Pres. Teddy Roosevelt 0.026BTC
edit: 0.26BTC
Congrats steeley Would you like to proceed using the service of OGNasty or minerjones? General question to everyone: Is it ok to retract a bid in here? FFrankie made a bid of 0.27 that he deleted: https://imgur.com/a/VhD3i3mNobody found the humor in it, I was continuing the trend of association with bid price to a name, nobody kept up I deleted it two days before it ended. Would have been better for everyone had you run a strikeout through the bid. Just sayin'
|
|
|
f for happy effing holidays, please! sweeteye
|
|
|
3, please. Tigers fierce! Mopar fierce~
|
|
|
4 please! Shipping to MJ as well~
|
|
|
67, please! Thanks for the raffle, sir!
|
|
|
89 please! Happy Thanksgiving, thank you for the raffle, MJ
|
|
|
edit: Want to trade only. Nickel plated brass. With funding addresses and public keys. Anybody interested, please pm me.
Thanks, sweeteye
|
|
|
I just cannot imagine that anyone who has ever participated in an auction would think that a bid on one item would extend the time for bidding on other items. Never seen that in my life. This has happened on at least one other recent auction I've taken part of - it adds chaos for bidders and has been an obvious headache for sellers. EDIT: Especially if there are more than a few items. Of course the bidding on one item should only pertain to that item. I don't know the seller/creator, but from an outsider looking in, this just looks like a greedy dishonest move. This was not my take, rather felt like it wasn't clearly thought through.
|
|
|
can someone here explain to me why I did not win #6 or have i misunderstood the rules this time - actually not... was not my first auction here #2 0.036 #6 0.036
6 - 0.0361
Seller determined that the entire auction should be extended by 5 minutes irrelevant of which number was last bid on. As there were bids that came in for other items besides #6 in those last 5 minutes, it automatically extended the auction on all items. That’s my understanding
|
|
|
FWIW, I never bid on #1, but at one point it was going for 0.1 BTC. Maybe some of the responses got edited ... just want to make sure nobody gets robbed! That's absolutely correct. Commited3d, when you scratched your #2 bid, did you change your #1 bid from 0.10 to 0.08? BTW, in thinking further about this action, EDIT: it is a MAJOR scratch and further puts into question the integrity of this auction and devalues the pieces that were bid on. For anyone paying attention in the heat of the moment and seeing 0.10 as a bid, and then shifting their focus to another item number or upping their bid because they knew a competitive bidder was willing to pay 1500 or more USD than the next highest final bids is a huge flaw. I understand that this may not have been a gaming tactic and perhaps even due to bidding inexperience, but edits in the moment are evidently not flagged to the top of anyone’s feed when we’re in the frenzy of bidding, so nobody even caught this until the auction was over. Bottom line is that anyone that is, should rightfully be bummed. EDIT: I also realize that Commited scratched their bid because they upped their own high bid from .08 to .10, another miss in the moment, but going forward, if someone is revising or editing a bid further down in a thread with a shit ton of action and commentary, it’s probably doing the right thing to announce that. Also, it’s really a pain to have bidders calling out wins, that should be left to the seller and if seller goes silent for whatever reason, it’s probably better to let it play out and sort it afterward instead of add to the confusion. I learned more from this auction than any other I’ve participated in. Question sellers early in the auction if something in the rules is unclear or needs looked at. Collectibles members are the coolest on the forum and want to help and keep the vibe. There’s a lot of history here from OG’s that are more than willing to dive in to help. Ask questions and you’ll see how willing this community is to dive in and answer from experience! My two sats
|
|
|
I'd like to offer #2 to @TheNovemberMan followed by @thiago007 if that's good by you, Clay (for my .077 bid). If not, I'm trading it for another of your creations that's been offered to me. sweeteye
That's okay with me. Still sticking with #17? If others want to do the same, please do so via PM, then PM me. Thx. I'll hold on to both until I hear from either of the two bros...
|
|
|
|