
|
|
That's possible too, but personally I stick to the idea that states keep losing their power. The future belongs to corporations.
The cyberpunk that we deserve.  I don't believe there will be "Ghost in the Shell" IRL, but maybe in a way... From the point of view of fulfilling the criterion "high tech, low life", many countries lived in cyberpunk already.  I think that in a full cyberpunk live 1/4 of the population, maybe less Asian developing/developed countries? |
|
|
|
I believe you guys have come quite far from the topic subject...
I want to know what issues can LAT resolve. Can it persuade China to slow down its regulations? |
|
|
|
You must be joking. There are so much NGOs, funds etc. Cryptocurrency is a non-state institute btw.
Cryptocurrency is being adopted by states, and it may mean that it will lose its independence. Rumors have it that the recent China's decisions are targeted to clean the way for a Beijing-controlled cryptocurrency. It can't be totally controlled by it. The blockchain technology itself states it that every transaction made is forever. Before some Politburo-appointed officials will realize that a specific transaction is contrary to the China's interests it will be done for good. Or bad. Oh, I don't think that it will be used by those whose intend is to disserve the Central Standing Comitee. The zest is in another matter. Possessing an independent blockchain tech the Chinese crypto-economy will be independent from the global crypto market. How in the world can it be independent? It seems to me it will be listed on exchanges anyway. Will it be certainly exchanged for crypto? Or for renminbi only? Renminbi is a reserve currency now, just like USD. |
|
|
|
You must be joking. There are so much NGOs, funds etc. Cryptocurrency is a non-state institute btw.
Cryptocurrency is being adopted by states, and it may mean that it will lose its independence. Rumors have it that the recent China's decisions are targeted to clean the way for a Beijing-controlled cryptocurrency. It can't be totally controlled by it. The blockchain technology itself states it that every transaction made is forever. Before some Politburo-appointed officials will realize that a specific transaction is contrary to the China's interests it will be done for good. Or bad. Oh, I don't think that it will be used by those whose intend is to disserve the Central Standing Comitee. The zest is in another matter. Possessing an independent blockchain tech the Chinese crypto-economy will be independent from the global crypto market. |
|
|
|
You must be joking. There are so much NGOs, funds etc. Cryptocurrency is a non-state institute btw.
Cryptocurrency is being adopted by states, and it may mean that it will lose its independence. Rumors have it that the recent China's decisions are targeted to clean the way for a Beijing-controlled cryptocurrency. |
|
|
|
I was wondering recently: can cryptocurrency benefit mutual understanding between nations?
I believe we have discussed something related to this earlier, but the international nature of LAToken just keeps arising these thoughts.
On one hand, it can meet the requirements of WTO somehow. On the other hand, governments doesn't care about WTO tbh. May LAToken practices bring more order to that system?
You mean that since the trustees will have to act as a mediator between the buyer and the owner they will link countries? I didn't mean that but this is a good idea. Maybe it's more about that the governments will be working together in the KYC sphere? That's possible too, but personally I stick to the idea that states keep losing their power. The future belongs to corporations. Indeed. What kind of future? 2027? Or 3489? Or 40M? Or 802,701? Are you hinting out that we have to wait quite a long time? Probably. There are no signs of the transaction of power to non-state actors now. |
|
|
|
I was wondering recently: can cryptocurrency benefit mutual understanding between nations?
I believe we have discussed something related to this earlier, but the international nature of LAToken just keeps arising these thoughts.
On one hand, it can meet the requirements of WTO somehow. On the other hand, governments doesn't care about WTO tbh. May LAToken practices bring more order to that system?
You mean that since the trustees will have to act as a mediator between the buyer and the owner they will link countries? I didn't mean that but this is a good idea. Maybe it's more about that the governments will be working together in the KYC sphere? That's possible too, but personally I stick to the idea that states keep losing their power. The future belongs to corporations. Indeed. What kind of future? 2027? Or 3489? Or 40M? Or 802,701? |
|
|
|
Cryptocurriencies and trade based on them can be good for understading between some people from different nations. But for goverments and states this tendencies not good i think.
Well, it's arguably. Governments desire to control the financial flows indeed, but not for the expense of their stability. And some free-trade will benefit to their stability. On the other hand, there is money-laundering and illegal activities financing. But LAToken will implement KYC, and governments will cooperate both with LAToken and each other in order to increase their security. Perhaps my views on this question are too pessimistic, but i see "money-laundering and illegal activities financing" one of the most important spheres of activity of almost any state. I am pretty sure that no one modern state will help to make their financial activities more open for anybody. Well, it's not up to LAToken to disclose states' financial activities even in case it will become a super-corporation  But it will do its part to prevent such activities of non-states actors. I would rather say "keep out from trade platform". The fight against illegal activity is due to other organizations.  Yes, indeed. LAToken doesn't want troubles from both sides |
|
|
|
Cryptocurriencies and trade based on them can be good for understading between some people from different nations. But for goverments and states this tendencies not good i think.
Well, it's arguably. Governments desire to control the financial flows indeed, but not for the expense of their stability. And some free-trade will benefit to their stability. On the other hand, there is money-laundering and illegal activities financing. But LAToken will implement KYC, and governments will cooperate both with LAToken and each other in order to increase their security. Perhaps my views on this question are too pessimistic, but i see "money-laundering and illegal activities financing" one of the most important spheres of activity of almost any state. I am pretty sure that no one modern state will help to make their financial activities more open for anybody. Well, it's not up to LAToken to disclose states' financial activities even in case it will become a super-corporation But it will do its part to prevent such activities of non-states actors. |
|
|
|
I was wondering recently: can cryptocurrency benefit mutual understanding between nations?
I believe we have discussed something related to this earlier, but the international nature of LAToken just keeps arising these thoughts.
On one hand, it can meet the requirements of WTO somehow. On the other hand, governments doesn't care about WTO tbh. May LAToken practices bring more order to that system?
You mean that since the trustees will have to act as a mediator between the buyer and the owner they will link countries? I didn't mean that but this is a good idea. Maybe it's more about that the governments will be working together in the KYC sphere? Cryptocurriencies and trade based on them can be good for understading between some people from different nations. But for goverments and states this tendencies not good i think. Well, it's arguably. Governments desire to control the financial flows indeed, but not for the expense of their stability. And some free-trade will benefit to their stability. On the other hand, there is money-laundering and illegal activities financing. But LAToken will implement KYC, and governments will cooperate both with LAToken and each other in order to increase their security. |
|
|
|
I was wondering recently: can cryptocurrency benefit mutual understanding between nations?
I believe we have discussed something related to this earlier, but the international nature of LAToken just keeps arising these thoughts.
On one hand, it can meet the requirements of WTO somehow. On the other hand, governments doesn't care about WTO tbh. May LAToken practices bring more order to that system?
You mean that since the trustees will have to act as a mediator between the buyer and the owner they will link countries? I didn't mean that but this is a good idea. Maybe it's more about that the governments will be working together in the KYC sphere? |
|
|
|
|
I was wondering recently: can cryptocurrency benefit mutual understanding between nations?
I believe we have discussed something related to this earlier, but the international nature of LAToken just keeps arising these thoughts.
On one hand, it can meet the requirements of WTO somehow. On the other hand, governments doesn't care about WTO tbh. May LAToken practices bring more order to that system?
|
|
|
|
Right now nobody can sell anything because there are trustees to seal an agreement with and the platform to develop. But they will be able to tokenize their property.
You mean the prospect of agreeing with the SEC, or i missed some changes in LAToken rules? LAToken is complementary with SEC rules now. I will be sure of this only when USA citisens will be have full access to functionality of LAT platform. This will need an additional round of talks, I suppose. Don't you want to discuss something easier? I do not understand what is KYC and how it relates with LAToken. Yes, sure. KYC is quite a difficult practice. |
|
|
|
Platform users can only be individuals? Or legal entities, too? Or there is no difference at all?
Legal entities for sure can, there are a point in terms of service about that. I have a questions about "worldwide" features, for example. Restriction of the functional works only in the territory of the above-mentioned countries? If I am a US citizen, but went to Europe on a tour. Maybe i can gain access to full functionality of trade platform during my trip somehow? Or maybe i can register a fictitious company outside USA and achive full access to any operations with backed-assets? I can't buy this assets for firm bcz i am USA citisen, but what if my firm will buy it for me? If you are an US citizen/resident, you should select that you are such. No matter where you are at the moment. |
|
|
|
What you guys think about perspective of SEC regulations for LAT in USA? Will can we buy anything in America ever for LAT?
Hard to say. LATOKEN did not easily enter the American market. A few weeks ago, americans could not buy LAT at all. What can we say about real estate sales But USA citizens are allowed to sell the assets. That means, a non-American resident will be able to buy a piece of property in there easily. Are you sure? I thought that US citisens and residents can't sell anything on LAT platform yet, at least right now? Right now nobody can sell anything because there are trustees to seal an agreement with and the platform to develop. But they will be able to tokenize their property. Come on, more details. I was sured too, that tokinization not allowed for USA livers. When you're to buy some LAT and you state you're a US citizen, you see the following:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
